Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Insulin glargine is an extended-action biosynthetic human insulin. It precipitates in the neutral environment of subcutaneous tissue and is thus gradually absorbed into the bloodstream. The addition of small amounts of zinc to the formulation further delays absorption. In small euglycaemic clamp studies, the onset of action of insulin glargine was shown to be later, the duration of action longer and the time-action profile flatter than that of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers. Four large clinical trials of up to 28 weeks' duration have shown that a single bedtime dose of insulin glargine, in combination with preprandial short-acting insulin, is as effective or more effective than once or twice daily NPH plus short-acting insulin in improving glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In 3 large comparative trials, insulin glargine decreased glycosylated haemoglobin and/or fasting blood glucose levels to a similar extent to that seen with NPH insulin in patients with insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus, either as monotherapy or in combination with oral hypoglycaemic agents. Insulin glargine appears to be well tolerated. A lower incidence of hypoglycaemia, especially at night, was reported in most trials with insulin glargine when compared with NPH insulin.
 ...
PMID:Insulin glargine. 1073 May 48

Optimal glucose control is the primary goal for treating diabetes mellitus and preventing long-term complications of diabetes, such as coronary heart disease, nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy. Insulin glargine is a novel, long-acting human insulin analog that is indicated in type 1 diabetic patients aged >or=6, or in type 2 diabetic patients who require basal insulin for glycemic control. Insulin glargine is a recombinant insulin with a modified structure that allows it to dissolve in an acidic solution, but to precipitate in the physiological subcutaneous tissue forming a depot effect. In contrast to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, insulin glargine has a slower onset, a longer duration of action, and no peak in metabolic activity. Once-daily subcutaneous administration of insulin glargine at bedtime has comparable efficacy to that of NPH insulin once or twice daily when used in combination with bolus insulin in type 1 diabetic patients, or in conjunction with oral antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetic patients. Overall, insulin glargine has similar adverse effects when compared with NPH insulin. Insulin glargine has been associated with less nocturnal hypoglycemia and improved treatment satisfaction in several clinical trials with durations of < 52 weeks. Pharmacoeconomic analysis comparing insulin glargine with other intermediate- or long-acting insulin preparations used as basal insulin therapy has not been performed. In summary, insulin glargine offers a promising alternative as a once-daily basal insulin therapy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Insulin glargine: a new once-daily basal insulin for the management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1278 37

Insulin glargine is a recombinant human insulin analog produced by DNA technology using a nonpathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Two modifications of human insulin result in a stable molecule which is soluble in slightly acidic conditions (pH 4.0) and precipitates in the neutral pH of subcutaneous tissue. Because of these properties, absorption of insulin glargine is delayed and the analog provides a fairly constant, basal insulin supply without peaks in plasma insulin levels for approximately 24 hours, similar to that achieved by a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Insulin glargine is indicated as a once daily subcutaneous injection to provide basal glycemic control in adults and children aged >6 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fasting plasma glucose and fasting blood glucose levels generally improved to a greater extent in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin glargine than patients who administered Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. In patients with type 1 or 2 disease, glycosylated hemoglobin levels were slightly reduced and to a similar extent with insulin glargine and NPH insulin. Most clinical trials in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus demonstrated a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycemia, with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. One of the most common adverse events with insulin glargine treatment was injection site pain which, in some studies, occurred more frequently than in patients receiving NPH insulin. In all cases the symptoms were mild and treatment discontinuation was not required. Otherwise, the drug is well tolerated and does not appear to be immunogenic. In conclusion, insulin glargine once a day provides basal control of glycemia for approximately 24 hours without inducing peaks in plasma insulin levels in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. In long-term, well designed trials insulin glargine once daily improved glycemic control at least as effectively as NPH insulin given once or twice daily. The drug was well tolerated and in most studies the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly less in patients treated with insulin glargine compared with patients receiving NPH insulin. Therefore, insulin glargine is likely to be a useful addition to the armamentarium of insulin therapy by establishing basal glycemic control with once daily administration and a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia.
 ...
PMID:Spotlight on insulin glargine in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. 1576 21

Insulin detemir (Levemir) is a soluble long acting human insulin analogue acylated with a 14-carbon fatty acid. The fatty acid modification allows insulin detemir to reversibly bind to albumin, thereby providing slow absorption and a prolonged metabolic effect (up to 24 hours) with low variability. Indeed, in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin detemir has a more predictable, protracted and consistent effect, with less intrapatient variability in glycaemic control (particularly fasting plasma glucose levels), compared with NPH (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn) insulin. Insulin detemir, is at least as effective as NPH insulin in maintaining overall glycaemic control, with a lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia. It also provides the additional benefit of less body weight gain as compared to other basal insulins. Levemir, presented in cartridges for the pen device NovoPen 3 and administered preferably at bedtime (if necessary morning and evening), is a promising new option for basal insulin therapy in diabetic patients, especially those on a basal-bolus scheme.
 ...
PMID:[Insulin detemir (Levemir)]. 1635 71

Acute hyperglycaemia exerts deleterious effects on the arterial wall. We suggested that rapid-acting insulin has a beneficial postprandial effect on endothelial dysfunction and inflammation compared with intermediate-acting insulin because of its ability to lower postprandial hyperglycaemia. This was tested in a parallel, controlled study on well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes randomly assigned to bedtime Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin (n = 41) or mealtime insulin aspart (n = 37). They were served standard diabetic meals for breakfast (8.00) and lunch (12.00). Blood samples were collected at 7.40 (fasting), 9.30, 11.30, 13.30 and 15.30 and analysed for glucose, insulin, lipids, intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAM), C-reactive protein (CRP), von Willebrand factor (vWF) and fibrinogen. The postprandial glucose response differed significantly between insulin regimens with a postprandial increase on NPH insulin and a decrease on insulin aspart. There was a minor but significant postprandial decrease in ICAM, CRP and vWF on both insulin regimens and a decrease in fibrinogen on NPH insulin. No insulin group differences were observed in postprandial responses for ICAM, CRP, vWF and fibrinogen. The rapid-acting insulin analogue aspart and the intermediate-acting insulin NPH had different effects on postprandial glucose response but similar postprandial effects on markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:Effects of mealtime insulin aspart and bedtime NPH insulin on postprandial inflammation and endothelial cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. 2151 59

Long-acting insulin analogues have been developed to mimic the physiology of basal insulin secretion more closely than human insulin formulations (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn, NPH). However, the clinical evidence in favour of analogues is still controversial. Although their major benefit as compared with NPH is a reduction in the hypoglycaemia risk, some cost/effectiveness analyses have not been favourable to analogues, largely because of their higher price. Nevertheless, these new formulations have conquered the insulin market. Human insulin represents currently no more than 20% of market share. Despite (in fact because of) the widespread use of insulin analogues it remains critical to analyse the pharmacodynamics (PD) of basal insulin formulations appropriately to interpret the results of clinical trials correctly. Importantly, these data may help physicians in tailoring insulin therapy to patients' individual needs and, additionally, when clinical evidence is not available, to optimize insulin treatment. For patients at low risk for/from hypoglycaemia, it might be acceptable and also cost-effective not to use long-acting insulin analogues as basal insulin replacement. Conversely, in patients with a higher degree of insulin deficiency and increased risk for hypoglycaemia, analogues are the best option due to their more physiological profile, as has been shown in PD and clinical studies. From this perspective optimizing basal insulin treatment, especially in type 2 diabetes patients who are less prone to hypoglycaemia, would be suitable making significant resources available for other relevant aspects of diabetes care.
...
PMID:Old and new basal insulin formulations: understanding pharmacodynamics is still relevant in clinical practice. 2440 Nov 18

Basal insulin therapy can improve glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. However, timely initiation, optimal titration, and proper adherence to prescribed basal insulin regimens are necessary to achieve optimal glycemic control. Even so, glycemic control may remain suboptimal in a significant proportion of patients. Unique circumstances in Asia (eg, limited resources, management of diabetes primarily in nonspecialist settings, and patient populations that are predominantly less educated) coupled with the limitations of current basal insulin options (eg, risk of hypoglycemia and dosing time inflexibility) amplify the challenge of optimal basal insulin therapy in Asia. Significant progress has been made with long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine 100 units/mL and insulin detemir), which provide longer coverage and less risk of hypoglycemia over intermediate-acting insulin (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin). Furthermore, recent clinical evidence suggests that newer long-acting insulin analogs, new insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec, may address some of the unmet needs of current basal insulin options in terms of risk of hypoglycemia and dosing time inflexibility. Nevertheless, more can be done to overcome barriers to basal insulin therapy in Asia, through educating both patients and physicians, developing better patient support models, and improving accessibility to long-acting insulin analogs. In this study, we highlight the unique challenges associated with basal insulin therapy in Asia and, where possible, propose strategies to address the unmet needs by drawing on clinical experiences and perspectives in Asia.
 ...
PMID:Challenges and unmet needs in basal insulin therapy: lessons from the Asian experience. 2927

Insulin is a lifesaving drug in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Many type 2 diabetes mellitus patients will eventually require insulin. The rapid-acting and long-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs and LAIAs) have a pharmacological profile that closely mimic normal human physiology when compared to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and regular human insulin, respectively. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were found to have a proven cardiovascular safety. They are preferred over insulin in many recent guidelines. Fixed-ratio combinations of GLP-1RAs and insulin are also recommended, when either of these molecules fail to achieve glycaemic control. Despite decades of experience in using insulin, there is a debate among scientific community over the safety of exogenous insulin, especially regarding their cardiovascular safety and the risk of cancer. There is also an ongoing debate regarding the safety, even after the two long-acting insulin analogues (glargine and degludec) have proven their cardiovascular non-inferiority. Drugs with proven safety are often preferred in patient with pre-existing cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease. In this review we will critically analyse these efficacy and safety issues related to insulin molecules to help in clinical decision making.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of Insulins. 3315 25