Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Nonketotic hyperglycemic hyperosmolar coma is an uncommon, but significant, complication of type II diabetes mellitus with a high overall mortality rate. Treatment of this entity is controversial but mandates aggressive fluid resuscitation and strict control of serum glucose levels. In the patient described, nonketotic hyperglycemic hyperosmolar coma complicated by diabetes insipidus was successfully treated with desmopressin acetate. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of nonketotic hyperglycemic hyperosmolar coma associated with partial central diabetes insipidus.
 ...
PMID:Partial central diabetes insipidus complicating nonketotic hyperglycemic hyperosmolar coma. 893 28

We examined the association between the polymorphism of the apolipoprotein E (apoE) and the ACE genes and the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid and femoral arteries measured using ultrasonography. The values of IMT of each artery were significantly higher in NIDDM patients (n = 356) than in control subjects (n = 235). The E4 allele or the D allele did not affect clinical characteristics, including age, fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, or blood pressure, in NIDDM or control subjects. No difference in the carotid IMT value was noted among the apoE genotypes in control or diabetic subjects. The carotid IMT was significantly higher in diabetic patients with the DD genotype (1.200 +/- 0.586 mm) than in those with the II genotypes (0.990 +/- 0.364 mm). Neither the E4 allele nor the D allele affected the femoral IMT in control or diabetic subjects. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the carotid IMT of NIDDM patients was associated with age, the D allele, and LDL cholesterol but not with the E4 allele, whereas that of control subjects was associated with age, sex, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol, inversely. These results suggested that the E4 allele was not associated with the carotid or femoral IMTs, but that the D allele was statistically associated with carotid IMT in NIDDM patients but not control subjects. However, since the association was weak (2.3% explanatory power), its biological significance remains to be determined.
 ...
PMID:Effect of polymorphism of apolipoprotein E and angiotensin-converting enzyme genes on arterial wall thickness. 907 11

Diabetic nephropathy accounts for almost a third of all causes of ESRD. Microalbuminuria screening among diabetics can offer early detection of incipient nephropathy. Aggressive treatment with ACE inhibitors may delay the onset of overt renal failure or delay its progression. Furthermore, intensive control of blood glucose has also been proven to prevent the microvascular complications of diabetes and should be pursued in both IDDM and NIDDM. The high association of diabetes mellitus with hypertension presents another problem to the clinician. It is necessary to control blood pressure to prevent further progression of renal failure. The choice of antihypertensive medications, however, becomes a therapeutic dilemma because of the metabolic and lipid disturbances that some drugs can cause. ACE inhibitors, CCBs, alpha-agonists, and low-dose diuretics, alone or in combination, may be tried to normalize blood pressures. Although beta-blockers are widely used and effective in nondiabetics, these agents should be considered the drugs of last resort because of their adverse effects, which are particularly troublesome for diabetics. Moderate protein restriction should also be advocated as a helpful adjunct to therapy.
 ...
PMID:Diabetic nephropathy. 916 51

Free radical activity may contribute to atherosclerotic lesions which in diabetic subjects may frequently lead to vascular complications. It is known that oxidative stress is associated to diabetes. Protein glycation and glucose oxidation could be possible source of free radicals. 28 non insulin dependent diabetic subjects (NIDDM) were examined. 20 healthy subjects matched for age, sex and for the presence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia were also studied. Hydrogen peroxide, measured by intracellular levels of the fluorescent 2,7-dichloro-fluorescein (DCF), was considered as indicative parameter of free radical production. The results showed that in resting platelets the basal level of hydrogen peroxide was significantly higher in diabetic subjects than in controls. Moreover, after stimulation with thrombin, collagen, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and platelet activating factor (PAF), platelets of diabetic subjects generated significantly higher amounts of hydrogen peroxide than controls. Moreover, platelet aggregation induced by adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) and plasma beta TG levels were higher in diabetics than in controls. In diabetic patients platelet free radical production and functional activity are increased and therefore could play a role in the elevated thrombotic risk described in diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Hyperactivity and increased hydrogen peroxide formation in platelets of NIDDM patients. 917 36

Lisinopril, like other ACE inhibitors, lowers blood pressure and preserves renal function in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM or IDDM) and early or overt nephropathy, without adversely affecting glycaemic control or lipid profiles. On available evidence, renoprotective effects appear to be greater with lisinopril than with comparator calcium channel blockers, diuretics and beta-blockers, despite similar antihypertensive efficacy. As shown by the EUCLID (EUrodiab Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes) trial, lisinopril is also renoprotective in normotensive patients with IDDM and microalbuminuria. The effect in normotensive patients with normoalbuminuria was smaller than in those with microalbuminuria, and no conclusions can yet be made about its use in patients with normoalbuminuria. In complications other than nephropathy, lisinopril has shown some benefit. Progression to retinopathy was slowed during 2 years' lisinopril therapy in the EUCLID study. Although not yet fully published, these results provide the most convincing evidence to date for an effect of an ACE inhibitor in retinopathy. The drug may also improve neurological function, but this finding is preliminary. Lastly, post hoc analysis of the GISSI-3 trial indicates that lisinopril reduces 6-week mortality rates in diabetic patients when begun as early treatment after an acute myocardial infarction. The tolerability profile of lisinopril is typical of ACE inhibitors and appears to be similar in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. Hypoglycaemia has occurred at a similar frequency with lisinopril and placebo, as shown in the EUCLID trial. In addition, the GISSI-3 study indicates that the incidence of persistent hypotension and renal dysfunction is increased with lisinopril in general, but the presence of diabetes does not appear to confer additional risk of these events in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving lisinopril. In summary, lisinopril lowers blood pressure and produces a renoprotective effect in patients with IDDM and NIDDM without detriment to glycaemic control or lipid profiles. Like other ACE inhibitors, lisinopril should thus be viewed as a first-line agent for reducing blood pressure and preventing or attenuating nephropathy in hypertensive diabetic patients with IDDM or NIDDM and microalbuminuria or overt renal disease. The EUCLID study, using lisinopril, provides new data supporting an additional place in managing normotensive patients with microalbuminuria and IDDM. These findings, together with some evidence for an effect of lisinopril in delaying progression of retinopathy and in reducing mortality, suggest a broader role for the drug in managing diabetic vascular complications.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and use in the management of the complications of diabetes mellitus. 917 32

The aim of our study was to evaluate whether inhibition of ACE (lisinopril 10-20 mg/day) can reduce the rate of decline in kidney function more than reducing blood pressure with conventional antihypertensive treatment (atenolol 50-100 mg/day), usually in combination with a diuretic. We performed a prospective, randomized, parallel study for 42 months, double blind for the first 12 months and single blind thereafter. Forty-three (21 lisinopril and 22 atenolol) hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy were enrolled. Data from 36 patients (17 lisinopril and 19 atenolol, 60 +/- 7 years of age, 27 men) who completed at least 12 months of the study period are presented. At baseline, the two groups were comparable: glomerular filtration rate (51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance) was 75 +/- 6 and 74 +/- 8 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2), mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (A&D TM2420) was 110 +/- 3 and 114 +/- 2 mmHg, and 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate was 961 (range 331-5,727) and 1,578 (476-5,806) mg/24 h in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. The mean follow-up time was similar, 37 and 35 months in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Mean ambulatory blood pressure was equally reduced in the two groups, 12 +/- 2 and 10 +/- 2 mmHg in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate declined in a biphasic manner with a faster initial (0 to 6 months) change of 1.25 +/- 0.49 and 0.81 +/- 0.29 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) followed by a slower sustained decline (6 to 42 months) of 0.59 +/- 0.10 and 0.54 +/- 0.13 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in either initial or sustained decline in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups. Urinary albumin excretion was reduced (% reduction of baseline) more in the lisinopril than in the atenolol group, at 55 (95% CI 29-72) and 15% (-13 to 34), respectively (P = 0.01). In conclusion, the relentless decline in kidney function characteristically found in hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy can be reduced equally effectively by two antihypertensive treatments, the beta-blocker atenolol and the ACE inhibitor lisinopril.
 ...
PMID:Long-term effect of lisinopril and atenolol on kidney function in hypertensive NIDDM subjects with diabetic nephropathy. 920 Jun 54

Base on their own experience with isradipine and results of a multicentric study with amplodipine in the Slovak Republic, as well as based on data in the literature the authors conclude that: 1. In the treatment of arterial hypertension associated in the syndrome of insulin resistance (syndrome X and 5H resp.) with type 2 diabetes, hyperlipiproteinaemia and hyperinsulinism drugs of first choice include ACE-inhibitors and Ca antagonist of the second generation, dihydropiridine type, such as amplodipine, isradipine, fellodipine, nirtendipine etc. ACE inhibitors and Ca antagonist of the dihydropyridine type with prolonged effect have a good tolerance, few undesirable effect, a favourable effect on the decline of BP, regression of hypertrophy of the left ventricle and vascular wall; they do not cause deterioration of insulin resistance and thus do not interfere with compensation of diabetes and associated hyperlipoproteinaemia. 2. ACE inhibitors moreover reduce glomerular filtration and albuminuria and thus retard along with the effect on BP the progression of diabetic nephropathy. 3. In pre-existing hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism (cca in 18% diabetic subjects) they can however cause dangerous hyperkalinaemia by further inhibition of the damaged renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In instances Ca inhibitors are indicated. The latter activate RAAS and do not have an impact on albuminuria. By their effect on the vas deferens they can increase glomerular filtration. 4. Diuretics are not suitable for the treatment of hypertension in X syndrome and the use of beta-blocking agents even with ISA and beta-1-selective preparations in restricted in particular when insulin is administered or other numerous contraindications are present (cardiac failure, bradyarrythmias, bronchitis etc.). Perhaps a combination of ACE-inhibitors and Ca antagonists of the 2nd generation with an alpha-blocking agent or hybrid alpha-beta-blocking agent is a suitable solution.
 ...
PMID:[The role of calcium inhibitors in the treatment of arterial hypertension]. 924 72

The therapeutic advantage of the long acting ACE-inhibitor benazepril in a 12 weeks intervention period on 23 diabetic (3 IDDM, 20 NIDDM) patients with essential hypertension was studied. Participants-giving informed consent before beginning the study-on the base of repeated casual blood pressure measurements were divided into "slightly" (n = 8) and "moderately" (n = 15) hypertonic groups. Type of diabetes, time elapsed since its manifestation, actual antidiabetic therapy, period of existence of the hypertension (newly discovered vs known and treated for a time) were independent from the point of view of entering the study. Initial dose of benazepril was 5-10 mg/day depending on the blood pressure level, followed by a stepwise dose elevation according to the control investigations (at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 casual blood pressure control, at weeks 4 and 12 ambulantory blood pressure monitoring, ABPM as well) to a maximal daily dose of 20 mg. In the majority of patients benazepril was given in a morning single dose, in some cases because of a better tolerability divided into two parts. 20 patients received benazepril in monotherapy, 3 patients combined with other antihypertensive preparations. Parameters indicating severity of hypertension-hypertonic time index, hyperbaric impact-showed significant improvement already at week 4 when analysed in the total of patients and the moderately hypertonic group respectively. As a tendence the same was observed also in the slightly hypertonic group. No remarkable side effects, or alterations of the metabolic state and in the investigated laboratory parameters appeared. Based on these results benazepril is an effective choice in the treatment of diabetic hypertensive patients.
 ...
PMID:[Experience with benazepril, a long-acting ACE inhibitor, in the management of diabetic hypertension]. 927 85

In 826 hypertensive patients including 396 with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus safety and efficacy of captopril 50 mg per day was evaluated throughout three months. In all patients blood pressure was significantly reduced. Moreover, in part of the patients with microalbuminuria, these tests turned negative with treatment. In addition, in patients with diabetes fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels as well as HBA1C levels decreased. Only in 6.8% side effects occurred. In all patients quality of life as evaluated by a 10 item rating scale questionnaire improved. Taken together the results of this observational study confirm improvement of blood pressure levels, kidney function and metabolic derangements in diabetic patients treated with the ACE-inhibitor captopril. Effectiveness of these actions of captopril in respect to longterm prognosis in diabetics, however, remains to be established.
 ...
PMID:[The hypertensive type II diabetic patient treated with captopril in free general practice (Austrian Safety Study). An indications study]. 933 64

European and American recommendations for coronary heart disease prevention put patients with clinically manifest coronary heart disease, or other major atherosclerotic disease, as the top priority for prevention. Coronary patients should have professional support to stop smoking, eat a healthier diet (reduce the dietary intake of fat to 30% or less of total energy; saturated fat to no more than one third of total fat intake, cholesterol to less than 300 mg per day; increase monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fat from both vegetables and marine sources; increase fresh fruit and vegetables) achieve optimal weight, and become physically fitter through regular aerobic exercise. The intensity of lifestyle intervention and the level of professional support required to achieve change should be determined by the absolute risk of a further major ischaemic event, based on an assessment of all risk factors, and this should also influence the threshold for drug therapy in relation to blood pressure, lipoproteins and glucose, rather than just the individual levels of these risk factors. In addition to lifestyle changes (reducing weight and restricting salt and alcohol as appropriate) blood pressure in coronary patients should be lowered if necessary with drug therapy. For these patients blood pressure should be consistently less than 140/90 mmHg. Lifestyle changes will reduce total cholesterol (and in particular LDL cholesterol) increase HDL cholesterol and lower triglycerides. Drug therapy may also be required and in coronary patients total cholesterol should be kept consistently below 4.8 mmol.l-1, and this threshold may be further reduced with the publication of new trial results. In insulin-dependent diabetes, rigorous metabolic control reduces the risk of microvascular complications and therefore for coronary patients with insulin-dependent or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus this is a desirable objective. As diabetics with coronary disease are at substantially higher risk of coronary morbidity and mortality compared with non-diabetics the threshold for treating blood pressure and lipids with drug therapy should be lower. In coronary patients, selected prophylactic drug therapy is indicated in the form of aspirin, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and systemic anticoagulants which, together with lipid lowering drug therapy, have all been shown to reduce coronary mortality and improve life expectancy. When a patient presents with coronary disease, and particularly when there is a family history of premature coronary heart disease, the opportunity of screening first degree relatives should be taken with a view to primary prevention.
 ...
PMID:European and American recommendations for coronary heart disease prevention. 951 37


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>