Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) are a powerful independent cardiovascular risk factor, bearing an inverse relationship with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (with risk rising sharply when levels are <1.04 mmol/L). Apart from its protective role in atherosclerosis, HDL-C increases fibrinolysis, is an antioxidant to low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and decreases platelet aggregability. Up to a third of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease have 'desirable' plasma levels of total cholesterol but low HDL-C levels. Benefits of treating low plasma HDL-C levels were clearly demonstrated in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial (VA-HIT) where gemfibrozil reduced nonfatal infarcts and coronary deaths by 22%. This was achieved by a 6% increase in plasma HDL-C levels, and a 24.5% decrease in plasma levels of triglycerides, without any significant decrease in LDL-C levels. Multivariate analyses revealed the rise in plasma HDL-C levels after treatment, but not decreases in plasma levels of triglycerides or LDL-C, predicted coronary artery disease events. The typical patient under consideration in this article is one with plasma levels of HDL-C <1 mmol/L, LDL-C <3.37 mmol/L [either receiving therapeutic lifestyle changes or or LDL-C-lowering therapy comprising a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor or bile acid sequestrant] and fasting triglycerides <2.26 mmol/L. We propose this dyslipidemia be classified as Type VI phenotype following the Frederickson and Lees classification. High-risk patients (with >/=2 risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, or 10-year cardiovascular risk >20%), patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, or type 2 diabetes mellitus, or metabolic syndrome should receive pharmacotherapy. Plasma HDL-C levels >1.16 mmol/L may be considered optimal and between 1 and 1.16 mmol/L as desirable. Fibric acid derivatives, nicotinic acid, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, estrogens, and ethanol (not recommended as therapy) increase plasma HDL-C levels. Nicotinic acid is the most potent agent and recent reports indicate that, in contrast to gemfibrozil, it selectively increases antiatherogenic HDL subfraction, lipoprotein (Lp) AI (without apolipoprotein AII), in patients with low plasma HDL-C levels. An extended-release formulation, administered once daily, has improved the tolerability of nicotinic acid. Recent evidence also indicates that nicotinic acid may effectively correct dyslipidemia in patients with diabetes mellitus without significantly compromising glycemic control. Fibric acid derivatives and estrogen raise plasma HDL-C levels by different mechanisms of action, and these agents may be used with nicotinic acid. Combination therapy (especially HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and nicotinic acid) should be considered in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and low plasma HDL-C levels.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2003
PMID:Optimal therapy of low levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol. 1472 46

In many industrialized nations, obesity is now considered an epidemic, resulting in accelerated morbidity and mortality. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease as well as the metabolic syndrome comprising abdominal obesity, increased fasting blood glucose levels, dyslipidemia and hypertension, which are all recognized cardiovascular risk factors. Diet, exercise, and lifestyle changes constitute important recommendations for treatment. Unfortunately, although effective in some individuals, these recommendations have proven to be ineffective in adequately addressing the broad, enlarging scope of this public health problem. Drug treatment is often indicated but is somewhat limited by the minimal number of well tolerated drugs that have proven to have long-term efficacy in maintaining bodyweight loss. For example, phentermine may result in modest bodyweight loss through suppression of appetite, but potential cardiovascular adverse effects exist and the efficacy is mainly short-term. Sibutramine, an inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine (noradrenaline) reuptake, may increase satiety and result in modest bodyweight loss. However, cardiovascular adverse effects may occur in susceptible patients. Nonetheless, sibutramine is one of the few drugs that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bodyweight loss. Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, is also approved by the FDA for bodyweight loss but may have bothersome gastrointestinal adverse effects, especially among patients who do not adhere to the recommended low-fat diet. Ongoing studies continue to evaluate other drug treatments that may result in bodyweight reduction through a number of different mechanisms. It is anticipated that the development of effective and well tolerated antiobesity drugs will elevate the pharmacologic treatment of obesity to the status of other cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic disorders. This may be especially important given that dyslipidemia, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus are often secondary to, or exacerbated by, obesity.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2002
PMID:Pharmacotherapy of obesity: currently marketed and upcoming agents. 1472 70

Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are medications from the thiazolidinedione class of compounds currently available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Traditionally used to enhance insulin sensitivity and decrease plasma insulin levels, added applications have emerged beyond those involving glycemic control. Cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance such as elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, abnormal fibrinolysis, and endothelial and vascular dysfunction have been shown to improve after thiazolidinedione treatment. Therapy with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone has been found to modify vascular reactivity and other processes involved in atherosclerosis. There may be differences between the agents in their effects on plasma lipid characteristics and particle size. These agents serve as excellent adjuncts to oral and insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hold promise for the prevention of cardiovascular disease associated with the insulin resistance syndrome. Clinical trials are in progress to determine whether such therapy will lead to a reduction in cardiovascular events.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2002
PMID:Effects of the thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors. 1472 77

The observed reduction in macrovascular outcomes in the United Kingdom Progressive Diabetes Study (UKPDS) trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), treated intensively with insulin or sulfonylureas, was of borderline significance (p = 0.052). This may be because of the role of factors other than glycemic control in the etiology of macrovascular disease. The UKPDS and other studies have suggested that lipid parameters are potent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 DM. In patients with DM, dyslipidemia is characterized by elevated serum triglycerides and low high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) with normal total serum cholesterol levels and usually accompanied by an elevation of atherogenic, small, dense low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) particles. Dyslipidemia is only partly corrected by dietary and lifestyle modifications and pharmacological glycemic control in patients with DM. Several guidelines, including those published by the New Zealand Heart Foundation, suggest that lipid-modifying therapies are appropriate in patients considered to be at high or very high risk of a cardiac event. This includes patients with established vascular disease. Some recent studies suggest that patients with type 2 DM have risk comparable to patients without DM, but have experienced previous myocardial infarction (MI). Subgroup analysis of trials including the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE), which included patients with DM, have shown a significant reduction in adverse outcomes, although many patients with DM and dyslipidemia were excluded. Of lipid-lowering drugs, fibric acid derivatives are probably the most appropriate for patients with DM and dyslipidemia and their role is being evaluated in large, long-term outcome studies such as Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD). Thiazolidinediones, a new class of compound for treating patients with type 2 DM, primarily exert their glucose-lowering effect by increasing insulin sensitivity at the level of skeletal muscle, and to a lesser extent, at the liver by decreasing hepatic glucose output. Some of their actions are mediated through binding and activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, a nuclear receptor that has a regulatory role in differentiation of cells, especially adipocytes. The nonhypoglycemic effects of thiazolidinediones, therefore, offer additional potential mechanisms for benefit in patients with type 2 DM and insulin resistance. Thiazolidinediones increase serum HDL-C levels. Troglitazone and pioglitazone have been shown to decrease serum triglyceride levels. Rosiglitazone, conversely has no significant effect on serum triglyceride levels. All of the thiazolidinediones increase serum LDL-C levels (pioglitazone to a lesser extent), although changes in the size of the LDL fraction may render it less susceptible to oxidation and, therefore, less atherogenic. A randomized comparative trial needs to be undertaken to determine whether true differences exist between the thiazolidinediones. Longer studies need to be undertaken to assess their effect on cardiovascular outcomes.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2002
PMID:Management of co-existing diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia: defining the role of thiazolidinediones. 1472 95

Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This condition leads to an increased risk of premature mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease and stroke. Many risk factors besides hyperglycemia in itself contribute to this increased risk, acting in a synergistic fashion. One of the most important risk factors is hypertension. Several recent clinical trials have shown the benefits of reducing high blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus to lower levels than have previously been recommended in clinical guidelines. In both the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study a significant trend for increased benefits associated with lower diastolic blood pressure levels was shown. Therefore, clinicians should be encouraged to do more to treat hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and increase the proportion of patients in whom acceptable blood pressure control is achieved. For example, in Sweden, acceptable blood pressure control is currently only achieved in about 20 to 25% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent evidence also points to the primary importance of a tight blood pressure control. This implies drug combination treatment for the majority of patients. Therefore, the clinician must be able to use a broad variety of antihypertensive drugs, and from these drugs choose alternative combinations with pharmacological synergism.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2001
PMID:What is the optimal blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus? 1472 32

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk for both micro-and macrovascular complications, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the most common causes of death in these patients, accounting for almost 70% of the deaths. Given the high prevalence of the condition and the expected global increase in the prevalence of type 2 DM, a case is made for prevention of these serious complications in order to reduce the individual morbidity and the economic burden on society. In this review we present the knowledge of how macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 DM may be prevented, and suggest possible strategies for doing so.A thorough search of the published literature was conducted and we first present relevant epidemiological studies demonstrating the impact of important risk factors for CVD in DM, such as dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hypertension, smoking, familial premature coronary heart disease and some non-classical risk factors such as hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. Secondly, we review the results from published randomized controlled clinical trials and meta-analysis of these, evaluate the findings and suggest strategies for preventing CVD in patients with type 2 DM using non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. Present knowledge indicates that most patients with type 2 DM either have manifest CVD or have a high risk for future cardiovascular events, men with DM have a 2- to 4-fold; and women with DM a 3- to 5-fold increased risk for cardiovascular death compared with non-diabetic individuals. Care of patients with type 2 DM should include yearly risk assessment by the use of published risk equations or risk charts. On the background of this assessment, an individual risk reducing strategy should be tailored to each patient's need, including the treatment of hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia together with the use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and ACE inhibitors. Such measures can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 DM.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2003
PMID:Preventing macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1472 81

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase in the risk of atherosclerotic diseases, including coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Insulin resistance is a key factor in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin resistance and its attendant metabolic abnormalities may cause much of the increased cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Among the abnormalities associated with insulin resistance are dyslipidemia, hypertension, systemic inflammation, and a prothrombotic state. This review discusses the role that each of these disorders plays in the cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2003 Dec
PMID:Atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus: the role of insulin resistance. 1474 74

Fatty acid metabolism is abnormal in insulin-resistant states that increase the risk of atherosclerosis such as type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. How fatty acids promote vascular disease is poorly understood, but lipoprotein lipase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha)-physiologically related proteins involved in fatty acid metabolism-may be involved. Glucocorticoid metabolism is also abnormal in insulin-resistant states and may promote several components of the metabolic syndrome. Recent studies have shown that hepatic fatty acid metabolism is required for the development of insulin resistance and hypertension caused by glucocorticoid excess, suggesting that crosstalk between glucocorticoid receptor-and PPARalpha-dependent pathways may contribute to vascular disease.
Trends Cardiovasc Med 2004 Feb
PMID:Fatty acid metabolism and vascular disease. 1503 Jul 93

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a common multiplex cluster of phenotypes strongly related to cardiovascular disease that includes central obesity with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes. The core molecular defect of the MetS is insulin resistance; indeed, the terms "MetS" and "insulin resistance syndrome" often are used interchangeably. The successful translation to clinical medicine of molecular genetic research on other rare monogenic metabolic disorders has stimulated the evaluation of such rare monogenic forms of insulin resistance as partial lipodystrophy resulting from mutations in either LMNA or PPARG genes. Careful phenotypic evaluation of carriers of monogenic insulin resistance using a range of diagnostic methods--an approach sometimes called "phenomics"--may help to find early presymptomatic biomarkers of cardiovascular disease, which, in turn, may uncover new pathways and targets for interventions for the common MetS, diabetes, and atherosclerosis.
Trends Cardiovasc Med 2004 May
PMID:Phenomics, lipodystrophy, and the metabolic syndrome. 1517 63

Diabetic nephropathy has become the single most important cause of end-stage renal disease in the USA, Europe and Japan. The earliest marker of incipient diabetic nephropathy is the transition of normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria at an albumin excretion rate of 20 microg/min. Human studies in patients both with and without diabetic kidney diseases have shown that the severity of baseline proteinuria is an important predictor of the rate of loss of renal function. Moreover, the reduction in protein excretion rate when patients with nephropathies are being treated with antihypertensive agents predicts the efficacy of subsequent renoprotection. Experimental and clinical observations provide the rationale for targeting the renin-angiotensin system as a renoprotective approach in diabetic and nondiabetic proteinuric nephropathies. Losartan (Cozaar, Merck Sharpe and Dohme) is a potent, orally active and highly specific angiotensin-type 1 receptor blocker. In addition to its antihypertensive efficacy, losartan decreases the left ventricular mass index in patients with hypertension, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume in subjects with heart failure and prevents cardiovascular morbidity and death, predominantly stroke, independent of blood pressure reduction. Short-term studies in Type 1 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy have demonstrated that losartan and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have similar beneficial effects on albumin excretion rate, blood pressure and renal hemodynamics. Losartan also lowered albumin excretion rate in microalbuminuric patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Moreover, the large multicenter Reduction of End points in Noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial has shown that blockade of angiotensin-type 1 receptor with losartan is superior to conventional antihypertensive therapy in slowing the progression of overt Type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Together, data from clinical trials demonstrate the beneficial effect of angiotensin-type 1 receptor blockers, including losartan, in the primary and secondary prevention of renal disease progression in diabetic patients. Nevertheless, it can be expected that the positive results achieved so far with this class of drugs may be further implemented by including angiotensin-type 1 receptor antagonists as a part of the multidrug approach that may hold more promise for the future of renoprotection in diabetic patients with chronic nephropathy.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2004 Jul
PMID:Losartan in diabetic nephropathy. 1522 8


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>