Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipemia are associated with an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, these risk factors are frequently clustered. We investigated whether long-term treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril can improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation in this particular group of patients. We selected 10 patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension (age 59.4 +/- 3.2 years, body mass-index 29.7 +/- 1.5 kg.m-2, blood pressure 169 +/- 6/92 +/- 1 mm Hg, total cholesterol 6.6 +/- 0.3 mM). Using venous occlusion plethysmography, we recorded the increases in forearm blood flow (FBF) in response to three vasodilator stimuli: (a) 5 min of forearm ischemia, (b) infusion of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator methacholine (Mch) into the brachial artery (0.03, 0.3, and 1.0 micrograms/min/100 ml), and (c) intraarterial infusion of the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP 0.06, 0.2, 0.6 microgram/min/100 ml). This procedure was repeated after 6 months of treatment with perindopril 4-8 mg/day. Forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was calculated by the quotient of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the FBF. Perindopril reduced blood pressure (BP) by 19/10 mm Hg (p < 0.05) and increased baseline FVR, but improved neither the maximal percentage decrease in vascular resistance induced by Mch (from -80 +/- 2 to -82 +/- 2%) nor that induced by SNP (from -73 +/- 3 to -72 +/- 3%). Perindopril decreased the FVR reached after the ischemic stimulus from 6.5 +/- 1.2 to 4.8 +/- 0.6 U (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Effect of long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on endothelial function in patients with the insulin-resistance syndrome. 759 36

It is commonly accepted that the tolerance to insulin and hyperglycemia of the patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is due to some defect of insulin receptors or disturbances in the signaling pathway of the cell. This disease is often accompanied by hypertension. In this paper the high activity of plasma kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) (kallikrein activity was 6-8 times higher than normal), of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) (4 times greater than normal), and of leukocyte elastase (2.7 times higher than normal) were demonstrated in plasma of patients with NIDDM. Increasing of KKS activity was coincident with rising of ACE activity, which may be the cause of the fast bradykinin inactivation and arising of hypertension. The treatment with ACE inhibitor during 3 months (4 mg of Perindopril per day) decreased ACE activity in patients' plasma which was accompanied with decreasing of the arterial pressure and some restoration of the carbohydrate metabolism indicators. The hyperinsulinemic euglycaemic clamping of 7 patients with NIDDM and essential hypertension showed that ACE-inhibitor (Perindopril, 4 mg) prevented bradykinin from destruction and increased the glucose consumption by tissues. The high activity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and secretion of the elastase in NIDDM patients' plasma and/or instability of plasmatic and granular membranes of leukocyte in conditions of hyperglycaemic plasma are probably the cause of endothelial irritation and high ACE secretion. Secondly, the leukocyte may be the cause of injuring and decreasing of susceptibility of the cell receptors for insulin and bradykinin.
 ...
PMID:[Possible participation of angiotensin-converting enzyme and leukocyte elastase in the pathogenesis of insulin-independent diabetes mellitus]. 963 24

Approximately 25% of US adults have high blood pressure (BP). Selection of effective and safe antihypertensive therapy for these individuals is an important health-care priority. High BP can be treated with a wide range of antihypertensive agents from a number of different classes. These drugs may differ in their suitability for administration to different subpopulations of patients. Results from both clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance indicate that the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril erbumine is safe and well tolerated in a wide range of patients with hypertension. Cough, the most common ACE inhibitor-associated side effect, is also the most common clinical adverse event reported for perindopril, but <2% of perindopril-treated patients discontinue therapy because of cough. Other adverse events often associated with ACE inhibitors, first-dose hypotension and hyperkalemia, appear to occur less often with perindopril than with other agents in this class. The favorable safety profile for perindopril extends to a wide range of patients, including the elderly and those with either heart failure or renal disease. Perindopril has no negative effects on lipids in patients with hyperlipidemia or on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and it reduces proteinuria in patients with renal disease. Perindopril has no known clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Thus, perindopril is a safe BP-lowering agent with documented tolerability in a wide range of patients with hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of perindopril. 1159 59

The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the elevation of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, in hypertensive patients, so the present study was designed to examine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity is also involved in the mechanism of ADMA elevation in type 2 diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). A crossover study was performed to determine if ACE inhibition with perindopril (4 mg/day) for 4 weeks decreases serum ADMA concentration and plasma von Willebrand factor (vWF) level (a marker of endothelial injury) in 11 patients with NIDDM. None of the patients was treated with insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs, and none had major diabetic complications. Before the protocol began, serum ADMA and plasma vWF were significantly higher in the 11 NIDDM patients, when compared with 8 control subjects without diabetes. Perindopril did not affect blood pressure or glucose metabolism, but did significantly decrease serum ADMA and plasma vWF. These results suggest that endothelial injury associated with ADMA elevation may be present even in patients with non-complicated NIDDM, and that increased activity of ACE may be involved in such endothelial dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity is involved in the mechanism of increased endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1222 17

Microalbuminuria in diabetes is a risk factor for early death and an indicator for aggressive blood pressure (BP) lowering. We compared a combination of 2 mg perindopril/0.625 mg indapamide with enalapril monotherapy on albumin excretion rate (AER) in patients with type 2 diabetes, albuminuria, and hypertension in a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group international multicenter study. Four hundred eighty-one patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension (systolic BP > or =140 mm Hg, <180 mm Hg, diastolic BP <110 mm Hg) were randomly assigned (age 59+/-9 years, 77% previously treated for hypertension). Results from 457 patients (intention-to-treat analysis) were available. After a 4-week placebo period, patients with albuminuria >20 and <500 microg/min were randomly assigned to a combination of 2 mg perindopril/0.625 mg indapamide or to 10 mg daily enalapril. After week 12, doses were adjusted on the basis of BP to a maximum of 8 mg perindopril/2.5 mg indapamide or 40 mg enalapril. The main outcome measures were overnight AER and supine BP. Both treatments reduced BP. Perindopril/indapamide treatment resulted in a statistically significant higher fall in both BP (-3.0 [95% CI -5.6, -0.4], P=0.012; systolic BP -1.5 [95% CI -3.0, -0.1] diastolic BP P=0.019) and AER -42% (95% CI -50%, -33%) versus -27% (95% CI -37%, -16%) with enalapril. The greater AER reduction remained significant after adjustment for mean BP. Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups. Thus, first-line treatment with low-dose combination perindopril/indapamide induces a greater decrease in albuminuria than enalapril, partially independent of BP reduction. A BP-independent effect of the combination may increase renal protection.
 ...
PMID:Effect of low-dose perindopril/indapamide on albuminuria in diabetes: preterax in albuminuria regression: PREMIER. 1265 6

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is often accompanied by high blood pressure (BP) and the clustering of several cardiovascular risk factors, and is the most frequent cause of end-stage renal disease. The stages of development of overt nephropathy in T2DM patients range from an initial alteration in renal function with an increased GFR, followed by the development of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria or proteinuria, featuring an established diabetic nephropathy, which eventually progresses to end-stage renal disease. Early intervention is needed to prevent the development of diabetic nephropathy and requires effective control of the different risk factors, and in particular high BP. In the initial stages of the disease, strict BP control is crucial to prevent the development of initial renal and vascular damage. Adequate BP control is particularly difficult in T2DM patients and in most cases requires the use of combination therapy. Preterax, a fixed-dose combination of perindopril 2 mg and indapamide 0.625 mg, allows BP to be significantly reduced compared with conventional strategies; this combination can be uptitrated to BiPreterax when further BP control is needed. In the PREMIER study performed in T2DM over 12 months, the perindopril/indapamide combination brought about, in addition to excellent BP control, a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion, compared with monotherapy with enalapril. In more advanced degrees of renal damage, higher doses of the fixed combination have to be considered. The pharmacological basis of the renoprotective effect of perindopril/indapamide is the demonstration that this combination prevented nephropathy as well as proteinuria in obese Zucker rats, independently of BP control. Strict BP control from the initial stages of nephropathy together with inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system is mandatory to prevent albuminuria. The fixed combination of perindopril/indapamide can greatly help clinicians in achieving the above goals, using Preterax in the early and BiPreterax in the late stages of nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Renal protection in diabetic patients: benefits of a first-line combination of perindopril-indapamide (Preterax). 1672 64

The year 2008 was rich in teachings and suspense in diabetology. Past studies, i.e. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) in type 2 diabetic patients and Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in type 1 diabetic patients, have shown that in the short term, intensive treatment reduces the incidence of microvascular complications linked to diabetes and in the long term that of both microvascular and macrovascular ones. The in-the-raw conclusions of the recent Action to Control Cardiovascular risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study note an increase in mortality in type 2 diabetic patients treated intensively, while the Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease, Perindopril and Indapamide Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study evidences a reduction in microvascular complications and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) study shows that intensive treatment has no significant effect. A well thought-out analysis of the studies published in 2008 (ACCORD, STENO 2 post-trial, ADVANCE, VADT, UKPDS post-trial, Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications [EDIC]) is particularly instructive and highlights the existence of glycaemic memory, the non-existence of blood pressure memory, the need to control all cardiovascular risk factors and to treat diabetes early while avoiding hypoglycaemic incidents. The glycaemic target based on HbA1c must take into account the patient's age and the duration of his diabetes, as well as his cardiovascular risk factors and previous glycaemic control. All in all, the intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes must begin early; it must not be too rapid and must avoid hypoglycaemic incidents and be combined with a strict control of other cardiovascular risk factors.
 ...
PMID:Glycaemic control and cardiovascular morbi-mortality: the contribution of the 2008 studies. 1919 63

Blood pressure is an important determinant of the risk of macro- and microvascular vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Current European guidelines for the management of hypertension recommend lowering blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial (n = 11,140), is the first trial designed to address the issue of whether routine blood pressure lowering with the fixed combination of perindopril/indapamide is beneficial in patients with diabetes with a broad range of baseline blood pressure values. In addition, it aimed to determine if clinical benefit is achieved over and above that observed with background angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. In the perindopril/indapamide arm, the reduction in blood pressure led to significant clinical benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, irrespective of baseline blood pressure values, and subsequently improved mortality rates, and macro- and microvascular outcomes, beyond the improvements associated with patients' existing antihypertensive therapies. ADVANCE is a robust well-designed trial, the results of which are directly applicable to current clinical practice. The ADVANCE study defines the relevant blood pressure goals for patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk of cardiovascular events and underscores the benefits of aggressive blood pressure reduction even in normotensive patients with diabetes. It is likely that these findings will have a significant impact on the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. In view of the evidence indicating that clinical benefits obtained with the perindopril/indapamide combination can be expected even in patients who are normotensive, vascular risk rather than initial blood pressure should be employed to determine appropriate treatment protocols in patients with type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Implications of the ADVANCE study for clinical practice. 1936 50

Whether glycaemic control may result in a reduction of cardiovascular (CV) risk has been a matter of continuous discussion and investigation. Epidemiological analyses have extensively suggested a relationship between glycaemic control and CV events; however, the results of intervention trials have been less conclusive. The UKPDS reported a 16% reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction, but this reduction was not statistically significant. The results of the Kumamoto and PROactive studies could not allow any firm conclusions to be drawn either, because of limited size and the defined primary endpoint, respectively. The results of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) and Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trials and the Veteran Administration Diabetes Trial (VADT) were published in rapid succession over the second half of 2008 and at the beginning of 2009. A total number of almost 25,000 type 2 diabetic patients were recruited in these three trials, which assessed the effect of intensive glycaemic control vs conventional treatment on well-defined CV endpoints. In spite of the achievement and maintenance of strict glycaemic control (HbA(1c) <7.0%), no beneficial effect of intensive therapy was apparent in any of the studies. At the same time these results were presented, the results of an analysis of the 10 year follow-up of the UKPDS also became available and provided a more optimistic view of the potential benefit of achieving good glycaemic control. The relative risk reductions for myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality were significantly lower in the patients who initially received the intensive treatment compared with those in the conventional treatment arm. Moreover, the initial benefit in terms of microvascular complications observed at the end of the intervention trial remained unaltered at follow-up. Once again the debate on the importance of glycaemic control in preventing macrovascular complications remains unsettled. These results, however, require some reconciliation, and the objective of this commentary is to analyse a series of elements, including the changes in the treatment approach to CV risk factors in type 2 diabetes, the effect of glucose-lowering agents, and the characteristics of the patients included in the different trials, that should be taken into account when interpreting the results of intervention trials in type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Megatrials in type 2 diabetes. From excitement to frustration? 1937 46

The relative importance of various blood pressure indices on cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been established. This study compares the strengths of the associations between different baseline blood pressure variables (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulse pressure [PP], and mean arterial pressure) and the 4.3-year risk of major cardiovascular events in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Study. Mean (SD) age for the 11 140 participants was 65.8 years (6.4 years). During follow-up, 1000 major cardiovascular events, 559 major coronary events, and 468 cardiovascular deaths were recorded. After adjustment for age, sex, and treatment allocation, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) associated with 1 increment in SD for the risk of major cardiovascular events were 1.17 (1.10 to 1.24) for SBP; 1.20 (1.13 to 1.28) for PP; 1.12 (1.05 to 1.19) for mean arterial pressure; and 1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) for DBP. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were slightly higher for SBP and PP compared with mean arterial pressure and DBP for major cardiovascular and coronary events. Using achieved instead of baseline blood pressure values marginally improved the effect estimates for SBP, DBP, and mean arterial pressure, with no significant differences in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between models with SBP and those with PP. In conclusion, SBP and PP are the 2 best and DBP is the least effective determinant of the risk of major cardiovascular outcomes in the relatively old patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus participating in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Study. However, SBP may be the simplest and most useful predictor across a wider range of age groups and populations.
 ...
PMID:Blood pressure variables and cardiovascular risk: new findings from ADVANCE. 1947 Aug 69


1 2 3 Next >>