Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (
type 2 diabetes
)
57,723
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Effects of 12 months of simvastatin treatment were examined in 48
NIDDM
patients with total serum cholesterol levels exceeding 220 mg/dl and were compared with those in 35 nondiabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia. In the diabetic group, 5-10 mg of simvastatin given once daily at bedtime significantly lowered total cholesterol (21%). LDL cholesterol (28%), apoB (15%) and triglycerides (8%) levels. These changes were identical to those in the nondiabetic group, except for triglycerides which did not change significantly. HDL cholesterol increased significantly in the nondiabetic group but not in the diabetic group. The reductions in LDL cholesterol and apoB in hypercholesterolemic patients with
NIDDM
were not influenced by gender, age, glycemic control, the presence or absence of systemic hypertension, obesity and overt proteinuria. In addition, the decrease in LDL cholesterol was not affected by the number of risk factors per patient.
Simvastatin
did not significantly alter hemoglobin A1c or fasting plasma glucose and was well tolerated in both groups.
Simvastatin
produced beneficial effects on serum lipids and apolipoproteins and neutral effects on glycemic control in hypercholesterolemic patients with
NIDDM
, whether or not they had an additional atherosclerotic risk factor.
...
PMID:Long-term effects of simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with NIDDM and additional atherosclerotic risk factors. Hyogo Simvastatin Study Group. 764 76
Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
(
NIDDM
) is often characterized by an increase in VLDL-triglyceride, VLDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and a reduction in HDL-cholesterol. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors significantly lower cholesterol rates and have an indirect effect on the LDL receptor. We measured the effect of simvastatin in 28 hypercholesterolemic subjects, including 14 with
NIDDM
in good metabolic control (HbAIc 7.8% +/- 1.3%). A 24-week treatment with 10 mg/day (weeks 1-4), 20 mg/day (weeks 5-8) and 40 mg/day (weeks 9-24) simvastatin revealed different responses in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apo B decreased significantly in both groups (less in the diabetics), whereas only
NIDDM
patients displayed a significant reduction in VLDL-cholesterol and VLDL-apo B. In the non-diabetics, the reduction in plasma cholesterol was mainly confined to the LDL fraction (276 +/- 65 vs. 132 +/- 28 mg/dl), whereas a significant fall in VLDL-cholesterol (45 +/- 19 vs. 21 +/- 10 mg/dl) was more evident in the
NIDDM
patients.
Simvastatin
also influenced plasma apo B levels (221 +/- 33 vs 134 +/- 23 mg/dl in non-diabetics and 182 +/- 44 vs. 134 +/- 30 mg/dl in diabetics). Significant reduction of apo B, LDL-apo B (205 +/- 39 vs. 128 +/- 23 mg/dl) in the non-diabetics and VLDL-apo B (16 +/- 5 vs. 9 +/- 2 mg/dl) in the diabetics, indicates that the VLDL are primarily concerned when statins are administered in
NIDDM
.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Hypercholesterolemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: different effect of simvastatin on VLDL and LDL cholesterol levels. 846 Oct 59
The incidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease is greatly increased in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (
NIDDM
). The most frequent lipoprotein abnormalities in this type of diabetes are an increase in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and a decrease in high-density lipoproteins. Hypertriglyceridaemia appears to be a stronger coronary heart disease risk factor in patients with
NIDDM
than in nondiabetic subjects. Plasma total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in
NIDDM
patients and nondiabetic subjects do not differ. Hypercholesterolaemia is, however, as powerful a predictor of coronary heart disease risk in diabetic patients as in nondiabetic subjects. In spite of this knowledge, there is to date no solid evidence to indicate whether correction of dyslipoproteinaemia in order to reduce coronary heart disease risk in patients with
NIDDM
is more, equally, or less beneficial than it is in nondiabetic subjects. The only available data come from post-hoc subgroup analyses of the Helsinki Heart Study and the Scandinavian
Simvastatin
Survival Study (4S). Other trials including patients with diabetes are in progress. Only one intervention trial (currently in its treatment phase), the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS), is specifically designed to examine the lipid hypothesis in patients with
NIDDM
.
...
PMID:Will correction of dyslipoproteinaemia reduce coronary heart disease risk in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes? Need for trial evidence. 886 91
Usual risk factors for coronary artery disease account for only 25-50% of increased atherosclerotic risk in diabetes mellitus. Other obvious risk factors are hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia. However, hyperglycemia is a very late stage in the sequence of events from insulin resistance to frank diabetes, whereas lipoprotein abnormalities are manifested during the largely asymptomatic diabetic prodrome and contribute substantially to the increased risk of macrovascular disease. The insulin-resistant diabetes course affects virtually all lipids and lipoproteins. Chylomicron and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants accumulate, and triglycerides enrich high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), leading to high levels of potentially atherogenic particles and low levels of HDL cholesterol. Hyperglycemia eventually impairs removal of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, the accumulation of which accentuates hypertriglyceridemia. As triglycerides increase-still within the so-called normal range-abnormalities in HDL and LDL became more apparent. Thus, when triglycerides are >200 mg/dL, LDL particles are small and dense (when they are <90 mg/dL, the particles are of the large, buoyant variety). The atherogenicity of small, dense LDL particles is attributed to their increased susceptibility to oxidation, but in many patients they may be a marker for insulin resistance or the presence of atherogenic VLDL. Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with atherosclerosis because (1) it is a marker for insulin resistance and atherogenic metabolic abnormalities; and (2) the small size of triglyceride-enriched lipoproteins enables them to infiltrate the blood vessel wall where they are oxidized, bind to receptors on macrophages, and ingested, leading to the development of the atherosclerotic lesion. Various studies (primary prevention with gemfibrozil: Helsinki Heart Study; secondary prevention with simvastatin and pravastatin: Scandinavian
Simvastatin
Survival Study [4S] and Cholesterol and Recurrent Events [CARE], respectively) have demonstrated that lipid-lowering therapy in
type 2 diabetes
is effective in decreasing the number of cardiac events. Risk reduction was 22% to 50% (statins) and approximately 65% (fibrate) relative to placebo. It was also noted (in 4S and CARE) that the risk of major coronary events in untreated diabetic patients was 1.5-1.7-fold greater than in untreated nondiabetic patients. Although gemfibrozil (fibric acid derivative) is more effective in decreasing triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol in diabetic patients than the statins, it does not change and may even increase LDL-cholesterol levels (fenofibrate may be an exception, decreasing LDL cholesterol by 20-25% in some studies). However, gemfibrozil does increase LDL particle size. Nevertheless, the statins are the current lipid-lowering drugs of choice because the change in LDL-cholesterol-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio is better than with gemfibrozil. Moreover, the diabetic patient may be more likely to benefit from statin therapy than the nondiabetic patient. It should be noted that, in theory, nicotinic acid can correct or improve all lipid or lipoprotein abnormalities in patients with
type 2 diabetes
. Unfortunately, it is relatively contraindicated because it causes insulin resistance and may precipitate or aggravate hyperglycemia (in addition to its other well-known side effects such as flushing, gastric irritation, development of hepatotoxicity, and hyperuricemia). It is unknown at present whether newer formulations such as once-daily Niaspan may be better tolerated in diabetes. In any case, most patients with
type 2 diabetes
have risk factors for coronary artery disease and qualify for aggressive LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy. At the same time, it is presently unknown whether improved glycemic control decreases coronary artery disease risk in such patients.
...
PMID:Diabetic dyslipidemia. 991 65
1. Hypercholesterolaemia often occurs in patients with
type 2 diabetes
, who therefore encounter administration of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Alteration of pancreatic beta-cell function leading to an impaired insulin secretory response to glucose plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of
type 2 diabetes
. Therefore, it is important to examine the effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on beta-cell function. 2. Cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) plays a central role in the regulation of beta-cell function. The present study examined the effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on the glucose-induced [Ca2+]i signalling and insulin secretion in rat islet beta-cells. 3.
Simvastatin
, a lipophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, at 0.1-3 microg ml(-1) concentration-dependently inhibited the first phase increase and oscillation of [Ca2+]i induced by 8.3 mM glucose in single beta-cells. The less lipophilic inhibitor, simvastatin-acid, inhibited the first phase [Ca2+]i increase but was two orders of magnitude less potent. The hydrophilic inhibitor, pravastatin (100 microg ml(-1), was without effect on [Ca2+]i. 4.
Simvastatin
(0.3 microg ml(-1)), more potently than simvastatin-acid (30 microg ml(-1)), inhibited glucose-induced insulin secretion from islets, whereas pravastatin (100 microg ml(-1)) had no effect. 5. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings demonstrated a reversible inhibition of the beta-cell L-type Ca2+ channels by simvastatin, but not by pravastatin.
Simvastatin
also inhibited the [Ca2+]i increases by L-arginine and KCl, agents that act via opening of L-type Ca2+ channels. 6. In conclusion, lipophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors can inhibit glucose-induced [Ca2+]i signalling and insulin secretion by blocking L-type Ca2+ channels in beta-cells, and their inhibitory potencies parallel their lipophilicities. Precaution should be paid to these findings when HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are used clinically, particularly in patients with
type 2 diabetes
.
...
PMID:Inhibition by simvastatin, but not pravastatin, of glucose-induced cytosolic Ca2+ signalling and insulin secretion due to blockade of L-type Ca2+ channels in rat islet beta-cells. 1020 10
Mixed hyperlipidemia is characterized by both elevated total cholesterol and triglycerides. It is estimated to account for 10% to 20% of patients with dyslipidemia. This study assessed the lipid-altering efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day as monotherapy. One hundred thirty patients (62 women [48%], 24 [16%] with
type 2 diabetes
mellitus, mean age 53 years) with mixed hyperlipidemia (baseline low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol 156 mg/dl [mean], and triglycerides 391 mg/dl [median) were randomized in a multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, 3-period, 22-week, balanced crossover study, and received placebo, and simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day each for 6 weeks. Compared with placebo, simvastatin produced significant (p <0.01) and dose-dependent changes in all lipid and lipoprotein parameters (LDL cholesterol 2.1%, -28.9%, and -35.5%; triglycerides -3.5%, -27.8%, and -33.0%; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 3.3%, 13.1%, and 15. 7%; apolipoprotein B 3.8%, -23.1%, and -30.6%; and apolipoprotein A-I 4.0%, 8.2%, and 10.5% with placebo, and simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day, respectively). The changes were consistent in patients with diabetes mellitus. One patient taking simvastatin 80 mg/day had an asymptomatic and reversible increase in hepatic transaminases 3 times above the upper limit of normal.
Simvastatin
40 and 80 mg/day is effective in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia across the entire lipid and lipoprotein profile. The reductions in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides are large, significant, and dose dependent. The increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was greater than that observed in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and appears dose dependent.
...
PMID:Effects of simvastatin (40 and 80 mg/day) in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. 1094 33
Recent studies have shown that statins are effective in reducing fasting low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride levels. However, it remains unknown if treatment with statins also lowers daily postprandial triglyceride concentrations, which may promote atherogenesis in
type 2 diabetes
subjects. Forty-one subjects with
type 2 diabetes
and combined hyperlipidemia who had stable glycemic control were randomly assigned to take simvastatin 20 mg (n = 27) or a placebo (n = 14) once daily for 12 weeks. The medication dosage was doubled after 4 weeks if a subject's LDL-C was not less than 130 mg/dL. Among these participants, 24 subjects (15 on simvastatin and 9 on placebo) agreed to take a meal tolerance test with isocaloric mixed meals (carbohydrate, 52%; fat, 33%, and protein, 15% of the daily caloric intake) and daytime hourly blood sampling from 8 AM to 4 PM.
Simvastatin
treatment reduced the fasting total cholesterol level from 237 +/- 5 to 178 +/- 6 mg/dL (-25%), the LDL cholesterol level from 150 +/- 6 to 87 +/- 5 mg/dL (-40%), and raised high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level from 36 +/- 2 to 40 +/- 2 mg/dL (+11%) (all P <.001). Fasting and daily ambient triglyceride concentrations from 8 AM to 4 PM decreased significantly in response to simvastatin administration (P <.001), but not to the placebo (P =.305).
Simvastatin
treatment not only decreased total cholesterol and LDL-C levels and increased HDL-C levels effectively, it also decreased fasting, as well as daily postprandial triglyceride concentrations, but had no effect on glycemic control in
type 2 diabetes
subjects with combined hyperlipidemia.
...
PMID:Simvastatin treatment on postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with combined hyperlipidemia. 1123 Jul 91
Patients with
type 2 diabetes
mellitus have an elevated risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease. This risk is partly attributable to an increased prevalence of classic coronary artery disease risk factors and partly because of hyperglycemia itself and a highly atherogenic lipid profile. The altered composition of lipoproteins and lipids in type 2 diabetic patients, termed diabetic dyslipidemia, is characterized by: (1) elevated levels of triglyceride; (2) normal levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); (3) reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); (4) elevated levels of apolipoprotein B; (5) a preponderance of small, dense LDL particles; and (6) increased levels of cholesterol-rich very-low-density lipoprotein. In most cases, diabetic dyslipidemia is preceded by hyperinsulinemia resulting from insulin resistance. Because patients with
type 2 diabetes
and insulin resistance are at a markedly increased risk of atherosclerosis, and because strict control of glycemia has proved beneficial in reducing microangiopathy but not macroangiopathy, treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia should be aggressive. Target levels have, therefore, been set at <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) for LDL-C, <2.3 mmol/L [200 mg/dL] for triglycerides, and >1.15 mmol/L (45 mg/dL) for HDL-C. Trial data suggest that these target levels are likely to be achieved with statins, if necessary, in combination with fibrates or nicotinic acid derivatives. Furthermore, in large-scale clinical trials (eg, Scandinavian
Simvastatin
Survival Study [4S] and the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events [CARE] study), it has been demonstrated that lipid lowering can appreciably reduce cardiovascular events in diabetic patients.
...
PMID:Insulin resistance syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1159 98
This study evaluates the influence of simvastatin on lipid concentrations and on LDL-subtype distribution in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with
type 2 diabetes
and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. Nine patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (LDL-cholesterol: 7.1 +/- 1.1 mmol/L, triglycerides: 1.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/L) and 8 patients with
type 2 diabetes
mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia (HbA1c 6.8 +/- 1.1%, LDL-cholesterol: 4.8 +/- 0.7 mmol/L, triglycerides: 2.5 +/- 1.1 mmol/L) were examined. Cholesterol concentration was determined in 7 LDL-subfractions isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation before and during simvastatin treatment (10-20 mg/d, 4 weeks).
Simvastatin
decreased LDL-cholesterol (-34%/-30%, all p < 0.05) and triglycerides (-2%, n.s./-25%, p < 0.05), but had little effect on HDL-cholesterol (+7%/+2%, n.s.) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus, respectively. In both groups a significant reduction of cholesterol in each LDL-subfraction was observed. Large-buoyant (LDL-1, LDL-2) and intermediate-dense (LDL-3, LDL-4) LDL were reduced more than small-dense (LDL-5-LDL-7) LDL-subtypes (-36%/-38%/-23%, respectively) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, while in diabetic patients cholesterol reduction was uniform in all LDL-subtypes (-29%/-27%/-31%, respectively).
Simvastatin
decreases cholesterol concentration in all LDL-subfractions in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with diabetes mellitus with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. However, the relative reduction of individual LDL-subtypes differed between both groups. This suggests that the effect of simvastatin on LDL-subtype distribution depends on the type of underlying hyperlipoproteinemia.
...
PMID:Influence of simvastatin on LDL-subtypes in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with diabetes mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. 1205 42
There are multiple lipids anomalies on diabetes. IDDM has, because of insulin lack, increased levels of triglycerides and afferent lipoproteins.
NIDDM
, especially obese one, linked by insulinoresistance and hyperinsulinemia, has different and complex anomalies by quality and quantity. There is a specific shape for this anomalies named "B phenotype" with high cardiovascular risk: rise LDL-chol charged with TG and low level of HDL-chol. We searched lipoproteins levels and the effects of simvastatin on aged persons (after 60 years). We randomised 158 cases with obese type II diabetes on a case control study. We concluded that only 28% had high TG levels and 71.8% had low levels of HDL-chol. For HDL-chol this percent is higher over 60 years old group (88.75%) (p < 0.001). Cholesterol has no significant high levels (28.55%) (p < 0.5), and aged group has almost normal levels of cholesterol and triglycerides (p < 0.0001). We administered simvastatin (
Zocor
) on 86% cases, therapeutically doses, during a period of 6 months to one year. Making lipidograms initially, after 6 months and a year, we proved good effects of
Zocor
, on lipoproteins levels: rise levels of HDL-chol (p < 0.005), moderate effect on LDL-chol (p < 0.01). At the same time the treatment improving the glucose tolerability to both groups (p < 0.002).
...
PMID:[Metabolic effects of hypolipemic drugs on aged type 2 diabetes]. 1209 85
1
2
3
Next >>