Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of candesartan cilexetil are reviewed. Candesartan is an angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB). It is administered as a pro-drug that undergoes activation during gastrointestinal absorption. The agent is excreted mostly unchanged and has a terminal half-life of about nine hours (slightly longer in the elderly). Candesartan differs from other agents in its class in that it is tightly bound to angiotensin II type 1 receptors, allowing prolonged activity. In clinical trials, candesartan cilexetil has produced a dose-dependent effect when given in dosages of 2-32 mg/day. Observed trough-to-peak blood pressure ratios support a once-daily dosage regimen. The antihypertensive effect of candesartan cilexetil 4-16 mg/day was as great as that of enalapril 10-20 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day and larger than that of losartan potassium 50 mg/day. Adding candesartan cilexetil to hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day led to enhanced blood-pressure reductions and was well tolerated. It appears that candesartan can decrease renal perfusion without adversely affecting renal blood flow and may mediate a decrease in albuminuria in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. No clinically important drug interactions have been reported. Adverse effects include headache, dizziness, nausea, diarrhea, and transient elevations in liver transaminases. The frequency of cough is similar to that seen with placebo. Candesartan cilexetil is an effective antihypertensive agent that can be used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. It is generally well tolerated and may be an option for patients who cannot tolerate angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors because of cough.
 ...
PMID:Candesartan cilexetil: an angiotensin II-receptor blocker. 1078 59

Approximately 25% of US adults have high blood pressure (BP). Selection of effective and safe antihypertensive therapy for these individuals is an important health-care priority. High BP can be treated with a wide range of antihypertensive agents from a number of different classes. These drugs may differ in their suitability for administration to different subpopulations of patients. Results from both clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance indicate that the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril erbumine is safe and well tolerated in a wide range of patients with hypertension. Cough, the most common ACE inhibitor-associated side effect, is also the most common clinical adverse event reported for perindopril, but <2% of perindopril-treated patients discontinue therapy because of cough. Other adverse events often associated with ACE inhibitors, first-dose hypotension and hyperkalemia, appear to occur less often with perindopril than with other agents in this class. The favorable safety profile for perindopril extends to a wide range of patients, including the elderly and those with either heart failure or renal disease. Perindopril has no negative effects on lipids in patients with hyperlipidemia or on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and it reduces proteinuria in patients with renal disease. Perindopril has no known clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Thus, perindopril is a safe BP-lowering agent with documented tolerability in a wide range of patients with hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of perindopril. 1159 59

To investigate the genetic susceptibility associated with cough related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes, 189 non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients with proteinuria or hypertension treated with perindopril were studied. Cough was considered to be present if the patients had been bothered by a cough during treatment and if they had had related symptoms for at least 2 weeks without an identifiable cause. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) was used to detect polymorphisms of ACE and bradykinin B2-receptor genes. After 8 weeks of treatment, 49.2% (93 of 189) of our NIDDM patients were found to be suffering from ACEI-related cough. ACEI-related cough was mainly associated with female patients, with 71.7% (76 of 106) of female and only 20.5% (17 of 83) of male patients experiencing cough after ACEI treatment. There was a significant association of ACE II genotype with ACEI-related cough. The genotype frequencies were 58.2% for II, 47.8% for ID, and 16.7% for DD in patients with ACEI-associated cough and 41.8% for II, 52.2% for ID, and 83.3% for DD in subjects without ACEI-associated cough (chi(2) = 10.268; df = 2, P =.006). As female patients made up the majority of the subjects suffering from ACEI-related cough, we further analyzed the association of ACE I/D genotype with ACEI-related cough separately by sex. Male patients with ACEI-related cough were not associated with ACE I/D genotype distribution, while female patients were strongly associated with ACE I/D genotype polymorphism (chi(2) = 16.12; df = 2; P <.001). There was no association between the bradykinin B2 receptor gene -58T/C polymorphism with ACEI-related cough. In conclusion, our results indicate that Chinese diabetic female subjects are susceptible to ACEI-related cough, and this susceptibility may be genetically predetermined.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion, not bradykinin B2 receptor -58T/C gene polymorphism, associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-related cough in Chinese female patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. 1169 55

A 77-year-old man was in good health until he complained of fatigue 3 weeks before presentation. Two weeks before admission, he developed gradually worsening shortness of breath. One week before admission, he developed a cough that initially was nonproductive but later was associated with hemoptysis.His past medical history was remarkable for a history of colon cancer (Dukes' stage III), for which he underwent a hemicolectomy and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy in 1993. He had a myocardial infarction in 1986 and underwent coronary artery bypass surgery in 1999. He also had a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and gout. He smoked in the past but had stopped more than 30 years ago.He was initially evaluated by his primary care physician, who noted that he complained of diaphoresis but denied fevers, chills, or contact with others who were ill. His physical examination was remarkable for bilateral crackles that were more pronounced on the right. A chest radiograph demonstrated bilateral pulmonary infiltrates (Figure 1). He was treated with amoxicillin. The next day, however, his physician noted that his dyspnea had worsened and that his oxygen saturation on room air was poor. He was therefore admitted for further evaluation. The amoxicillin was discontinued, and he was treated with levofloxacin, followed by ceftriaxone and azithromycin as his pulmonary status continued to deteriorate. He received intravenous diuretic agents, which failed to improve his respiratory status. During the initial phase of hospitalization, he was anemic, with a hematocrit of 21.3%. His serum creatinine level, which had been 1.0 mg/dL in 1999, was now 2.5 mg/dL. Urinalysis was remarkable for the presence of numerous red blood cells. His oxygen requirement increased, and he eventually required a 100% nonrebreather mask. A computed tomographic scan of the chest demonstrated prominent alveolar opacities throughout the right upper, middle, and lower lobes, with similar opacities in the left upper and left lower lobes (Figure 2). An echocardiogram showed an ejection fraction of 50%, as well as mild mitral regurgitation. Serologies were remarkable for an antinuclear antibody titer of 1:320 and a P-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (P-ANCA) titer of greater than 1:320. C-ANCA was negative. Anti-glomerular basement membrane and anti-human immunodeficiency virus antibodies were undetectable.
 ...
PMID:Cases from the medical grand rounds of the Osler Medical Service at Johns Hopkins University. 1207 15

In well designed studies in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, combinations of the sustained-release (SR) formulation of the nondihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist verapamil 120 to 240 mg/day and the ACE inhibitor trandolapril 0.5 to 8 mg/day were significantly more effective in reducing sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline than placebo. In most randomised studies, combinations of verapamil SR 120 to 240 mg/day and trandolapril 0.5 to 8 mg/day were significantly more effective in lowering sitting DBP and SBP than the corresponding monotherapies administered at the same dosage. Trandolapril/verapamil SR 2/180 mg/day provided significantly more effective 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control than of the corresponding monotherapies. Moreover, trandolapril/verapamil SR reduced BP in patients inadequately controlled with either of the corresponding monotherapies. The antihypertensive efficacy of trandolapril/verapamil SR 2/180 mg/day was generally similar to that of other combinations of antihypertensive agents (metoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol/chlorthalidone, lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide, enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide) in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trandolapril/verapamil SR reduced BP in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes or primary renal disease, Black patients and elderly patients. Trandolapril/verapamil SR was more effective than the individual components administered as monotherapy in reducing proteinuria in patients with type 2 diabetes or primary renal disease. Trandolapril/verapamil SR had a neutral or beneficial effect on metabolic parameters (glucose, insulin, lipids) in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes. Trandolapril/verapamil SR preserved left ventricular function in patients with heart failure. Fewer cardiac events occurred after therapy with trandolapril/verapamil SR than after trandolapril alone in post-myocardial infarction patients with congestive heart failure. The incidence of adverse events in recipients of trandolapril/verapamil SR was similar to that of the individual components, and that of other combination therapies. In placebo-controlled trials conducted in the US, headache, upper respiratory tract infections, cough, constipation, atrioventricular block (first degree) and dizziness were the most commonly reported adverse events in recipients of combinations of verapamil SR (120 to 240 mg/day) and trandolapril (0.5 to 8 mg/day). In conclusion, the fixed-dose combination of trandolapril/verapamil SR is an effective treatment for patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes. Trandolapril/verapamil SR tended to be more effective than monotherapy with either verapamil SR or trandolapril, and generally showed antihypertensive efficacy similar to that of other combination antihypertensive therapies. Current data support the use of trandolapril/verapamil SR as an alternative treatment when monotherapy with either agent is not effective. Data from large clinical trials currently being conducted will assist in fully defining the role of trandolapril/verapamil SR as a cardio- and renoprotective agent.
 ...
PMID:Fixed combination trandolapril/verapamil sustained-release: a review of its use in essential hypertension. 1242 Nov 12

Irbesartan (Avapro, Aprovel) is a potent and selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist indicated for use in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy. Once-daily administration of irbesartan provided 24-hour control of blood pressure (BP). In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension irbesartan was as effective as enalapril, atenolol and amlodipine, and more effective than valsartan in terms of absolute reduction in BP and response rates. Irbesartan produced a greater reduction in diastolic BP at trough than once-daily losartan, but had a smaller effect than olmesartan; the reduction in systolic BP achieved with irbesartan was similar or greater than that with losartan and similar to that seen with olmesartan. The combination of irbesartan with hydrochlorothiazide produced additive effects on BP reduction. Irbesartan also induced regression of left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. In two large studies (IRbesartan MicroAlbuminuria type 2 diabetes mellitus in hypertensive patients [IRMA 2] and the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT]) irbesartan exerted a renoprotective effect in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. The renoprotective effect was at least partly independent of the BP-lowering effect. In the IRMA 2 trial, the proportion of patients progressing to overt nephropathy was significantly lower for recipients of irbesartan 300mg once daily than placebo. In patients with overt nephropathy in the IDNT, irbesartan 300mg once daily provided significantly greater renoprotection than amlodipine 10mg once daily or placebo. The relative risk of doubling of serum creatinine was significantly lower with irbesartan than amlodipine or placebo. Irbesartan is well tolerated in hypertensive patients, including those with type 2 diabetes and incipient or overt nephropathy. The overall incidence of adverse events with irbesartan was similar to that with placebo. Irbesartan was associated with a lower incidence of cough than enalapril and was not associated with ankle oedema or with any clinically significant drug interactions. In conclusion, irbesartan is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent. It also slows the progression of renal disease in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. Thus, irbesartan is a valuable agent in the management of patients with these indications.
 ...
PMID:Irbesartan: a review of its use in hypertension and in the management of diabetic nephropathy. 1510 93

Severe and resistant hypoglycemia occurred in two patients with diabetes mellitus who were receiving concomitant gatifloxacin and glyburide. An 84-year-old woman treated with glyburide for type 2 diabetes mellitus experienced, for the first time, a severe episode of hypoglycemia after 2 days of gatifloxacin 400 mg/day for nonproductive cough. Her blood glucose level on hospital admission was 28 mg/dl. Gatifloxacin and glyburide were discontinued, and the patient was treated with intravenous dextrose infused over 36 hours. Glyburide was restarted before her discharge, with no recurrence of hypoglycemia. A 79-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with glyburide was prescribed gatifloxacin 400 mg/day for pneumonia. After 1 day of therapy, the patient was admitted to the emergency department in a coma. His blood glucose level was 18 mg/dl. Despite discontinuation of gatifloxacin and oral hypoglycemic therapy, hypoglycemia was reversed only after administration of multiple boluses of intravenous dextrose, followed by intravenous dextrose infused over 48 hours. On hospital day 7, gliclazide and levofloxacin were started; the patient experienced no recurrence of hypoglycemia and was discharged on day 10. Several cases of severe and resistant hypoglycemia associated with gatifloxacin therapy have been reported in the recent literature. Although the exact mechanism is not fully understood, it may be linked to a gatifloxacin-induced closing of the adenosine 5'-triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels in the pancreatic beta cells, leading to insulin secretion. The onset of hypoglycemia in relation to the start of gatifloxacin suggests that the drug precipitated this adverse event. Patients receiving oral hypoglycemic agents are at greater risk of experiencing gatifloxacin-induced hypoglycemia than patients not receiving these agents. Clinicians should be aware of this potentially life-threatening adverse event and monitor blood glucose levels in all patients receiving concomitant oral hypoglycemic agents and gatifloxacin.
 ...
PMID:Severe and resistant hypoglycemia associated with concomitant gatifloxacin and glyburide therapy. 1530 56

This study was designed to compare the short-term (1-y) tolerability and antiproteinuric efficacy of enalapril and valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes. Forty-two patients with normal renal function or early-stage nephropathy were recruited in Hong Kong and randomized to valsartan 80 mg/day or enalapril 5 mg/day; the doses were increased to 160 mg and 10 mg daily, respectively, as tolerated. Early-morning urine was analyzed for albumin and creatinine and 24-hour urinary albumin excretion at baseline and 1 year after therapy began. Twenty-two patients were randomized to valsartan and 20 to enalapril. The 2 treatment groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, and duration of diabetes or hypertension. Blood pressure decreased to a similar extent (-2.5% to -5.0%) with each drug. Similarly, the 24-hour urinary albumin excretion decreased by 5% to 6% with each drug. The albumin-creatinine ratio in early-morning urine samples and plasma creatinine levels decreased in the valsartan group and increased in the enalapril group, but the difference was not significant. Plasma potassium levels were stable in both groups at the end of study. Cough was reported by 7 (35%) patients receiving enalapril and none of those receiving valsartan (P=.003). In conclusion, enalapril and valsartan both reduced blood pressure and albuminuria to a similar extent with 1 year of therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and normal renal function or early-stage nephropathy. Fewer adverse events were reported with valsartan, but both drugs appear to be relatively safe.
 ...
PMID:Stabilization and regression of albuminuria in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a one-year randomized study of valsartan versus enalapril. 1602 Apr 5

The angiotensin II receptor antagonist eprosartan is approved for the treatment of essential hypertension and may be administered using a convenient once-daily regimen. The drug is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent with benefit in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular events, independent of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Eprosartan has a low potential for serious adverse events and has not been associated with clinically significant drug interactions, establishing it as a promising agent for combination antihypertensive strategies. Unlike ACE inhibitors such as enalapril, eprosartan does not have a tendency to cause persistent nonproductive cough. Accordingly, eprosartan represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension, including those who have had a stroke and those with co-morbid type 2 diabetes mellitus.
 ...
PMID:Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. 1626 4

Despite strong evidence supporting the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACED, beta-blockers, and spironolactone in heart failure, evidence suggests these drugs are under-used and under-dosed. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of hospitalisation on heart failure pharmacotherapy in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). A retrospective study was conducted, based on 300 consecutive admissions with the medical record diagnosis of heart failure, in each of seven grade one teaching hospitals. At admission, 49.5% of patients were treated with ACEI, 19.2% with beta-blockers and 8.1% with spironolactone. Twenty-six per cent of untreated patients started ACEI treatment during their hospital stay, and 9.4% started beta-blockers The main determinants of treatment with ACEI at discharge were a primary diagnosis of heart failure (odds ratio (OR) = 1.886) and the presence of a potential contraindication (high creatinine OR = 0.458, cough OR = 0.187, renal artery stenosis OR = 0.309). Patients were less likely to be discharged on beta-blockers if greater than 85 years of age (OR = 0.545), or there was mention of airways disease (OR = 0.347), asthma (OR = 0.238) or type 2 diabetes (OR = 0.721) on the medical record. Patients admitted by a cardiologist were more likely to be discharged on beta-blockers (OR = 3.207). Spironolactone was more likely used in patients with primary diagnosis of heart failure (OR = 1.549), aged less than 85 years (OR = 0.319), and/or admitted by a cardiologist (OR = 1.827). The substantial number of patients admitted to hospital with a secondary diagnosis of heart failure should be targeted for therapeutic optimisation.
 ...
PMID:CHART: congestive cardiac failure in hospitals, an Australian review of treatment. 1635 15


1 2 3 4 Next >>