Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (
type 2 diabetes
)
57,723
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
There is an extensive literature on sexual disorders among diabetic patients, but a shortage of studies on their prevalence in selection-free populations. In the present trial (JEVIN), 90% of all insulin-treated diabetic patients (IDDM/
NIDDM
, n = 127/117) aged 16-60 years and living in the city of Jena (100247 inhabitants) were studied. Each subject underwent a structured interview followed by a clinical and laboratory examination. The prevalence of sexual disorders was 32% in IDDM and 46% in
NIDDM
male patients. Patients with sexual disorders were older (IDDM 47.5 +/- 9.8 vs. 37.7 +/- 11.6, P = 0.0004;
NIDDM
53.4 +/- 4.3 vs. 49.5 +/- 8.2 years, P = 0.04) and had longer diabetes duration (IDDM 23.1 +/- 13.8 vs. 13.5 +/- 11.1, P = 0.001;
NIDDM
12.4 +/- 7.5 vs. 8.4 +/- 5.8 years, P = 0.03) than patients without sexual disorders. There were no significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups as regards HbA1c, body-mass index and insulin dose/kg body weight. The prevalence of diabetes long-term complications in men with versus men without sexual disorders (IDDM/
NIDDM
): retinopathy, 65/53% vs. 50/18% (P = 0.34/0.03); neuropathy, 58/48% vs. 9/34% (P = 0.001/0.47); nephropathy, 65/50% vs. 12/36% (P = 0.001/0.45). In addition, all the patients completed standardized questionnaires according to
Bradley
et al. and Lewis et al. to assess quality of life and treatment satisfaction, and one question concerning sexual disorders. The quality of life of IDDM patients with sexual disorders was lower than that of patients without sexual disorders (42.2 +/- 11.4 vs. 54.2 +/- 8.5, P = 0.0005), but there were no differences (P < 0.05) in
NIDDM
patients. In women, the prevalence of sexual disorders was 18/42% in IDDM and
NIDDM
. Comparing these data with the literature and with reports from healthy controls, mostly there is clearly an underestimation of the prevalence of sexual disorders in diabetic populations. Physicians must make more efforts to detect and treat sexual disorders, which may result in an improvement of patients' quality of life.
...
PMID:Prevalence of sexual disorders in a selection-free diabetic population (JEVIN). 1041 30
Long-term micro- and macrovascular complications cause major morbidity and mortality in patients with
type 2 diabetes
mellitus. Up to the present it is not clear whether intensified or conventional insulin treatment is more effective to keep blood glucose concentrations close to the normal range. In the present trial 90% (n = 117) of all insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients aged 16 to 60 years and living in the city of Jena (100,247 inhabitants), Thuringia, Germany were examined. Fourty patients (34%) were on intensive insulin therapy (ICT, > or = 2 injections of normal- and > or = 1 injection of NPH-/mixed-insulin/day, > or = 1 insulin-dose adjustments/week, > or = 2 blood-glucose self-tests/day) and 77 patients (66%) were on conventional insulin therapy (CIT). Patients with ICT had more injections/d (4.3 +/- 0.7 vs CIT 2.4 +/- 0.7, p < 0.001), more insulin-dose adjustments/week < or = 11.5 +/- 8.2 vs 2.2 +/- 5.2, p < 0.001) and more blood-glucose self-tests/week (25.2 +/- 5.7 vs 9.6 +/- 8.8, p < 0.001). Patients with ICT had higher insulin doses (0.71 +/- 0.32 vs 0.47 +/- 0.2 IU/kg body wt/d, p < 0.001), were younger (50.5 +/-6.7 vs 54.0 +/- 5.9 years, p = 0.004) and they had a non-significant tendency to a better HbAlc (8.7 +/- 2.2 vs 9.2 +/- 2.0%, p = 0.23, HPLC, Diamat, normal range 4.4-5,9%). There was a negative correlation between HbAlc and the frequency of blood-glucose self-tests/week (r = -0.23, p = 0.019) and the number of insulin-dose adjustments/week (r = -0.33, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups as regards body-mass index (29.7 +/-4.9 vs 28.0 +/- 4.5 kg/m2, p = 0.06), diabetes duration (12.3 +/- 6.9 vs 12.2 +/- 7.5 years, p = 0.96), duration of insulin therapy (4.2 +/-3.5 versus 4.5 +/- 4.8 years, p = 0.67), incidence of acute complications (severe hypoglycaemia, diabetic coma), prevalence of retino-, nephro- and neuropathy (assessed according to Young et al.) and education or socio-economic factors. Also, in respect of quality of life and treatment satisfaction, assessed with standardized questionnaires according to
Bradley
et al. and Lewis et al., there were no differences between the two groups. In conclusion, in type 2 diabetic patients, ICT seems to be indicated in a second step in "problem-patients" with bad metabolic control under CIT and/or individual's need for more flexibility. Perhaps, in these patients ICT leads to an improvement in the quality of metabolic control.
...
PMID:Intensive or conventional insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients? A population-based study on metabolic control and quality of life (The JEVIN-trial). 1061 81