Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Amylin, a 37 amino acid polypeptide, has been suggested to play a prominent role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance in type II diabetes mellitus. Various studies have demonstrated most recently that amylin is cosecreted with insulin. No data are available on the elimination of amylin from the circulation. We therefore tested plasma levels of amylin, insulin and C-peptide in 49 non-obese, non-diabetic patients (27 male/22 female) with various degree of renal impairment (Group A: CCr less than 20 ml/min, n = 20; Group B: CCr 20-89 ml/min, n = 18; and Group C: CCr greater than 80 ml/min, n = 9). We found a significant increase of plasma amylin when kidney function, expressed by creatinine clearance fell below 20 ml/min (17.9 +/- 1.7 vs. 12.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.8 +/- 1.2 pg/ml; p = 0.0005). Plasma amylin correlated closely with serum C-peptide (r = .764; p = 0.0001), and to a lesser extent with insulin (r = .595; p = 0.0001) underlining its postulated cosecretion with these peptides. The data indicate that amylin might be eliminated by renal mechanisms. Our data show that besides type II diabetes mellitus, advanced renal failure is another clinical situation with enhanced plasma amylin levels. Whether amylin plays any pathogenetic role in renal patients remains to be elucidated.
 ...
PMID:Increased levels of plasma amylin in advanced renal failure. 156 16

The prevalence of diabetic complications is reported from a cross-sectional study of rural diabetic subjects in Western Australia. Logistic-regression analysis has been used to discover potential risk factors associated with each complication. A distinction has been made between time-related variables (age, age at diagnosis, duration of diabetes) and other risk variables. We have attempted to identify the major time-related risk variables for each complication and then examined the effect of other risk variables after accounting for the major time-related variables. The important time-related variables were found to be duration of diabetes for retinopathy, age for macrovascular disease, duration and age at diagnosis of diabetes for sensory neuropathy, and age for renal impairment. When matched on these important time-related variables, the overall prevalences of complications for insulin-dependent (IDDM) compared with non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM) diabetic patients were essentially the same. An exception is renal impairment, for which IDDM patients had a higher prevalence than did NIDDM patients of the same age. After allowing for time-related variables, the analysis also demonstrates positive independent associations between diabetic control (glycosylated hemoglobin) and retinopathy and between diabetic control and macrovascular disease. Plasma cholesterol (positively) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (negatively) were related independently to both macrovascular disease and renal impairment. Very few differences in the risk-factor profiles for complications were found for IDDM compared with NIDDM patients after allowing for time-related variables.
 ...
PMID:Prevalence of diabetic complications in relation to risk factors. 377 Mar 11

The sulphonylureas and the biguanides are widely used as adjuncts to dietary measures in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Adverse effect profiles differ markedly between the sulphonylureas and biguanides, reflecting differences in chemical structure and mode of action. Sulphonylureas are generally well tolerated, although pharmacokinetic differences between these agents have important clinical implications. The main adverse effect associated with sulphonylureas is hypoglycaemia. This effect is a predictable consequence of the principal pharmacological effect of these drugs, i.e. sensitisation of the islet beta-cell to glucose, resulting in enhanced endogenous insulin secretion. Sulphonylurea-induced suppression of hepatic glucose production may cause profound and protracted hypoglycaemia, especially in elderly patients, in individuals with intercurrent illnesses and reduced caloric intake, or when taken in combination with other compounds with hypoglycaemic potential, e.g. alcohol (ethanol). Sulphonylureas with a longer duration of action, notably chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide), are more liable to induce serious hypoglycaemia, particularly when drug elimination is reduced by renal impairment. Other drugs such as salicylates may potentiate the actions of sulphonylureas, thereby increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Biguanide therapy is associated with alterations in lactate homeostasis which under certain clinical circumstances may result in fatal lactic acidosis. Phenformin is associated with a markedly greater risk of lactic acidosis than metformin. Phenformin has been withdrawn in many countries for this reason. All biguanides must be avoided in patients with renal impairment, hepatic dysfunction and cardiac failure--conditions where drug accumulation or disordered lactate metabolism may predispose to lactic acidosis. Phenformin should not be given to individuals who exhibit a severe, genetically conferred hepatic defect of hydroxylation which impedes metabolism of this drug. Less seriously, the biguanides are associated with a relatively high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects which limit compliance. Acarbose, a competitive inhibitor of intestinal alpha-glucosidases, has recently been introduced. In contrast to the sulphonylureas and biguanides, acarbose has not been associated with life-threatening adverse effects. This reflects the low systemic absorption of the drug and, predictably, its principal unwanted effects are gastrointestinal disturbances resulting from iatrogenic carbohydrate malabsorption.
 ...
PMID:Comparative tolerability profiles of oral antidiabetic agents. 784 43

It is generally believed that the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has no effect on the lipid profile. Our recent data show that in patients with proteinuric renal disease, serum levels of total cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may be lowered during treatment with an ACE inhibitor, fosinopril sodium. During a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study involving 26 patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment, fosinopril administration was associated with significant decreases in both urinary protein excretion and serum total cholesterol levels, whereas placebo was not. During a 6-week washout phase, both parameters returned to baseline in fosinopril-treated patients and remained unchanged in placebo recipients. In addition, fosinopril-treated patients had a decrease in plasma levels of Lp(a), whereas this was not seen in placebo-treated patients. When data from a subset of 13 patients with proteinuric renal disease and hypertension were examined, a significant decrease in serum total cholesterol levels was observed; this decrease reversed after discontinuation of fosinopril. Analysis of the effect of fosinopril on plasma Lp(a) levels in a subset of patients who had type II diabetes mellitus and overt proteinuria revealed a significant decrease in plasma Lp(a) after administration of fosinopril. Moreover, fosinopril lowered plasma Lp(a) levels in blacks, whose pretreatment levels were higher than those of whites with comparable degrees of proteinuria and levels of serum total cholesterol. Thus, the reduction in serum Lp(a) levels may be related not only to amelioration of proteinuria, but also to another direct action of fosinopril on the metabolism of Lp(a).
 ...
PMID:Metabolic effects of converting enzyme inhibitors: focus on the reduction of cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) by fosinopril. 828 81

A trial to study the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nitrendipine and enalapril in the treatment of diabetic hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria (MA) was performed to compare the effects of both drugs in the prevention of the renal impairment. Twenty-eight valid patients [13 with nitrendipine (N) and 15 with enalapril (E) with NIDDM, hypertension (diastolic blood pressure between 90 to 114 mm Hg) and MA (urinary albumin between 30 to 300 mg/24 hr) were recruited in a double blind, randomized trial. Following a placebo run-in period of two to four weeks, all eligible patients were randomly allocated to either N or E treatment. Treatment lasted six months, with two different visits at three and six months in which blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), renal function and MA were measured. No statistically significant differences on BP and metabolic parameters were found between both treatment groups. The geometric mean of final glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the N group was 34.5% higher than in the E group, while the reduction on MA was most important in the E group. Eleven patients reported adverse events (AEs) and there were four dropouts, three of them due to AEs. We conclude that both treatments are a good choice for treating diabetic hypertensive patients with early altered renal function, as they reduce BP without altering metabolic parameters, increase GFR and reduce MA with a low frequency of AEs.
 ...
PMID:Nitrendipine and enalapril in the treatment of diabetic hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria. 874 19

Chronic hyperglycaemia, i.e. impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and NIDDM, conveys a great risk of macrovascular disease. Both insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion seem necessary to establish chronic hyperglycaemia, and untreated it appears to promote and worsen both insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. The prevention and treatment of chronic hyperglycaemia should include measures directed at both derangements, and the therapeutic goal should be normoglycaemia. As this is rarely achieved by non-pharmacologic treatment alone, addition of oral antidiabetic drugs are often indicated. Their ability to attain euglycaemia is greater the earlier they are employed, but they should never be introduced until after optimization of non-pharmacologic measures. Delayed early insulin response to glucose or a meal always accompanies chronic hyperglycaemia and is not normalized by non-pharmacologic treatment. This justifies the use of insulin-releasing drugs with a rapid onset of action, e.g. the sulphonylurea glipizide. The non-sulphonylureas, repaglinide and A-4166, are even more rapid- and also short-acting, representing a reduced risk of long-lasting, and hence dangerous, hypoglycaemia. Continuous exposure to high concentrations of sulphonylureas may downregulate beta-cell sensitivity. Maximum doses are much lower than previously assumed. The most effective improvers of insulin action seem to be the thiazolidinediones, but they are not yet marketed. Metformin is the only globally available drug for improving insulin action. It is as antihyperglycaemic as sulphonylureas but does not cause hyperinsulinaemia, weight increase or hypoglycaemia. The risk of lactic acidosis can be minimized by avoiding metformin in subjects with renal impairment. Combined treatment with sulphonylurea and metformin can be highly effective even in advanced NIDDM.
 ...
PMID:Oral antidiabetic drugs: an overview. 889 98

Type 2 diabetes mellitus results from impaired insulin secretion and reduced peripheral insulin sensitivity. Treatment options include diet, oral antihyperglycemic agents, and insulin. Metformin, an oral biguanide, ameliorates hyperglycemia by improving peripheral sensitivity to insulin, and reducing gastrointestinal glucose absorption and hepatic glucose production. Unlike sulfonylureas, it does not stimulate insulin secretion, aggravate hyperinsulinemia, or cause hypoglycemia or weight gain (weight stabilizes or decreases). It also has beneficial effects on serum lipid profiles. In lean or overweight type 2 diabetic patients uncontrolled by diet, metformin monotherapy significantly improves glycemic control, compared with placebo, and to similar extents as sulfonylurea monotherapy. In secondary sulfonylurea failure, combination metformin-sulfonylurea treatment significantly improves glycemic control beyond that achieved with either agent along. Metformin-sulfonylurea also appears to be as effective as insulin or insulin plus sulfonylurea, suggesting that such combination therapy may obviate or substantially delay insulin therapy. Limited data suggest that metformin-insulin therapy may improve glycemic control, possibly reducing insulin requirements, in type 2 diabetic patients uncontrolled by insulin alone following secondary sulfonylurea failure. Gastrointestinal side effects are common, but usually tolerated. Lactic acidosis risk is minimal, provided that contraindications, particularly renal impairment, and prescribing guidelines are respected. Aside from elevated plasma metformin levels with cimetidine and synergistic hypoglycemia with sulfonylureas, few interactions occur. Thus, metformin is safe and effective both as monotherapy or in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents in type 2 diabetic patients requiring additional glycemic control and may be advantageous when weight control is desirable and/or hyperlipidemia exists.
 ...
PMID:An overview of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 920 6

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (formerly named non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or NIDDM) is a heterogeneous disease resulting from a dynamic interaction between defects in insulin secretion and insulin action. Various pharmacological approaches can be used to improve glucose homeostasis via different modes of action: sulphonylureas essentially stimulate insulin secretion, biguanides (metformin) act by promoting glucose utilisation and reducing hepatic-glucose production, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose) slow down carbohydrate absorption from the gut and thiazolidinediones (troglitazone) enhance cellular insulin action on glucose and lipid metabolism. These pharmacological treatments may be used individually for certain types of patients, or may be combined in a stepwise fashion to provide more ideal glycaemic control for most patients. Selection of oral antihyperglycaemic agents as first-line drug or combined therapy should be based on both the pharmacological properties of the compounds (efficacy and safety, profile) and the clinical characteristics of the patient (stage of disease, bodyweight, etc.). Mildly hyperglycaemic patients should preferably be treated with metformin, acarbose or thiazolidinediones (which are not associated with any hypoglycaemic risk), while more severely hyperglycaemic individuals should receive a sulphonylurea. In moderately hyperglycaemic patients, sulphonylureas should be preferred in nonobese patients while metformin, and probably also thiazolidinediones, should have priority in obese insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients. Acarbose is mainly indicated to reduce post-prandial glucose fluctuations and improve glycaemic stability. Each antihyperglycaemic agent may also be combined with insulin therapy to improve glycaemic control and/or reduce the insulin requirement of diabetic patients after secondary failure to oral treatment. Finally, safety should be taken into account in elderly patients and/or those with renal impairment, especially as far as the use of sulphonylureas (higher risk of hypoglycaemia) and metformin (higher risk of lactic acidosis) is concerned.
 ...
PMID:Oral antidiabetic agents. A guide to selection. 950 42

The treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus remains controversial. Since most patients are overweight or obese, regimens based on dietary modification and increased physical exercise are logical and safe treatment approaches. However, the long term impact of these interventions is frequently disappointing and pharmacotherapy is therefore required in the majority of patients. Oral antidiabetic agents, principally the sulphonylureas and biguanides, are often only partially effective, even in combination. Insulin is the treatment of choice for certain clinical situations, for example, pregnancy. Often insulin will be a temporary measure. Safety considerations will also point to the preferential use of insulin in other circumstances, for example, in patients with pronounced renal impairment. In addition, a significant proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus will ultimately require insulin therapy in the long term because of failure of oral agents to provide adequate glycaemic control (i.e. secondary failure). Reservations about insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly elderly patients with cardiovascular complications, include hypoglycaemia and bodyweight gain. However, severe hypoglycaemia occurs with considerably lower frequency than in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. To date, no clear evidence has emerged implicating exogenous insulin therapy in the promotion of cardiovascular disease. On the contrary, recent clinical and experimental studies suggest anti-atherogenic effects. Insulin therapy can be successful in type 2 diabetes mellitus if patients are carefully selected. Twice daily isophane (neutral protamine Hagedom; NPH) or pre-mixed insulin is used routinely in many centres. The role of combinations of insulin and oral agents remains an area of controversy. Combined therapy with sulphonylureas may be more expensive and clear clinical advantages have not been consistently demonstrated. Bodyweight gain may be lessened by the concomitant use of metformin and troglitazone may improve glycaemic control in obese patients. Procrastination about transfer to insulin is not uncommon. Patient acceptance may be facilitated by a positive attitude from the diabetes care team and discussion of the possibility at a relatively early stage. Adequate support from a multidisciplinary team is important for safe and effective insulin therapy. Even so, in the long term, attainment of glycaemic targets may prove difficult to sustain with present therapeutic strategies.
 ...
PMID:Benefits and risks of transfer from oral agents to insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1043 50

Troglitazone is a new thiazolidinedione oral antidiabetic agent approved for use to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is rapidly absorbed with an absolute bioavailability of between 40 and 50%. Food increases the absorption by 30 to 80%. The pharmacokinetics of troglitazone are linear over the clinical dosage range of 200 to 600 mg once daily. The mean elimination half-life ranges from 7.6 to 24 hours, which facilitates a once daily administration regimen. The pharmacokinetics of troglitazone are similar between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy individuals. In humans, troglitazone undergoes metabolism by sulfation, glucuronidation and oxidation to form a sulfate conjugate (M1), glucuronide conjugate (M2) and quinone metabolite (M3), respectively. M1 and M3 are the major metabolites in plasma, and M2 is a minor metabolite. Age, gender, type 2 diabetes, renal impairment, smoking and race do not appear to influence the pharmacokinetics of troglitazone and its 2 major metabolites. In patients with hepatic impairment the plasma concentrations of troglitazone, M1 and M3 increase by 30%, 4-fold, and 2-fold, respectively. Cholestyramine decreases the absorption of troglitazone by 70%. Troglitazone may enhance the activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and/or transporter(s) thereby reducing the plasma concentrations of terfenadine, cyclosporin, atorvastatin and fexofenadine. It also reduces the plasma concentrations of the oral contraceptive hormones ethinylestradiol, norethindrone and levonorgestrel. Troglitazone does not alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, glibenclamide (glyburide) or paracetamol (acetaminophen). There is no pharmacodynamic interaction between troglitazone and warfarin or alcohol (ethanol). Pharmacodynamic modelling showed that improvement in fasting glucose and triglyceride levels increased with dose from 200 to 600 mg. Knowledge of systemic troglitazone exposure within a dose group does not improve the prediction of glucose lowering response or adverse effects beyond those based on the administered dose.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics of troglitazone. 1049 99


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>