Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (
type 2 diabetes
)
57,723
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
A screening program for diabetic eye disease was established in Iceland in 1980. Approximately 90% of the insulin dependent patients in Iceland undergo annual eye examination and fundus photography and about a fifth of the type 2 diabetic patients. We report on 245 diabetic patients with
type 2 diabetes
. Any diabetic retinopathy was present in 100 patients (41%), proliferative retinopathy had been present in 17 (7%) and 24 (10%) had clinically significant diabetic
macular edema
. Two-hundred and twenty-four patients (91%) had visual acuity equal or better than 6/12 in their better eye, 17 patients (7%) with 6/18-6/36 in their better eye, and 4 patients (1.6%) equal or worse than 6/60 in their better eye.
...
PMID:Screening for eye disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 797 65
The existence of a linkage between retinal and renal microvascular complications in
type 2 diabetes
has been so far little investigated. For this purpose we evaluated the presence and degree of renal dysfunction in the most serious clinical conditions of diabetic retinopathy. On the basis of the alterations evidenced by fluorescein angiography 73 type 2 diabetic patients were recruited and divided into the following groups: 19 patients were affected by "clinically significant"
Macular Edema
(ME), 25 subjects had Preproliferative Retinopathy (PrePR) and 29 patients showed Proliferative Retinopathy (PR). Mean values (M +/- SD) of glycosylated hemoglobin, plasma basal C-peptide, lipid profile, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, body mass index, age and known duration of diabetes were similar between the groups. Urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE) was determined for each patient on three consecutive overnight collections (pg/min). Even though the distribution of normo (UAE < 20 micrograms/min), micro (UAE:20-200) and macroalbuminuric (UAE > 200) patients did not significantly differ between the groups, mean values of UAE increased significantly in PrePR (371.1 +/- 532.2) and PR (300.7 +/- 717.3) with respect to ME (35.4 +/- 73.1; p < 0.05). The evaluation of all patients recruited for the study, independently of the kind of retinal alteration, showed that 56.8% of them had no sign of even incipient renal dysfunction, in spite of the advanced retinal damage. When considering those patients affected by both retinal and renal complications (43.2%) the prevalence of renal involvement resulted different in the three conditions investigated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Severe diabetic retinopathy and renal function in non-insulin-dependent (type-2) diabetes mellitus]. 853 94
We investigated familial clustering of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in the families of 372 subjects from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). These subjects had 467 first-degree relatives with IDDM or
NIDDM
. Family sizes ranged from two to six. A complete data set was obtained from 241 relatives of 217 DCCT subjects. Among the DCCT subjects, 53% were in the intensive treatment group and 47% were in the conventional group; 44% were from the primary prevention cohort (no retinopathy or microalbuminuria at the DCCT baseline) and 56% were from the secondary intervention cohort (mild-to-moderate nonproliferative retinopathy and <200 mg/24 h albumin excretion rate [AER] at baseline). Retinopathy and nephropathy were assessed with seven-field stereo fundus photography and timed urinary AER measurements. Retinopathy was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale. ETDRS scores and AERs were adjusted for the DCCT treatment group and for significant covariates from among sex, age, diabetes duration, HbA1c value, and body weight. Familial associations were assessed by comparing the prevalence of retinopathy and nephropathy in diabetic relatives of the respective positive versus negative DCCT subjects. To determine family clustering of the severity of retinopathy or nephropathy, the intraclass (familial) correlation was computed from the log-adjusted retinopathy and nephropathy scores of DCCT subjects and their relatives for all family members and sib-sib relationships. For parent-offspring, mother-child, and father-child relationships, the pairwise estimate of the correlations was computed. A correlation of 0.2 was considered to be biologically meaningful a priori. Among families of patients in the intensive and conventional groups combined, there was an increased risk of severe retinopathy (an ETDRS score > or =47, clinically significant
macular edema
, or laser treatment in either eye) among relatives of retinopathy-positive vs. retinopathy-negative DCCT subjects in the secondary intervention cohort (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% CI 1.2-7.8; P < 0.05). There was no increase in the risk of retinopathy of any severity (microaneurysms or worse) in the relatives of retinopathy-positive vs. retinopathy-negative DCCT subjects of the primary prevention cohort. There was an increased risk of nephropathy (AER >40 mg/24 h) in relatives of nephropathy-positive versus nephropathy-negative DCCT subjects of the secondary intervention cohort (OR, 5.4; 95% CI 2.2-13.7; P < 0.001). The risk of severe retinopathy in the relatives of positive versus negative subjects from the conventional treatment group alone (OR, 4.3; 95% CI 1.01-18.6; P < 0.05) was statistically significant and somewhat greater than that among relatives of the subjects in intensive treatment group (OR, 2.4; 95% CI 0.7-8.1), which was not significant. Correlations for the severity of retinopathy were 0.187 (all family members), 0.327 (parent-offspring), 0.249 (father-child), 0.391 (mother-child), and 0.060 (sib-sib), using the combined treatment group families. All these correlations were statistically significant (P < 0.05), except for sib-sib. The results showed similar trends when the families from the conventional and intensive treatment groups were analyzed separately. Correlations for nephropathy in the combined treatment group families were 0.063 (all family members), 0.138 (parent-offspring), 0.170 (father-child), 0.103 (mother-child), and 0.107 (sib-sib). None of these correlations is statistically significant. The lack of significant correlation for the severity of nephropathy may reflect the relatively short duration of diabetes in the offspring of these families and the known high intrasubject variability of AERs. These data provide the first available evidence that the severity of diabetic retinopathy is influenced by familial (possibly genetic) factors and confirmatory evidence that such factors influence the development
...
PMID:Clustering of long-term complications in families with diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. 935 33
Diabetic retinopathy is the principal cause of irreversible blindness in patients of working age in the industrialized world (1,2). For some types of retinopathy (e.g., proliferative disease), effective treatment in the form of laser photocoagulation has been available for more than 20 years, but many patients seek help too late when treatment is no longer effective.
Macular edema
, which is much more common in patients with
type 2 diabetes
mellitus, may be the presenting sign and therefore may already be established at diagnosis. If vision is significantly reduced, current treatment options are often ineffective. Screening of diabetic persons for early signs of retinopathy, which are treatable, improves the visual prognosis. Medical factors such as good blood glucose control, management of hypertension, and regulation of blood lipid levels are also considered to be of major importance.
...
PMID:Diabetic retinopathy. 1280 Apr 77
Since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has a strong effect on induction of vascular permeability, VEGF is an attractive candidate gene for development of diabetic
macular edema
(ME). Among the 378 patients with
type 2 diabetes
studied, 203 patients had no retinopathy, 93 had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and 82 had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). ME was present in 16 patients with NPDR and 47 patients with PDR. We genotyped three VEGF polymorphisms: C-2,578A, G-1,154A, and C-634G. Genotype and allele distribution of C-634G, but not C-2,578A or G-1,154A, were significantly different between patients with and without diabetic retinopathy. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the C-634G genotype was a risk factor for DR (p = 0.002), and furthermore for ME (p = 0.047), independently from severity of DR, with the -634C allele increasing the risk. Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography was correlated with the C-634G genotype, with the trend increasing with the presence of more -634C alleles (p = 0.006). Stepwise regression analysis showed that duration of diabetes and presence of the C-634G genotype were independent predictors of macular thickness. In addition, basic transcriptional activity levels associated with the -634C allele were greater compared to those seen with the -634G allele in human glioma and lymphoblastic T-lymphocyte cells. These results demonstrate that the VEGF C-634G polymorphism is a genetic risk factor for ME as well as DR.
...
PMID:Functional VEGF C-634G polymorphism is associated with development of diabetic macular edema and correlated with macular retinal thickness in type 2 diabetes. 1596 67
Solid-phase enzyme immunoassay was used to study the serum levels of the antiendoxin IgA, IgM, IgG antibodies and total immunoglobulins of classes A, M, and G in 62 patients (122 eyes) with
type 2 diabetes
mellitus at different stages of diabetic retinopathy. Patients with diabetic retinopathy concurrent with
type 2 diabetes
mellitus were found to have a significant imbalance of antiendotoxin immunity. The highest level of anti-lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-IgA was detected in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy that exhibited
macular edema
, single or multiple aneurysms, hemorrhages, portions of solid lipid exudate and preproliferative diabetic retinopathy, in addition to vascular changes. Much lower levels of anti-LPS-IgA were found in nonproliferative retinopathy in which only retinal vascular changes and in proliferative diabetic retinopathy were noted. The patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy complicated by neovascular glaucoma were ascertained to have the lowest levels of antiendotoxin antibodies of all the classes. As compared with the control group, the patients of all groups had the decreased levels of anti-LPS-IgM. The paper presents the results of a correlation analysis of the relationship of the parameters of antiendotoxin immunity to the levels of total immunoglobulins.
...
PMID:[Impaired antiendotoxin immunity in patients with diabetic retinopathy and type 2 diabetes mellitus]. 1640 60
This study was designed to investigate whether V16A polymorphism of the manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) gene is associated with the development of
type 2 diabetes
mellitus and with progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic
macular edema
(DME). We simultaneously analyzed insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene in the 16th intron to avoid its confounding effect. A total of 192 nondiabetic subjects and 304 type 2 diabetic patients were included in the study. Diabetic retinopathy was classified as nonretinopathy, nonproliferative retinopathy, and proliferative retinopathy. Diabetic macular edema was defined as thickening of the retina and/or hard exudates within a 1-disk diameter of the center of the macula. Diabetic macular edema was further classified into focal, diffuse, and ischemic types. The A allele frequency of the Mn-SOD gene was not different between nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects, between the normotensive and hypertensive groups, between the DR (-) and DR (+) groups, and among the stages of DR. In the DR (+) group, the DME (+) group had a lower A allele frequency than that of the DME (-) group. In the DME (+) group, focal, diffuse, and ischemic types were found in 8, 23, and 6 patients, respectively. The A allele frequency of each type was 0.188, 0.109, and 0.0. The D allele frequency of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene did not differ in any of the comparisons. Clinical and laboratory parameters of the A allele carriers were not different from those of the noncarriers except for the prevalence of hypertension and DME. Hypertension, diabetic duration, and insulin therapy were related to DR. The A allele, hypertension, and insulin therapy were associated with DME. In conclusion, our results suggest that V16A polymorphism of the Mn-SOD gene is not related to the development of diabetes and progression of DR, but is associated with DME in Korean type 2 diabetic patients.
...
PMID:Association of manganese superoxide dismutase gene polymorphism (V16A) with diabetic macular edema in Korean type 2 diabetic patients. 1714 44
Ruboxistaurin, an orally active protein kinase C beta (PKC beta) inhibitor, is a macrocyclic bisindolylmaleimide compound under development by Eli Lilly with potential as a therapy for diabetic macular oedema and other diabetic angiopathies, including diabetic retinopathy, diabetic peripheral neuropathy and diabetic nephropathy. Ruboxistaurin is awaiting approvals in the US and Europe for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Eli Lilly and Alcon entered into a long-term agreement to co-promote ruboxistaurin in the US and Puerto Rico for diabetic retinopathy. The agreement is subject to the US FDA's approval of the agent for this indication. Under the terms of the agreement, Alcon will assume primary responsibility for promotion to eye specialists including retinal specialists and general ophthalmologists, while Eli Lilly will be targeting endocrinologists and physicians. Subject to approval in the US, Eli Lilly will receive milestone and marketing payments from Alcon. Alcon in turn will receive compensation based on product sales. In December 2003, Eli Lilly signed a joint development and co-marketing agreement with Takeda Chemical Industries for ruboxistaurin in the Japanese market. Under the terms of the agreement, Eli Lilly Japan and Takeda will jointly develop ruboxistaurin in Japan, will file an NDA for diabetic peripheral neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy, and subsequently will market the drug in Japan. Ruboxistaurin was submitted for approval in Europe in the second quarter of 2006. The agent is also in phase II studies for the treatment of diabetic maculopathy (macular retinopathy) in Japan. Data from a phase III, 3-year study of ruboxistaurin in patients with moderate to severe diabetic retinopathy showed that ruboxistaurin markedly reduced the risk of sustained vision loss compared with placebo. This multicentre, randomised study, named PKC-DRS2 (Protein Kinase C-Diabetic Retinopathy Study 2), was conducted at 70 clinical sites and involved 685 patients with diabetic retinopathy. The agent is also in a phase II study in the US, Canada and Europe in patients with clinically significant macular oedema. The trial (B7A-MC-MBCU), which will evaluate oral administration of the drug using optical coherence tomography over a period of 18 months, is expected to enrol approximately 220 patients. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was initiated in August 2005 and is expected to be completed in March 2008. Previously, results of the PKC-Diabetic Retinopathy Study (PKC-DRS) showed that ruboxistaurin at a dose of 32 mg/day has potential to reduce the risk of moderate vision loss especially in patients with diabetic macular oedema. This phase III, randomised, double-blind, multidose study in 252 patients with type 1 and
type 2 diabetes
receiving ruboxistaurin or placebo for 3-4 years evaluated the safety of the agent and its effect on progression of diabetic retinopathy, moderate vision loss and sustained moderate vision loss. The study was conducted at Joslin Diabetes Center and at centres in the US, Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands and the UK. In 2004, Eli Lilly presented new analysis of previously reported data for ruboxistaurin in diabetic macular oedema indicating that ruboxistaurin has the potential to decrease the progression of diabetic macular oedema involving the center of the macula. Positive results from the PKC Beta Inhibitor Diabetic
Macular Edema
(PKC-DMES) trial were reported in 2003. Eli Lilly expected to file for approval of ruboxistaurin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the US and Europe in 2005. However, no development was reported for this indication. On 15 March 2007, Eli Lilly withdrew its marketing authorisation application for ruboxistaurin for diabetic retinopathy filed with EMEA in May 2006. Its current development status in the EU is unclear at this stage.
...
PMID:Ruboxistaurin: LY 333531. 1747 15
Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy, characterized by cotton wool spots, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and/or
macular edema
, can occur following improvement of glycemic control. In four randomized 28- to 52-week clinical trials comparing insulin glargine and NPH insulin in regard to glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia, ophthalmologic examinations and fundus photographs were included to assess frequency of early worsening of retinopathy or other early adverse ocular effects. Retinopathy progression rates at 28 weeks were 7-12% by clinical examination and 3-8% by photographic grading; corresponding rates of clinically significant
macular edema
(CSME) were 1-8% and 1-4%, respectively. Optic disc swelling was not observed clinically or in photographs. Two of the 24 possible comparisons (four trials, three outcomes, two assessment methods), both of which were photographic assessments in
type 2 diabetes
, were in/near the nominally significant range and favored NPH insulin: 28-week rates of >or=3-step retinopathy progression (insulin glargine: 16/213, 7.5%; NPH insulin: 6/220, 2.7%; p=0.028) and 52-week CSME rates (26/233, 11.2% and 14/214, 6.5%, respectively; p=0.098). Because the between-treatment differences were small and inconsistent across trials and assessment methods, and because overall rates were consistent with the natural course of diabetic retinopathy, we conclude that it is unlikely that insulin glargine carries a higher risk of early worsening or other early adverse effect than NPH insulin. These trials tended to exclude a large early adverse effect, such as optic disc swelling, but cannot assess longer-term effects; a 5-year randomized trial of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin has been initiated. Data from this manuscript have been presented as posters and published in abstract form at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes 2001 ( DIABETOLOGIA 44(Suppl 1):I-IV(A287), 2001) and the Latin American Diabetes Association 2001 (11-15 November 2001, Punta del Este, Uruguay; Poster 180) congresses.
...
PMID:Early retinopathy progression in four randomized trials comparing insulin glargine and NPH [corrected] insulin. 1747 40
A 27-bp variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) in intron 4 of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene has been associated with the risk for developing diabetic retinopathy (DR) in various ethnic populations. Hundred and eighty seven patients with retinopathy (cases; DR+) and 188 patients without retinopathy (controls: DR-) from southern India who had
type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2DM) for more than 10 years, were included in the study. We could neither find significant allelic association with clinical severity of DR nor with
macular edema
. Our results suggest lack of association of intron 4 VNTR of eNOS gene with DR in southern India.
...
PMID:Intron 4 VNTR of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 patients in southern India. 1755 49
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next >>