Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In normal subjects, approximately half of the daily insulin requirement constitutes basal insulin. We investigated whether increasing the dose of insulin glargine up to half of the total insulin requirement could lead to better glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients who were treated on basal-prandial insulin therapy. A total of 62 patients with type 2 diabetes on mealtime rapid-acting insulin analogue and bedtime NPH were randomized to either continuation of bedtime NPH (n=31) or morning glargine (n=31) for 6 months while continuing the aspart/lispro at each meal. The two groups were matched for age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, HbA(1C), endogenous insulin secretion, and proportion of numbers using aspart/lispro and using oral hypoglycemic agents. The dose of insulin glargine was increased by 2-4 units to meet the target fasting blood glucose, whereas the dose of NPH was principally unchanged as a control group. Mean HbA(1C) at baseline was similar between patients with glargine and NPH (7.2% versus 6.9%). The percentage of glargine dose increased significantly (31% at baseline to 48% at 6 months) without any significant changes in total insulin dose. Mean HbA(1C) at 3 months was 6.6% with glargine and 7.0% with NPH (P<0.0001, adjusted mean change between-treatment difference 0.6% [95% CI 0.3-0.9]), and the values at 6 months were 6.6% and 6.9%, respectively (P=0.007). Frequency of hypoglycemia did not differ between the groups. Increasing the dose of glargine without changing the total daily insulin dose resulted in significantly better glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients on basal-prandial insulin therapy. Conversion from bedtime NPH to morning glargine appears efficacious with no increase in frequency of hypoglycemia.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of conversion from bedtime NPH insulin to morning insulin glargine in type 2 diabetic patients on basal-prandial insulin therapy. 1651 2

Our experience over many years from 2 diabetes clinics with large patient populations indicated that, apparently, excessive doses of intermediate-acting insulin preparations (150-300 U of NPH insulin), alone or in combination with rapid-acting insulin, generally did not result in acceptable control of fasting blood glucose. We hypothesized that insulin resistance at the tissue level and the known variability of insulin absorption were not satisfactory explanations. To deal with the ambiguities of available data on insulin absorption, we elected to measure insulin bioavailability via a different approach. Thirteen publications provided plasma insulin concentrations after the subcutaneous administration of defined doses of insulin. These data were then analyzed by noncompartmental analysis and by standard pharmacokinetic methods. Analyses required only knowledge of the areas under the plasma insulin curve and the metabolic clearance rate of insulin. Both of these are parameters measurable with considerable accuracy. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of published insulin absorption curves for insulin administered subcutaneously revealed mean absorption levels for regular and lispro insulin of 70 to 80%, 30% or less for NPH insulin, and 30 to 40% for lente insulin. In conclusion, poor absorption of intermediate-acting insulin preparations, or combinations of intermediate- and rapid-acting insulin preparations, explains the difficulty in lowering blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have had long-standing disease, are insulin resistant, and have a flat insulin response to a glucose load.
 ...
PMID:Insulin absorption: a major factor in apparent insulin resistance and the control of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1663 37

To evaluate the superiority of insulin glargine as basal insulin replacement by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). Twenty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) whose blood glucose was not well controlled with sulphanylureas were enrolled. At first, they were treated with extended-release glipizide (glucotrol XL) 5mg/d before breakfast for 2 weeks, then randomized to combination treatment with glargine (16 patients) or NPH (8 patients) and treated for 12 weeks. CGMS were carried in the second week after treatment with glucotrol XL, and in the 12th week after combination treatment. The data of CGMS showed: (1) When FPG were well controlled in both groups (glargine group versus NPH group: 6.0+/-1.0 mmol/L versus 5.8+/-1.3 mmol/L), the blood glucose level at 3:00 a.m. (5.1+/-0.9 mmol/L versus 4.2+/-0.8 mmol/L) were higher (P<0.05), TPG< or =3.0 mmol/L at night were lower (2.56+/-1.79 versus 5.88+/-1.96), and the rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia (1/16 versus 4/8) were less (P=0.028) in glargine group than those in NPH group. (2) CGMS showed that the daily blood glucose profile excursion were more smoother in glargine group than those in NPH group. In conclusion, it was confirmed with CGMS that compared with traditionally basal insulin replacement with NPH, the combination treatment with glargine injection at bedtime may be predominant for stabilizing the daily blood glucose profile excursion and decreasing the nocturnal hypoglycemia events incidence. So glargine may be a more ideal basal insulin replacement than NPH.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of the superiority of insulin glargine as basal insulin replacement by continuous glucose monitoring system. 1697 55

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is usually preceded by impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG), which are often referred to as pre-diabetes. Individuals with IGT demonstrate beta-cell dysfunction, insulin resistance, and increased hepatic glucose production; IGT and IFG are risk factors for both diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Type 2 diabetes is associated with micro- and macrovascular complications that lead to excessive mortality and morbidity and the risk of microvascular complications extends to people with pre-diabetes. Maintaining good glycemic control in type 2 diabetes can reduce the risk of developing chronic disease-associated complications. Most individuals who develop type 2 diabetes appear to pass through a stage of IFG or IGT; thus, early intervention (lifestyle and/or pharmacologic) in individuals with pre-diabetes may help prevent cardiovascular disease and the development of type 2 diabetes.The use of exogenous insulin treatment offers the potential to reduce the cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes through effective reductions in blood glucose and lipid levels, and in the associated tissue damage resulting from their chronic elevations. However, there are barriers associated with insulin initiation in both type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes (e.g. hypoglycemia, weight gain, the possible unpredictable action of long-acting insulin, and the need for injections). Insulin glargine, with its flat time-action profile, near 24-hour duration of action, reduced risk of hypoglycemia, and improved glycemic control compared with insulin suspension isophane (neutral protamine hagedorn [NPH] insulin), may help to overcome some of these barriers.Initial results from a small study have indicated the feasibility of treating individuals with pre-diabetes to near-normoglycemia using a regimen of low-dose insulin glargine plus caloric restriction. This is being followed up in the ongoing ORIGIN (Outcomes Reduction with Initial Glargine INtervention) study, which will investigate whether treatment to near-normoglycemia with insulin glargine in individuals with IGT, IFG, or new-onset type 2 diabetes can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with conventional management of these conditions, and whether the rate of progression to type 2 diabetes can be similarly reduced.Further studies are needed to investigate the potential benefits of insulin therapy in individuals with pre-diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Is there a rationale for insulin therapy in pre-diabetic individuals? 1710 24

A recent meta-analysis evaluated trials of the rapid-acting analogues insulin lispro and insulin aspart, performed before the introduction of the basal analogues, insulin glargine and insulin detemir. This article reviews the effect of rapid-acting and basal insulin analogues separately and in combination, relative to human insulin. Outcomes evaluated include HbA(1c), hypoglycaemia, postprandial glucose (PPG), and weight changes. Results from trials that matched defined criteria are presented in tables. In type 1 diabetes, compared with human insulin, the rapid-acting analogues generally reduced hypoglycaemia and postprandial glucose, whereas the basal analogues tended to reduce hypoglycaemia -- particularly nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Weight gain may also be reduced with basal analogues, compared with human basal insulin. In type 2 diabetes, premix rapid-acting analogues controlled postprandial glucose better than human insulin mixes; basal analogues used as basal-only therapy reduced hypoglycaemia compared with NPH insulin; and some advantages were apparent with analogues in basal-bolus therapy. Whilst the benefits on individual metabolic and clinical outcomes appear modest, almost all studies report some advantage when using insulin analogues in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Significant benefits, including PPG lowering with the rapid-acting analogues and the potential for reduction in cardiovascular risk, should be investigated further.
 ...
PMID:A review of human and analogue insulin trials. 1711 21

Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy, characterized by cotton wool spots, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and/or macular edema, can occur following improvement of glycemic control. In four randomized 28- to 52-week clinical trials comparing insulin glargine and NPH insulin in regard to glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia, ophthalmologic examinations and fundus photographs were included to assess frequency of early worsening of retinopathy or other early adverse ocular effects. Retinopathy progression rates at 28 weeks were 7-12% by clinical examination and 3-8% by photographic grading; corresponding rates of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) were 1-8% and 1-4%, respectively. Optic disc swelling was not observed clinically or in photographs. Two of the 24 possible comparisons (four trials, three outcomes, two assessment methods), both of which were photographic assessments in type 2 diabetes, were in/near the nominally significant range and favored NPH insulin: 28-week rates of >or=3-step retinopathy progression (insulin glargine: 16/213, 7.5%; NPH insulin: 6/220, 2.7%; p=0.028) and 52-week CSME rates (26/233, 11.2% and 14/214, 6.5%, respectively; p=0.098). Because the between-treatment differences were small and inconsistent across trials and assessment methods, and because overall rates were consistent with the natural course of diabetic retinopathy, we conclude that it is unlikely that insulin glargine carries a higher risk of early worsening or other early adverse effect than NPH insulin. These trials tended to exclude a large early adverse effect, such as optic disc swelling, but cannot assess longer-term effects; a 5-year randomized trial of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin has been initiated. Data from this manuscript have been presented as posters and published in abstract form at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes 2001 ( DIABETOLOGIA 44(Suppl 1):I-IV(A287), 2001) and the Latin American Diabetes Association 2001 (11-15 November 2001, Punta del Este, Uruguay; Poster 180) congresses.
 ...
PMID:Early retinopathy progression in four randomized trials comparing insulin glargine and NPH [corrected] insulin. 1747 40

Maternally inherited diabetes with deafness (MIDD) is a rare, monogenic form of diabetes mellitus caused by mutations in the mitochondrial genome, the most frequent being the A3243G substitution of the tRNA(Leu) gene. We screened 520 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 45 probands from families with a clinical picture of maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) using restriction fragment length polymorphism. One carrier of the mutation being investigated was found in a proband from a MODY family. The patient was a 20 year-old woman, diagnosed at the age of 16 years as having type 1 diabetes mellitus. On entry to the study, she was treated by a multiple daily injection regimen (MDI) with regular human insulin and human NPH insulin. Typical extra-pancreatic symptoms of MIDD were present, such as macular pattern dystrophy and mild bilateral sensory hearing loss. Additionally, the patient presented abdominal obesity (BMI 32.0), an uncommon feature in monogenic insulin secretion defects, including MIDD. To facilitate weight loss, the diabetes treatment was modified. Since metformin treatment is considered to be contraindicated in MIDD because of the increased risk of lactic acidosis, we used insulin analogues (aspart and detemir) in an MDI regimen and hypocaloric diet. This resulted in a 6.3 kg weight reduction (BMI 27.4) and normalization of HbA1c level (from 7.2 to 6.1 %) during a three-month follow-up. On the basis of this case, we suggest that an MDI regimen with insulin analogues may be a preferred therapeutic option in some rare clinical situations, such as MIDD associated with obesity.
 ...
PMID:Maternally inherited diabetes with deafness and obesity: body weight reduction response to treatment with insulin analogues. 1748 45

To evaluate glycemic control using convenience-oriented biphasic insulin analog compared with intensified insulin therapy, we conducted a 6-month multicentric, open-label, randomized trial in Japanese insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 160 adult patients at 19 centers were randomized into two groups: those who received twice-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and those on three-times-daily injections of insulin aspart with or without NPH insulin (multiple daily injections). At 6 months, mean HbA(1c) decreased by approximately 2.5% in both groups. Reduction of HbA(1c) on both regimens was better in patients whose prior therapy before starting the study was only diet and exercise (-5.0%) than in patients who were previously taking oral antidiabetic agents (-1.0%). No incidence of major hypoglycemia was observed in either regimen. These results suggest that convenience-oriented insulin therapy using biphasic insulin analog is as useful as intensified insulin therapy with insulin analog for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus over 6 months. Furthermore, early induction of insulin therapy in individuals hitherto using only diet and exercise may provide good glycemic control. This study suggests that convenience-oriented biphasic insulin aspart 30 might be a useful option for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially for insulin-naive patients over 6 months, although it should be changed to another regimen when expected efficacy is not obtained.
 ...
PMID:Six-month multicentric, open-label, randomized trial of twice-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus multiple daily injections of insulin aspart in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients (JDDM 11). 1791 62

Approximately 25% of patients in nursing homes have diabetes, and it is the primary reason for 12% of nursing home admissions among residents 45 to 75 years of age. Glycemic control is important to reduce the risk of diabetic complications in this patient population. Management of diabetes in the long-term care setting is complicated, because many residents already have diabetic complications and other comorbidities. Data from several studies suggest that a significant number of nursing home residents receive suboptimal diabetes care. This review is intended to provide guidance for optimizing glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in long-term care facilities. Oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) represent first-line pharmacotherapy for diabetes. However, because of the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes, most patients will eventually require insulin. Adding a basal insulin analog, such as insulin glargine or insulin detemir, to an OAD is a simple, safe, and effective strategy for introducing insulin therapy. These long-acting insulin analogs provide effective glycemic control with a lower risk of hypoglycemia, a particular concern in the elderly, compared with NPH insulin. In patients whose insulin requirements have increased as a result of increases in post-prandial glucose excursions, prandial insulin should be added following a stepwise approach to therapy. Overall patient care and optimizing treatment of type 2 diabetes and its associated complications are vital services provided by the nursing staff at long-term care facilities.
 ...
PMID:Optimizing insulin use in type 2 diabetes: role of basal and prandial insulin in long-term care facilities. 1793 73

To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine as intensive replacement of basal insulin in Japanese patients with type 1 (n = 72) and type 2 (n = 46) diabetes, we switched their intensive insulin regimen from NPH plus regular or rapid-acting insulin to glargine plus bolus insulin, which included regular and rapid-acting insulin, and recorded changes in glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia for 18 months. The dose titration of basal and bolus insulin was based on home self-monitored blood glucose measurements and monthly HbA(1C). Mean HbA(1C) level was improved significantly at 3 months after switching to glargine plus bolus insulin regimen and these effects continued for 18 months in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients (HbA(1C) level: type 1: baseline 8.9 +/- 2.6%, 18 months 7.8 +/- 1.5% (p<0.05), type 2: baseline 8.2 +/- 2.6%, 18 months 7.7 +/- 1.5%. Body weight was slightly but significantly increased at 18 months only in type 2 diabetes. Total daily bolus insulin doses were not changed but basal insulin could be increased significantly after switching regimens in both types diabetes compared with baseline. The frequency of mild to moderate hypoglycemia (self-assisted episodes, blood glucose <70 mg/dl) was marginally lower with glargine but not significantly. Self-monitored fasting blood glucose level was significantly improved after switching in type 2 diabetes. Patients with the worst HbA(1C) level at baseline exhibited more than 10% improvement in HbA(1C) level after switching both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The HbA(1C) levels of the effectively treated patients were comparable to those of ineffectively treated ones at 6 months and the same improvement was seen at 18 months. Our results suggested that insulin glargine is more effective than NPH insulin as intensive replacement of basal insulin, particularly in those Japanese patients with difficult glycemic control with NPH insulin, equally in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Long-term efficacy of insulin glargine after switching from NPH insulin as intensive replacement of basal insulin in Japanese diabetes mellitus. Comparison of efficacy between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (JUN-LAN Study 1.2). 1800 Mar 43


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>