Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011860 (type 2 diabetes)
 57,723 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal failure in Western countries and carries an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality. Studies have identified a number of factors that play a part in the development of DN. Among them, hypertension and proteinuria are the most important. In the early stages of DN, when albumin is present in the urine in very low quantities (microalbuminuria) and an increase is seen in BP, there is no loss of filtrate and patients respond well to prophylactic measures. Microalbuminuria is considered an early marker of DN. Prevention of the onset of microalbuminuria, therefore, could be considered as the primary means of preventing DN. The Bergamo Nephrologic Diabetes Complication Trial (BENEDICT) was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study that was organized in two phases. Phase A included 1204 patients and was aimed at assessing the efficacy of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor trandolapril, the non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker verapamil, and the trandolapril plus verapamil combination as compared with placebo in prevention of microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and normal urinary albumin excretion rate. Phase B was aimed at assessing the efficacy of the combination as compared with trandolapril alone in prevention of macroalbuminuria in patients with microalbuminuria. The BENEDICT Phase A study showed that DN can be prevented by ACE inhibitor therapy. The beneficial effect of ACE inhibition is not enhanced by combined non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker therapy. The apparent advantage of ACE inhibitors over other agents includes a protective effect on the kidney against the development of microalbuminuria, which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events and death in this population.
 ...
PMID:Prevention and treatment of diabetic renal disease in type 2 diabetes: the BENEDICT study. 1656 56

Hypertension is defined by the Joint National Committee (JNC 7) as blood pressure (BP) > or =Y130/80 mmHg. It affects up to 70% of patients with type 2 diabetes and is twice as prevalent in diabetics as in non-diabetics. Due to its contribution to renal and cardiovascular disease, hypertension increases diabetic mortality four to five-fold. Therefore, a BP goal of 130/80 mmHg or less (125/75 mmHg in patients with proteinuria >1 g/die and increased creatinemia), is recommended. For isolated systolic hypertension, defined as a systolic BP > or =Y180 mmHg with normal diastolic BP, the treatment goal is to reduce systolic BP to <160 mmHg. The evidence from most trials suggests that there are only minimal differences between the various antihypertensive drugs, and that almost all agents are capable of successfully reducing adverse clinical events. Nevertheless, there is evidence that certain drugs are more useful in preventing damage to a specific organ system; and therefore, the selection of the therapy should be guided by the presence of concomitant disease and the protection of the organ system that is most at risk. Beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers are effective antianginals; diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers are useful for heart failure; ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are especially effective in preserving renal function. Adequate BP control, irrespective of the type of antihypertensive drugs used, should replace the academic debate on what is the best antihypertensive agent.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive drugs in diabetic's hypertension]. 1663 91

Hypertension is a cardiovascular risk factor commonly associated with insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent in vitro data indicate that certain angiotensin receptor antagonists, for example, telmisartan, activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) and increase adiponectin protein content in adipocytes. By this means, they may improve insulin sensitivity in vivo. To investigate the effect of antihypertensive treatment on insulin sensitivity and fasting adiponectin serum levels, 37 nondiabetic patients with essential hypertension were randomized to receive telmisartan, the calcium channel blocker nisoldipine, or their combination for 6 weeks in a prospective, parallel group study. Fasting serum glucose, insulin, and adiponectin were evaluated before, 3 weeks (low dose), and 6 weeks (high dose) after initiation of treatment. Furthermore, the effect of telmisartan on PPAR-gamma receptor activity was investigated in vitro using a PPAR-gamma reporter gene assay. As reported previously, telmisartan significantly enhanced PPAR-gamma receptor activity in vitro. At baseline, a positive correlation between insulin serum levels and body mass index of investigated subjects was observed, whereas body mass index and serum adiponectin levels were negatively associated. High-dose treatment with telmisartan but not with nisoldipine reduced serum insulin levels as well as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, but did not affect serum adiponectin levels. In conclusion, in our study cohort of nondiabetic patients with essential hypertension, telmisartan improved insulin sensitivity by mechanisms apparently not involving adiponectin induction. Future studies will demonstrate whether these telmisartan-induced effects may contribute to a blood pressure-independent reduction in cardiovascular morbidity.
 ...
PMID:Telmisartan improves insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic patients with essential hypertension. 1691 33

For assessment of the independent renoprotective effect of BP control and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) therapy, the relationships of baseline BP, BP reduction, and follow-up BP with the incidence of persistent microalbuminuria were evaluated in 1204 hypertensive patients who had type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria and were included in the BErgamo Nephrologic Diabetic Complications Trial (BENEDICT) study and were randomly assigned to 3.6 yr of treatment with the ACEi trandolapril (2 mg/d), the nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (ndCCB) verapamil SR (240 mg/d), their fixed combination Veratran (trandolapril 2 mg/d plus verapamil SR 180 mg/d), or placebo, plus other antihypertensive medications targeted at systolic/diastolic BP <130/80 mmHg. Follow-up (from month 3 to study end) systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse BP and their reductions versus baseline--but not baseline BP--independently predicted (P < 0.001) the risk for microalbuminuria. In patients with follow-up BP above medians, ACEi significantly reduced the risk for microalbuminuria to levels that were observed among patients with BP below medians, regardless of ACEi treatment. The same trend was observed among patients with BP reductions below medians. ndCCB therapy did not independently affect microalbuminuria. Patients who were on Veratran had lower BP and less frequently received diuretics, beta blockers, or dihydropyridine dCCB. In hypertensive, normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes, BP reduction and ACEi therapy both independently may prevent microalbuminuria. ACEi therapy is particularly effective when BP is poorly controlled, whereas ndCCB therapy is ineffective at any level of achieved BP. As compared with trandolapril, Veratran may help with achievement of target BP with less need for concomitant antihypertensive medications.
 ...
PMID:Impact of blood pressure control and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy on new-onset microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the BENEDICT trial. 1710 13

Diabetes and hypertension frequently coexist, and their combination provides additive increases in the risk of life-threatening cardiovascular events. Recent guidelines agree (JN-VII) on the need for early, aggressive reduction of blood pressure, with a goal of < 130/80 mmHg, in patients with diabetes. The mechanism responsible for the increased sensitivity of diabetics to hypertension is not known, but may involve attenuated nocturnal decrease (non-dipping) of blood pressure. Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes provides dramatic cardiovascular benefit. Aggressive blood pressure control may be the most important factor in preventing adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Target diastolic blood pressures of less than 80 mm Hg and systolic targets less than 135 mm Hg appear optimal. All classes of antihypertensive agents are effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with diabetes, and all show evidence of a concomitant reduction in cardiovascular risk. Although there is evidence that agents that interrupt the renin-angiotensin system system may be superior in both the nephroprotection and cardioprotection, however the data are not totally conclusive. However, most diabetics and especially diabetic patients with nephropathy will require combination therapy ("antihypertensive cocktail") to reach goal blood pressure. Hypertensive patients have a significantly increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes, and antihypertensive drugs can also significantly influence the risk for that. While diuretics and ss-blockers have a prodiabetic effect, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers may prevent diabetes more effectively than the metabolically neutral calcium channel blockers.
 ...
PMID:[Success of blood pressure reduction in diabetic patients]. 1713 80

Type 2 diabetes has long been known to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Patients with type 2 diabetes have also been shown to benefit more from antihypertensive therapy than do non-diabetics with hypertension. The benefits of aggressive antihypertensive therapy are reflected in the recent reduction of blood pressure (BP) targets in international guidelines. Drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) have well-documented efficacy, and results from large-scale trials with highly selective angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blockers (ARBs), such as valsartan, are awaited. The VALUE trial will provide the largest body of information yet on the comparative benefits of using an ARB or calcium channel blocker in hypertensive patients with diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Cardiac, renal and vascular complications in the diabetic patient. 1719 15

The ABCD (Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes) and ABCD-2V (Part 2 with Valsartan) are prospective, randomised clinical trials which will provide important data on the impact of intensive vs. moderate blood pressure (BP) control on microvascular and macrovascular complications in normotensive and hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The ABCD trial was a five-year study that compared the effects of intensive vs. moderate BP control on the endpoints of nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease events using a calcium channel blocker (CCB) and an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor as the primary antihypertensive agents. The recently published results of the hypertensive cohort of ABCD are reviewed herein. The follow-up study, ABCD-2V, is ongoing and was designed to compare intensive vs. moderate BP control on the same endpoints as the ABCD study, using the highly selective angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan as the primary antihypertensive agent. First results of ABCD-2V are expected in 2004. The baseline characteristics for the patients enrolled thus far in the hypertensive cohort of ABCD-2V are reviewed. These studies will provide insight into the role of intensive vs. moderate BP control in the management of normotensive and hypertensive patients with type 2 DM.
 ...
PMID:Improving the prognosis of diabetic patients: evaluating the role of intensive versus moderate blood pressure control with selective angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy. 1719 16

Metabolic syndrome is a constellation of interrelated abnormalities that increase the risk for the development of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Together with obesity and dyslipidaemia, hypertension is one of the basic elements of the metabolic syndrome. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendation for pharmacological management of the hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. Recent trials have consistently shown that therapy involving beta-blockers and diuretics may have some negative impact on metabolic and haemodynamic disorders present in metabolic syndrome. Several lines of evidence support the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers as the appropriate first-line therapy and calcium channel blockers, as the second, in the patients with metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:[Metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension]. 1721 93

Arterial hypertension is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and both of these diseases are the major risk factors for cardiovascular complications. During the past few years, a number of large randomized clinical trials examined the frequency of new onset diabetes mellitus during administration of antihypertensive drugs. Application of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers reduces the risk for the onset of diabetes mellitus by 20-27%, and calcium channel blockers by 16%. Despite some uncertainties, novel studies have demonstrated an increased risk for cardiovascular complications related to new onset diabetes mellitus. The duration of patient monitoring is also an important factor, as the onset of diabetes-related complications is closely associated with the duration of this disease. Considering all above, the aim of preventing the onset of diabetes is to recognize patients with an increased risk. The risk factors include basal glycemia, positive family history for diabetes mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and some ethnic groups (South Asia, the Caribbeans). Therefore, increased-risk patients should be subjected to therapy with ACE inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, or calcium channel blocker as the first drug of choice. For these patients, application of thiazides and beta blockers or the combination of these two drugs is not advantageous. However, such a view poses a dilemma whether thiazide diuretics should be the first choice in the treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive agents and the risk of new onset diabetes mellitus]. 1721 94

Liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of death from cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. We propose the following strategy of risk-reduction, based on currently available literature. Lifestyle: standard advice should be given (avoidance of smoking, excess alcohol and obesity, adequate exercise, reduction of excess sodium intake). Hypertension: target blood pressure should be 140/90 mmHg or lower, but for those with diabetes or renal disease, 130/80 mmHg or lower. For patients without proteinuria, antihypertensive therapy should be initiated with a calcium channel blocker and for those with proteinuria, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. If monotherapy fails to achieve adequate response, calcium channel blockers and ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be combined. If hypertension remains uncontrolled, an alpha-blocker may be added. Consideration should be given to changing immunosuppression and avoiding use of calcineurin inhibitors. Diabetes: recipients should be regularly screened for diabetes. For patients with new-onset diabetes after transplant, stepwise therapy should be guided by HbA1c concentrations, as with type II diabetes mellitus. Hyperlipidemia: annual screening of lipid profile should be undertaken, with treatment thresholds and targets based on those advocated for the high risk general population. Dietary intervention is appropriate for all patients. A statin should be considered as the first line treatment to achieve specified targets. In patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor, Pravastatin should be commenced at a dose of 10 mg/day. In patients receiving other forms of immunosuppression, pravastatin may be commenced at a dose of 20 mg/day. Liver tests should be monitored and patients warned to report myalgia. If monotherapy is inadequate, ezetimibe or a fibrate may be added. Consideration may be given to change in immunosuppression if combination lipid-lowering therapy proves inadequate.
 ...
PMID:Reducing the risks of cardiovascular disease in liver allograft recipients. 1749 26


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>