Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011854 (type 1 diabetes)
 20,749 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Treatment with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin predisposes individuals with diabetes to anaphylactoid reactions when given bolus protamine for heparin reversal during cardiovascular procedures. To prospectively examine production of protamine antibodies, 30 patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes were followed for 12 months from initiation of therapy with porcine NPH or Lente insulin. Twenty-one subjects were randomly assigned to NPH (protamine containing) and nine controls to Lente (protamine free) insulin. Protamine specific IgG antibody was produced by 6/21 (29%) of NPH-treated subjects and 0/9 controls. Among NPH treated subjects, there was no difference between protamine antibody producers and non-producers with regard to age, race, weight, or pre-treatment glycosylated hemoglobin. Both producer and non-producer groups received similar amounts of insulin and protamine and achieved similar glycemic control. Insulin antibodies were made by 4/6 (67%) of protamine antibody producers and by 6/15 (40%) of non-producers (NS). The authors conclude that one of three new diabetics who are treated with porcine NPH insulin will make IgG protamine antibodies. These antibodies do not affect insulin requirements, glycemic control, or insulin antibody production. Because of the frequency of protamine antibody production and the risk of anaphylaxis to bolus protamine administration in NPH treated diabetics, the authors suggest that NPH insulin-treated individuals should avoid heparin reversal by protamine.
 ...
PMID:Protamine antibody production in diabetic subjects treated with NPH insulin. 233 21

Insulin glargine is an extended-action biosynthetic human insulin. It precipitates in the neutral environment of subcutaneous tissue and is thus gradually absorbed into the bloodstream. The addition of small amounts of zinc to the formulation further delays absorption. In small euglycaemic clamp studies, the onset of action of insulin glargine was shown to be later, the duration of action longer and the time-action profile flatter than that of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers. Four large clinical trials of up to 28 weeks' duration have shown that a single bedtime dose of insulin glargine, in combination with preprandial short-acting insulin, is as effective or more effective than once or twice daily NPH plus short-acting insulin in improving glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In 3 large comparative trials, insulin glargine decreased glycosylated haemoglobin and/or fasting blood glucose levels to a similar extent to that seen with NPH insulin in patients with insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus, either as monotherapy or in combination with oral hypoglycaemic agents. Insulin glargine appears to be well tolerated. A lower incidence of hypoglycaemia, especially at night, was reported in most trials with insulin glargine when compared with NPH insulin.
 ...
PMID:Insulin glargine. 1073 May 48

The aim of the study was to examine the effects of intensive insulin therapy using lispro on metabolic control, immunogenicity and beta-cell function of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects in comparison with intensive insulin therapy using regular insulin. An open study was conducted in 45 newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects. Patients were randomly assigned to intensive insulin therapy using insulin lispro (lispro) (lispro, n=22; 22.8 years) or intensive insulin therapy using regular insulin (regular) (regular, n=23; 24.4 years): three to five injections of subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin before meals and Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) before dinner/bed-time. GAD, IA2, insulin antibodies, basal and stimulated plasma C-peptide and HbA(1c) were measured initially and at months 1, 4, 8 and 12. Daily blood glucose profiles tended to be lower in the lispro group, particularly values after breakfast, without reaching statistical significance. There were no differences in terms of HbA(1c) throughout the study. The proportion of subjects achieving an HbA(1c)<6% at the end of the study was similar in both groups (regular 73.9%, lispro 68.0%). The number of mild hypoglycemic episodes tended to be lower with lispro, but not significantly. beta-Cell function was not significantly different in both groups. During follow-up there were no differences in antibodies, including IAAb. In summary, insulin lispro used in intensive insulin therapy is as effective as regular insulin in optimizing metabolic control and preserving beta-cell function at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Insulin lispro is as effective as regular insulin in optimising metabolic control and preserving beta-cell function at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus. 1275 87

Insulin glargine is a recombinant human insulin analog produced by DNA technology using a nonpathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Two modifications of human insulin result in a stable molecule which is soluble in slightly acidic conditions (pH 4.0) and precipitates in the neutral pH of subcutaneous tissue. Because of these properties, absorption of insulin glargine is delayed and the analog provides a fairly constant, basal insulin supply without peaks in plasma insulin levels for approximately 24 hours, similar to that achieved by a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Insulin glargine is indicated as a once daily subcutaneous injection to provide basal glycemic control in adults and children aged >6 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fasting plasma glucose and fasting blood glucose levels generally improved to a greater extent in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin glargine than patients who administered Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. In patients with type 1 or 2 disease, glycosylated hemoglobin levels were slightly reduced and to a similar extent with insulin glargine and NPH insulin. Most clinical trials in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus demonstrated a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycemia, with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. One of the most common adverse events with insulin glargine treatment was injection site pain which, in some studies, occurred more frequently than in patients receiving NPH insulin. In all cases the symptoms were mild and treatment discontinuation was not required. Otherwise, the drug is well tolerated and does not appear to be immunogenic. In conclusion, insulin glargine once a day provides basal control of glycemia for approximately 24 hours without inducing peaks in plasma insulin levels in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. In long-term, well designed trials insulin glargine once daily improved glycemic control at least as effectively as NPH insulin given once or twice daily. The drug was well tolerated and in most studies the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly less in patients treated with insulin glargine compared with patients receiving NPH insulin. Therefore, insulin glargine is likely to be a useful addition to the armamentarium of insulin therapy by establishing basal glycemic control with once daily administration and a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia.
 ...
PMID:Spotlight on insulin glargine in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. 1576 21

Standardized protocols for maintaining near-normal glycemic levels in diabetic rodent models for testing therapeutic agents to treat disease are unavailable. We developed protocols for 2 common models of spontaneous type 1 diabetes, the BioBreeding diabetes-prone (BBDP) rat and nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse. Insulin formulation, dose level, timing of dose administration, and delivery method were examined and adjusted so that glycemic levels remained within a normal range and fluctuation throughout feeding and resting cycles was minimized. Protamine zinc formulations provided the longest activity, regardless of the source of insulin. Glycemic control with few fluctuations was achieved in diabetic BBDP rats through twice-daily administration of protamine zinc insulin, and results were similar regardless of whether BBDP rats were acutely or chronically diabetic at initiation of treatment. In contrast, glycemic control could not be attained in NOD mice through administration of insulin twice daily. However, glycemic control was achieved in mice through daily administration of 0.25 U insulin through osmotic pumps. Whereas twice-daily injections of protamine zinc insulin provided glycemic control with only minor fluctuations in BBDP rats, mice required continuous delivery of insulin to prevent wide glycemic excursions. Use of these standard protocols likely will aid in the testing of agents to prevent or reverse diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Development of standardized insulin treatment protocols for spontaneous rodent models of type 1 diabetes. 2311 41

Insulin is a lifesaving drug in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Many type 2 diabetes mellitus patients will eventually require insulin. The rapid-acting and long-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs and LAIAs) have a pharmacological profile that closely mimic normal human physiology when compared to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and regular human insulin, respectively. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were found to have a proven cardiovascular safety. They are preferred over insulin in many recent guidelines. Fixed-ratio combinations of GLP-1RAs and insulin are also recommended, when either of these molecules fail to achieve glycaemic control. Despite decades of experience in using insulin, there is a debate among scientific community over the safety of exogenous insulin, especially regarding their cardiovascular safety and the risk of cancer. There is also an ongoing debate regarding the safety, even after the two long-acting insulin analogues (glargine and degludec) have proven their cardiovascular non-inferiority. Drugs with proven safety are often preferred in patient with pre-existing cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease. In this review we will critically analyse these efficacy and safety issues related to insulin molecules to help in clinical decision making.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of Insulins. 3315 25