Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0011854 (
type 1 diabetes
)
20,749
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The aim of these studies was to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses, as well as cognitive function during hypoglycaemia induced by s.c. injection of 0.15 IU/kg of regular human insulin (HI) and the monomeric insulin analogue [Lys(
B28
),Pro (B29)] (MI) in insulin-dependent-diabetic (
IDDM
) subjects. In these studies glucose was infused whenever needed to prevent decreases in plasma glucose below 3 mmol/l. After MI, plasma insulin increased earlier to a peak (60 vs 90 min) which was greater than after HI (294 +/- 24 vs 255 +/- 24 pmol/l), and plasma glucose decreased earlier to a 3 mmol/l plateau (60 vs 120 min) (p < 0.05). The amount of glucose infused to prevent plasma glucose falling below 3 mmol/l was approximately three times greater after MI than HI (293 +/- 26 vs 90 +/- 25 mumol.kg-1 x 60-375 min-1, p < 0.05). After MI, hepatic glucose production was more suppressed (0.7 +/- 1 vs 5.9 +/- 0.54 mumol.kg-1.min-1) and glucose utilization was less suppressed than after HI (11.6 +/- 0.65 vs 9.1 +/- 0.11 mumol.kg-1.min-1) (p < 0.05). Similarly, plasma NEFA, glycerol, and beta-OH-butyrate were more suppressed after MI than HI (p < 0.05), whereas plasma lactate increased only after MI, but not after HI. Responses of counterregulatory hormones, symptoms and deterioration in cognitive function during plasma glucose plateau of 3 mmol/l were superimposable after MI and HI (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and glucose counterregulation following subcutaneous injection of the monomeric insulin analogue [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] in IDDM. 795 44
Insulin lispro [Lys (
B28
), Pro (B29) human insulin] is a rapidly absorbed analog that has diminished tendency to self-associate. In four open-label, 1-year-long international randomized trials, we contrasted the immunogenicity of insulin lispro versus regular human insulin (RHI) in patients previously treated with insulin who had
IDDM
or NIDDM. Using a self-blank subtraction assay, we assessed sera for the presence of insulin-specific antibodies (ISA), insulin lispro-specific antibodies (LSA), and cross-reactive antibodies (CRA). Basal insulin needs were provided either with human ultralente (UL) or NPH insulins. After 2 to 4 weeks of therapy with RHI plus UL or RHI plus NPH, 50% of patients were randomly assigned to begin insulin lispro or continue on RHI. At baseline, few pretreated patients had LSA (0-4%) and approximately 10% had ISA, whereas 41-45% of patients with
IDDM
and 23-27% of patients with NIDDM had CRA (
IDDM
vs. NIDDM, P < 0.001). Within studies, no significant differences were noted over time in ISA, LSA, or CRA attributable to the type of short-acting insulin. When data were pooled, inconsistent changes were noted in ISA and LSA (LSA were greater in NIDDM vs.
IDDM
at baseline, P = 0.001, and ISA were greater in
IDDM
vs. NIDDM at 6 months, P = 0.007). Significant levels of CRA were more common in
IDDM
at all times (P < 0.001, P = 0.022, and P = 0.002 at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively). For patients receiving insulin lispro, no significant changes occurred in antibody status among
IDDM
and NIDDM patients throughout the study (became positive, remained positive, became negative, or remained negative).
IDDM
patients were more likely to develop or maintain CRA levels (P = 0.008 vs. NIDDM), whereas antibody levels were comparable among positive individuals. No evidence was noted that insulin lispro differs in immunogenicity from RHI in previously treated
IDDM
and NIDDM patients.
...
PMID:Immunologic effects of insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] in IDDM and NIDDM patients previously treated with insulin. 892 61
Besides dietary approaches, various pharmacological means have been recently developed in order to better control postprandial hyperglycaemia. This objective may be obtained: 1) by slowing down the intestinal absorption of carbohydrates; 2) by insuring a better insulin priming soon after the meal; and 3) by inhibiting post-prandial glucagon secretion or action. Some hormones (amylin, glucagon-like peptide-1) can slow gastric emptying while alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose, miglitol) retard intestinal digestion and resorption of complex carbohydrates. A more physiological post-meal profile of insulin may be obtained in type 2 diabetes by using new insulin secretagogues of the glinide family (repaglinide, nateglinide) with an earlier and shorter insulinotropic action or, mainly in
type 1 diabetes
but also in type 2 diabetes, by using short-acting insulin analogues (lispro. Asp
B28
) or inhated insulin the action of which is faster than that of subcutaneous insulin. Post-prandial glucagon secretion can be inhibited by amylin. GLP-1 or insulin while other glucagon antagonists are currently in development.
...
PMID:[Postprandial hyperglycemia. II. Pharmacological approaches]. 1207 90