Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011854 (type 1 diabetes)
 20,749 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The renal protective effect of antihypertensive drugs is linked to 2 mechanisms. First, reduction in blood pressure (BP) is a fundamental prerequisite common to all antihypertensive drugs. The exact definition of the level to which BP should be reduced remains to be established, although there is some evidence that BP should be reduced below 130/85 mm Hg in patients with diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies and below 125/75 mm Hg in patients with nondiabetic nephropathies and proteinuria >1 g/day. However, available data suggest that tight BP control (BP<140/80 mm Hg) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; NIDDM). Secondly, intrarenal actions on mechanisms such as glomerular hypertension and hypertrophy, proteinuria, mesangial cell proliferation, mesangial matrix production and probably endothelial dysfunction, which can cause and/or worsen renal failure, are relevant for the renal protective action of some drug classes. ACE inhibitors possess such properties and also seem to lower proteinuria more than other antihypertensive drugs, despite a similar BP lowering effect. Calcium antagonists likewise exert beneficial intrarenal effects, but with some differences among subclasses. It remains to be evaluated whether angiotensin II-receptor antagonists can exert intrarenal effects and antiproteinuric actions similar to those of ACE inhibitors. While primary prevention of diabetic nephropathy is still an unsolved problem. there is convincing evidence that in patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; IDDM) or 2 diabetes mellitus and incipient nephropathy ACE inhibitors reduce urinary albumin excretion and slow the progression to overt nephropathy. Similar effects have been reported with some long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, although less consistently than with ACE inhibitors. In patients with diabetic overt nephropathy, ACE inhibitors and nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists are particularly effective in reducing proteinuria and both drugs can slow the decline in glomerular filtration rate more successfully than other antihypertensive treatment. Available data in patients with nondiabetic nephropathies indicate that ACE inhibitors can be beneficial, principally in patients with significant proteinuria, in slowing the progression of renal failure. However, it is still unclear whether this beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors is particularly evident in patients with mild and/or more advanced renal failure and whether calcium antagonists possess a similar nephroprotective effect. Overall, data from clinical trials thus seem to indicate that ACE inhibitors and possibly calcium antagonists should be preferred in the treatment of patients with diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies. However, further information is needed to understand renal protection.
 ...
PMID:Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status. 1035 94

Diabetes mellitus and hypertension is often associated, but with a different type of development in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes, renal disease, starting with microalbuminuria, is associated with increasing blood pressure or hypertension, whereas the patient without renal disease is most often normotensive. Poor metabolic control is a predictor of microalbuminuria or incipient nephropathy, but with microalbuminuria hypertension is an important risk factor for progression along with poor glycemic control. The same is the case for overt renal disease, and metabolic control is important in all stages of renal disease in type 1 diabetes. It has also been shown that good metabolic control as well as antihypertensive treatment, especially with ACE-inhibitors, often combined with other agents is quite effective in preventing progression in renal disease in all its stages. In type 2 diabetes, blood pressure elevation is often found as early as at the actual diagnosis, and blood pressure significantly increases according to the degree of albuminuria, normo-microalbuminuria and clinical proteinuria (macroalbuminuria). Elevated blood pressure is an important risk for renal disease but more importantly so also for cardiovascular disease. Several studies document that antihypertensive treatment in particular with ACE-inhibitors is important in preventing microalbuminuria, in treating microalbuminuria and thus preventing progression, also in overt renal disease. Near-normalization of blood pressure is vital. Regarding cardiovascular disease, a series of studies now document that antihypertensive treatment with various antihypertensive agents is able to significantly reduce a number of major cardiovascular complications in diabetes, such as cardiac disease, stroke, and also microvacular disease, including retinopathy. Several studies show that antihypertensive treatment should be started at a level higher than 140-150/90. The blood pressure to be achieved during treatment is probably around 140/85 mmHg or even 130/80 mmHg as a pragmatic goal. However, there is no sign of a J-shaped curve in any of the studies, and therefore even lower blood pressure could be advantageous. Even mortality, at least from diabetes-related causes can be effected by antihypertensive treatment. With more advanced renal disease, normalization of blood pressure is increasingly difficult, especially systolic blood pressure, and therefore it is recommendable to screen patients much earlier on with focus on blood pressure recordings and measurements of albuminuria, including microalbuminuria, and to treat early.
 ...
PMID:Drug treatment for hypertensive patients in special situations: diabetes and hypertension. 1042 11

In type 1 diabetes, increases in sodium-lithium countertransport (Na-Li CT), kidney volume (KV), and albumin excretion rate (AER) may precede the development of persistent microalbuminuria. Limited data exist on reversibility of these factors early in the evolution of diabetic nephropathy. A crossover design was used to study the separate effects of enalapril and intensive diabetes management (IDM) on Na-Li CT, KV and AER in 17 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (5-10 years duration) with large kidneys (>275 ml/1. 73 m(2)) and predominantly normoalbuminuria. Subjects were randomized to receive 3 months of either enalapril (0.25 mg/kg/day) or IDM, a 3-month washout, followed by the alternate treatment for 3 months. During IDM, HbA1c decreased 2.5% (pre 9.5+/-0.3% (mean+/-SE), post 7.0+/-0.1%, p<0.0001), but was unchanged while on enalapril (pre 8.8+/-0.3%, post 8.5+/-0.3%, p=0.1). A significant decrease in Na-Li CT was seen with IDM (pre 0.43+/-0.05, post 0.36+/-0.04 mmol/l RBC/h, p=0.006) but not angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (ACE-i) (pre 0.39+/-0.04, post 0.38+/-0.04 mmol/RBC/h, p=0.4). Neither ACE-i nor IDM affected KV or AER. It is concerning that kidney enlargement does not appear reversible at this early stage in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, although our conclusions are limited by the short duration of intervention and small sample size. The reduction in Na-Li CT with IDM suggests this may be a potentially modifiable risk factor for diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Intensive diabetes management decreases Na-Li countertransport in young subjects with type 1 diabetes and enlarged kidneys. 1112 Apr 58

Although diabetic nephropathy is a slowly progressing, well studied disease, it is the most common cause of end stage renal disease in industrialized countries. Recently the first randomized controlled long term trials about microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes have been published. Only seven years ago the first hallmark papers about metabolic control and ACE inhibition emerged. This review highlights the current status of prevention and therapy of diabetic nephropathy by metabolic and blood pressure control in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, depending on their stage of nephropathy (normo-, micro-, or macroalbuminuria). In patients with type 1 diabetes and normo- or microalbuminuria, strict metabolic control has been shown to slow the progression of nephropathy. In macroalbuminuric patients an aggressive antihypertensive treatment, preferably with an ACE inhibitor, is more important than the metabolic control. ACE inhibitor therapy has also been proven beneficial in microalbuminuric patients, but not yet in normotensive, non-albuminuric type 1 patients. Because of the high prevalence of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes, a strict antihypertensive treatment is more important than metabolic control for the prevention of progression of microvascular disease. Since most patients need a combination of antihypertensive medications a recommendation for a single substance class can not be given.
 ...
PMID:[Effect of blood glucose and blood pressure control on progression of diabetic nephropathy]. 1114 4

Diabetic nephropathy is one of the leading causes of end-stage renal disease. We examined whether ACE inhibitor treatment may have a nephroprotective effect in normotensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients without microalbuminuria and with normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and whether any effect was associated with the ACE genotype. In a prospective double-blind randomized study, normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus with normal serum creatinine and no microalbuminuria were treated with either placebo or perindopril, an ACE inhibitor. Urine albumine/creatinine ratio (ACR), mean blood pressure (MBP) and index of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on S-creatinine were determined. ACE genotype was determined by electrophoresis. ACR was higher in the placebo group than in the perindopril group after 4 months, and continued to increase during the study period. After 36 months of observation, ACR in the placebo group was 1.7+/-1.1 mg/mmol, and 0.6+/-0.2 mg/mmol in the ACE-inhibitor-treated group (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). During treatment, a significant increase in ACR in the placebo group (p=0.007), Wilcoxon matched paired test) was observed. There were no differences between the groups regarding MBP or GFR. The nephroprotective effects of ACE inhibitor treatment was not associated with the ACE genotype (II, ID, DD).
 ...
PMID:Randomized placebo-controlled trial of perindopril in normotensive, normoalbuminuric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. 1118 84

Hypertension is often associated with diabetes mellitus. Its physiopathology is different when it's a question of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. In the case of type 1 diabetes mellitus, hypertension is often the result of a underlying nephropathy. In the case of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension is more often essential and it lies within a plurimetabolic syndrome and insulin resistance context. In all cases, hypertension worsens the patients' prognostics, increasing the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications. The optimal blood pressure control allows to limit their evolution. It is necessary to fight against all cardiovascular risks like sedentary lifestyle, obesity, tabacco or hyperlipemia. ANAES recommends a blood pressure control lower or equal to 140/80 mmHg. In type 1 diabetes mellitus, the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) are the first recommended treatment because of their action in case of nephropathy. In type 2 diabetes mellitus, besides ACE, diuretics. beta-blockers can be used in first line. Often, therapeutic associations are necessary.
 ...
PMID:[Hypertension and diabetes]. 1119 Feb 92

Hypertension is found among 1 to 6% of young women. Treatment aims to decrease cardiovascular risk, the magnitude of which is less dependent on the absolute level of blood pressure (BP) than on associated cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension-related target organ damage and/or concomitant disease. Lifestyle modifications are recommended for all hypertensive individuals. The threshold of BP at which antihypertensive therapy should be initiated is based on absolute cardiovascular risk. Most young women are at low risk and not in need of antihypertensive therapy. All antihypertensive agents appear to be equally efficacious; choice depends on personal preference, social circumstances and an agent's effect on cardiovascular risk factors, target organ damage and/or concomitant disease. Although most agents are appropriate for, and tolerated well by, young women, another consideration remains that of pregnancy, 50% of which are unplanned. A clinician must be aware of a woman's method of contraception and the potential of an antihypertensive agent to cause birth defects following inadvertent exposure in early pregnancy. Conversely, if an oral contraceptive is effective and well tolerated, but the woman's BP becomes mildly elevated, continuing the contraceptive and initiating antihypertensive treatment may not be contraindicated, especially if the ability to plan pregnancy is important (e.g. in type 1 diabetes mellitus). No commonly used antihypertensive is known to be teratogenic, although ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists should be discontinued, and any antihypertensive drugs should be continued in pregnancy only if anticipated benefits outweigh potential reproductive risk(s). The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate 5 to 10% of pregnancies and are a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Treatment aims to improve pregnancy outcome. There is consensus that severe maternal hypertension (systolic BP > or = 170mm Hg and/or diastolic BP > or = 110mm Hg) should be treated immediately to avoid maternal stroke, death and, possibly, eclampsia. Parenteral hydralazine may be associated with a higher risk of maternal hypotension, and intravenous labetalol with neonatal bradycardia. There is no consensus as to whether mild-to-moderate hypertension in pregnancy should be treated: the risks of transient severe hypertension, antenatal hospitalisation, proteinuria at delivery and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome may be decreased by therapy, but intrauterine fetal growth may also be impaired, particularly by atenolol. Methyldopa and other beta-blockers have been used most extensively. Reporting bias and the uncertainty of outcomes as defined warrant cautious interpretation of these findings and preclude treatment recommendations.
 ...
PMID:Treating hypertension in women of child-bearing age and during pregnancy. 1136 52

Diabetic Nephropathy is one of the microvascular complications associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus with a major portion of the excess morbidity and mortality. In order to avoid or at least delay its onset we should detect a very small amount of proteins in the urine (between 15-20 and 200 micrograms/min.) that is a strong predictor of those likely to progress to overt nephropathy. This detection can be obtained evaluating an overnight sample of urine and suggest preventives interventions. such as intensive diabetes management and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi). Furthermore, associated risk factors should be prevented or treated (hypertension, retinopathy, hyperlipidemia and smoking).
 ...
PMID:[Practical considerations on screening for microalbuminuria in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes]. 1142 22

A glomerular permeability defect occurs early in the course of type 1 diabetes and precedes the onset of microalbuminuria and renal morphological changes. Recently, ACE inhibitors have been shown to prevent loss of glomerular membrane permselective function, but the mechanism of this nephroprotective effect is still being debated. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of hypotensive and subhypotensive dosages of the ACE inhibitor quinapril ex vivo and of its active metabolite quinaprilat in vitro on the glomerular albumin permeability (P(alb)) defect in the early phases of experimental diabetes. For the ex vivo study, six groups of male Wistar rats were evaluated for 4 weeks. One group served as a nondiabetic control (C); the other five groups were rendered diabetic and included untreated diabetic rats (D) and diabetic rats receiving quinapril at the dosages of 5 (DQ1), 2.5 (DQ2), 1.25 (DQ3), and 0.625 (DQ4) mg. kg(-1). day(-1). Dosage-dependent effects of quinapril on systolic blood pressure and the glomerular filtration rate were observed. In contrast, control of P(alb) in isolated glomeruli exposed to oncotic gradients, proteinuria, and glomerular and tubular hypertrophy was obtained with subhypotensive dosages (DQ3 and DQ4 groups) of the ACE inhibitor. In the in vitro study, quinaprilat reduced P(alb) significantly in concentration ranges from 10(-6) to 10(-14) mol/l compared with results in control glomeruli. The effect on P(alb) may have occurred by mechanisms different from kidney ACE inhibitor. These study results indicated that ACE inhibitor treatment prevents the early onset of the P(alb) defect in experimental diabetes. This effect seemed to occur independently of systemic or glomerular hemodynamic changes and, at least partially, from kidney ACE inhibition.
 ...
PMID:Modulation of incipient glomerular lesions in experimental diabetic nephropathy by hypotensive and subhypotensive dosages of an ACE inhibitor. 1167 43

Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States, accounting for about 50% of all new cases. Although we previously established the renoprotective benefits of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with coexisting hypertension and type 1 diabetes, evidence of the renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes is less clear. We conducted the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) to determine whether the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan slows the progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of its blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect. In this randomized, controlled trial, we found that irbesartan was associated with a 20% reduction in the risk for the primary composite end point (doubling of the baseline serum creatinine concentration, development of end-stage renal disease, or death from any cause) compared with placebo (P =.02) and a 23% reduction compared with amlodipine therapy (P =.006). These results were not explained by differences in the BP that was achieved. In a separate study, losartan was shown to reduce the risk for progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy has also been demonstrated to slow the progression to overt nephropathy when initiated early in the course of type 2 diabetic renal disease (ie, in patients with microalbuminuria). Based on these studies, ARBs are clearly effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. This protection is independent of their BP-lowering effect. Preclinical studies with the newest ARB, olmesartan medoxomil, suggest that this agent may provide renoprotective benefits as well.
 ...
PMID:The role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in preventing the progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. 1238 93


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>