Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011854 (type 1 diabetes)
 20,749 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] is a rapidly absorbed analog that has diminished tendency to self-associate. In four open-label, 1-year-long international randomized trials, we contrasted the immunogenicity of insulin lispro versus regular human insulin (RHI) in patients previously treated with insulin who had IDDM or NIDDM. Using a self-blank subtraction assay, we assessed sera for the presence of insulin-specific antibodies (ISA), insulin lispro-specific antibodies (LSA), and cross-reactive antibodies (CRA). Basal insulin needs were provided either with human ultralente (UL) or NPH insulins. After 2 to 4 weeks of therapy with RHI plus UL or RHI plus NPH, 50% of patients were randomly assigned to begin insulin lispro or continue on RHI. At baseline, few pretreated patients had LSA (0-4%) and approximately 10% had ISA, whereas 41-45% of patients with IDDM and 23-27% of patients with NIDDM had CRA (IDDM vs. NIDDM, P < 0.001). Within studies, no significant differences were noted over time in ISA, LSA, or CRA attributable to the type of short-acting insulin. When data were pooled, inconsistent changes were noted in ISA and LSA (LSA were greater in NIDDM vs. IDDM at baseline, P = 0.001, and ISA were greater in IDDM vs. NIDDM at 6 months, P = 0.007). Significant levels of CRA were more common in IDDM at all times (P < 0.001, P = 0.022, and P = 0.002 at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively). For patients receiving insulin lispro, no significant changes occurred in antibody status among IDDM and NIDDM patients throughout the study (became positive, remained positive, became negative, or remained negative). IDDM patients were more likely to develop or maintain CRA levels (P = 0.008 vs. NIDDM), whereas antibody levels were comparable among positive individuals. No evidence was noted that insulin lispro differs in immunogenicity from RHI in previously treated IDDM and NIDDM patients.
 ...
PMID:Immunologic effects of insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] in IDDM and NIDDM patients previously treated with insulin. 892 61

Insulin lispro, an insulin analog recently developed particularly for mealtime therapy, has a fast absorption rate and a short duration of action. We compared insulin lispro and regular human insulin in the mealtime treatment of 1,008 patients with IDDM. The study was a 6-month randomized multinational (17 countries) and multicenter (102 investigators) clinical trial performed with an open-label crossover design. Insulin lispro was injected immediately before the meal, and regular human insulin was injected 30-45 min before the meal. Throughout the study, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was significantly lower during insulin lispro therapy. At the endpoint, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was reduced at 1 h by 1.3 mmol/l and at 2 h by 2.0 mmol/l in patients treated with insulin lispro (P < 0.001). The rate of hypoglycemia was 12% less with insulin lispro (6.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.3 episodes/30 days, P < 0.001), independent of basal insulin regimen or HbA1c level. The reduction was observed equally in episodes with and without symptoms. When the total number of episodes for each patient was analyzed according to the time of occurrence, the number of hypoglycemic episodes was less with insulin lispro than with regular human insulin therapy during three of four quarters of the day (P < 0.001). The largest relative improvement was observed at night. In conclusion, insulin lispro improves postprandial control, reduces hypoglycemic episodes, and improves patient convenience, compared with regular human insulin, in IDDM patients.
 ...
PMID:Reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia and frequency of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients on insulin-analog treatment. Multicenter Insulin Lispro Study Group. 900 Jul 4

Insulin lispro is a human insulin analog that dissociates more rapidly than human regular insulin after subcutaneous injection, resulting in higher insulin levels at an earlier point in time and a shorter duration of action. The aim of the study was to evaluate if this pharmacokinetic difference would translate into better postprandial and overall control in 30 IDDM patients (age, 35.1 +/- 1.5 years; male-female ratio, 17:13; BMI, 24.8 +/- 0.5 kg/m2; HbA1c, 8.03 +/- 0.13% at baseline) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; Disetronic H-TRON V100) in a double-blind crossover clinical study. Patients were randomized to insulin lispro or human regular insulin for 3 months before crossing over to the other insulin for another 3 months. All meal boluses were given immediately before breakfast, lunch, and supper. An eight-point blood glucose profile was measured once weekly, and HbA1c levels were measured monthly. At the end of the 3-month treatment period, HbA1c levels were significantly lower with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 7.66 +/- 0.13 vs. 8.00 +/- 0.16% (P = 0.0041). While preprandial, bedtime, and 2:00 A.M. values for blood glucose were not significantly different, 1-h postprandial blood glucose was significantly improved after breakfast, lunch, and dinner with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 8.35 vs. 9.79 mmol/l (P = 0.006), 7.58 vs. 8.74 mmol/l (P = 0.049), and 7.85 vs. 9.01 mmol/l (P = 0.03). The incidence of hypoglycemia per 30 days (blood glucose levels, <3.0 mmol/l) was 8.4 +/- 1.3 before randomization, decreasing to 6.0 +/- 0.9 for insulin lispro and to 7.6 +/- 1.3 for regular insulin during the last month of the study. Two patients in each group reported insulin precipitation. We conclude that insulin lispro improves glycemic control in CSII without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.
 ...
PMID:Insulin lispro in CSII: results of a double-blind crossover study. 903

Insulin lispro, a recombinant insulin analogue, is identical to human insulin except for the transposition of proline and lysine at positions 28 and 29 in the C-terminus of the B chain. The resultant reduced capacity for self-association in solution translates into more rapid absorption of insulin lispro than human regular insulin from subcutaneous sites. Maximum insulin concentrations are higher and are reached earlier with insulin lispro than with human regular insulin, and insulin concentrations return to baseline values more quickly with insulin lispro; consequently, insulin lispro has a more rapid onset and a shorter duration of glucose-lowering activity. These pharmacological properties provided the rationale for comparative clinical trials of subcutaneous insulin lispro (administered within 15 minutes before meals, preferably immediately before meals) and subcutaneous human regular insulin (administered 20 to 45 minutes before meals) in patients with type 1 diabetes (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) or type 2 diabetes (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) requiring premeal insulin therapy plus basal insulin therapy. Available clinical trials are well designed and results suggest that 1- and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels with insulin lispro are similar to or lower than those with human regular insulin; 1- and 2-hourpostprandial glucose excursions are similar to or less pronounced than those with human regular insulin. Glycated haemoglobin A values were generally similar with both agents. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion was associated with greater improvements in postprandial blood glucose levels and glycated haemoglobin A1 values with insulin lispro than with human regular insulin. Confirmatory data are required. The incidence of hypoglycaemia with insulin lispro was similar to or lower than that with human regular insulin. In particular insulin lispro appears to be associated with a lower incidence of night-time and severe hypoglycaemic episodes. Evidence also suggests that patients perceive their quality of life to be improved with insulin lispro compared with human regular insulin, and that satisfaction with treatment is greater with the insulin analogue. Thus, in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes requiring premeal insulin therapy, insulin lispro appears to provide greater postprandial glycaemic control than human regular insulin without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Furthermore, the reduced injection-meal interval with this agent offers greater convenience for the patient than regular human insulin. If longer term clinical experience supports these promising results it is likely that insulin lispro will offer important advantages over human regular insulin.
 ...
PMID:Insulin lispro: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of diabetes mellitus. 933 63

Glucose tolerance deteriorates, and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus increases, with advancing age. Most elderly diabetic patients have type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, but the prolonged survival of young people with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus increases the prevalence of type 1 diabetes among the elderly. Approximately 25 to 29% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are treated with insulin. Conventional therapy with regular and intermediate-acting insulin preparations does not mimic physiological insulin secretion. Subcutaneous administration of insulin lispro, a recently introduced insulin analogue, more closely mimics the time-action curve of endogenous insulin that is produced in response to meals. Its rapid onset and short duration of action allow for adequate control of postprandial glucose levels while reducing the risk of late postprandial hypoglycaemia. Insulin lispro offers improved glycaemic control, convenience and increased flexibility in insulin-treated patients with diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Practical guidelines on the use of insulin lispro in elderly diabetic patients. 950 89

The objective of this 6-month, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study was to compare glycemic control when patients were treated with (1) 2 manufactured premixed insulin formulations containing insulin lispro and a novel insulin lispro-protamine formulation, neutral protamine lispro (NPL), and (2) 2 manufactured premixed human insulin formulations, human insulin 50/50 and human insulin 30/70. One hundred individuals, 37 with type 1 diabetes mellitus (12 females, 25 males; mean age, 39.4 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 24.8; mean duration of diabetes, 12.9 years) and 63 with type 2 diabetes mellitus (33 females, 30 males; mean age, 59.0 years; mean BMI, 28.4; mean duration of diabetes, 12.6 years), were treated with insulin lispro mixtures. Insulin lispro Mix50 (50% insulin lispro/50% NPL) and human insulin 50/50 (50% regular insulin/50% neutral protamine Hagedorn [NPH] insulin) were administered before breakfast; insulin lispro Mix25 (25% insulin lispro/75% NPL) and human insulin 30/70 (30% regular insulin/70% NPH) were administered before dinner. Blood glucose (BG), hypoglycemic episodes (hypoglycemic signs or symptoms or BG <3.0 mmol/L), insulin dose and timing of dose before meals, and hemoglobin A1c were measured. Mean doses of insulin lispro and human insulin mixtures were similar overall and for both diabetes subgroups. However, compared with human insulin mixtures, twice-daily administration of insulin lispro mixtures resulted in improved postprandial glycemic control, similar overall glycemic control, and less nocturnal hypoglycemia, as well as offering the convenience of dosing closer to meals.
 ...
PMID:Improved postprandial blood glucose control and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia during treatment with two novel insulin lispro-protamine formulations, insulin lispro mix25 and insulin lispro mix50. Mix50 Study Group. 1032 21

The importance of glucose control in reducing the complications of diabetes mellitus has been clearly demonstrated. The emergency physician routinely is expected to treat a wide range of problems related to this disease, including making the initial diagnosis of type 2 and occasionally type 1 diabetes. Also common are patients with poorly controlled diabetes. The recent introduction of new classes of agents to lower blood glucose, especially in type 2 diabetes, should improve the control in this category of patient and reduce the complication rate. Some of these agents, such as troglitazone, have potentially fatal complications and require careful monitoring. Emergency physicians should be aware of the common complications of these drugs because patients can present to the ED with them. Hypoglycemia, a common cause of 911 calls and emergency visits, is not a side effect of either metformin or acarbose. Insulin lispro has improved postprandial glycemic control for type 1 and some insulin-requiring type 2 diabetics. Hypoglycemia is less of a risk with insulin lispro, and quality of life is better with this rapidly acting insulin. Newer methods of insulin delivery, such as continuous subcutaneous infusion, have greatly improved glucose control, given greater freedom to patients, and reduced the risks of hypoglycemia.
 ...
PMID:Recent advances in the pharmacologic management of diabetes mellitus. 1113 Sep 36

Excellent glycaemic control is essential in pregnancy to optimise maternal and foetal outcomes. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of insulin analogues in pregnancy. Insulin lispro and insulin aspart are safe in pregnancy and may improve post-prandial glycaemic control in women with type 1 diabetes. However, a lack of data indicating improved foetal outcomes would suggest that there is no imperative to switch to a short-acting analogue where the woman's diabetes is well controlled with human insulin. There are no reports of the use of insulin glulisine in pregnancy and so its use cannot be recommended. Most studies of insulin glargine in pregnancy are small, retrospective and include women with pre-existing diabetes and gestational diabetes. There appear to be no major safety concerns and so it seems reasonable to continue insulin glargine if required to achieve excellent glycaemic control. A head-to-head comparison between insulin detemir and NPH insulin in women with type 1 diabetes showed that while foetal outcomes did not differ, fasting plasma glucose improved with insulin detemir without an increased incidence of hypoglycaemia. The greater evidence base supports the use of insulin detemir as the first line long-acting analogue in pregnancy but the lack of definitive foetal benefits means that there is no strong need to switch a woman who is well controlled on NPH insulin. There seems little justification in using long acting insulin analogues in women with gestational diabetes or type 2 diabetes where the risk of hypoglycaemia is low.
...
PMID:The use of insulin analogues in pregnancy. 2348 21