Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a 22-year followup of 3686 San Francisco longshoremen, the roles of physical activity, cigarette smoking habit, and systolic blood pressure level were evaluated independently in relation to risk of death from a broad range of diseases. Smoking pattern and blood pressure status were established in 1951 and job activity was assessed annually during the followup period. Lower levels of energy expenditure predicted increased risk of fatal heart attack and perhaps of stroke. Heavy cigarette smoking predicted increased risk of death from heart attack, cancer, chronic obstructive respiratory disease, and pneumonia. Higher levels of systolic blood pressure were associated with death from all cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, and cirrhosis. Tacit to these findings: sedentary living takes its toll largely through heart disease and stroke; the toxicity of cigarette smoking is associated with a broader range of diseases, including heart attack, cancer, and respiratory disease; and higher level of blood pressure related to an even broader range of cardiovascular disease than either of the other characteristics studied.
 ...
PMID:Energy expenditure, cigarette smoking, and blood pressure level as related to death from specific diseases. 68 71

The prevalence of diabetes recorded in population surveys in the American region varies from < 1% (rural Mapuche Indians aged 20 years and over, Chile) to almost 50% (Pima Indians aged 20 years and over, United States of America). The prevalence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) was approximately 2.5 times higher among Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic white Americans. In the Mexican Americans, prevalence followed a sociocultural gradient: 16% in low-income barrios, about 10% in middle-income neighbourhoods and 5% in high-income suburbs in San Antonio, Texas. Data from the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey indicate prevalence of diabetes in the age range 45-74 years of 24% for Mexican Americans, 26% for Puerto Ricans and 16% for Cuban Americans, compared to 12% for non-Hispanic whites. Figures for a low-income district of Mexico City show a 36% lower prevalence than for Mexican Americans in the USA. Prevalence in Brazil is approximately 7% in subjects aged 30-69 years. Black Americans have a relatively high prevalence of NIDDM, though not as high as the Mexican Americans. There is evidence that complications of diabetes may vary between populations, and that they may be particularly severe in Mexican Americans, and higher in black than in white Americans. The extent to which these differences relate to access to health care and treatment remains to be clarified.
 ...
PMID:Recent developments in the epidemiology of diabetes in the Americas. 129 75

An unfavourable body fat distribution has been associated with an increased prevalence and incidence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The potential utility of assessing body fat distribution in diabetes screening, however, has not been assessed. We compared the impact of upper body fat distribution (assessed by the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)) and body mass index (BMI) and NIDDM using the population attributable risk approach of Levin in 1965 Mexican Americans from the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The population attributable risk percentage (PAR%) was 52.0% for WHR compared to 43.4% for body mass index. After stratification by BMI, women with a high WHR had a PAR% of approximately 50% and men had a PAR% of 28-58%. For any given cutpoint (e.g. the 10th percentile, 20th percentile, etc.) of WHR used to screen for NIDDM, WHR had both a higher sensitivity and a lower false positive rate than the corresponding cutpoint of BMI. To evaluate the relative contribution of WHR in identifying prevalent cases of NIDDM, multiple logistic regression analyses were performed, and the number of subjects identified as being in the top 20% of the risk score distribution was compared using a model that included WHR and a model that included BMI. In men, BMI did not increase the sensitivity in detecting NIDDM subjects once age was accounted for; WHR increased the sensitivity only slightly. In women, sensitivity was enhanced modestly using both measures, although WHR again was the more sensitive method. These data suggest that WHR is a better single screening measure for NIDDM than BMI.
 ...
PMID:Public health significance of upper body adiposity for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Mexican Americans. 131 26

Obese subjects have increased bone density relative to non-obese subjects yet this relationship is not fully understood. We examined whether alterations in sex hormones or binding proteins might explain the effect of obesity on osteoporosis in 83 premenopausal women from the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study of diabetes. We measured total testosterone, oestradiol, oestrone, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-SO4). Bone density was assessed by a Hologic dual photon absorptometer. Lumbar spine and femoral neck density were positively correlated with body mass index (BMI). In addition, femoral neck density was positively correlated with DHEA-SO4. BMI was negatively correlated with SHBG. After adjustment for sex hormones by multiple linear regression a positive association between bone density and obesity still exists suggesting that the association between obesity and bone density is at least partially independent of sex steroids in premenopausal women.
 ...
PMID:Excess androgenicity only partially explains the relationship between obesity and bone density in premenopausal women. 133 41

Mexican Americans have a high prevalence of diabetes relative to non-Hispanic whites, but paradoxically experience a lower prevalence of myocardial infarction and lower cardiovascular mortality (at least in men). To determine whether Mexican Americans might be more resistant to the atherogenic effects of diabetes than non-Hispanic whites, we examined the associations between diabetes and myocardial infarction and selected coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors in these two ethnic groups. The study population consisted of 5149 Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites who were 25 to 64 years old and recruited from the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study of cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes conducted between 1979 and 1988. Diabetic men were more than twice as likely to have an electrocardiography (ECG)-documented myocardial infarction than were nondiabetic men, while diabetic women were more than three times as likely to have a myocardial infarction than were nondiabetic women. In both sexes the association between myocardial infarction and diabetes was nearly identical between the two ethnic groups. In both ethnic groups diabetes was also more strongly associated with conventional CHD risk factors (e.g., triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol) in women than in men. Furthermore, these associations were at least as strong, if not stronger, in Mexican Americans as in non-Hispanic whites. Thus, these data provide no evidence to suggest that Mexican Americans are resistant to the lipid-altering effects of diabetes. We conclude that the protective effect against CHD conferred by Mexican American ethnicity may be obscured in part by the high prevalence of diabetes in this ethnic group.
 ...
PMID:Diabetes and coronary heart disease risk in Mexican Americans. 828 49

NIDDM patients have a two- to fourfold increased risk of CHD relative to nondiabetic subjects. This excess risk is explained only partially by increased levels of standard risk factors. We compared the plasma concentrations of Lp(a) in NIDDM patients (n = 260) and nondiabetic subjects (n = 336) who participated in a population-based study (San Antonio Heart Study). Lp(a) was measured using a monoclonal anti-Lp(a) antibody. NIDDM patients and nondiabetic subjects had similar Lp(a) concentrations for both men (13.6 +/- 1.5 vs. 16.1 +/- 1.4 mg/dl) and women (12.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 15.9 +/- 1.3 mg/dl) (P = 0.361). Duration of diabetes and level of fasting glycemia were not significantly related to Lp(a) concentrations. Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients who had higher total and LDL cholesterol levels. We conclude that in a large population-based study, Lp(a) levels are not increased in NIDDM patients.
Diabetes 1992 Oct
PMID:Lp(a) concentrations in NIDDM. 139 99

Hyperinsulinemia is associated with an adverse pattern of cardiovascular risk factors, including obesity, elevated triglyceride levels, low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and elevated blood pressure. Whether hyperinsulinemia precedes (and perhaps causes) this deterioration in the risk factors or merely accompanies the deterioration is controversial. We therefore examined the 8-year changes in lipids, lipoproteins, and blood pressure as a function of baseline levels of fasting insulin in 1,383 nondiabetic Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white subjects enrolled between October 1979 and November 1982 in the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based longitudinal study of cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes in San Antonio, Texas. After age and concomitant changes in body mass index were adjusted for, fasting insulin at baseline was found to be correlated positively with 8-year changes in triglyceride levels and negatively with 8-year changes in HDL cholesterol levels (p less than 0.05). Among the non-Hispanic whites, insulin was more strongly correlated with a decline in HDL cholesterol levels in women than in men (p less than 0.001). Fasting insulin was also positively correlated with changes in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in non-Hispanic whites, but not in Mexican Americans, although these correlations were slightly diminished and no longer achieved statistical significance after subjects receiving antihypertensive medications were excluded. These results support the hypothesis that in nondiabetic subjects, insulin has a direct regulatory effect on triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels. These data provide evidence for a possible role for insulin in blood pressure regulation, at least in non-Hispanic whites, although further analysis of this issue is warranted.
 ...
PMID:The relation between serum insulin levels and 8-year changes in lipid, lipoprotein, and blood pressure levels. 141 28

The insulin resistance syndrome ("syndrome X") consists of hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, although the inclusion of hypertension has been challenged. Insulin has biological effects that could produce a hyperdynamic circulation. We therefore postulated that an insulin-induced hyperdynamic circulation is an early feature of the insulin resistance syndrome and that this circulatory abnormality leads to later fixed hypertension. The San Antonio Heart Study cohort, a population-based cohort of 3,301 Mexican Americans and 1,857 non-Hispanic whites, was used to define individuals who were hyperdynamic (pulse pressure and heart rate in the upper quartile of their respective distributions), intermediate, and hypodynamic (pulse pressure and heart rate in the bottom quartile). The characteristics of the insulin resistance syndrome were then examined according to these three hemodynamic categories. We also examined the 8-year incidence of hypertension and of type II diabetes according to these hemodynamic categories. A hyperdynamic circulation was associated with statistically significant increases in body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), subscapular-to-triceps skinfold ratio (p = 0.042), triglyceride (p = 0.002), 2-hour glucose (p = 0.002), and fasting and 2-hour insulin (p = 0.019 and 0.006). When hemodynamic status was examined separately in lean (BMI < 27 kg/m2) and obese (BMI > or = 27 kg/m2) individuals, the above effects persisted, although they were somewhat attenuated. The odds ratio for the hyperdynamic state as a predictor of future hypertension was 1.66, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.304). The odds ratio for predicting future type II diabetes was 3.97, which was statistically significant (p = 0.047).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Hyperdynamic circulation and the insulin resistance syndrome ("syndrome X"). 145 96

There is considerable evidence that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a strong independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. Based on their risk factor profile, Mexican Americans have an increased risk of coronary heart disease, yet Mexican Americans have coronary heart disease mortality similar to or lower than that of non-Hispanic whites. The authors therefore attempted to determine whether Mexican Americans had decreased Lp(a) concentrations relative to non-Hispanic whites in the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Lp(a) concentrations (mg/dl) were significantly lower in Mexican Americans (n = 316) than in non-Hispanic whites (n = 242) (men: 10.4 vs. 16.3; women: 11.5 vs. 16.4). In addition, the proportion of persons with Lp(a) concentrations of > or = 30 mg/dl (the threshold at which increased risk of coronary heart disease is believed to occur) was significantly higher in non-Hispanic whites than in Mexican Americans (18.6% vs. 7.6%; Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (adjusted for sex) = 2.79). Age, obesity, body fat distribution, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and glucose and insulin concentrations were not significantly related to Lp(a) levels. Decreased Lp(a) concentrations may account in part for Mexican Americans' relative protection from coronary heart disease mortality.
 ...
PMID:Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the San Antonio Heart Study. 146 66

The objective of this study was to determine whether a less favorable risk factor pattern for cardiovascular disease among persons with impaired glucose tolerance could be explained by fasting insulin, obesity, and/or a central distribution of body fat. Between 1984 and 1988, cardiovascular risk factors were examined cross-sectionally in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white participants in the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study who had either impaired (n = 173) or normal (n = 1,107) glucose tolerance. Sex-specific analysis of covariance models were constructed to adjust risk factor levels for age, age and insulin, and age, insulin, body mass index, and centrality index. Both males and females with impaired glucose tolerance had higher age-adjusted mean diastolic blood pressures, heart rates, uric acid levels, and triglyceride levels and lower levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HDL3 cholesterol than normal subjects; differences were significant for all risk factors except HDL cholesterol and HDL3 cholesterol in males. Differences in diastolic blood pressure in males, and differences in heart rate and triglyceride in both sexes, remained significant after adjustment for all covariates. However, differences in uric acid in males and differences in diastolic blood pressure and HDL3 cholesterol in females were attenuated to borderline significance levels. Differences in uric acid and HDL cholesterol in females were diminished to nonsignificant levels, especially after adjustment for obesity-related measures. With few exceptions, fasting insulin did not appear to play a major role in accounting for differences in these risk factors. With adjustment, ethnic differences (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic white) were smaller and were statistically significant less often than differences observed between impaired and normal glucose tolerant groups. The authors concluded that hyperinsulinemia, obesity, and a central body fat distribution accounted for some, but usually not all, of the less favorable cardiovascular risk factor pattern found in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.
 ...
PMID:The roles of insulin, obesity, and fat distribution in the elevation of cardiovascular risk factors in impaired glucose tolerance. The San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. 146 70


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>