UMLS:C0011849 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Recent studies have further elucidated the association between blood pressure and albumin excretion in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients with (i) normal urinary albumin excretion (UAE), and (ii) moderate microalbuminuria (20 to 70 micrograms/min). In a study comprising 117 normoalbuminuric (UAE < 20 micrograms/min) patients we performed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (AMBP), and short-term power spectral analysis of RR interval oscillations. In comparison with the group with a UAE below the median, patients with UAE above the median were characterized by: significantly higher 24-hour systolic and diastolic AMBP, significantly reduced short-term RR interval variability, and significantly higher HbA1c. In a double blind study, normotensive IDDM patients with moderate microalbuminuria (20 to 70 micrograms/min) were randomized to either lisinopril (20 mg once a day, N = 12) or placebo (N = 10) for two years. In the lisinopril group there were significant reductions in 24-hour systolic and diastolic AMBP compared to the placebo group. Lisinopril did not attenuate the diurnal blood pressure variation. UAE tended to be reduced in the lisinopril group. A significantly positive association between changes in AMBP and changes in UAE was present in the placebo group in contrast to the lisinopril group. Changes in UAE were strongly and positively associated with changes in filtration fraction in the lisinopril treated group. In conclusion, interactions between albumin excretion, blood pressure, autonomic function, and glycemic status are already detectable within the normoalbuminuric range in IDDM patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) treatment in a small group of normotensive IDDM patients with moderate microalbuminuria reduces blood pressure without attenuating diurnal blood pressure variation, tends to reduce albumin excretion, and abolishes the association between changes in UAE and changes in blood pressure observed in the placebo group. ACEi intervention in selected normoalbuminuric high risk patients (high-normal UAE, high-normal blood pressure, and poor glycemic control) would be of interest.
...
PMID:High normo- or low microalbuminuria: basis for intervention in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. 940 13

Chronic nephropathies are associated with enhanced renal synthesis of endothelin (ET)-1. A recent study demonstrated that an ET(A) receptor antagonist given to diabetic rats at the moment of disease induction prevented the development of renal injury. Here we investigated whether an unselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist, PD 142,893, was renoprotective when given to streptozotocin diabetic rats when animals were already proteinuric. The effect of PD 142,893 was compared with that of an ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, known to retard progressive renal disease in experimental and human diabetes. PD 142,893 normalized systemic blood pressure, reduced urinary protein and albumin excretion, and ameliorated renal blood flow in diabetic rats, but it did not affect such parameters in control rats. Lisinopril had a renoprotective effect comparable to PD 142,893, although lisinopril controlled systemic blood pressure better. Northern blot analysis of ET-1 mRNA revealed upregulation of ET-1 gene in the diabetic kidney. Similar results were obtained by in situ hybridization in glomeruli and tubuli of diabetic rats. Both treatments remarkably attenuated exaggerated renal ET-1 gene expression. These data suggest that ET-1 is a contributory mediator of kidney damage in diabetes and indicate that ET receptor antagonists may represent a new therapeutic mean for treatment of progressive diabetic nephropathy.
Diabetes 1998 Mar
PMID:Unselective inhibition of endothelin receptors reduces renal dysfunction in experimental diabetes. 951 53

We examined whether the ACE gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism modulates renal disease progression in IDDM and how ACE inhibitors influence this relationship. The EURODIAB Controlled Trial of Lisinopril in IDDM is a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial in 530 nonhypertensive, mainly normoalbuminuric IDDM patients aged 20-59 years. Albumin excretion rate (AER) was measured every 6 months for 2 years. Genotype distribution was 15% II, 58% ID, and 27% DD. Between genotypes, there were no differences in baseline characteristics or in changes in blood pressure and glycemic control throughout the trial. There was a significant interaction between the II and DD genotype groups and treatment on change in AER (P = 0.05). Patients with the II genotype showed the fastest rate of AER progression on placebo but had an enhanced response to lisinopril. AER at 2 years (adjusted for baseline AER) was 51.3% lower on lisinopril than placebo in the II genotype patients (95% CI, 15.7 to 71.8; P = 0.01), 14.8% in the ID group (-7.8 to 32.7; P = 0.2), and 7.7% in the DD group (-36.6 to 37.6; P = 0.7). Absolute differences in AER between placebo and lisinopril at 2 years were 8.1, 1.7, and 0.8 microg/min in the II, ID, and DD groups, respectively. The significant beneficial effect of lisinopril on AER in the II group persisted when adjusted for center, blood pressure, and glycemic control, and also for diastolic blood pressure at 1 month into the study. Progression from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria (lisinopril versus placebo) was 0.27 (0.03-2.26; P = 0.2) in the II group, and 1.30 (0.33-5.17; P = 0.7) in the DD group (P = 0.6 for interaction). Knowledge of ACE genotype may be of value in determining the likely impact of ACE inhibitor treatment.
Diabetes 1998 Sep
PMID:Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism on progression of renal disease and the influence of ACE inhibition in IDDM patients: findings from the EUCLID Randomized Controlled Trial. EURODIAB Controlled Trial of Lisinopril in IDDM. 972 42

1. Our objective was to compare the effect of a long-acting calcium antagonist (nisoldipine) compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril) on the non-neurogenic regulation of the microvascular blood flow in hypertensive Type I diabetes patients with diabetic nephropathy.2. We performed a 1-year double-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled study comparing nisoldipine (20-40 mg once daily) with lisinopril (10-20 mg once daily) in 48 hypertensive Type I diabetes patients with diabetic nephropathy. For comparison, 22 age-matched normotensive healthy control subjects were included. Measurements were performed at baseline and after 1 year of antihypertensive treatment. The minimal vascular resistance and distensibility (stiffness) of resistance vessels in skin and skeletal muscle were measured using the local isotope washout method.3. Mean arterial pressure was reduced to the same extent in both groups: nisoldipine, 113+/-2.1 to 105+/-1.6 mmHg (P<0.001); lisinopril, 110+/-2.7 to 101+/-2.1 mmHg (P<0.002) (controls, 88+/-2.2 mmHg; P<0.0001 compared with diabetic patients). Nisoldipine improved the skin vascular distensibility from 28+/-3.3 to 43+/-3.8% (P<0.005) and decreased skin minimal vascular resistance from 16.9+/-1.0 to 13.6+/-0.8 mmHg.ml-1.min.100 g (P<0. 02). Lisinopril had no significant effect on skin vascular distensibility (40+/-4.0% and 41+/-4.4%), but minimal vascular resistance tended to diminish (18.1+/-0.9 to 15.8+/-1.3 mmHg.ml-1. min.100 g (P=0.09). Nisoldipine significantly increased the skin distensibility (P=0.05) after 1 year of antihypertensive treatment compared with lisinopril.4. The control group had a skin vascular distensibility of 54+/-3.2% and a minimal vascular resistance of 10. 8+/-0.7 mmHg.ml-1.min.100 g, both significantly different from the values in the diabetic groups (P<0.0001 for all). Skeletal muscle vascular distensibility was unaltered after 1 year of treatment with both nisoldipine (22+/-3.3% and 19+/-2.7%) and lisinopril (19+/-2.1% and 24+/-2.5%), but was reduced compared with a control value of 43+/-3.7% (P<0.0001 for diabetes patients versus controls). However, neither nisoldipine nor lisinopril had any effect on the increased minimal vascular resistance or the reduced skeletal muscle distensibility.5. Enhanced thickening of the basement membranes of the terminal arteriolar wall was found in skin biopsy specimens in 91% of diabetic patients and 38% only in control subjects (P<0. 000001 both before and after treatment for diabetic patients versus controls). There was no significant effect of antihypertensive treatment on arteriolar hyalinosis.6. The reduction in systemic blood pressure was identical during 1 year of treatment with nisoldipine or lisinopril. The abnormal arteriolar stiffness was more pronounced in the group treated with nisoldipine than with lisinopril and only nisoldipine compared with lisinopril improved the abnormal arteriolar stiffness and minimal vascular resistance in the skin. This suggests that nisoldipine can reverse the peripheral skin perfusion and thereby improve the local protection against development of ischaemic skin lesions in Type I diabetes patients with clinical diabetic nephropathy.
...
PMID:Effects of nisoldipine and lisinopril on microvascular dysfunction in hypertensive Type I diabetes patients with nephropathy. 983 96

Cigarette smoking is a pernicious risk factor for the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease, and endothelial dysfunction is an important antecedent event in this process. This is important, as cigarette smoke is directly toxic to endothelial cells. Inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) have been shown to improve endothelial function in diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia, and are a promising option in smokers. We treated 23 subjects (age 38+/-12 years; mean+/-S.D.) for 8 weeks with 20 mg of lisinopril in a randomized controlled trial. Endothelial function was assessed by measurement of forearm blood flow responses to intra-arterial infusions of endothelial-dependent and -independent vasodilators and an endothelial-dependent vasoconstrictor [acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside and monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) respectively] using venous occlusion plethysmography. Lisinopril significantly increased the forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine by 20% [lisinopril, 3.12+/-0.37 (mean+/-S.E.M.); placebo, 2.58+/-0.25; P=0.02, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.09, 1.06] (values given are ratios of flow in the infused arm to that in the control arm); there was no effect on the response to sodium nitroprusside (lisinopril, 3.97+/-0.40; placebo, 3.92+/-0.39; P=0.84; 95% CI -0.50, 0.61). The vasoconstrictor response to L-NMMA demonstrated a significant improvement (lisinopril, 0.77+/-0.06; placebo, 0.95+/-0.05; P<0.001; 95% CI -0.09, -0.27). In conclusion, these results indicate that ACE inhibition can improve endothelial function in cigarette smokers. We show that lisinopril improves both receptor-mediated and tonic NO release. The mechanism could be either that lisinopril limits the angiotensin II-induced production of superoxide radicals which would normally inactivate NO, or that lisinopril may increase bradykinin-mediated NO release.
...
PMID:Lisinopril improves endothelial function in chronic cigarette smokers. 1141 Jan 14

The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are widely used in the management of essential hypertension, stable chronic heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI) and diabetic nephropathy. There is an increasing number of new agents to add to the nine ACE inhibitors (benazepril, cilazapril, delapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, pentopril, perindopril, quinapril and ramipril) reviewed in this journal in 1990. The pharmacokinetic properties of five newer ACE inhibitors (trandolapril, moexipril, spirapril, temocapril and imidapril) are reviewed in this update. All of these new agents are characterised by having a carboxyl functional groups and requiring hepatic activation to form pharmacologically active metabolites. They achieve peak plasma concentrations at similar times (t(max)) to those of established agents. Three of these agents (trandolapril, moexipril and imidapril) require dosage reductions in patients with renal impairment. Dosage reductions of moexipril and temocapril are recommended for elderly patients, and dosages of moexipril should be lower in patients who are hepatically impaired. Moexipril should be taken 1 hour before meals, whereas other ACE inhibitors can be taken without regard to meals. The pharmacokinetics of warfarin are not altered by concomitant administration with trandolapril or moexipril. Although imidapril and spirapril have no effect on digoxin pharmacokinetics, the area under the concentration-time curve of imidapril and the peak plasma concentration of the active metabolite imidaprilat are decreased when imidapril is given together with digoxin. Although six ACE inhibitors (captopril, enalapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, quinapril and ramipril) have been approved for use in heart failure by the US Food and Drug Administration, an overview of 32 clinical trials of ACE inhibitors in heart failure showed that no significant heterogeneity in mortality was found among enalapril, ramipril, quinapril, captopril, lisinopril, benazepril, perindopril and cilazapril. Initiation of therapy with captopril, ramipril, and trandolapril at least 3 days after an acute MI resulted in all-cause mortality risk reductions of 18 to 27%. Captopril has been shown to have similar morbidity and mortality benefits to those of diuretics and beta-blockers in hypertensive patients. Captopril has been shown to delay the progression of diabetic nephropathy, and enalapril and lisinopril prevent the development of nephropathy in normoalbuminuric patients with diabetes. ACE inhibitors are generally characterised by flat dose-response curves. Lisinopril is the only ACE inhibitor that exhibits a linear dose-response curve. Despite the fact that most ACE inhibitors are recommended for once-daily administration, only fosinopril, ramipril, and trandolapril have trough-to-peak effect ratios in excess of 50%.
...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics and selective pharmacodynamics of new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: an update. 1192 21

Inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) or beta isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC) are nephroprotective in diabetes mellitus. We investigated the influence of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes mellitus and of treatment with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril (4 mg/kg p.o. twice daily for 4 weeks) on the expression of PKC beta 1 and PKC beta 2 in the renal cortex of female Sprague-Dawley rats. Immunohistochemistry indicated an enhanced renocortical accumulation of macrophages expressing both MHC II, a marker for antigen-presenting cells, as well as PKC beta 2 in STZ diabetes which was confirmed by Western blotting demonstrating an enhanced renocortical expression of MHC II (1.8-fold) as well as of membrane-associated PKC beta 2 (1.9-fold). Whereas immunohistochemistry could not detect unequivocal alterations, Western blotting showed a rise in the renocortical expression of membrane-associated PKC beta 1 (1.7-fold) in STZ diabetes. Lisinopril lowered renocortical albumin content and proteinuria in STZ diabetes and attenuated the enhanced accumulation of macrophages expressing PKC beta 2 as well as the increase of membrane-associated expression of PKC beta 1 and PKC beta 2 in the renal cortex. The data suggest that the nephroprotective actions of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril in experimental diabetes mellitus were associated with and thus could be mediated in part by inhibition of diabetes-induced activation of PKC beta isoenzymes in the renal cortex.
...
PMID:Protein kinase C beta isoenzymes in diabetic kidneys and their relation to nephroprotective actions of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril. 1243 80

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk for hypertension and associated cardiovascular diseases, including coronary, cerebrovascular, renal and peripheral vascular disease. The risk for developing cardiovascular disease is increased when both diabetes and hypertension co-exist; in fact, over 11 million Americans have both diabetes and hypertension. These numbers will continue to climb, internationally, since the leading associated risk for diabetes development, obesity, has reached epidemic proportions, globally. Moreover, the frequent association of diabetes with dyslipidemia, as well as coagulation, endothelial, and metabolic abnormalities also aggravates the underlying vascular disease process in patients who possess these comorbid conditions. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) are overactivated in both hypertension and diabetes. Drugs that inhibit this system, such as ACE inhibitors and more recently angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs), have proven beneficial effects on the micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes, especially the kidney. The BRILLIANT study showed that lisinopril reduces microalbuminuria better than CCB therapy. Numerous other long-term studies confirm this association with ACE inhibitors including the HOPE trial. Furthermore, the European Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-dependent Diabetes (EUCLID) study, showed that lisinopril slowed the progression of renal disease, even in individuals with mild albuminuria. In fact, there are now five appropriately powered randomized placebo-controlled trials to show that both ACE inhibitors and ARBs slow progression of diabetic nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes. These effects were shown to be better than conventional blood pressure lowering therapy, including dihydropyridine CCBs. In patients with microalbuminuria, ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduce the progression of microalbuminuria to proteinuria and provide a risk reduction of between 38 and 60% for progression to proteinuria. This is important since microalbuminuria is known to be associated with increased vascular permeability and decreased responsiveness to vasodilatory stimuli. Recently, increased AVP levels have been lined to microalbuminuria and hyperfiltration in diabetes. The microvascular and macrovascular benefits of ACE inhibition, ARBs and possible role of AVP antagonists in diabetic patients will be discussed, as will be recommendations for its clinical use.
...
PMID:Treatment of the diabetic patient: focus on cardiovascular and renal risk reduction. 1243 44

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in the under 65s, and with the burden of disease case load expected to exceed 200 million worldwide within 10 years, much effort is being spent on prophylactic interventions. Early work focused on improving glycaemic control; however, with the publication of EURODIAB Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-dependent Diabetes (EUCLID) and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), the focus has recently moved to control of blood pressure and specifically the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). There is a large body of evidence for a local RAS within the eye that is activated in diabetes. This appears to be directly responsible, as well as indirectly through other mediators, for an increase in concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a selective angiogenic and vasopermeability factor that is implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme appears to reduce concentrations of VEGF, with a concurrent anti-proliferative effect independent of systemic VEGF levels or blood pressure. Angiotensin II (Ang II) Type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockade has been shown to reduce neovascularisation independent of VEGF levels in animal models. This may be due to antagonism of activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase, which is a potent cellular proliferation stimulator, by Ang II, although this needs further evaluation.
...
PMID:The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the eye in diabetes. 1258 67

The effect of lisinopril (an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) on diabetic macular edema (DME) was investigated by quantitative measurement of macular thickness. In a nonrandomized clinical trial, 19 normotensive type 2 diabetic patients with DME prospectively received oral lisinopril therapy for 2 months. Another 10 normotensive type 2 diabetic patients with similar DME were prospectively followed for two months without treatment. Central macular thickness was measured with a retinal thickness analyzer (RTA). In the lisinopril group, visual acuity improved by two lines or more in two out of 19 eyes (11%), was unchanged in 15 eyes (78%), and deteriorated by two lines or more in two eyes (11%). The mean central macular thickness was significantly reduced after 2 months of treatment (381.3 +/- 121.1 microm) compared with that before administration (475.2 +/- 171.0 microm, P = 0.0093). In the control group, central macular thickness was not significantly decreased after 2 months (458.5 +/- 113.7 microm, P = 0.2178) compared with the baseline value (464.7 +/- 152.2). Fluorescein angiography showed that macular leakage was decreased in 10 patients from the lisinopril group (53%) and was unchanged in nine patients (47%). There was a significant difference of central macular thickness between the patients with and without improvement of macular leakage (P = 0.0040). Lisinopril therapy may reduce macular thickness in patients with DME, as shown by this quantitative study. In addition, quantitative measurement of retinal thickness is useful when evaluating therapeutic agents for DME.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004 Dec
PMID:Quantitative measurement of retinal thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema is useful for evaluation of therapeutic agents. 1553 18

<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>