Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

1. The effect of administration of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), lisinopril (Carace; 10-40 mg twice daily) and the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine (Adalat Retard; 20-40 mg twice daily) on ex vivo [45Ca2+] uptake by platelets from hypertensive diabetic (type 1 and 2) patients was investigated. 2. At the end of at least 3 months treatment, blood was collected prior to the patient taking the morning dose of medication and washed platelets prepared. [45Ca2+] uptake was monitored following the addition of adrenaline, isoprenaline and dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), as well as in unstimulated (zero) platelets. 3. Both nifedipine and lisinopril significantly inhibited the ex vivo uptake of [45Ca2+] by platelets when this process was stimulated by adrenaline, isoprenaline and dibutyryl cAMP. Basal uptake was also inhibited in both groups. 4. These data consolidate the hypothesis that ACE inhibitors may possess calcium channel/calcium mobilisation blocking properties. Apart from its hypertensive action, lisinopril may also reduce platelet activity via modulation of calcium dynamics, thereby reducing the incidence of vascular complications associated with diabetes mellitus.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril and nifedipine administration inhibits the ex vivo uptake of [45Ca2+] by platelets from hypertensive diabetic patients. 131 54

The effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on slow and fast twitch muscle contractile properties, nerve conduction and hypoxic resistance, and muscle and nerve capillary density were examined in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Prolongation of soleus contraction and relaxation were partially prevented by treatment (p less than 0.01). A 22% deficit in fast twitch extensor digitorum longus tetanic tension production was also ameliorated (p less than 0.01). Sciatic motor and sensory conduction velocity, 25% and 12% reduced by diabetes respectively, were 75% normalized by lisinopril (p less than 0.01). There was a 47% increase in resistance to hypoxic conduction block with diabetes (p less than 0.01). Lisinopril treatment resulted in normal hypoxic resistance. Capillarization of nerve and muscle was little affected by diabetes; however, there was a 17% increase in capillary density in sciatic nerve, and a 40% increase in extensor digitorum longus muscle with lisinopril (p less than 0.01). For soleus, a smaller treatment-induced increase in capillary density led to an elevated capillary/muscle fibre ratio (p less than 0.01). These results suggest that lisinopril promoted angiogenesis. It was concluded that the beneficial effect of preventive lisinopril treatment is likely to depend upon a reduction of peripheral vascular resistance and improvement of tissue blood flow, which implicates relative hypoxia as an important factor in the development of myopathy and neuropathy in experimental diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition prevents development of muscle and nerve dysfunction and stimulates angiogenesis in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. 137 57

The effects of long-term lisinopril therapy on glucose tolerance and serum lipid profiles were investigated prospectively in 30 hypertensive patients: 15 with normal glucose tolerance and the remaining 15 with glucose intolerance. The levels of plasma glucose, serum lipids, and plasma glycosylated hemoglobin A1c were determined before and during long-term (6 months) therapy with lisinopril. A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed before and during long-term lisinopril therapy. Lisinopril produced significant falls in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in both patient groups during the long-term therapy. Neither fasting nor post-glucose-load venous plasma glucose levels were altered in either group of patients, and no patients with normal glucose tolerance developed diabetes mellitus during the study. There was no significant change in the insulinogenic index (delta IRI/delta BS at 30 min post-glucose load) in both patient groups. No significant changes in fasting levels of serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol were observed in either group during long-term lisinopril therapy. Long-term lisinopril therapy does not compromise glucose or lipid metabolism in hypertensive patients. Lisinopril may have an advantage as an antihypertensive agent that can be given to hypertensive patients without concern that it might alter their serum lipid concentrations or impair glucose tolerance.
 ...
PMID:Glucose and lipid metabolism during long-term lisinopril therapy in hypertensive patients. 170 82

The comparative effects of lisinopril, a third generation angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, on components of the renin-angiotensin system were assessed in normal and in an animal model of diabetes-related hypertension, the streptozotocin-diabetic rat. Two weeks after injection of streptozotocin the mean systolic blood pressure of diabetic rats was elevated 11% above that of normal rats. This effect was prevented by daily injection of insulin. The mean serum ACE activity was elevated 71% above that of normal rats. Lisinopril reduced systolic blood pressure and inhibited serum ACE activity in both normal and diabetic rats in a dose-response fashion. In normal rats maximum inhibition of blood pressure occurred at a mean dose of 1.0 mg/kg and in the diabetic rat at a mean dose of 5.0 mg/kg. At a mean dose of 5 mg/kg, ACE was inhibited by 100 and 92% in normal and diabetic rats, respectively. Plasma renin activity (PRA) increased sharply in both groups of rats treated with the lower doses of lisinopril, only to decrease at the 5 mg/kg level. At 20 mg/kg, PRA continued to decline in normal animals, but not in diabetic rats. Formation of angiotensin II (Ang II) in both normal and diabetic rats was maximally inhibited at doses of 1.0 and 0.1 mg/kg of lisinopril, respectively without a significantly greater effect at the higher doses of the drug. In separate experiments the effects of chronic treatment with lisinopril at two dosage levels on various physiological parameters of streptozotocin-diabetic rats were compared with the effects of another hypotensive agent, hydralazine, an arteriolar vasodilator.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on normal and diabetic rats. 284 85

Hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance are associated with essential hypertension irrespective of obesity and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. One of the mechanisms whereby hyperinsulinaemia may play a role in the increase in blood pressure, is an increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system. The authors studied the incidence of hyperinsulinaemia, and the possibility of modulating it by 12-week administration of the ACE inhibitor (ACEI) lisinopril (Prinivil by MSD) at a dose of 20-40 mg/day. Compared with normotensive subjects, hypertensives showed a degree of hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance (higher blood glucose at higher immunoreactive insulin and C-peptide concentrations, and a higher IRI/blood glucose ratio) as well as manifestations of enhanced sympathetic activity (higher adrenaline levels). Lisinopril had a favourable effect not only on blood pressure but, also, on hyperinsulinaemia and adrenaline levels. It can be reasonably concluded that therapy with ACEI, in addition to its antihypertensive effect, may also favourably modulate some pathogenic and metabolic factors in essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Control of hyperinsulinemia in essential hypertension using the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril]. 838 86

The effect of treatment of rats with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril after 5 weeks of untreated streptozotocin-diabetes was examined by daily monitoring of sciatic motor conduction velocity to tibialis anterior muscle. Diabetes produced a 31.5% decrease in conduction velocity (P < 0.001). Lisinopril treatment caused a progressive improvement which was significant after 3 days (P = 0.002), full normalization being achieved by 6 days (P < 0.0001). After 7 days of treatment there followed a 7-day washout period in which no lisinopril was given. During this time conduction velocity declined to untreated diabetic levels over 3 days. A subsequent treatment period resulted in complete normalization of conduction velocity within 2 days (P < 0.0001). Thus, the marked functional effects seen for vasodilator treatment with lisinopril suggest that angiotension converting enzyme inhibitors may have potential therapeutic value in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy.
 ...
PMID:Rapid reversal of a motor nerve conduction deficit in streptozotocin-diabetic rats by the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril. 839 3

A total of 3463 hypertensive patients with type II diabetes were treated with lisinopril for 3 months. Lisinopril was well tolerated, adverse effects were observed in only 2.2% of the patients. Blood pressure values were effectively reduced by lisinopril, two-thirds of the patients could be treated with lisinopril monotherapy. Parameters of metabolic control (HbA1c, lipids) showed an overall improvement under lisinopril therapy. Serum levels of creatinine did not change in patients who were with normal pretreatment values, but were normalized in approximately 50% of patients with elevated pretreatment values. It can be concluded that under routine medical care ACE inhibitor lisinopril is a well tolerated, effective drug for treatment of hypertensive type II diabetic patients.
J Diabetes Complications
PMID:Effects of ACE inhibitors on renal function in incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy. 880 57

Following establishment of its efficacy in hypertension and congestive heart failure, the ACE inhibitor lisinopril has now been shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction when administered as early treatment. The ability of lisinopril to attenuate the detrimental effects of left ventricular remodelling is a key mechanism; however, additional cardioprotective and vasculoprotective actions are postulated to play a role in mediating the early benefit. The GISSI-3 trial in > 19 000 patients has demonstrated that, when given orally within 24 hours of symptom onset and continued for 6 weeks, lisinopril (with or without nitrates) produces measurable survival benefits within 1 to 2 days of starting treatment. Compared with no lisinopril treatment, reductions of 11% in risk of mortality and 7.7% in a combined end-point (death plus severe left ventricular dysfunction) were evident at 6 weeks. Advantages were apparent in all types of patients. Thus, those at high risk-women, the elderly, patients with diabetes mellitus and those with anterior infarct and/or Killip class > 1 -also benefited. These gains in combined end-point events persisted in the longer term, despite treatment withdrawal after 6 weeks in most patients. At 6 months, the incidence rate for the combined end-point remained lower than with control (a 6.2% reduction). The GISSI-3 results concur with those from recent large investigations (ISIS-4, CCS-1, SMILE) of other ACE inhibitors as early management in myocardial infarction. However, the results of the CONSENSUS II trial (using intravenous enalaprilat then oral enalapril) were unfavourable in some patients. These findings, together with the development of persistent hypotension and, to a lesser extent, renal dysfunction among patients in the GISSI-3 trial, have prompted considerable debate over optimum treatment strategies. Present opinion generally holds that therapy with lisinopril or other ACE inhibitors shown to be beneficial may be started within 24 hours in haemodynamically stable patients with no other contraindications; current labelling in the US and other countries reflects this position. There is virtually unanimous agreement that such therapy is indicated in high-risk patients, particularly those with left ventricular dysfunction. The choice of ACE inhibitor appears less important than the decision to treat; it seems likely that these benefits are a class effect. Lisinopril has a tolerability profile resembling that of other ACE inhibitors, can be given once daily and may be less costly than other members of its class. However, present cost analyses are flawed and this latter points remains to be proven in formal cost-effectiveness analyses. In conclusion, early treatment with lisinopril (within 24 hours of symptom onset) for 6 weeks improves survival and reduces cardiovascular morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction, and confers ongoing benefit after drug withdrawal. While patients with symptoms of left ventricular dysfunction are prime candidates for treatment, all those who are haemodynamically stable with no other contraindications are also eligible to receive therapy. Lisinopril and other ACE inhibitors shown to be beneficial should therefore be considered an integral part of the early management of myocardial infarction in suitable patients.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the early management of acute myocardial infarction. 889 68

Lisinopril, the lysine analogue of enalaprilat, is a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor which is administered once daily by mouth. The efficacy of lisinopril in reducing blood pressure is well established in younger populations, and many trials now show it to be effective in lowering blood pressure in elderly patients with hypertension. In comparative and non-comparative clinical trials, 68.2 to 89.1% of elderly patients responded (diastolic pressure < or = 90 mm Hg) to > or = 8 weeks' lisinopril treatment. Age-related differences in antihypertensive efficacy do not appear to be clinically significant, and dosages effective in elderly patients tend to range from 2.5 to 40 mg/day. Dosages usually need to be lower in patients with significant renal impairment. In congestive heart failure, lisinopril 2.5 to 20 mg/day increases exercise duration, improves left ventricular ejection fraction and has no significant effect on ventricular ectopic beats. It is similar in efficacy to enalapril and digoxin and similar or superior to captopril on most end-points. Data from the GISSI-3 post-myocardial infarction trial show that lisinopril reduced mortality and left ventricular dysfunction when given for 42 days starting within 24 hours of the onset of infarction symptoms. Results at 6 weeks and 6 months were similar in elderly and younger patients. Elderly patients, however, among other subgroups, exhibited a strong reduction in risk of low ejection fraction after treatment (-25.5%). Economic studies suggest that lisinopril is cost saving compared with other ACE inhibitors in some markets. When given according to the GISSI-3 protocol, lisinopril appears to be one of the less expensive of the successful ACE inhibitor regimens for acute myocardial infarction. In other trials, patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension improved or did not deteriorate during lisinopril treatment. Blood pressure was controlled and reductions or trends towards reductions in albuminuria were observed. These reductions were similar to those in diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil recipients, and greater than those in patients receiving atenolol. Lisinopril appears to reduce mortality in diabetic patients after myocardial infarction and may also improve neuropathy associated with diabetes. Lisinopril is well tolerated and the profile of adverse events seen is typical of ACE inhibitors as a class. There is a tendency for more elderly than younger patients to discontinue treatment, but this trend is not clearly related to the incidence of adverse events in these age groups. Drug interactions occur with few other agents and are usually clinically significant only between lisinopril and either diuretics or lithium. Lisinopril is, thus, an effective treatment for elderly patients with hypertension, congestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction and has shown promising benefits in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in elderly patients. 906 Dec 70

Lisinopril, like other ACE inhibitors, lowers blood pressure and preserves renal function in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM or IDDM) and early or overt nephropathy, without adversely affecting glycaemic control or lipid profiles. On available evidence, renoprotective effects appear to be greater with lisinopril than with comparator calcium channel blockers, diuretics and beta-blockers, despite similar antihypertensive efficacy. As shown by the EUCLID (EUrodiab Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes) trial, lisinopril is also renoprotective in normotensive patients with IDDM and microalbuminuria. The effect in normotensive patients with normoalbuminuria was smaller than in those with microalbuminuria, and no conclusions can yet be made about its use in patients with normoalbuminuria. In complications other than nephropathy, lisinopril has shown some benefit. Progression to retinopathy was slowed during 2 years' lisinopril therapy in the EUCLID study. Although not yet fully published, these results provide the most convincing evidence to date for an effect of an ACE inhibitor in retinopathy. The drug may also improve neurological function, but this finding is preliminary. Lastly, post hoc analysis of the GISSI-3 trial indicates that lisinopril reduces 6-week mortality rates in diabetic patients when begun as early treatment after an acute myocardial infarction. The tolerability profile of lisinopril is typical of ACE inhibitors and appears to be similar in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. Hypoglycaemia has occurred at a similar frequency with lisinopril and placebo, as shown in the EUCLID trial. In addition, the GISSI-3 study indicates that the incidence of persistent hypotension and renal dysfunction is increased with lisinopril in general, but the presence of diabetes does not appear to confer additional risk of these events in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving lisinopril. In summary, lisinopril lowers blood pressure and produces a renoprotective effect in patients with IDDM and NIDDM without detriment to glycaemic control or lipid profiles. Like other ACE inhibitors, lisinopril should thus be viewed as a first-line agent for reducing blood pressure and preventing or attenuating nephropathy in hypertensive diabetic patients with IDDM or NIDDM and microalbuminuria or overt renal disease. The EUCLID study, using lisinopril, provides new data supporting an additional place in managing normotensive patients with microalbuminuria and IDDM. These findings, together with some evidence for an effect of lisinopril in delaying progression of retinopathy and in reducing mortality, suggest a broader role for the drug in managing diabetic vascular complications.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and use in the management of the complications of diabetes mellitus. 917 32


1 2 3 Next >>