Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

1. Insulin resistance is an early and major feature in the development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), but it is also associated with hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, obesity and cardiovascular disease, the so-called 'insulin-resistance syndrome' (Syndrome X). 2. There is a strong genetic determination of NIDDM and insulin resistance, but the environmental factors of calorie excess, reduced activity and obesity also make a major contribution. 3. Central (abdominal) obesity is much more strongly associated with insulin resistance than is overall obesity. From twin studies, there appears to be specific genetic determinants of central abdominal fat, independent of overall obesity. 4. Calorie restriction and weight loss improve insulin sensitivity in overweight humans. Isocaloric alteration of macronutrients substantially affects insulin sensitivity in rats but not, at least in the short-term, in humans. 5. Exercise training improves insulin sensitivity via increased oxidative enzymes, glucose transporters (GLUT4) and capillarity in muscle as well as by reducing abdominal fat. 6. Metformin has been the only available drug that has been used clinically to significantly improve insulin sensitivity, but the new 'glitazones' (thiazolidinediones) have a more specific effect via altered lipid metabolism.
 ...
PMID:Pathogenesis of the insulin resistance syndrome (syndrome X). 931 89

Metformin often promotes weight loss in patients with obesity with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The mechanism may be attributed to decreased food intake. This study has tested the effect of metformin on satiety and its efficacy in inducing weight loss. Twelve diet-treated NIDDM women with obesity were randomly given two dose levels (850 mg or 1700 mg) of metformin or placebo at 0800 for three consecutive days followed by a meal test on the third day on three occasions using a 3x3 Latin square design. The number of sandwich canapes eaten in three consecutive 10-minute periods beginning at 1400 hours was used to quantitate food intake, and the level of subjective hunger was rated just before the sandwich meal with a linear analogue hunger rating scale at 1400 after a 6-hour fast. The prior administration of metformin produced a reduction in calorie intake after each of the two doses of metformin treatment. The 1700-mg metformin dose had the most marked appetite suppressant action. Similarly, hunger ratings were significantly lowered after metformin, and the effect was most pronounced after the administration of 1700 mg of metformin. To assess the efficacy of metformin in reducing bodyweight, 48 diet-treated NIDDM women with obesity who had failed to lose weight by diet therapy were first placed on a 1200-kcal ADA (American Diabetes Association) diet before being randomized to receive either metformin (850 mg) or placebo twice daily in a double-blind fashion for 24 weeks. A 4-week single-blind placebo lead-in period preceded and a 6-week single-blind placebo period followed the 24-week double-blind treatment period. Subjects treated with metformin continued to lose weight throughout 24 weeks of treatment; their mean maximum weight loss was 8 kg greater than that of the placebo group, with corresponding lower HbA1C and fasting blood glucose levels at the end of the active treatment period. These results indicate that metformin decreases calorie intake in a dose-dependent manner and leads to a reduction in bodyweight in NIDDM patients with obesity.
 ...
PMID:Metformin decreases food consumption and induces weight loss in subjects with obesity with type II non-insulin-dependent diabetes. 952 70

Metformin effects on insulin resistance and insulin/glucose relationships during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were investigated in 60 non-diabetic male patients previously treated with coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty in an open, 12 week prospective study. During a 4 week run-in period, all patients were treated with diet and lifestyle advice and lovastatin 40 mg daily. Lovastatin treatment was continued in all the patient throughout the study. After randomization, the metformin group got additional treatment with metformin up to 2000 mg/day. Fasting plasma glucose levels and glucose area during OGTT remained unaffected by metformin treatment. Insulin resistance, assessed as the insulin area/glucose area ratio during OGTT decreased by 24% (P = 0.028) in the whole group and by 30% in obese subjects (P = 0.049). Notably, the reduction in body weight by metformin treatment did not correlate with amelioration of insulin resistance or changes in lipid levels. However, changes in insulin resistance correlated with changes in lipid levels. Hence, metformin effects on insulin resistance and body weight appear to be mediated, at least partly, by different mechanisms, while metformin effects on insulin resistance and lipid metabolism are associated in non-diabetic subjects.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1998 Jan
PMID:Evidence for dissociation of insulin- and weight-reducing effects of metformin in non-diabetic male patients with coronary heart disease. 959 74

Diabetes mellitus is associated with alterations in a number of key metabolic pathways. Despite theoretical concerns, clinically significant alterations in the pharmacokinetic properties of commonly prescribed drugs are relatively uncommon. Indeed, dose adjustment is rarely required in the setting of well controlled diabetes mellitus. However, significant alterations in drug handling may occur in the context of poor metabolic control or in the presence of complications such as nephropathy. Metformin use may be complicated by lactic acidosis. Fortunately, this is a rare occurrence providing that the agent is not used in circumstances in which it is contraindicated. Indeed, the risk of death from metformin-related lactic acidosis is similar in magnitude to the risk of death related to hypoglycaemia in sulphonylurea-treated patients. The novel hypoglycaemic agent troglitazone may be associated with abnormalities in liver function in approximately 2% of patients. Discontinuation of treatment is followed by normalisation of liver enzyme levels. Current prescribing information recommends frequent monitoring of liver function tests and immediate cessation of therapy if abnormalities develop. In addition to disturbances in intermediary metabolism, diabetes mellitus may also lead to chronic microvascular and marcovascular complications. Thus, in addition to the use of drugs for the control of blood glucose, patients with diabetes mellitus are likely to be prescribed medication for associated conditions such as cardiovascular disease. Such medication includes the ACE inhibitors which are contraindicated in patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis. This complication may be theoretically more common in patients with diabetes mellitus because of accelerated atherosclerosis. However, in clinical practice this is an uncommon occurrence in the absence of clinical features that should alert the treating clinician that an individual patient might be at high risk. Although caution should also be used with beta-blocker therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus, current evidence suggests that, like ACE inhibitors, these drugs may be particularly useful in this patient group.
 ...
PMID:Drug administration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Safety considerations. 963 89

Although low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is a critically important factor in the development of atherosclerosis, nearly half the patients with coronary artery disease have LDL cholesterol levels within the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines. Therefore, attention has focused on other modifiable risk factors that could strongly impact the development of coronary artery disease. Type 2 diabetics have a 3-fold increased risk of coronary artery disease; prediabetics, without chronic hyperglycemia, have a 2-fold increased risk compared with normal subjects. Insulin resistance has also been implicated as the cause of atherosclerosis. Insulin resistance is associated with hyperinsulinemia and a constellation of other factors, some of which are themselves independent risk factors for coronary artery disease. These include reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia, increased small dense LDL particles, hypertension, visceral obesity, and increased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance at the vascular level also may contribute to vascular injury and the atherosclerotic process. Current studies suggest that controlling hyperglycemia, LDL cholesterol, and blood pressure are important to protect the diabetic from atherosclerosis. A key question, particularly in type 2 diabetes, is to define the best regimen for glucose control that will protect the vasculature. Sulfonylureas, metformin, and troglitazone have direct vascular actions. Metformin lowers LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, while troglitazone reverses many of the components associated with the insulin resistance syndrome. Clinical trials focusing on coronary artery disease outcomes are now warranted to prevent coronary artery disease, the major vascular complication and cause of mortality in diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Cardiovascular risk continuum: implications of insulin resistance and diabetes. 970 62

The hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and obesity syndrome associated with type 2 diabetes can have debilitating consequences. The biguanide metformin has a mechanism of action that is complementary to those of insulin and the sulfonylureas, suggesting that combination therapy that includes metformin may result in improved glycemic control. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to determine the effects of adding metformin in an uncontrolled fashion to existing therapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal glycemic control and insulin resistance. For the review, the records of 124 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included 71 patients who were taking insulin with or without a sulfonylurea, and group 2 consisted of 53 patients who were taking a sulfonylurea alone. Metformin was added to patients' existing therapy in conjunction with downward titration of the sulfonylurea and insulin doses. A retrospective chart review was conducted at the end of 6 months for group 1 and at the end of 12 months for group 2 to determine the change from baseline in measures of diabetes control (ie, insulin and sulfonylurea dose, glycated hemoglobin [Hb A1c] value, body mass index [BMI], and lipid profiles). In group 1, the mean insulin dose decreased from 46.4 U/d at baseline to 6.1 U/d at the end of follow-up. Eighty-three percent of the patients were able to discontinue insulin therapy completely. Similarly, group 2 had statistically significant reductions in mean sulfonylurea dose. Both groups also achieved statistically significant reductions in Hb A1c, BMI, and total cholesterol level. The addition of metformin to treatment with insulin or sulfonylureas, either alone or in combination, significantly improved glycemic control and cholesterol levels and promoted weight loss in obese type 2 diabetic patients with insulin resistance. Less than 5% of patients reported mild, transient gastrointestinal side effects, none of which required cessation of metformin therapy. Five patients discontinued metformin due to lack of efficacy.
 ...
PMID:A retrospective chart review of uncontrolled use of metformin as an add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes. 973 29

Methylglyoxal (MG) is a reactive alpha-dicarbonyl that is thought to contribute to diabetic complications either as a direct toxin or as a precursor for advanced glycation end products. It is produced primarily from triose phosphates and is detoxified to D-lactate (DL) by the glyoxalase pathway. Because guanidino compounds can block dicarbonyl groups, we have investigated the effects of the diamino biguanide compound metformin and of hyperglycemia on MG and its detoxification products in type 2 diabetes. MG and DL were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in plasma from 57 subjects with type 2 diabetes. Of these subjects, 27 were treated with diet, sulfonylureas, or insulin (nonmetformin), and 30 were treated with metformin; 28 normal control subjects were also studied. Glycemic control was determined by HbA1c. MG was significantly elevated in diabetic subjects versus the normal control subjects (189.3 +/- 38.7 vs. 123.0 +/- 37 nmol/l, P = 0.0001). MG levels were significantly reduced by high-dosage (1,500-2,500 mg/day) metformin (158.4 +/- 44.2 nmol/l) compared with nonmetformin (189.3 +/- 38.7 nmol/l, P = 0.03) or low-dosage (< or = 1,000 mg/day) metformin (210.98 +/- 51.0 nmol/l, P = 0.001), even though the groups had similar glycemic control. Conversely, DL levels were significantly elevated in both the low- and high-dosage metformin groups relative to the nonmetformin group (13.8 +/- 7.7 and 13.4 +/- 4.6 vs. 10.4 +/- 3.9 micromol/l, P = 0.03 and 0.06, respectively). MG correlated with rising HbA1c levels (R = 0.4, P = 0.03, slope = 13.2) in the nonmetformin subjects but showed no increase with worsening glycemic control in the high-dosage metformin group (R = 0.0004, P = 0.99, slope = 0.02). In conclusion, MG is elevated in diabetes and relates to glycemic control. Metformin reduces MG in a dose-dependent fashion and minimizes the effect of worsening glycemic control on MG levels. To the extent that elevated MG levels lead to their development, metformin treatment may protect against diabetic complications by mechanisms independent of its antihyperglycemic effect.
Diabetes 1999 Jan
PMID:Metformin reduces systemic methylglyoxal levels in type 2 diabetes. 989 43

The treatment of NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylurea is a common problem. We performed a crossover study in 50 NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glibenclamide by comparing the addition to sulphonylurea of either a low-dose bedtime NPH insulin or a t.i.d. oral metformin and by analyzing treatment efficacy in relation to patient and disease characteristics. Both combined therapies clearly improved glycaemic control. HbA1 c were similarly reduced by the addition of either bedtime NPH insulin (7.6+/-0.34 vs 8.7+/-0.35, p<0.01) or metformin (7.6+/-0.22 vs 8.6+/-0.31, p<0.01). Also fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and post-prandial plasma glucose (PPPG) significantly decreased (p<0.01) with both treatments. Bed-time NPH insulin was more effective on FPG reduction than metformin (-36+/-2% vs -25+/-2%, p<0.01); in contrast, metformin addition was more effective on PPPG reduction than bedtime NPH insulin addition (-30+/-2% vs 20+/-3%, p<0.01). Serum cholesterol was marginally but significantly decreased after metformin (5.49+/-0.19 vs 5.91 +/-0.18 mM, p<0.05) but not after NPH insulin. Body weight increase was significantly greater after insulin addition than after metformin (1.47+/-0.25 Kg vs 0.64+/-0.17 p=0.02). All patients preferred the addition of metformin rather than NPH insulin. None of the measured clinical and metabolic variables (before treatment FPG and PPPG, HbA1 c, post-glucagon C-peptide levels, insulin sensitivity, patient age, BMI and diabetes duration) significantly correlated to the efficacy of the two combined treatments studied. In conclusion, in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylureas the addition of either low-dose bedtime NPH insulin or t.i.d. metformin is similarly effective in improving glycaemic control. Metformin is better accepted by patients and provides a modest advantage in terms of body weight and cholesterol levels. The most common clinical and metabolic variables are not useful for predicting the efficacy of these two combined treatments.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of combined treatments in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylureas. Is it predictable? 997 73

Glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes has been proven efficient in preventing microvascular and neurological complications. The assumption that good control of hyperglycaemia may also have significant impact on alleviation of complications in Type 2 diabetes has gained growing support in recent years. Measures such as body weight reduction and exercise improve the metabolic defects, but pharmacological therapy is most frequently used. The sulphonylureas stimulate insulin secretion. Metformin and troglitazone increase glucose disposal and decrease hepatic glucose output without causing hypoglycaemia. Acarbose helps to spread the dietary carbohydrate challenge to endogenous insulin over time. These pharmacological treatments can improve blood glucose regulation in Type 2 diabetes patients. However, the key to strict glycaemic control with use of exogenous insulin lies in the creation of delivery methods that emulate physiologic insulin secretion. Insulin lispro, a recombinant insulin analogue, is identical to human insulin except for the transposition of proline and lysine at positions 28 and 29 in the C-terminus of the B chain. Evidence suggests that patients perceive their quality of life to be improved with insulin lispro when compared with regular human insulin, and that satisfaction with treatment is greater with the insulin analogue. Numerous new pharmacological approaches are under active investigation, with the aim of promoting insulin secretion, improving the action of insulin, or slowing carbohydrate absorption. With respect to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy and implantable pumps, despite that this approach is not widely utilised, it appears to bring us as close to achieving glycaemic control as is feasible with current treatment approaches. However, general application of such technology requires significant improvements in several areas, such as improvement of patency of catheter, pump failures due to early battery depletion incidents, and pump miniaturisation. Future perspective resides on insulin analogues with longer half-lives that would provide better basal insulin coverage in association with fast-acting analogues.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacological management of diabetes: recent progress and future perspective in daily drug treatment. 1005 Nov 77

For the last 30 years, sulfonylureas have been the mainstay of treatment for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). They offered patients an alternative to using insulin to lower their blood glucose. One of the advantages of these agents was that they could be taken orally as opposed to insulin, which required multiple daily injections. In addition, they are tolerable, with few side effects, and they cause less hypoglycemia than does insulin. In the past year, new agents (metformin and acarbose) have been introduced into the market and have offered practitioners an alternative to the traditional sulfonylureas. The sulfonylureas are still valuable agents in the treatment of NIDDM. Their efficacy is unsurpassed by any other oral medications. They possess the best tolerability profile of all oral agents on the market, and they possess very few contraindications or drug interactions. The sulfonylureas should still be considered first-line agents for NIDDM. Metformin and acarbose are agents that may benefit a specific patient population, but sulfonylureas are agents that can benefit most patients.
 ...
PMID:Exploring the role of sulfonylureas in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. 1017 6


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>