Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Membrane peptidases are a group of ectoenzymes with a broad functional repertoire. In protein metabolism, their importance is well known, especially in peptide degradation and amino acid scavenging at the intestinal and renal brush border. However, they also perform more subtle tasks; not only do they provide or extinguish signals by cleaving exterior peptide mediators, but they also may function as receptors or participate in signal transduction or in adhesion. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV), which is identical to the lymphocyte surface glycoprotein CD26, is unique among these peptidases because of its ability to liberate Xaa-Pro and less efficiently Xaa-Ala dipeptides from the N-terminus of regulatory peptides. It occurs in the plasma membrane as a homodimer with a total molecular mass of 22-240 KdA and the C-terminal domain probably forms on alpha/beta hydrolase fold. In addition to, but independent of its serine type catalytic activity, DPPIV binds closely to the soluble extracellular enzyme adenosine deaminase. The in vivo expression on epithelial, endothelial and lymphoid cells of DPPIV is compatible with a role as physiological regulator of a number of peptides that serve as biochemical reporters between and within the immune and neuroendocrine system. Surprisingly, not cytokines with a N-terminal Xaa-Pro motif, but a number of chemokines have recently been identified as substrates. Despite DPPIV mediates only a minimal N-terminal truncation, important alterations in chemokine activities and receptor specificitIes were observed in vitro together with modified inflammatory and antiviral responses. Most probably the great flexibility of the N-terminus of a number of chemokines facilitates the accessibIlity to the catalytic site of DPPIV. Other known substrates which are subject in vitro to receptor-specific changes induced by DPPIV truncation include neuropeptides such as substance P, peptidE YY and neuropeptide Y. On the other hand, DPPIV mediated cleavage of the N-terminal His-Ala or Tyr-Ala dipeptides from circulating incretin hormones like, glucagon-like peptides (GLP)-1 and -2, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), all members of the enteroglucagon/GRF superfamily, results in their biological inactivation in vitro and in vivo. Administration of specific DPPIV inhibitors closes this pathway of incretin degradation and greatly enhances insulin secretion. The improved glucose tolerance in several animal models for type II diabetes points to specific DPPIV inhibition as a pharmaceutical approach for type 2 diabetes drug development.
 ...
PMID:Peptide truncation by dipeptidyl peptidase IV: a new pathway for drug discovery? 1128 88

We studied the mechanisms and physiological relevance of the cephalic insulin response to meal ingestion in 12 healthy women (age 63 +/- 0.4 years; BMI 27.7 +/- 1.7 kg/m2). The ganglionic antagonist, trimethaphan, which impairs neurotransmission across parasympathetic and sympathetic autonomic ganglia, or atropine or saline was given intravenously during the first 15 min after ingestion of a standard meal (350 kcal). During saline infusion, insulin levels increased during the first 10 min after meal ingestion, whereas the first increase in glucose was evident at 15 min. The preabsorptive 10-min insulin response was reduced by 73 +/- 11% by trimethaphan (P = 0.009), accompanied by impaired reduction of glucose levels from 25 to 60 min after meal ingestion (deltaglucose = -1.27 +/- 0.5 [with saline] vs. 0.1 +/- 0.4 mmol/l [with trimethaphan]; P = 0.008). This reduction at 25-60 min in glucose levels correlated significantly to the 10-min insulin response (r = 0.65, P = 0.024). The 10-min insulin response to meal ingestion was also reduced by atropine, but only by 20 +/- 9% (P = 0.045), which was lower than the reduction with trimethaphan (P = 0.004). The preabsorptive insulin response was not accompanied by any increase in circulating levels of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) or glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). In conclusion, 1) the early preabsorptive insulin response to meal ingestion in humans can be largely attributed to autonomic activation mediated by noncholinergic and cholinergic mechanisms, 2) this cephalic insulin response is required for a normal postprandial glucose tolerance, and 3) GIP and GLP-1 do not contribute to the preabsorptive cephalic phase insulin response to meal ingestion.
Diabetes 2001 May
PMID:The cephalic insulin response to meal ingestion in humans is dependent on both cholinergic and noncholinergic mechanisms and is important for postprandial glycemia. 1133 5

The search for intestinal factors regulating the endocrine secretion of the pancreas started soon after the discovery of secretin, i.e. nearly 100 years ago. Insulinotropic factors of the gut released by nutrients and stimulating insulin secretion in physiological concentrations in the presence of elevated blood glucose levels have been named incretins. Of the known gut hormones only gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like polypeptide-1 (GLP-1 [7-36] amide) fulfill this definition.--The incretin effect (i.e. the ratio between the integrated insulin response to an oral glucose load and an isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion) is markedly diminished in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, while the plasma levels of GIP and GLP-1 and their responses to nutrients are in the normal range. Therefore, a reduced responsiveness of the islet B-cells to incretins has been postulated. This insensitivity of the diabetic B-cells towards incretins can be overcome by supraphysiological (pharmacological) concentrations of GLP-1 [7-36], however not of GIP. Accordingly, fasting and postprandial glucose levels can be normalized in patients with type 2 diabetes by infusions of GLP-1 [7-36]. Further studies revealed that this is partially due to the fact that GLP-1 [7-36]--in addition to its insulinotropic effect--also inhibits glucagon secretion and delays gastric emptying. These three antidiabetic effects qualify GLP-1 [7-36] as an interesting therapeutic tool, mainly for type 2 diabetes. However, because of its short plasma half life time natural GLP-1 [7-36] is not suitable for subcutaneous application. At present methods are being developed to improve the pharmacokinetics of GLP-1 by inhibition of the cleaving enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) or by synthesis of DPP-IV resistant GLP-1 analogues. Also naturally occurring GLP-1 analogues (for instance exendin-4) with a much longer half life time than GLP-1 [7-36] are being tested.--Thus, after 100 years of speculations and experimentations, incretins and their analogues are emerging as new antidiabetic drugs.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2001
PMID:The entero-insular axis in type 2 diabetes--incretins as therapeutic agents. 1146 May 78

In patients with type 2 diabetes, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) has lost much of its insulinotropic activity. Whether this is similar in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes is unknown. A total of 21 first-degree relatives, 10 patients with type 2 diabetes, and 10 control subjects (normal oral glucose tolerance) were examined. During a hyperglycemic "clamp" (140 mg/dl for 120 min), synthetic human GIP (2 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1)) was infused intravenously (30-90 min). With exogenous GIP, patients with type 2 diabetes responded with a lower increment (Delta) in insulin (P = 0.0003) and C-peptide concentrations (P < 0.0001) than control subjects. The GIP effects in first-degree relatives were diminished compared with control subjects (Delta insulin: P = 0.04; Delta C-peptide: P = 0.016) but significantly higher than in patients with type 2 diabetes (P < or = 0.05). The responses over the time course were below the 95% CI derived from control subjects in 7 (insulin) and 11 (C-peptide) of 21 first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes. In conclusion, a reduced insulinotropic activity of GIP is typical for a substantial subgroup of normoglycemic first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes, pointing to an early, possibly genetic defect.
Diabetes 2001 Nov
PMID:Reduced insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes. 1167 27

Morbid obesity (MO) is associated with diabetes mellitus-type II (DM-II). Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RNY) has been shown to normalize glucose intolerance in these patients through an incompletely understood mechanism. Gastrointestinal hormonal changes have been suggested as an explanation for resolution of DM II. Preoperatively, 20 MO patients with DM-II were evaluated for demographics and fasting levels of the following: glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, cortisol, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Each patient underwent RNY with a 15-cc gastric pouch and 150-cm Roux limb. Postoperatively, each of the variables was measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks and compared with the preoperative result using Student t test with significance, P = 0.05. Results are expressed as mean +/- SD. Twenty patients (5 male and 15 female), age 40.3 +/- 7.9 years, weight 146.3 +/- 34.0 kg, height 158.7 +/- 18.7 cm, and BMI 52.7 +/- 8.8, were enrolled in this IRB-approved protocol. Weight and BMI decreased progressively (117.5 +/- 26.9 kg and 47.0 +/- 7.4, P = 0.01, respectively) during the study but reached significance only at 12 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose decreased significantly within 2 weeks after RNY. Insulin and cortisol both approached, but never achieved, significant changes over 12 weeks. GLP-1 increased initially, but not significantly. GIP and C-peptide both decreased significantly. Glucagon remained essentially unchanged over 12 weeks. RNY rapidly normalizes fasting plasma glucose in morbidly obese patients with DM-II. GIP, a gactor in the enteroinsulin axis, decreases and may play a role in the correction of DM-II after gastric bypass.
 ...
PMID:Hormonal changes after Roux-en Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and the control of type-II diabetes mellitus. 1496 37

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) are important factors in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and have a promising therapeutic potential. Alterations of their secretion, in vivo degradation, and elimination in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) have not yet been characterized. Ten patients with CRI (aged 47 +/- 15 years, BMI 24.5 +/- 2.2 kg/m(2), and serum creatinine 2.18 +/- 0.86 mg/dl) and 10 matched healthy control subjects (aged 44 +/- 12 years, BMI 24.9 +/- 3.4 kg/m(2), and serum creatinine 0.89 +/- 0.10 mg/dl) were included. On separate occasions, an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g), an intravenous infusion of GLP-1 (0.5 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1) over 30 min), and an intravenous infusion of GIP (1.0 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1) over 30 min) were performed. Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of glucose (glucose oxidase), insulin, C-peptide, GLP-1 (total and intact), and GIP (total and intact; specific immunoassays). Plasma levels of GIP (3-42) and GLP-1 (9-36 amide) were calculated. Statistics were performed using repeated-measures and one-way ANOVA. After the oral glucose load, plasma concentrations of intact GLP-1 and intact GIP reached similar levels in both groups (P = 0.31 and P = 0.87, respectively). The concentrations of GIP (3-42) and GLP-1 (9-36 amide) were significantly higher in the patients than in the control subjects (P = 0.0021 and P = 0.027, respectively). During and after the exogenous infusion, GLP-1 (9-36 amide) and GIP (3-42) reached higher plasma concentrations in the CRI patients than in the control subjects (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0033, respectively), whereas the plasma levels of intact GLP-1 and GIP were not different between the groups (P = 0.29 and P = 0.27, respectively). Plasma half-lives were 3.4 +/- 0.6 and 2.3 +/- 0.4 min for intact GLP-1 (P = 0.13) and 5.3 +/- 0.8 and 3.3 +/- 0.4 min for the GLP-1 metabolite (P = 0.029) for CRI patients vs. healthy control subjects, respectively. Plasma half-lives of intact GIP were 6.9 +/- 1.4 and 5.0 +/- 1.2 min (P = 0.31) and 38.1 +/- 6.0 and 22.4 +/- 3.0 min for the GIP metabolite (P = 0.032) for CRI patients vs. healthy control subjects, respectively. Insulin concentrations tended to be lower in the patients during all experiments, whereas C-peptide levels tended to be elevated. These data underline the importance of the kidneys for the final elimination of GIP and GLP-1. The initial dipeptidyl peptidase IV-mediated degradation of both hormones is almost unaffected by impairments in renal function. Delayed elimination of GLP-1 and GIP in renal insufficiency may influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dipeptidyl peptidase IV-resistant incretin derivatives to be used for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes 2004 Mar
PMID:Secretion, degradation, and elimination of glucagon-like peptide 1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide in patients with chronic renal insufficiency and healthy control subjects. 1498 49

It has been known for at least one century that agents secreted from the intestine during meal absorption regulates glucose assimilation. Extensive research during the past three decades has identified two gut hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP, also known as gastric inhibitory polypeptide) that are important in postprandial glucose metabolism. Both peptides are incretins; they are secreted during carbohydrate absorption and increase insulin secretion. Since they are potent insulin secretagogues, GIP and GLP-1 have received considerable attention as potential diabetes therapeutics. However, only GLP-1 exerts insulinotropic properties when administered to patients with Type 2 diabetes. Both GLP-1 and GIP are rapidly inactivated in the circulation by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV). The application of GLP-1 into clinical practice has been delayed due to the need to develop compounds that overcome this rapid inactivation. Two approaches have been taken to utilise the insulinotropic and glucose-lowering actions of GLP-1 as an antidiabetic agent: the development of DPP-IV-resistant analogues and the inhibition of DPP-IV. This review focuses on the physiology of GLP-1 and GIP and the advances that have been made thus far in developing treatments based on these physiological incretins for Type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Gut peptides in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. 1501 38

Inhibitors of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) are of increasing interest to both diabetologists and the pharmaceutical industry alike, as they may become established as the next member of the oral antidiabetic class of therapeutic agents, designed to lower blood glucose and, possibly, prevent the progressive impairment of glucose metabolism in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and Type 2 diabetes. DPP IV has become a focus of attention for drug design, as it has a pivotal role in the rapid degradation of at least two of the hormones released during food ingestion, a property that has warranted the design of inhibitor-based drugs. At the molecular level, DPP IV cleaves two amino acids from the N-terminus of the intact, biologically active forms of both so-called incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (formerly known as gastric inhibitory polypeptide), resulting in truncated metabolites, which are largely inactive. Inhibition of the enzyme, therefore, is thought to increase levels of the active forms of both incretin hormones, culminating in an increase in insulin release after a meal, in a fully glucose-dependent manner. DPP IV inhibitors combine several features of interest to the drug design process. They can be readily optimised for their target and be designed as low molecular weight, orally active entities compatible with once-daily administration.
 ...
PMID:Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase IV: a novel approach for the prevention and treatment of Type 2 diabetes? 1533 Jul 41

Our objective was to study whether young first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes (FDRs) have altered insulin secretion and insulin clearance in response to gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in combination with glucose and arginine. A hyperglycemic clamp (11.1 mmol/l for 115 min), followed by addition of GIP (2 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1), 60-115 min) and an arginine bolus and infusion (10 mg. kg(-1). min(-1), 90-115 min), was conducted on 14 healthy volunteers and 13 FDRs. Both groups had normal glucose tolerance. FDRs were more insulin resistant (HOMA(IR)) under basal conditions (P = 0.003). FDRs demonstrated significant global impairment in insulin secretion capacity, which was not specific for one of the secretagogues. Insulin clearance was significantly reduced in the group of FDRs under basal conditions and in response to GIP, but there was no general defect in insulin clearance in response to glucose and arginine. The HOMA(IR) correlated negatively (P < 0.01) with insulin clearance under basal conditions (r = -0.96) and under GIP infusion (r = -0.56). We propose that impairment in insulin secretion capacity and decreased insulin sensitivity is compensated for several mechanisms, one of which includes a GIP-dependent reduction of the insulin clearance that will increase peripheral insulin levels to maintain normoglycemia.
Diabetes 2004 Sep
PMID:Reduced hepatic insulin extraction in response to gastric inhibitory polypeptide compensates for reduced insulin secretion in normal-weight and normal glucose tolerant first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetic patients. 1533 46

A reduced insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is a characteristic of patients with type 2 diabetes. It was the aim of this study to determine the response of insulin secretion to different GIP doses administered by intravenous bolus injection and via continuous infusion in both healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes. Eight patients with type 2 diabetes and eight healthy subjects participated in a 240-min hyperglycemic clamp (140 mg/dl) with intravenous infusion of placebo, GIP at a low dose, and GIP at a high dose, each administered continuously over 60 min. Boluses of placebo, 20 pmol GIP/kg, and 80 pmol GIP/kg were injected intravenously at 0, 60, and 120 min, respectively. Capillary and venous blood was drawn for glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and GIP. Plasma insulin and C-peptide concentrations were lower in patients than in control subjects during all infusion periods. GIP bolus administration evoked a significant increase in plasma insulin levels in both patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy subjects. In contrast, the continuous GIP infusion led to a weak increase in insulin secretion in both healthy subjects and type 2 diabetic patients. The dose-response relationship for the increase in insulin secretion after GIP bolus administration was similar in both groups, although at different degrees of beta-cell function. The stimulation of insulin secretion by GIP is stronger after its bolus administration than during continuous infusion. Even though the insulin secretory capacity is generally impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes, the relative sensitivity of insulin secretion to a bolus administration of GIP is almost preserved. Therefore, the existence of a specific GIP receptor defect in type 2 diabetes appears unlikely.
Diabetes 2004 Dec
PMID:Stimulation of insulin secretion by intravenous bolus injection and continuous infusion of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. 1556 15


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>