Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Until recently, the role of statin therapy in diabetic patients without clinical signs or symptoms of coronary heart disease had been inadequately defined. The Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to compare the effects of atorvastatin with placebo in preventing primary coronary events in diabetic patients. After a median of only 3.9 years (the study was terminated approximately 2 years early due to the magnitude of benefit attributable to atorvastatin therapy), risk for major cardiovascular events was decreased by 37%, acute coronary heart disease-related events were also reduced by 36%, coronary revascularizations by 31%, and stroke by 48%. Benefit emerged within 1 year of initiating therapy.
 ...
PMID:The CARDS trial: diabetic patients dealt a winning hand. 1690 14

Guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) focus the need for the most intensive efforts to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the patients at greatest risk of a major future clinical coronary heart disease event. Major clinical trials, such as Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy and the Heart Protection Study, demonstrated the value of lowering LDL-C levels in high-risk patients to well below the ATP III target of <100 mg/dL. In 2004, the NCEP writing group suggested that a more aggressive LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is an option when treating high-risk patients, particularly those with the presence of established cardiovascular disease plus major multiple risk factors (especially diabetes), severe and poorly controlled risk factors (ie, cigarette smoking), multiple criteria of the metabolic syndrome, or an acute coronary syndrome. With stricter targets, high-risk patients are less likely to achieve their cholesterol goals than lower risk patients. Recent large trials comparing rosuvastatin with other statin monotherapies have shown a greater LDL-C reduction and better attainment of goals with rosuvastatin. In addition, the MERCURY [Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin Therapy] trials demonstrate that switching to rosuvastatin significantly increased the percentage of patients who achieved their ATP III LDL-C targets.
 ...
PMID:Rising to the challenge of treating high-risk patients. 1704 74

Computer simulation models are mathematical equations combined in a structured framework to represent some real or hypothetical system. One of their uses is to allow the projection of short-term data from clinical trials to evaluate clinical outcomes and costs over a long-term period. This technology is becoming increasingly important to assist decision making in modern medicine in situations where there is a paucity of long-term clinical trial data, as recently acknowledged in the American Diabetes Association Consensus Panel Guidelines for Computer Modeling of Diabetes and its Complications. The Mount Hood Challenge Meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models and identify key areas of future development to advance the field. The Fourth Mount Hood Challenge in 2004 was the first meeting of its kind to ask modelers to perform simulations of outcomes for patients in published clinical trials, allowing comparison against "real life" data. Eight modeling groups participated in the challenge. Each group was given three of the following challenges: to simulate a trial of type 2 diabetes (CARDS [Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study]); to simulate a trial of type 1 diabetes (DCCT [Diabetes Control and Complications Trial]); and to calculate outcomes for a hypothetical, precisely specified patient (cross-model validation). The results of the models varied from each other and for methodological reasons, in some cases, from the published trial data in important ways. This approach of performing systematic comparisons and validation exercises has enabled the identification of key differences among the models, as well as their possible causes and directions for improvement in the future.
Diabetes Care 2007 Jun
PMID:Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: a report on the Fourth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting. 1752 23

Several large-scale clinical trials have assessed the efficacy of atorvastatin in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus and/or metabolic syndrome. In primary prevention, CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study) showed that atorvastatin 10 mg/day (vs placebo) reduced relative risk of the composite primary endpoint (acute coronary heart disease [CHD] events, coronary revascularisation, or stroke) by 37% (p = 0.001). This decrease was similar to decreases in major cardiovascular events in the ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm) trial and HPS (Heart Protection Study). However, in CARDS, atorvastatin efficacy was evident as early as 6 months after starting treatment, whereas in HPS, simvastatin efficacy was noticeable only from about 15-18 months after starting treatment. In the ASCOT-LLA trial, in 2226 hypertensive diabetic patients without previous cardiovascular disease, atorvastatin (vs placebo) reduced the relative risk of all cardiovascular events and procedures by 25% (p = 0.038). In secondary prevention, substudies of the GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation), TNT (Treating to New Targets) and PROVE-IT (PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy) trials reported results for the approximately 15-25% of study participants who had diabetes. In the GREACE substudy, atorvastatin (vs physicians' standard care) significantly reduced the relative risk of total mortality by 52% (p = 0.049), coronary mortality by 62% (p = 0.042), coronary morbidity by 59% (p < 0.002) and stroke by 68% (p = 0.046). In the TNT substudy, incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in diabetic patients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg/day rather than 10 mg/day (13.8% vs 17.9%; relative risk 0.75; p = 0.026). In the PROVE-IT substudy, a significantly lower incidence of acute cardiac events was reported for atorvastatin versus pravastatin recipients (21.1% vs 26.6%; p = 0.03) and, therefore, an absolute risk reduction of 5.5% was associated with atorvastatin therapy. ASPEN (Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of coronary heart disease Endpoints in Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) - a mixed primary and secondary prevention trial in diabetic patients - found that a 29% lower low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level was seen with atorvastatin than placebo at endpoint (p < 0.0001); however, the reduction in composite primary endpoint of major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal major cardiovascular event or stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalisation) with atorvastatin (13.7% vs 15.0% with placebo), and reduction in acute myocardial infarction relative risk of 27% with atorvastatin were not statistically significant. In CHD patients with metabolic syndrome (n = 5584) in a sub-analysis of the TNT trial, intensive versus lower-dosage atorvastatin therapy reduced the relative risk of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events by 29% (p < 0.0001). The analysis also revealed that CHD patients with, rather than those without, metabolic syndrome had a 44% greater level of absolute cardiovascular risk, thus clearly underscoring the clinical feasibility of administering intensive lipid-lowering therapy to CHD patients with metabolic syndrome. In summary, several patient populations, from definitive, large-scale studies, are now available to corroborate the integral place of atorvastatin--in line with various regional and internationally accepted disease management guidelines--in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and/or metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Atorvastatin efficacy in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus and/or metabolic syndrome. 1791 May 20

An association between hypercholesterolaemia and ischaemic stroke has not yet been clearly defined by observational studies. In clinical trials, however, cholesterol-lowering treatments appear to consistently reduce stroke risk. Data are now available from various primary prevention studies - ALLHAT-LLT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack, Lipid-Lowering Therapy), ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, Lipid-Lowering Arm), CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study, WOSCOPS (West of Scotland COronary Prevention Study) - and secondary prevention studies - 4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study), CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events), GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation), HPS (Heart Protection Study), LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease), MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels), TNT (Treating to New Targets) - confirming the ability of statins to reduce stroke risk. Regarding primary prevention, post hoc analyses showed pravastatin reduced the relative risk of stroke by 9-11% (not statistically significant) in the ALLHAT-LLT and WOSCOPS trials, whereas atorvastatin reduced this risk by 27-48% in the ASCOT-LLA (p = 0.024) and CARDS trials. It remains to be established in prospective studies whether cholesterol-lowering is effective in the primary prevention of stroke. Regarding secondary prevention, in five placebo-controlled studies (4S, CARE, HPS, LIPID, MIRACL) involving a total of >40 000 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), statin therapy reduced the relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 19-50% (p < or = 0.048); the largest decrease was produced by atorvastatin in the MIRACL study (-50%, p = 0.045). In addition, high-dosage atorvastatin reduced stroke risk by 25% (p = 0.02) relative to lower-dosage therapy in the TNT trial, and by 47% (p = 0.034) relative to 'usual' care in the GREACE study. A post hoc analysis of data for 3280 HPS study participants who had had a previous stroke revealed that simvastatin reduced major vascular events by 20% (p = 0.001).The SPARCL study assessed the secondary preventive efficacy of atorvastatin versus placebo in 4731 patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), but without CHD. Atorvastatin reduced the adjusted relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 16% (p = 0.03), and that of fatal stroke alone by 43% (p = 0.03). Among secondary study endpoints, atorvastatin reduced the relative risks of stroke and TIA (-23%; p < 0.001), TIA alone (-26%; p = 0.004), and ischaemic stroke (-22%; p = 0.01). Overall, SPARCL study findings suggest that intensive atorvastatin therapy should be started immediately after a stroke or TIA. In summary, atorvastatin has developed a well defined role in the primary and secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease, and appears to have a particularly prominent place in preventing such disease in CHD patients, and in the post-stroke and post-TIA setting in patients without CHD.
 ...
PMID:Atorvastatin: its clinical role in cerebrovascular prevention. 1791 May 21

There is considerable disparity between the major clinical guidelines on lipid targets in diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Over the past few years, several trials have reported results that contribute to the evidence base for such lipid targets. The Treat to New Targets study data provide support for the efficacy and safety of using high-dose statin therapy for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to at least 2 mmol/L in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study and the Heart Protection Study provide support for the efficacy and safety of lowering LDL-C to at least 2 mmol/L with lower doses of statins. Once these LDL-C targets have been reached, it is unknown whether targeting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides is more efficacious than further lowering of LDL-C. The optimal treatment strategy, therefore, is unclear. Trials are underway to resolve this question. Patients with metabolic syndrome derive similar relative reduction in CVD from statin therapy as those without, and the appropriate treatment and targets depend on the estimated CVD risk. Prediction of CVD risk with currently available risk scores is imperfect but there is little evidence that including metabolic syndrome improves risk prediction beyond Framingham Risk Score mainly because the latter already includes blood pressure and HDL-C.
 ...
PMID:Lipid goals in metabolic syndrome and diabetes. 1817 56

Adiponectin can suppress atherogenesis by inhibiting the adherence of monocytes, reducing their phagocytic activity, and suppressing the accumulation of modified lipoproteins in the vascular wall. Contradictory data have been reported about the effect of statins on adiponectin plasma levels. In this work, adiponectin plasma levels were measured in 102 statin-free subjects from the Spanish population of the Achieve Cholesterol Targets Fast with Atorvastatin Stratified Titration (ACTFAST) study, a 12-week, prospective, multi-centre, open-label trial which enrolled subjects with coronary heart disease, coronary heart disease-equivalent or a 10-year coronary heart disease risk >20%. Subjects were assigned to atorvastatin (10-80 mg/day) based on low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol concentration at screening. For comparison, age and gender-matched blood donors (N=40) were used as controls. Control subjects did not present hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and history of cardiovascular diseases. Adiponectin levels were diminished in patients at high cardiovascular risk compared with control subjects [4166 (3661-4740) vs 5806 (4764-7075) ng/ml respectively; geometric mean (95% CI); P<0.0001]. In the whole population, atorvastatin treatment increased adiponectin levels [9.7 (3.2-16.7);% Change (95% CI); P=0.003]. This increment was in a dose-dependent manner; maximal effect observed with atorvastatin 80 mg/d [24.7 (5.7-47.1); P=0.01]. Adiponectin concentrations were positively correlated with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol both before and after atorvastatin treatment. No association was observed between adiponectin and LDL-cholesterol before and after atorvastatin treatment. In conclusion, atorvastatin increased adiponectin plasma levels in subjects at high cardiovascular risk, revealing a novel anti-inflammatory effect of this drug.
 ...
PMID:Adiponectin plasma levels are increased by atorvastatin treatment in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. 1837 27

A number of patients with hyperlipidemia are prescribed 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors that are concomitantly used along with the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin on insulin-induced glucose uptake and the related signal transduction in 3T3L1 adipocytes were studied. 3T3L1 fibroblasts were differentiated into adipocytes, pretreated with atorvastatin or pravastatin, and then exposed to insulin. Glucose uptake and the amount of insulin signal proteins were measured. Atorvastatin significantly decreased insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake in 3T3L1 adipocytes associated with the prevention of translocation of GLUT4 into the plasma membrane. The amounts of Rab4 and RhoA that required lipid modification with farnesyl or geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, in the membrane fraction were decreased by atorvastatin. Insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and serine/threonine phosphorylation of Akt were reduced by atorvastatin. Pravastatin did not modify these insulin-induced changes in the signal transduction. Inhibitors of the RhoA/Rho kinase system, C3 and Y27632, as well as atorvastatin reduced insulin-induced changes in signal transduction. Atorvastatin and pravastatin did not affect messenger RNA expression, protein level, and tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptors. In conclusion, hydrophobic atorvastatin decreases the glucose uptake by 3T3L1 adipocytes since it can enter the cell and prevents lipid modification of some proteins that are involved in the insulin signal transduction process.
 ...
PMID:Effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin on signal transduction related to glucose uptake in 3T3L1 adipocytes. 1846

Placebo-controlled clinical trials have shown that atorvastatin is beneficial in patients with myocardial ischemia, established coronary artery disease, hypertension and 3 other cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. left-ventricular hypertrophy, type 2 diabetes, smoking), and in diabetes, but not in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Recently, intensive low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg/day has been shown to have a greater clinical benefit than atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with coronary heart disease and one other high-risk factor (previous myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization or angina), and to be superior to moderate lipid lowering with pravastatin (40 mg/day) in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. However, a smaller study comparing lovastatin 5 mg/day with atorvastatin 80 mg/day was unable to detect any difference in outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease, despite the greater LDL-cholesterol lowering with the atorvastatin, possibly because it was not powered to do so. In a retrospective cohort study, atorvastatin 10 mg/day, pravastatin 20 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/day, lovastatin 20 mg/day and fluvastatin 20 mg/day had similar efficacy as secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction. At present, the evidence from clinical trials is favouring the intensity of the effect on LDL-cholesterol and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) with atorvastatin 80 mg, rather than the use of atorvastatin per se, when greater benefits are observed with the 80 mg dose of atorvastatin compared to other statins. Thus, at present, it is not clear whether atorvastatin is superior to other statins in some indications (coronary heart disease, acute coronary syndromes) or whether it is the intensive lipid lowering that is responsible for the superiority. Atorvastatin has little or no ability to increase high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and this may be a disadvantage in patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes, where low HDL-cholesterol is a key feature. Thus, other statins should probably be preferred to atorvastatin in patients with diabetes/metabolic syndrome. Alternatively, atorvastatin can be used in combination with a fibrate to increase HDL-cholesterol in patients with diabetes/metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Is atorvastatin superior to other statins? Analysis of the clinical trials with atorvastatin having cardiovascular endpoints. 1847 65

Atherosclerosis, especially when manifested as coronary artery disease (CAD), continues to be the number one cause of mortality and morbidity in developed nations and will soon become so in developing countries. Survivors of an acute heart attack have an increased risk of illness and death that is 1.5-15 times greater than in the general population. Sudden death occurs in myocardial infarction (MI) survivors at a rate 4-6 times greater than in the general population. After an initial recognized MI, 25% of male and 38% of female survivors die within 1 year. Within 6 years after a recognized MI, 18% of men and 35% of women will have a second MI, 7% of men and 6% of women will suffer sudden death, and 22% of men and 46% of women will be disabled with heart failure. Aggressive secondary prevention, therefore, is the key to containing and reversing the "malignant" natural history of CAD, since patients with CAD or CAD risk equivalents are already in the "high risk" category according to the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education rogram (NCEP). Treatment of dyslipidemia, especially the reduction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels to below 100 mg/dl, was recommended by the 2001 NCEP-ATP Guidelines. In 2004, based on the increasing evidence from several major clinical trials between 2001 and 2004, the NCEP-ATP reaffirmed its LDL goal of < 100 mg/dl in patients with CAD or coronary disease risk equivalents (including multiple risk factors), with an optional LDL goal of < 70 mg/dl in very-high-risk patients (including patients with established coronary heart disease plus other highrisk conditions) Findings from major studies, such as the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study, the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS), the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial and, more recently, the Lipid-Lowering Arm of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT-LAA), lend support to the idea that greater LDL cholesterol lowering than that achieved with standard doses of statins may be warranted in patients with CAD and metabolic syndrome, CAD and diabetes, CAD and congestive heart failure, and CAD and renal insufficiency. On the other hand, additional lipid reduction may also be warranted in patients with risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension or a history of stroke, but without manifest CAD and despite relatively normal cholesterol levels. These newer indications for statins, atorvastatin in particular, as part of more aggressive secondary and primary prevention, are reviewed in this paper.
 ...
PMID:Expanding roles for atorvastatin. 1859 99


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>