Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although steroid avoidance and withdrawal in renal transplant recipients (RTR) are actively being evaluated by physicians, the attitudes of recipients toward steroid use have not been systematically studied in the modern era. We conducted a confidential written survey of single-organ adult RTR pertaining to prednisone-related side-effects. Recipients were asked which drug they felt maximized graft life, which drug they wished to avoid if graft life was unaffected, and which drug they had most compliant with. They also rated 16 common immunosuppressive-related side-effects on a Likert scale with 1 meaning complete disagreement and 10 complete agreement with their own prednisone-attributed experience. A comparison of responses based on RTR demographic characteristics was made by ANOVA or chi-square analysis with Bonferroni correction. The questionnaire was completed by 223 recipients, of whom 93% were primary recipients, 57% were cadaveric organ recipients, and 69% were white people, 7% black people, and 23% Asian people. Age at transplant, age at survey and time since transplant were 41.5 +/- 11, 47.5 +/- 11 and 6.0 +/- 5 yr, respectively. For the entire group, overall side-effect profile for prednisone was rated as 6.1 +/- 3 on the Likert scale, while efficacy was rated as 7.3 +/- 3. If offered monotherapy, 67% preferred a calcineurin-inhibitor (CI), 23% mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/azathioprine (AZA), and 10% prednisone. When asked which drug they would like to discontinue, 19% chose CI, 16% MMF/AZA, and 65% prednisone. Most recipients felt that CI was the most efficacious drug (80%), followed by MMF/AZA (12%), and prednisone (8%). The side-effects reported as most common were unacceptable weight gain (5.8 +/- 3) and bone/joint disease (5.3 +/- 3). The least common side-effects were blood disorders (2.2 +/- 2) and cancer (2.3 +/- 2). Black people were more likely than non-black people to report developing diabetes (p = 0.02), blood disorders (p = 0.003) and headaches (p = 0.003) as a result of prednisone use. Males reported more liver damage (p = 0.01) while females reported more body fat (p = 0.01) and fluid retention (p = 0.006). RTR >5 yr post-transplant reported more infections (p = 0.008), skin/hair problems (p = 0.02), gastrointestinal irritation (p = 0.02), and bone disease (p = 0.02) compared with RTR <1 yr. Donor source and recipient age did not determine any responses. If given a 'risk-free' choice, the majority of recipients prefer withdrawal of steroids over other agents. Demographic data may be used to predict prednisone-related side-effects and guide steroid use in this population. Study designs related to steroid withdrawal should account for patient preferences in this context.
 ...
PMID:Renal transplant recipient attitudes toward steroid use and steroid withdrawal. 1270 80

A retrospective survey was performed to establish patient and graft outcome for all 41 patients at our centre receiving sirolimus (SRL) in combination with calcineurin inhibition (CNI) as primary therapy for the 6 years prior to March 2002. Patient mortality [12%; n = 5 (TTP, lymphoma, mucormycosis, and small bowel perforation] was significantly higher at 3 months compared with those not receiving SRL, but not thereafter. 12.8% had delayed graft function and 33% had one or more episodes of rejection in the first 6 months. Mean GFR at 12 months was significantly lower (47.3 mL/min) in the SRL group compared with those not receiving SRL (51.3 mL/min). Twenty-two patients had a 12-month protocol biopsy; CNI toxicity was present in 36%. SRL was associated with significant hyperlipidaemia (serum cholesterol, 5.2 +/- 1.4 at baseline vs 7.3 +/- 1.7 mmol/L at 3 months, P <.001; triglycerides, 2.3 +/- 1.4 at baseline vs 2.7 +/- 1.1 mmol/L at 3 months, P <.05). Mild thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% but was not associated with haemorrhagic events. LDH increased by 62%, remaining elevated out to 2 years post engraftment. Seven patients developed insulin requiring diabetes mellitus, similar to the rate observed in our general transplant population.Thus, in this early experience, SRL in combination with CNI was associated with significant mortality and morbidity including CNI toxicity, presumably a reflection of a heavy burden of immunosuppression. However, 1-year graft survival on SRL was similar to the mean Australia-wide graft survival regardless of immunosuppression. The future use of SRL may center around CNI sparing and avoidance type protocols.
 ...
PMID:Sirolimus: a single center experience in combination with calcineurin inhibitors. 1274 76

This study sought to determine 1) the incidence and costs of new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) associated with maintenance immunosuppression regimens following renal transplantation and 2) whether the mode of dialysis pretransplant or the type of calcineurin inhibition used for maintenance immunosuppression affected either the incidence or cost of NODM. The study examined the United States Renal Data System's clinical and financial records from 1994 to 1998 of all adult, first, single-organ, renal transplantations in either 1996 or 1997 with adequate financial records. It used the second diagnosis of diabetes in previously nondiabetic patients to identify NODM. While NODM had an incidence of approximately 6% per year among wait-listed dialysis patients, NODM over the first 2 years post-transplant had an incidence of almost 18% and 30% among patients receiving cyclosporine and tacrolimus, respectively. By 2 years post-transplant, Medicare paid an extra $21 500 per newly diabetic patient. We estimated the cost of diabetes attributable to maintenance immunosuppression regimens to be $2025 and $3308 for each tacrolimus patient and $1137 and $1611 for each cyclosporine patient at 1 and 2 years post-transplant, respectively.
 ...
PMID:Incidence and cost of new onset diabetes mellitus among U.S. wait-listed and transplanted renal allograft recipients. 1275 5

FTY720, a synthetic analogue of myriocin (ISP-1), is derived from culture filtrates of the fungus Isaria sinclairii. As a sphingosine analogue, FTY720 appears to undergo phosphorylation and thereby interact with specific G-protein-linked receptors. In vivo, FTY720 causes emigration of lymphocytes from peripheral blood to secondary lymphoid structures. Thus, the drug is the archetype of a new class of agents that alter cellular homing patterns: the adhesion-migration paradigm. Since FTY720 seems to spare nonspecific elements of host resistance, it may address the not infrequent complications of infections associated with existing therapies. In experimental rodent, canine and non-human primate models, FTY720 produces lymphopenia and immunosuppression, prolonging the survival of allografts. Because of synergistic interactions, it promotes the immunosuppressive effects not only of calcineurin antagonists, but also of proliferation signal inhibitors. These interactions proffer the possibility of large reductions in exposure to and mitigated toxicity of existing drugs. In humans, FTY720 causes dose-dependent peripheral blood lymphopenia, a reduced incidence of acute rejection episodes and only one apparent adverse reaction - a negative chronotropic effect - particularly after the loading dose. While the clinical utility of FTY720 is difficult to predict before completion of Phase III studies that elucidate its benefits versus unanticipated side effects, the initial data suggest several potential advantages: it does not produce hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity or myelosuppression, which are characteristic of other immunosuppressants. Furthermore, it displays high oral bioavailability and a low interindividual coefficient of variation. Clearly, structural analogues, as well as other agents that alter the balance of chemokines or affect cellular adhesion to activated endothelium, will represent important components of future regimens.
 ...
PMID:FTY720: A new kid on the block for transplant immunosuppression. 1283 71

It is estimated that there are greater than 100000 kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in the United States. Recent advances in immunosuppression have improved short-term graft survival rates and decreased early mortality by decreasing the incidence and therapy for acute rejection episodes. For those accepted on the waiting list, transplant prolongs patient survival compared with remaining on dialysis. During the 1990s, 3 new immunosuppressive drugs were introduced in clinical kidney transplantation. All were approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration after large, controlled, randomized trials. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone, lowered acute rejection rates by nearly 50% compared with control. Tacrolimus compared with CSA also significantly reduced acute rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients, but was associated with a significant increase in posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in the early trials. When evaluated in combination with MMF, the incidence of PTDM was much lower. At the end of the decade, sirolimus was shown in several randomized trials to lower acute rejection rates and is believed to be less nephrotoxic compared with calcineurin inhibitors. All of the randomized trials were not statistically powered to assess long-term superiority. Registry analyses have been performed that appear to show some long-term benefit of immunosuppressive therapy with MMF. Other outcome assessments in kidney transplant recipients include risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and bone disease. Although there are few randomized trials, understanding of the significance of these common complications has progressed and strategies for therapy and intervention have been developed. This article focuses on the randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy and complications associated with use of these drugs. In addition, we review the current management and intervention for the comorbidities associated with the long-term clinical management of the kidney transplant recipient.
 ...
PMID:Outcomes in kidney transplantation. 1283 99

Both type 2 diabetes and hypertension are multifactorial diseases. Several lines of evidence suggested that common genetic factors contribute to both conditions. Genes responsible for obesity and insulin resistance are candidates for common genetic factors. Among candidate genes are genes encoding glycogen synthase, beta 3-adrenergic receptor, glycogen-associated regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase-1, peroxisome proliferator--activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma), leptin and adiponectin. In addition, recent genome scans mapped loci linked to type 2 diabetes, hypertension and/or metabolic syndrome. Identification of genes responsible for both type 2 diabetes and hypertension will increase our understanding of molecular mechanisms of these conditions and facilitate the development of effective methods for prevention and intervention of diabetes and hypertension as well as metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:[Genetic susceptibility to diabetes and hypertension]. 1287 70

Although protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are known to regulate the activities of different enzymes, sufficient information on the role of dephosphorylation in cardiac function is not available. Since protein phosphatases mediate dephosphorylation, it is possible that cardiac dysfunction induced by diabetes may be due to alterations in the activities of these enzymes. We therefore determined cardiac protein phosphatase activity as well as protein contents of phosphatase 1 and phosphatase 2A in diabetic animals. For this purpose, rats were made diabetic by administering a single intravenous injection of streptozotocin (65 mg/kg body weight) and hearts were examined after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 weeks. Some of the 4-week diabetic animals received subcutaneous injections of insulin (3 U/day) for a further period of 4 weeks. Cardiac dysfunction was evident after 2 weeks of inducing diabetes and deteriorated further with time. A significant increase in protein phosphatase activity appeared after 1 week and persisted until 8 weeks. Increased protein phosphatase activity in the diabetic heart was associated with a corresponding increase in the protein contents of both phosphatase 1 and phosphatase 2A. Insulin treatment partly prevented the changes observed in diabetic animals. The results suggest that increased protein phosphatase activities and subsequent enhanced protein dephosphorylation may play a role in diabetes-induced cardiac dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:Elevated levels of protein phosphatase 1 and phosphatase 2A may contribute to cardiac dysfunction in diabetes. 1287 29

Recently, new calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus (FK-506) and microemulsion cyclosporin, have been approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients and short-term outcomes have been accumulating. In the majority of patients, these calcineurin inhibitors have been used in combination with new immunosuppressive drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus. Under these circumstances, a comparison of cyclosporin and tacrolimus provides the answer to a very important controversial issue. Which drug should we choose in individual patients? In an attempt to answer this question, this review compared the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporin in modern immunosuppressive regimens, which have already been published in well designed clinical studies, and discusses how immunosuppression should be individualised in renal transplant patients.Overall, short-term patient and graft survival with cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus is almost identical. The incidence of acute rejection is generally lower in tacrolimus/azathioprine- than in cyclosporin/azathioprine-treated patients. However, in conjunction with MMF, the difference in the incidence of acute rejection between tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients became smaller. Adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes (gum hypertrophy, hirsutism) seem to be less frequent in tacrolimus-treated than in cyclosporin-treated patients. Recent randomised studies showed that the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was almost identical between low-dose tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients. According to the data discussed in this review, the recommendation on the choice of calcineurin inhibitors at this moment is that either cyclosporin or tacrolimus can be used safely and effectively for patients without any risk factors. However, at our centre, we prefer tacrolimus to cyclosporin in patients with a high risk for rejection, such as those with ABO-incompatibility, delayed graft function, sensitisation, and African American race and some other risk factors, such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Moreover, tacrolimus may be preferable to cyclosporin for women because of hirsutism and for children because of the steroid-sparing effect. We consider that cyclosporin should be chosen when patients experience tacrolimus-related adverse events, such as severe chest pain, tremor, gastrointestinal symptoms and encephalopathy. In conclusion, well tolerated and effective immunosuppression is feasible with both cyclosporin and tacrolimus. In the current immunosuppressive regimens, a calcineurin inhibitor, either tacrolimus or cyclosporin, is the essential basic standard immunosuppressant. Clinicians need to decide the best means of optimising therapy for individual patients, based on various risk factors, such as risk of rejection, i.e. sensitisation, delayed graft function and ABO-incompatibility, and some adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes.
 ...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: what is the best option? 1288 61

Insulin rapidly and completely inhibits expression of the hepatic insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) genes. This inhibition is mediated through a phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-dependent regulation of a DNA element, termed the thymine-rich insulin response element, found within the promoters of each of these genes. This has led to the conclusion that these three promoters are regulated by insulin using the same molecular mechanism. However, we recently found that the regulation of the IGFBP1 but not the PEPCK or G6Pase genes by insulin was sensitive to rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTOR. Here, we present further evidence that different regulatory pathways mediate the insulin regulation of these promoters. Importantly, we identify a protein phosphatase activity in the pathway connecting mTOR to the IGFBP-1 promoter. These data have major implications for the development of molecular therapeutics for the treatment of insulin-resistant states such as diabetes and hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Different mechanisms are used by insulin to repress three genes that contain a homologous thymine-rich insulin response element. 1291 28

G(M), the muscle-specific glycogen-targeting subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) targeted to the sarcoplasmic reticulum, was proposed to regulate recovery of glycogen in exercised muscle, whereas mutation truncation of its COOH-terminal domain is known to be associated with type 2 diabetes. Here, we demonstrate differential effects of G(M) overexpression in human muscle cells according to glycogen concentration. Adenovirus-mediated delivery of G(M) slightly activated glycogen synthase (GS) and inactivated glycogen phosphorylase (GP) in glycogen-replete cells, causing an overaccumulation of glycogen and impairment of glycogenolysis after glucose deprivation. Differently, in glycogen-depleted cells, G(M) strongly increased GS activation with no further enhancement of early glycogen resynthesis and without affecting GP. Effects of G(M) on GS and GP were abrogated by treatment with dibutyryl cyclic AMP. Expression of a COOH-terminal deleted-mutant (G(M) Delta C), lacking the membrane binding sequence to sarcoplasmic reticulum, failed to activate GS in glycogen-depleted cells, while behaving similar to native G(M) in glycogen-replete cells. This is explained by loss of stability of the G(M) Delta C protein following glycogen-depletion. In summary, G(M) promotes glycogen storage and inversely regulates GS and GP activities, while, specifically, synthase phosphatase activity of G(M)-PP1 is inhibited by glycogen. The conditional loss of function of the COOH-terminal deleted G(M) construct may help to explain the reported association of truncation mutation of G(M) with insulin resistance in human subjects.
Diabetes 2003 Sep
PMID:Regulation and function of the muscle glycogen-targeting subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (GM) in human muscle cells depends on the COOH-terminal region and glycogen content. 1294 60


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>