Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) contribute to cardiovascular risk (CR) in renal transplant (RT) patients. However, the CR profile in RT patients without preexistent diabetes is not well known. We compared CR factors in 191 nondiabetic RT recipients with functioning grafts beyond 1 year, receivingly either CsA (Neoral; n=100) or tacrolimus (Tac; n= 91). Clinical data and pretransplant CR profiles were similar in both groups. There were no differences in acute rejection episodes and graft survival rates during follow-up. The overall proportions of posttransplant diabetes (9% versus 6%), and of hypertension (73% vs 63%) were similar in both groups. Hyperlipidemia was more frequent in the CsA group (58% vs 31%; P=.0001). The cholesterol levels in the CsA group showed at 3 months (232+/-47 vs 202+/-42 m/dL; P=.0001), 6 months (232+/-49 vs 205+/-41 mg/dL; P=.0001), and 12 months (217+/-50 vs 202+/-40 mg/dL; P=.028), despite receiving a greater proportion of lipid-lowering drugs (49% vs 15%; P=.0001). Logistic regression analysis showed that CsA was an independent predictor of posttransplant hyperlipidemia (OR: 5.8, CI 95%; 3.3-10.7; P=.0001) as were age, female gender, pretransplant dyslipidemia, and body mass index (BMI). Interestingly, an interaction was observed between pretransplant BMI and CIs: Among pretransplant normal weight patients (BMI <25 kg/m2), CsA produced a greater incidence of hyperlipidemia than tacrolimus (58% vs 23%; P=.0001) while not among patients who were overweight (BMI >25 kg/m2: pretransplant 58% vs 42%; P=.341). In conclusion, CsA confers a higher risk of hyperlipidemia after RT in nondiabetic patients, particularly those with normal pretransplant weight.
 ...
PMID:Cardiovascular risk profile in nondiabetic renal transplant patients: cyclosporine versus tacrolimus. 1296 73

Tacrolimus (Tac), which blocks T- and B-cell proliferation by inhibiting calcineurin, was first used for immunosuppression following heart transplant (HT) in 1989. Two multicenter randomized trials have compared Tac to the oil-based cyclosporine (CsA) formulation (both combined with azathioprine and steroids) in HT patients. The two drugs displayed similar patient survival rates and incidences of rejection, nephrotoxicity, diabetes, and infections. The Tac group however, showed a lower incidence of arterial hypertension (and, in one study, of dyslipidemia). A pilot study of Tac in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids suggested that maintenance of serum mycophenolic acid levels at 2.5 to 4.5 microg/mL yields lower rejection rates without greater toxicity than previous regimens. Currently, a European multicenter randomized trial is comparing Tac with Neoral CsA, both used in combination with MMF, steroids, and induction antibodies. For patients undergoing primary immunosuppression with CsA, Tac has proved effective for rescue from steroid-resistant acute rejection. It also has tentatively been used without other drugs in selected patients. It is a valid alternative to CsA in current immunosuppressive regimens, because it does not cause gingival hyperplasia or hirsutism and, thus, may improve the quality of life and treatment compliance of female and pediatric patients. It may be preferable to CsA for patients with arterial hypertension or intractable dyslipidemia. Current and future studies will clarify the efficacy and safety of regimens combining Tac with MMF or rapamycin.
 ...
PMID:Tacrolimus in heart transplantation. 1296 69

Cyclosporine (CsA) is currently the basis of most immunosuppressive protocols after solid organ transplantation. The introduction of Neoral, a new microemulsion formulation of CsA, and more recently a range of adjunctive immunosuppressants have further enhanced short-term efficacy and tolerability of CsA-based immunosuppression. In addition, Neoral C2 monitoring has been shown to have advantages not only in the early posttransplant period, but also for maintenance transplant patients. The major long-term disadvantage associated with CsA is the development of nephrotoxicity and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), which is the second major cause of graft failure. Thus, strategies to reduce the risk of CAN include CsA-sparing protocols, use of C2 level monitoring, introduction of non-nephrotoxic adjunctive immunosuppressants, and optimal management of additional risk factors. Other important side effects related to CsA-based immunosuppression include hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Optimal management of these conditions may lead to significant reduction of cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality following solid organ transplantation.
 ...
PMID:Experience with cyclosporine in the Canary Islands. 1504 20

Our understanding of cyclosporine (CsA) administration for liver transplantation has significantly improved over the past decade. Cyclosporine is a highly lipophilic molecule, and the original galenic formulation, Sandimmune, was highly dependent on bile flow and gut motility for its absorption. Sandimmune's poor absorption profile produced erratic CsA levels after liver transplantation. A new microemulsification formulation of CsA, Neoral (CsA-ME), was developed to overcome these limitations. The NOF-1 study confirmed the superiority of CsA-ME's absorption compared with Sandimmune; CsA-ME had a more consistent and reliable absorption, with lower intrapatient variability and improved dose linearity with drug exposure as measured by area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). These advantages translated into more reliable CsA predose concentrations and less toxicity. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic data showed that 2-hour postdose CsA levels (C2) provided a better measure of immune suppression than did trough levels (C0). The LIS2T study recently confirmed and extended these data by showing equivalent efficacy between CsA-ME using C2 monitoring or tacrolimus in liver transplant patients, with a similar incidence of adverse events except for a higher rate of diabetes mellitus and diarrhea with tacrolimus. These data confirmed that the improved CsA-ME formulation, when used in conjunction with optimized drug-monitoring protocols, is well tolerated after transplantation and provides low rates of graft rejection.
 ...
PMID:Optimization of cyclosporine for liver transplantation. 1504 51

As liver transplantation is now being performed with an excellent 5-year survival rate of approximately 70% at selected centers, attention has been shifted to reduce long-term complications of calcineurin inhibitors including diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, which have a major effect on morbidity and mortality within the transplant setting. Cyclosporine (CsA) monitoring has been performed traditionally by measurement of predose "trough" blood concentrations (C0). Recent development of 2 hour postdose CsA (C2) monitoring strategy has emerged as a much more sensitive approach for assessing the pharmacokinetics and providing greater precision in the optimization of Neoral dosing than C0 measurements. Furthermore, a reduction of risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease and in the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection have been associated with the adoption of C2 monitoring. However, further data from multicenter trials are required to evaluate the long-term benefits of this new therapeutic monitoring strategy.
 ...
PMID:Future directions in immunosuppression. 1504 8

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; cyclosporine and tacrolimus) has dramatically increased medium-term life expectancy after heart transplantation but has had only limited impact on long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients. The original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine has been superceded by a microemulsion formulation (Neoral), which has more predictable pharmacokinetics and allows more precise dose-tailoring. Cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus (Prograf) have a similar efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection of heart transplants, but their use is accompanied by nephrotoxicity and by cardiovascular side effects. The efficacy of immunosuppression can be improved by adjunctive therapy, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cellcept), corticosteroids, and induction therapy. One of the most important predictors of patient mortality at >5 years after heart transplantation is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)/late graft failure, which accounts for 31% of deaths. Neither cyclosporine nor tacrolimus have been shown to prevent the development of CAV. In terms of efficacy, MMF provides a modest advantage over azathioprine in preventing CAV, and the combination of cyclosporine plus MMF results in significantly lower mortality than cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Overall, CNIs have multiple cardiovascular side effects, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia and new-onset diabetes after transplantation, although cyclosporine and tacrolimus have somewhat different cardiovascular side-effect profiles. The challenge in choosing the best immunosuppressive regimen is to balance efficacy and safety to optimize graft and patient survival over the course of many decades. Because cyclosporine and tacrolimus have similar efficacy against acute rejection the choice of CNI for heart transplant recipients should be based on the relative risk of cardiovascular and renal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in heart transplantation. 1509 6

This is the first multicenter, randomized, open-label study to compare the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A microemulsion (CsA-ME) (Neoral, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland ) with C2 monitoring versus tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients. Patients were stratified according to hepatitis C virus status and randomized to receive CsA-ME (n= 250) or tacrolimus (n= 245) with steroids, with or without azathioprine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included death or graft loss and safety evaluations at 6 months. The incidence of BPAR at 3 months was 26% in the CsA-ME group and 24% in the tacrolimus group (not significant). At 6 months, 89% of patients receiving CsA-ME and 88% of patients receiving tacrolimus were alive with a functioning graft. Among the hepatitis C virus-positive patients, there was no difference in BPAR, but death or graft loss was more frequent in those receiving tacrolimus (15% vs. 6%, P <0.05). Diabetes mellitus (14% vs. 7%, P <0.02) and diarrhea (29% vs. 14%, P <0.001) were significantly more often reported in patients receiving tacrolimus. The incidence of hypertension was similar in both groups. At 6 months, the median total cholesterol was 4.7 mmol/L (2.9-7.4 mmol/L) in the CsA-ME arm versus 4.3 mmol/L (2.5-6.4 mmol/L) in the tacrolimus arm; the median serum creatinine was 106 micromol/L (52-238 micromol/L) in the CsA-ME arm versus 103 micromol/L (44-477 micromol/L) in the tacrolimus arm. Efficacy is equivalent with CsA-ME using C2 monitoring or tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients. The incidence of adverse events is comparable except for a significantly higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and diarrhea in the tacrolimus group. Both agents are effective primary immunosuppressants in liver transplant recipients.
 ...
PMID:Results of lis2t, a multicenter, randomized study comparing cyclosporine microemulsion with C2 monitoring and tacrolimus with C0 monitoring in de novo liver transplantation. 1520 59

After the introduction of cyclosporine into liver transplantation in 1983, 1-year patient survival more than doubled. Later, with the improved microemulsified formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) more stable pharmacokinetics were achieved. Today, C(2) monitoring of cyclosporine blood levels allows a more accurate estimation of the area under the concentration-versus-time curve as the single best indicator of cyclosporine exposure. As a consequence, with better control of side effects as well as desired effects the results of cyclosporine in liver transplantation have been further improved. The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and basiliximab/daclizumab combination therapy has provided new options for the prevention of allograft rejection. The safety profile of individual immunosuppressive regimens comes more into focus since acute allograft rejection may be controlled successfully with competing strategies. As the focus in liver transplantation is shifting toward greatly improved long-term results, late posttransplant mortality with a functioning graft is a major concern. Prevention of long-term complications associated with highly effective immunosuppressants--posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, cytomegalovirus infection, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia-gains importance. Technical advances in living-related and cadaveric split-liver transplantation have lead to increasing use of segmental liver transplantation with the need to consider the effects of immunosuppression on liver regeneration and metabolism. The individualized orchestration of immunosuppression taking into account the underlying liver disease as well as other individual predispositions remains a future challenge.
 ...
PMID:Update on liver transplantation using cyclosporine. 1562 Oct 81

Increased risk of cardiovascular disease contributes significantly to the higher rate of mortality seen in kidney transplant patients compared to the general population. New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, as well as being associated with significantly increased graft loss and higher health care costs compared to the nondiabetic transplant population. Evidence from large-scale analyses of registry databases has shown that the calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus, is associated with approximately a 50% increase in the risk of NODM compared to the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (CsA); but to date, little robust evidence is available from clinical trials. The DIRECT (Diabetes Incidence after REnal transplantation: Neoral C2 monitoring versus Tacrolimus) study will be the first prospective trial to compare directly the impact of tacrolimus and CsA microemulsion on glucose metabolism in kidney transplant recipients. DIRECT is a 6-month, parallel-group, open-label, randomized trial for which approximately 700 patients will be recruited at around 70 transplant centers worldwide. Patients will be randomized to tacrolimus or CsA microemulsion (using C2 monitoring), with mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolic acid, steroids, and basiliximab. Primary endpoints are: (a) a composite of NODM or impaired fasting glucose among patients who are nondiabetic at time of transplantation; and (b) combined incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death with CsA microemulsion C2 monitoring compared to tacrolimus trough monitoring . Full results are expected in 2006, with interim results available by the end of 2004, and will be awaited with interest by the transplant community.
 ...
PMID:Rationale and design of the DIRECT study: a comparative assessment of the hyperglycemic effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine following renal transplantation. 1583 49

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is associated with increased risk of graft failure and death in renal transplant recipients. Some clinical studies have indicated that NODM risk is higher with tacrolimus than cyclosporine, but no comparative trial has used American Diabetic Association (ADA)/World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Incidence After Renal Transplantation, Neoral C2 Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus (DIRECT) study is a 6-month open-label, multicenter trial comparing the impact of tacrolimus and Neoral (cyclosporine microemulsion) on glucose metabolism in 700 de novo kidney transplant recipients, based on ADA/WHO criteria. Patients are randomized to tacrolimus (C0 monitoring) or Neoral (C2 monitoring), stratified by baseline diabetic status and ethnicity. All patients receive basiliximab, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate acid (myfortic). Pooled interim 3-month results from a subset of 115 patients receiving either tacrolimus or Neoral showed that the primary efficacy end-point (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss or death) occurred in 11 patients (10%). There were four graft losses and only one death, which occurred after graft loss. Eight patients experienced BPAR (7.3%). Among 99 patients who were nondiabetic at baseline, 14 developed NODM by month 3, 17 developed impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and another 5 patients received hypoglycemic treatment for at least 14 consecutive days or at the month 3 visit, resulting in a 36% incidence of impaired glucose metabolism. At 3 months, median GFR (Nankivell) was 63.7 mL/min; median serum creatinine was 137 micromol/L. Full complete results are expected in December 2005.
 ...
PMID:Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus and glucose metabolism in patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion versus tacrolimus after de novo kidney transplantation. 1584 4


<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>