Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

1. The effect of administration of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), lisinopril (Carace; 10-40 mg twice daily) and the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine (Adalat Retard; 20-40 mg twice daily) on ex vivo [45Ca2+] uptake by platelets from hypertensive diabetic (type 1 and 2) patients was investigated. 2. At the end of at least 3 months treatment, blood was collected prior to the patient taking the morning dose of medication and washed platelets prepared. [45Ca2+] uptake was monitored following the addition of adrenaline, isoprenaline and dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), as well as in unstimulated (zero) platelets. 3. Both nifedipine and lisinopril significantly inhibited the ex vivo uptake of [45Ca2+] by platelets when this process was stimulated by adrenaline, isoprenaline and dibutyryl cAMP. Basal uptake was also inhibited in both groups. 4. These data consolidate the hypothesis that ACE inhibitors may possess calcium channel/calcium mobilisation blocking properties. Apart from its hypertensive action, lisinopril may also reduce platelet activity via modulation of calcium dynamics, thereby reducing the incidence of vascular complications associated with diabetes mellitus.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril and nifedipine administration inhibits the ex vivo uptake of [45Ca2+] by platelets from hypertensive diabetic patients. 131 54

Abnormalities in sodium homeostasis and in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) behavior could play a role in determining and accelerating the development of glomerular hypertension, hypertension, and microalbuminuria in insulin-dependent diabetes. The aim of the present study was to investigate in 32 hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients (HD) with an altered albumin excretion rate the natriuretic response and ANP release to saline load (2 mmol/kg 90 min, and the effects angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy 2.5 to 5.0 mg cilazapril, once daily), and calcium antagonists (sustained release verapamil: 120 to 240 mg Isoptin Press, once daily, and long acting nifedipine: 20 to 40 mg Adalat AR, twice daily) on sodium homeostasis and albumin excretion rate. Eight normal subjects matched for sex, age, and weight served as controls. The 32 HD patients showed a blunted response in ANP release and sodium excretion during saline infusion in comparison with controls. The cilazapril and verapamil treatments were tested in 16 of the 32 HD patients and were both effective in ameliorating natriuretic and ANP response to saline load and in decreasing albumin excretion rate. The combined cilazapril and verapamil treatment further improved both these parameters in these patients, although blood pressure levels were comparable. The other 16 HD patients underwent sequential verapamil and nifedipine treatment. Verapamil was more effective than nifedipine in improving natriuresis and ANP release to saline load and in lowering the albumin excretion rate. The results of the present study demonstrate that sodium homeostasis and ANP release are altered in hypertensive nephropathic patients, and both cilazapril and verapamil are more effective than nifedipine in ameliorating natriuresis, ANP release, and albumin excretion rate.
 ...
PMID:Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists on atrial natriuretic peptide release and action and on albumin excretion rate in hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients. 145 87

It is widely accepted that abdominal obesity presents with exaggerated insulin secretion, insulin resistance and a trend toward glucose intolerance. Hypertension is frequently associated to abdominal obesity, and hyperinsulinism could play a role in its pathogenesis. Some studies reported that Ca-antagonists positively influence insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in obese patients with normal or elevated blood pressure. However, other studies reported worsening of metabolic balance during treatment with Ca-antagonists in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients and in normal subjects. We studied 19 patients with abdominal obesity, mild hypertension and insulin resistance on balanced, mild hypocaloric diet (1400 Kcal), to verify the effects of the Ca-antagonist nifedipine on both basal and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-induced glucose and insulin levels as well as on IGF-I basal and DHEA-S levels and fat mass (FM). To achieve this goal, 10 hypertensive obese subjects (HOB-NIFE, 3 males, 7 females, mean age +/- SD 44.6 +/- 1.7 yr; body mass index (BMI) 37.1 +/- 2.5 Kg/m2, WHR 0.95 +/- 0.02) received 3-month treatment with nifedipine (Adalat Crono 30 Bayer, 1 tab daily) while other 9 hypertensive obese (HOB, 3 males, 6 females, 42 +/- 2.4 yr, BMI 35.8 +/- 1.8 Kg/m2, WHR 0.91 +/- 0.03) were studied during diet only. The same parameters were studied also in 8 normotensive obese patients (OB: 3 males, 5 females, 48.1 +/- 2.1 yr, BMI 35.8 +/- 2.4 Kg/m2, WHR 0.90 +/- 0.03) on the same balanced hypocaloric diet. Basal systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure levels in HOB-NIFE and HOB were similar. At baseline, all groups had similar basal and OGTT-induced glucose, insulin and glucose insulin ratio (GIR) levels as well as IGF-I and DHEA-S levels. After 3 months BMI fell to the same extent in all groups (p < 0.05 vs baseline) while WHR and FFM/FM ratio did not change. SBP and DBP decreased HOB-NIFE (p < 0.02) but also during diet alone in both HOB and OB, though to a lesser extent (p < 0.05). Both basal and OGTT-stimulated glucose and insulin levels as well as IGF-I and DHEA-S levels were not modified in HOB-NIFE as well as in HOB and OB. In conclusion, our data indicate that nifedipine treatment does not modify glucose tolerance as well as insulin secretion and sensitivity, IGF-I and DHEA-S levels in hypertensive abdominal obese patients. Thus, nifedipine treatment has no detrimental effects on endocrine-metabolic balance in hypertensive obese patients.
 ...
PMID:Effects of 3-month nifedipine treatment on endocrine-metabolic parameters in patients with abdominal obesity and mild hypertension. 963 24

The release of Adalat Oros 60 on the Belgian market was justified since it has been clearly demonstrated that the dosage of 60 mg significantly increases the proportion of responders to nifedipine monotherapy. This gives us the opportunity to briefly review the history of nifedipine and to describe the original and ingenious galenic controlled-release formulation known as Oros (Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System, or GITS in the anglo-saxon world). Cleary, nifedipine is a potent calcium antagonist the action of which is now smooth and devoid of the usual ups and downs observed with the regular capsules, even in their Retard form. These abrupt changes in plasma concentrations, with the subsequent variations in heart rate and blood pressure, were dangerous and bothersome. Oros allows plasma concentrations of nifedipine to plateau for at least 24 hours after oral administration. This reduces the incidence of side-effects which remain those classically attributable to calcium antagonists (i.e.: flushes, headaches); interestingly, they tend to appear early after treatment initiation which allows to easily ascribe them to the drug and to quickly assess tolerance. The INSIGHT trial compared the effects on nifedipine Oros to those of a classical diuretic combination (hydrochlorothiazide-amiloride) in 6321 hypertensives who had at least one additional risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The rate of the primary outcome (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke) was similar in the two treatment groups, but nifedipine was superior among the subgroup of diabetics. Substudies suggested that nifedipine slows the progression of atherosclerotic lesions (carotid and coronary arteries), preserves renal function, and prevents the development of new diabetes.
 ...
PMID:[Medication of the month. Adalat Oros 60 mg]. 1513 4

The year 2004 was not marked by major pharmacological advances, but by confirmation of previous "evidence". Several innovative drugs for stable angina (ranolazine, ivabradine), some interesting results in acute coronary syndrome (PROVE IT study), some classic concepts (cannabinoid receptors and their antagonists such as rimonabant) applied to novel indications (treatment of obesity), hopes for the "sartans" revived in the light of new evidence (VALUE study), advances in the management of diabetes and hypertension (ASCOT and CARDS studies), nebivolol which is not just a betablocker but also produces the NO radical (is this why it decreased the mortality of heart failure in the elderly in the SENIOR study?). In contrast, although Chronadalate did not live up to expectations for coronary insufficiency, the year was marked above all by the much heralded withdrawal of Vioxx for increasing cardiovascular risk. The old adage: primum non nocere springs to mind.
 ...
PMID:[The best of clinical pharmacology in 2004]. 1571 64

Gingival enlargement is common among patients and can be caused by a variety of etiological factors. The most common reason is poor oral hygiene and high bacterial load that leads to gingival inflammation and enlargement. Other implicated factors include systemic drugs, such as phenytoin (Dilantin) taken by epileptic patients, calcium channel blockers such as nifedipine (Procardia) and verapamil (Calan) for the treatment of hypertension, arrhythmia and angina. Another class of medication associated with gingival enlargement is immunosuppressive agents given to organ-transplant patients to prevent rejection of the new element such as cyclosporine. Some enlargements could be associated with other conditions such as puberty, pregnancy or diabetes or be a symptom of a systemic disease (leukemia, Wegener's granulomatosis or sarcoidosis). In rare cases the cause for the enlargement is genetic and termed hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF). HGF is a genetic disorder characterized by a progressive enlargement of the gingiva. Histologically, the gingiva is characterized by an accumulation of dense fibrous connective tissue. This is believed to be due to an imbalance between synthesis and degradation of extracellular matrix composed mainly of collagen molecules or due to an alteration in fibroblast proliferation. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed and examined over the years but no precise process has been identified. The main objective of this paper is to discuss this genetic anomaly and support it with clinical cases of a mother and her two children. It will focus on the clinical and histologic characteristics of HGF as well as known biologic and genetic features and treatment modalities.
 ...
PMID:Gummy smile: could it be genetic? Hereditary gingival fibromatosis. 2287 May 49

Gingival enlargement is common among patients and can be caused by a variety of etiological factors. The most common reason is poor oral hygiene and high bacterial load that leads to gingival inflammation and enlargement. Other implicated factors include systemic drugs, such as Phenytoin (Dilantin) taken by epileptic patients, Calcium Channel Blockers such as Nifedipine (Procardia) and Verapamil (Calan) for the treatment of hypertension, arrhythmia and angina. Another class of medication associated with gingival enlargement is immunosuppressive agents given to organ-transplant patients to prevent rejection of the new element, such as Cyclosporine. Some enlargements could be associated with other conditions such as puberty, pregnancy or diabetes or be a symptom of a systemic disease (leukemia, Wegener's granulomatosis or sarcoidosis). In rare cases the cause for the enlargement is genetic and termed Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis (HGF). HGF is a genetic disorder characterized by a progressive enlargement of the gingiva. Histologically, the gingiva is characterized by an accumulation of dense fibrous connective tissue. This is believed to be due to an imbalance between synthesis and degradation of extracellular matrix composed mainly of collagen molecules or due to an alteration in fibroblast proliferation. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed and examined over the years but no precise process has been identified. The main objective of this paper is to discuss this genetic anomaly and support it with clinical cases of a mother and her two children. It will focus on the clinical and histologic characteristics of HGF as well as known biologic and genetic features and treatment modalities.
 ...
PMID:Gummy smile: could it be genetic? Hereditary gingival fibromatosis. 2334 94