Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Currently available data and clinical observations which suggest that there is a pathogenetic relationship between hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerosis have provided a concept of the X syndrome, by which hypertensive patients, mainly males, have impaired insulin tolerance along with hyperinsulinemia and concurrent atherogenic disorders of lipid metabolism. The paper discussed the specific pathogenetic mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and prospects for drug correction of the metabolic syndrome. The treatment of arterial hypertension with the calcium antagonist Lomir has indicated there are no negative changes as a control of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the presence of effective correction of arterial hypertension and atherogenic dyslipidemias. With the monotherapy of essential hypertension concurrent with hypercholesterolemia with the alpha 1-adrenoblocker Doxazosin, in addition to the agent's high antihypertensive effects, the authors noted its favourable action on lipid spectral parameters and platelet functional activity. There is abundant evidence for the use of specific hypolipidemic agents in patients with essential hypertensive refractory to current antihypertensive drugs. The data obtained with the use of Lescol (fluvastatin) in patients with hypertensive disease and hypercholesterolemia suggest that by substantially reducing the levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and its transport protein apo B does not deteriorate the quality of correction of arterial hypertension in this group of patients.
...
PMID:[Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis: clinical manifestations of metabolic syndrome X. Prospects of pharmacological treatment]. 762 78

The effects of spirapril and isradipine on blood pressure, urinary albumin excretion and sodium-volume homeostasis in hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients with nephropathy were assessed. Fifteen Type 1 diabetic patients aged 28-53 years with a diabetes duration of 19-37 years were studied. All had hypertension and diabetic nephropathy with a urinary albumin excretion of more than 300 mg/24 h. After a single blind placebo treatment period of 4 weeks the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with the calcium antagonist isradipine SRO 5 mg once daily or the ACE inhibitor spirapril 6 mg once daily for 6 months in a double-blind design. Isradipine lowered ambulatory systolic blood pressure from 152 +/- 12 to 141 +/- 11 mmHg (p < 0.05) and ambulatory diastolic pressure from 91 +/- 9 to 86 +/- 8 mmHg (p < 0.05). The blood pressure lowering effect of spirapril was similar: 156 +/- 13 vs 143 +/- 11 mmHg (p < 0.01) and 90 +/- 4 vs 84 +/- 4 mmHg (p < 0.05). The fractional albumin clearance was unchanged on isradipine but decreased after 6 months treatment with spirapril with on average 20% (p < 0.05). Total body exchangeable sodium decreased on spirapril treatment: 2994 +/- 296 vs 2636 +/- 194 meq/1.73 m2 (p < 0.05) and extracellular volume tended to do so (p = 0.12). On isradipine treatment these parameters remained unchanged. In conclusion both isradipine and spirapril lowered blood pressure in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Only the ACE inhibitor had demonstrable beneficial effects on urinary albumin excretion rate and the sodium-volume expansion seen in these patients.
...
PMID:A comparison of spirapril and isradipine in patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension. 817

Recent trials in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes reveal important differences in the risk for major cardiovascular events when individual agents are compared. In the Fosinopril Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Trial (FACET), 380 patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes were randomized to fosinopril or amlodipine and followed for up to 3.5 years to assess effects on serum lipids. Although both agents effectively controlled blood pressure, amlodipine caused a significantly greater decrease in systolic pressure. At the end of the trial, serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c, serum glucose, plasma insulin, serum creatinine, and microalbuminuria were similar in both groups. The patients randomized to fosinopril were significantly less likely to experience the prospectively defined combined outcome of acute myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalized angina, or stroke compared to those randomized to amlodipine (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.95). In the Appropriate Blood pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial, 470 patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes who were randomized to long-acting nisoldipine had an adjusted sevenfold increased risk for acute MI compared to those randomized to enalapril (RR 7.0; 95% CI 2.3-21.4). In the Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS) trial, the patients with hypertension and above the median of HbA1c (> or =6.7%) randomized to isradipine had a threefold increased risk for major cardiovascular events compared to those randomized to hydrochlorothiazide (RR 2.81; 95% CI 1.09-7.26). These findings are supported by several observational studies. Therefore, evidence is emerging that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and low-dose diuretics may be more effective than calcium antagonists for prevention of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with diabetes or impaired glucose control.
...
PMID:New evidence on the prevention of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. 973 37