Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Atenolol is a beta-selective (cardioselective) adrenoceptor blocking drug without partial agonist or membrane stabilising activity. Its profile of action most closely resembles that of metoprolol which differs only in that it has some membrane stabilising activity. Atenolol has been well studied and is effective in the treatment of hypertension and in the prophylactic management of angina. Its narrow dose response range obviates the need for highly individualised dose titration. In patients with angina its long duration of beta-blocking activity allows once daily dosage, whereas other beta-blockers, unless in sustained release dosage forms, need to be given in divided doses. Other beta-blockers can be given once daily in hypertension, but at presnt the evidence for effective control with a once daily regimen is more convincing with atenolol. Further studies are need to clarify any important differences in blood pressure control between the various beta-blocking drugs, both in conventional or sustained release dosage forms. As with metoprolol, atenolol is preferable to non-selective beta-blockers in patients with asthma or diabetes mellitus. Atenolol has been well tolerated in most patients, its profile of adverse reactions generally resembling that of other beta-blocking drugs, although its low lipid solubility and limited penetration into the brain results in a lower incidence of central nervous system effects than seen with propranolol. Atenolol is eliminated virtually entirely as unchanged drug in the urine and dosage needs to be reduced in patients with moderate to severely impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml/min). There is no need for modification of dosage of atenolol in liver disease.
 ...
PMID:Atenolol: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in angina pectoris and hypertension. 3 96

Hypertensive diabetic patients are particularly prone to renal function impairment. A total of nine out-patients with diabetes and hypertension were, therefore, entered into this single-blind uncontrolled study on the effects of 50 mg/day atenolol on reducing blood pressure and preserving normal kidney functioning. Treatment and evaluations were continued for 12 months. Serum beta 2-microglobulin concentration was used as the index for measuring renal impairment. Atenolol significantly reduced heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and serum beta 2-microglobulin concentrations compared with baseline. Plasma glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin levels were unchanged, and blood urea nitrogen levels were increased slightly (non-significant). Serum creatinine showed a tendency (non-significant) to reflect the changes in beta 2-microglobulin concentration. Ways in which atenolol may act to improve kidney functioning are suggested. It is concluded that atenolol is a favourable choice for the treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients with normally functioning kidneys since, even in long-term use, normal renal functioning is preserved.
 ...
PMID:A 1-year follow-up study on the effect of atenolol on serum beta 2-microglobulin level in hypertensive diabetic patients. 265 32

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus frequently coexist and are independent risk factors for reduced peripheral perfusion. Antihypertensive medications that reduce blood pressure and improve peripheral perfusion would have advantages in diabetic hypertensive patients. In a randomized, two-placebo-period, single-blind, two-way, crossover study, finger and forearm blood flow, lipid levels, and blood pressure control were determined in 19 diabetic hypertensive patients given prazosin and atenolol, with each drug and placebo period lasting four weeks. Both drugs reduced blood pressure (sitting, 157/95 to 142/84 mm Hg for atenolol and 155/95 to 138/82 mm Hg for prazosin; standing, 154/94 to 144/84 mm Hg for atenolol and 154/94 to 133/81 mm Hg for prazosin). Lipid levels did not change, except that low-density lipoprotein levels decreased from 148 to 127 mg/dl with prazosin. Atenolol did not change forearm or finger blood flow or vascular resistance. Prazosin increased blood flow and reduced vascular resistance in both finger and forearm. In conclusion, prazosin demonstrated a potentially more appropriate hemodynamic profile than atenolol in diabetic hypertensive patients in this study.
 ...
PMID:Forearm and finger hemodynamics, blood pressure control, and lipid changes in diabetic hypertensive patients treated with atenolol and prazosin. A brief report. 291 73

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus frequently coexist and are independent risk factors for reduced peripheral perfusion. Antihypertensive medications that reduce blood pressure and improve peripheral perfusion would have advantages in diabetic patients with hypertension. In a randomized, two-placebo period, single-blind, two-way crossover study, we determined finger and forearm blood flow, lipid levels, and blood pressure control in 19 diabetic patients with hypertension, with each atenolol or prazosin and placebo period of 4 weeks' duration. Both drugs reduced blood pressure (sitting: 157/95 to 142/84 mm Hg, atenolol; 155/95 to 138/82 mm Hg, prazosin; standing: 154/94 to 144/84 mm Hg, atenolol; 154/94 to 133/81 mm Hg, prazosin). Lipid levels did not change except that low-density lipoprotein levels fell from 148 to 127 mg/dl with prazosin. Atenolol did not change forearm or finger blood flow or vascular resistance. Prazosin increased blood flow and reduced vascular resistance in both finger and forearm. In conclusion, prazosin has a potentially more appropriate hemodynamic profile than has atenolol in diabetic patients with hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Forearm and finger hemodynamics, blood pressure control, and lipid changes in patients with diabetic hypertension treated with atenolol and prazosin. 329 75

Atenolol and bisoprolol, two beta-1-selective blockers, were compared in patients with mild and medium severe hypertension. Forty patients with a diastolic blood pressure of 95-115 mm Hg were two weeks after discontinuation of treatment divided at random into two groups treated with 50 mg atenolol and 5 mg bisoprolol. If the blood pressure was not affected by this dosage, the dose was raised to 100 mg atenolol and 10 mg bisoprolol. The blood pressure readings, heart rate, side effects of the drugs, laboratory and echocardiographic values were followed up for a period of three months. The authors recorded a marked decline of pressure and heart rate after the first week of therapy, the pressure readings in an upright position did not differ statistically from values in a sitting position, orthostatic hypotension was not recorded. The rate of success of bisoprolol was 85%, of atenolol 75%. During treatment no serious side-effects were observed. The biochemical parameters and echocardiographic values were not altered significantly by treatment. Atenolol and bisoprolol are two effective beta-1-selective blockers with a comparable effect in the treatment of mild and medium severe hypertension. They are useful in monotherapy as well as in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. In hypertension associated with diabetes mellitus, incipient bronchopulmonary disease and pregnancy they are also indicated. They are well tolerated also by elderly patients, an advantage of bisoprolol may be that it has a smaller impact on pressure and heart rate during the night.
 ...
PMID:[Atenolol and bisoprolol in the treatment of mild and moderately severe hypertension]. 821 7

When used as first-line treatment, any monotherapy selected from one of the main classes of agents for the management of slight to moderate arterial hypertension cannot be expected to have a success rate exceeding 60%. However, this level of efficacy approaches 80% if two classes of antihypertensive drugs with complementary modes of action are combined--a notable example being the combination of a beta-blocker, atenolol 50 mg, and a calcium antagonist, sustained-release nifedipine 20 mg. This fixed combination provides efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of arterial hypertension. Atenolol has beta-adrenolytic properties similar to those of propranolol, the most commonly named comparator drug. Atenolol is a selective beta 1-adrenergic antagonist with negative chronotropic, bathmotropic, dromotropic and inotropic actions. Because of its selectivity, it induces only moderate vasoconstriction. Its cardioselective nature diminishes the risk of bronchospasm, an event commonly induced by this type of drug. Atenolol reduces renin secretion from the renin-angiotensin system and consequently decreases the production of angiotensin II and plasma aldosterone. The renal effects of atenolol are an increase in both diuresis and natriuresis, with a reduction in the renal plasma flow. beta-Adrenergic antagonists in general modify carbohydrate metabolism and may mask the precursor signs of hypoglycaemia. They have a negligible effect upon lipid metabolism and practically no effect on total or high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Nifedipine belongs to the class of dihydropyridines. It acts by blocking the influx of calcium ions through the slow channels. Although a potent vasodilating agent, nifedipine does not induce tachycardia or water-sodium retention. The negative inotropic effect observed in vitro has not been reported in humans; the coronary dilatation produced by nifedipine is indisputable, both in unstable angina and exertional or exercise-induced angina. However, its cardioprotective effect remains questionable outside the context of recent-onset atheromatous plaques. Nifedipine increases renal blood flow and is practically devoid of diabetes-inducing factors. The fixed combination of atenolol 50 mg and sustained release nifedipine 20 mg offers a particularly interesting complementary action, the beta-blocker reducing the dihydropyridine-induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the latter reducing the vasoconstriction induced by the beta-blocker. Compared with each agent used alone, the pharmacokinetic profiles of atenolol and nifedipine remain unmodified by their administration in the fixed combination.
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacologic importance of the combination atenolol/nifedipine in hypertensive patients]. 981 39

The effects on glucose metabolism by the beta-blocker atenolol and the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor trandolapril were investigated in a randomised double-blind parallel group study of patients with primary hypertension. Twenty-six patients were treated with 50-100 mg atenolol and 27 patients with 2-4 mg trandolapril o.d. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests, euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamps and serum lipid measurements were performed after 8 and 48 weeks of active treatment. After 48 weeks insulin sensitivity was reduced by 23% by atenolol while it remained unchanged during trandolapril treatment (+0.5%, P = 0.0010 for difference between treatments, ANCOVA). The effect on triglycerides (+22% vs -8.5%) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-13% vs +0.7%) also differed significantly between atenolol and trandolapril. Results after 8 weeks were similar. Glucose tolerance was not affected by either drug. Atenolol reduced diastolic blood pressure (DBP) better than trandolapril (-15.3 mm Hg vs -6.6 mm Hg for supine DBP after 48 weeks, P = 0.012). The difference in effect on insulin sensitivity between the drugs corresponded to 25% of the baseline values of insulin sensitivity, and persisted over 48 weeks of treatment. The choice of antihypertensive treatment could influence the risk of diabetes associated with treated hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, 175-180.
 ...
PMID:Induction of insulin resistance by beta-blockade but not ACE-inhibition: long-term treatment with atenolol or trandolapril. 1069 31

The aim of our investigation was to determine whether the presence of additional risk factors or type of hypertension (diastolic or isolated systolic) influences blood pressure (BP) response to treatment. The International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) study is a double-blinded outcome comparison of calcium channel blockade with diuretics in high-risk patients aged 55 to 80 years. Dynamic randomization between nifedipine once daily and hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride was performed to ensure that approximately equal numbers of patients in the 2 groups had each of the major cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension were also separately randomized. Atenolol or enalapril was the mandatory second-line drug. In 5669 patients who completed the 18-week titration, BP fell from 172+/-15/99+/-9 mm Hg (mean+/-SD) while receiving placebo to 139+/-12/82+/-7 mm Hg. Twenty-six percent of patients required 2 drugs, and 4% required 3 drugs. Patients with diabetes were the most resistant to treatment, requiring second and third drugs 40% and 100% more frequently than patients without diabetes and achieving marginally the highest final BP, for any risk group, of 141+/-13/82+/-8 mm Hg. Age, smoking, gender, hypercholesterolemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, and existing atherosclerosis had little (<1 mm Hg) or no influence on BP at the end of titration, but all except smoking slightly reduced the initial response of either systolic or diastolic BP. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension were slightly more responsive than average to treatment. Our findings suggest that in patients at high absolute risk of cardiovascular complications from hypertension, the risk factors themselves do not prevent the recommended BP targets from being achieved.
 ...
PMID:Influence of diabetes and type of hypertension on response to antihypertensive treatment. 1081 61

A novel aspiration in treatment of chronic disease like diabetes associated with other non communicable disease risk factors, such as hypertension is to provide greater therapeutic effect, overcome the side effects by complex therapeutic regimen and to improve patient compliance upon administering combinational transdermal delivery of Glibenclamide (G) and Atenolol (A) which have not been tested literally. Hence, the present study was designed to develop a transdermal patch containing Glibenclamide and Atenolol using blends of different polymeric combinations such as Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), Poly vinyl pyrolidone (PVP) and Carbopol (CP). The patches were subjected to physicochemical parameters, in-vitro and in-vivo drug release and in-vitro skin permeation studies. Good results were obtained in all the evaluated parameters. The drug release of all formulation follows zero order kinetics by diffusion mechanism of non fickian diffusion type. In-vitro transdermal permeation studies by using rat & goat skin and finally in-vivo studies by using rabbits were carried out for the optimized formulation (GA4 HPMC 1%, PVP 0.5%, CP 0.5%). The developed transdermal delivery system containing Glibenclamide & Atenolol might be a milestone in the combinational therapy of diabetes and hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Preparation, in-vitro and in-vivo characterization of transdermal patch containing glibenclamide and atenolol: a combinational approach. 2145 64