Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Valsartan as angiotensin-II receptor antagonist in normotensive diabetic may provide kidney and heart protection. It also increases insulin receptor sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of valsartan on lipid profile in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. Fifteen normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, mean age 58.6+/-5.6 years, with mean BMI 28.6+/-2.5 kg/m2, were treated with valsartan in doses 20-80 mg per day. After a year of treatment with valsartan we witnessed significant decrease in total cholesterol level (6.8+/-1.4 to 5.4+/-0.9 mmol/l, p<0.05) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) from 4.5 to 2.7 mmol/l. Triglycerides were not affected significantly. Albumin excretion in urine significantly decreased. Level of basal insulin (from 256 to 78 pmol/l) has, also, decreased. In type 2 diabetes mellitus, the use of angiotensin-II receptor antagonists reduces the progression from micro to macro albuminuria. These results suggest that the angiotensin-II receptor antagonist decreases lipid serum levels in normotensive diabetes mellitus type 2 patients.
...
PMID:The effects of valsartan on lipid profile in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. 1613 56

Although numerous prospective randomized trials since the Veterans Administration studies clearly have attested to the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive therapy, there remain some controversial issues with all classes of antihypertensive drugs. Thiazide diuretics increase the risk for new-onset diabetes and their long-term safety has been questioned. Alpha-blockers do not reduce morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated hypertension but are well known to cause a variety of poorly tolerated side effects. The safety of calcium antagonists has been questioned for many years, although recent large prospective randomized trials such as Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study, Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension, Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation and the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) have attested to their safety and efficacy. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, in general, are well tolerated but have potentially fatal adverse effects in a few patients. Angiotensin-receptor blockers are exceedingly well tolerated, but may be less-efficacious antihypertensive agents than other drug classes. Most antihypertensive drug classes have an effect on new-onset diabetes that should be taken into account in patients at risk. No head-to-head comparison of combination therapy looking at efficacy and safety has been available. The long-term safety of antihypertensive therapy is documented poorly because most trials only last 4 to 6 years. Despite these drawbacks and concerns, the benefits of antihypertensive therapy clearly outweigh its potential risk.
...
PMID:Therapeutic controversies in hypertension. 1620 95

The hypertensive patient with type 2 diabetes is especially at risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) studies suggested that treatment to a lower target blood pressure resulted in better prevention of clinical disease in these patients. Most trials comparing antihypertensive drugs have shown only minimal differences between the various agents. The evidence from the trials suggests that diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and the angiotensin-receptor antagonists (ARBs) will all successfully reduce adverse clinical events. The largest of the comparative hypertensive drug trials, the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), demonstrated that a diuretic has a better hypotensive effect, and was more successful in preventing many aspects of cardiovascular disease compared with CCBs and ACE inhibitors. The importance of good blood pressure control and the general equivalence of antihypertensive drugs were again shown in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial, which compared an ARB with a CCB. Choice of antihypertensive agent should be individualized and guided by the presence of concomitant clinical disease and the need to protect any specific target organ system in the diabetic hypertensive. Diuretics, being potent hypotensive drugs with clearly demonstrated clinical benefit, should form part of the antihypertensive regimen of most diabetic hypertensives. ACE inhibitors and ARBs are especially useful in preventing nephropathy. Most patients will require a combination of antihypertensive drugs to achieve tight blood pressure control of under 130/80 mm Hg in the diabetic hypertensive. The clinician should concentrate on seeking this lower target blood pressure rather than be excessively concerned about which is the best antihypertensive agent.
...
PMID:Choice of antihypertensive drug in the diabetic patient. 1636 52

Valsartan is an angiotensin receptor antagonist that specifically blocks the angiotensin II type 1 receptors. It is an effective and well-tolerated once-daily antihypertensive agent, with a tolerability profile similar to placebo. A recent series of large-scale clinical trials have shown the benefits of valsartan in disease states beyond hypertension. Based on the results of the Val-HeFT (Valsartan in Heart Failure Trial) and VALIANT (Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial) studies, valsartan is indicated for use in patients with heart failure and in patients post-myocardial infarction. Recently, in the VALUE (Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation) trial, valsartan was no more cardioprotective than calcium channel blockers, but was shown to reduce the risk of developing new-onset diabetes in hypertensive patients at high risk of cardiac events compared with calcium antagonist treatment. In diabetic patients with microalbuminuria, valsartan has been shown to have benefits beyond those attributable to blood pressure lowering alone.
...
PMID:The angiotensin receptor antagonist valsartan: a review of the literature with a focus on clinical trials. 1655 73

In the main Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation (VALUE) report, we investigated outcomes in 15 245 high-risk hypertensive subjects treated with valsartan- or amlodipine-based regimens. In this report, we analyzed outcomes in 7080 patients (46.4%) who, at the end of the initial drug adjustment period (6 months), remained on monotherapy. Baseline characteristics were similar in the valsartan (N=3263) and amlodipine (N=3817) groups. Time on monotherapy was 3.2 years (78% of treatment exposure time). The average in-trial blood pressure was similar in both groups. Event rates in the monotherapy group were 16% to 39% lower than in the main VALUE trial. In the first analysis, we censored patients when they discontinued monotherapy ("censored"); in the second, we counted events regardless of subsequent therapy (intention-to-treat principle). We also assessed the impact of duration of monotherapy on outcomes. No difference was found in primary composite cardiac end points, strokes, myocardial infarctions, and all-cause deaths with both analyses. Heart failure in the valsartan group was lower both in the censored and intention-to-treat analyses (hazard ratios: 0.63, P=0.004 and 0.78, P=0.045, respectively). Longer duration of monotherapy amplified between-group differences in heart failure. New-onset diabetes was lower in the valsartan group with both analyses (odds ratios: 0.78, P=0.012 and 0.82, P=0.034). Thus, despite lower absolute event rates in monotherapy patients, the relative risks of heart failure and new-onset diabetes favored valsartan. Moreover, these findings support the feasibility of comparative prospective trials in lower-risk hypertensive patients.
...
PMID:The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial: outcomes in patients receiving monotherapy. 1768 74

It is well recognised that the metabolic syndrome, a constellation of risk factors including obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications and the development of Type 2 diabetes. Consequently, timely identification and management of all components of the metabolic syndrome is warranted. In particular, guidelines have emphasised the importance of targeting elevated blood pressure (BP) and dyslipidaemia as a method of reducing global cardiovascular risk. Findings from the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial show that the angiotensin receptor blocker, valsartan, reduces cardiovascular events and the development of Type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals. This profile is being further explored in the ongoing Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial. Given the potential advantages to patients and physicians of tackling more than one of the components of the metabolic syndrome, antihypertensive agents such as valsartan would appear to be and important addition to the management of vulnerable patients at high risk of cardiovascular events.
...
PMID:Angiotensin receptor blockers: Cardiovascular protection in the metabolic syndrome. 1698 30

Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is a fixed-dose (valsartan 80, 160 or 320mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 or 25mg) angiotensin II receptor blocker/diuretic drug combination indicated for the treatment of patients with essential hypertension not adequately controlled by monotherapy.There is ample evidence that valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is an effective fixed-dose combination antihypertensive agent. However, efficacy and tolerability data pertaining to the 320mg dose of valsartan in the combination are currently relatively few. There is also some evidence of potential benefits associated with the relatively favourable tolerability profile of the combination, the low occurrence of new-onset diabetes mellitus versus amlodipine and the valsartan-associated improvements in cardiac and endothelial function.
...
PMID:Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. 1704 Jan 20

Several lines of evidence suggest that both advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and oxidation processes play key roles in the physiology of aging and age-related pathologies, leading to irreversible proteins modifications in both tissues and the extracellular matrix. Such an accelerated accumulation of these modifications has been reported to be present in several age-related chronic diseases, such as atherosclerosis, diabetes, arthritis, and neurodegenerative diseases. The current literature reveals that the specific inhibition of AGEs may constitute an innovative therapeutic goal. In experimental animals, the use of sartans significantly reduces blood pressure and kidney pentosidine content, improving both histologic renal damage and proteinuria. In this study, 12 subjects who were affected by diabetes mellitus and hypertension were subjected to oral antihypertensive therapy with valsartan (class of sartans) with timed sampling of plasma and urine pentosidine, N(epsilon)-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), malondialdehyde, and isoprostanes levels, respectively, at baseline and after both 3 and 6 months, with parallel ongoing evaluation of glycemic control and blood pressure levels. Valsartan elicited a good antihypertensive effect with a 30% decrease in plasma pentosidine levels (P < .05) after 3 months of therapy, followed by a slight increase after 6 months. Urinary pentosidine concentrations exhibited a 40% decrease after 3 months (215 +/- 19 vs 129 +/- 23 nmol/24 h) and a further significant reduction after 6 months of therapy (105 +/- 24 nmol/24 h). Plasma CML levels showed a progressive decrease after 3 months (23.15 +/- 3.215 vs 19.88 +/- 1.684 micromol/mL) and achieved a further slight reduction after 6 months of therapy (19.48 +/- 1.339 micromol/mL); for urinary CML, a statistically significant reduction was gained after the sixth month of therapy (48.51 +/- 5.70 vs 30.30 +/- 2.77 micromol/24 h after 3 months and 27.02 +/- 4.13 micromol/24 h after 6 months; F = 7.62, P < .005). Plasma and urinary concentrations of malondialdehyde were slightly modified by valsartan treatment; the mean levels after both 3 and 6 months did not significantly differ from baseline. Urinary 15-F2t-isoprostanes (2.96 +/- 0.45 ng/24 h) levels displayed a progressive decrease after both 3 (2.27 +/- 0.31 ng/24 h) and 6 months (1.70 +/- 0.23 ng/24 h) with statistical significance achieved only at the end of the study (P < .05). The present data suggest interesting in vivo antiglycation and antioxidation effects of this angiotensin II receptor antagonist with reductions in plasma and urinary pentosidine, plasma CML, and urinary isoprostanes levels. The present study supports an antagonistic role of valsartan in the production of AGEs precursors through the chelation of transition metals and an antioxidant activity that scavenges reactive oxygen species. This property of valsartan may broaden the scope of newly developed pharmacologic inhibitors of advanced glycoxidation.
...
PMID:Effects of valsartan therapy on protein glycoxidation. 1714 34

The ABCD (Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes) and ABCD-2V (Part 2 with Valsartan) are prospective, randomised clinical trials which will provide important data on the impact of intensive vs. moderate blood pressure (BP) control on microvascular and macrovascular complications in normotensive and hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The ABCD trial was a five-year study that compared the effects of intensive vs. moderate BP control on the endpoints of nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease events using a calcium channel blocker (CCB) and an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor as the primary antihypertensive agents. The recently published results of the hypertensive cohort of ABCD are reviewed herein. The follow-up study, ABCD-2V, is ongoing and was designed to compare intensive vs. moderate BP control on the same endpoints as the ABCD study, using the highly selective angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan as the primary antihypertensive agent. First results of ABCD-2V are expected in 2004. The baseline characteristics for the patients enrolled thus far in the hypertensive cohort of ABCD-2V are reviewed. These studies will provide insight into the role of intensive vs. moderate BP control in the management of normotensive and hypertensive patients with type 2 DM.
...
PMID:Improving the prognosis of diabetic patients: evaluating the role of intensive versus moderate blood pressure control with selective angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy. 1719 16

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a well-established role in the management of patients with hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and myocardial infarction (MI). ACE inhibitors have been particularly well studied in acute and chronic MI with consistent and substantial survival benefits demonstrated, particularly in the higher risk groups. The recent development of angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blockers (ARBs) as a well tolerated pharmacological therapy to more completely inhibit the actions of Ang II at the AT1-receptor level raises questions concerning comparative efficacy with the proven ACE inhibitor experience. Two major trials will provide a direct comparison of ARBs with an ACE inhibitor. The Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VALIANT) trial is specifically designed to compare and contrast the ARB, valsartan, used both alone as well as in combination with a proven ACE inhibitor regimen, in a high risk MI population. VALIANT, with its three arms targetting 14,500 patients, is uniquely poised to determine whether the pharmacological advance in the development of ARBs confers additional clinical (survival) value in high risk MI patients.
...
PMID:Will more complete inhibition of the RAAS with angiotensin receptor blockade improve survival following myocardial infarction? 1719 21


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>

---