Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
 277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Clinical factors which might influence the absorption of subcutaneously injected 125I-NPH insulin were studied in 101 diabetics. The disappearance curve was monoexponential after a delay period of 1.5 +/- 0.8 h (mean +/- SD). Lipohypertrophy significantly prolonged insulin absorption (half life (T1/2) = 11.2 +/- 3.1 h, p = 0.0001). Low bicarbonate levels increased the absorption (T1/2 3.9 +/- 2.3 h, p less than 0.05). Lean diabetics had a faster absorption (6.2 +/- 1.9 h) than normal weight diabetics (7.5 +/- 2.0 h, p less than 0.02). Sex, age, diabetes duration and injection depth did not influence T1/2. The half life was significantly inversely correlated to the resting subcutaneous blood flow (r = 0.882, p less than 0.01). The overall interindividual coefficient of variation for insulin absorption in nonketotic diabetics was 27.4%. Also considerable intra-patient day-to-day variation was found (24.5%), and between different injection sites (30.2%). These variations emphasize the drawbacks of conventional insulin therapy in the management of insulin-requiring diabetics.
 ...
PMID:Clinical factors influencing the absorption of 125I-NPH insulin in diabetic patients. 640 73

Children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) typically self-inject insulin twice daily. Injection sites must be rotated with each insulin administration to avoid lipohypertrophy. Lipohypertrophy results in erratic insulin release and threatens metabolic stability. To aid rotation, children are usually provided with a picture of a human figure with injection sites identified within a grid. Children often have difficulty using the charts or lack the skills necessary to identify injection sites. An alternative three-dimensional visual aid, a pair of "injection bears", simplifies injection site identification. Fifty-eight 6- to 11-year-old children with IDDM identified 10 injection sites using both the injection chart and the injection bears. Accuracy of injection site identification was compared on five subcomponents. Forty-four percent of informants recalled that their doctors recommended using injection charts. Of those recalling the recommendation, 81% never or rarely used charts at home. Thirty-nine percent of the informants reported a history of lipohypertrophy. Matched sample t-tests demonstrated that children committed significantly fewer identification errors on all subcomponents (P < or = .05) when using the injection bears. Chi square analyses indicated a significant preference (P < or = .05) for the injection bears, which may be a useful tool for insulin injection rotation with younger children.
 ...
PMID:Accuracy of injection site identification among children with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a comparison of traditional and new visual aids. 866 52

The incidence and prevalence of all types of diabetes mellitus is increasing at an alarming rate. Modern therapy involves greater and earlier use of intensive insulin regimens in order to achieve better control of blood glucose levels and reduce the long-term risks associated with the condition. Insulin therapy is associated with important cutaneous adverse effects, which can affect insulin absorption kinetics causing glycemic excursions above and below target levels for blood glucose. Common complications of subcutaneous insulin injection include lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy. The development of lipoatrophy may have an immunological basis, predisposed by lipolytic components of certain insulins. Repeated use of the same injection site increases the risk of lipoatrophy--with time, patients learn that these areas are relatively pain free and continue to use them. However, the absorption of insulin from lipoatrophic areas is erratic leading to frequent difficulties in achieving ideal blood glucose control. With the increasing use of modified, rapidly absorbed analog insulins (e.g. insulin lispro, insulin aspart) the incidence of lipoatrophy occurring has decreased over recent years. The likelihood of lipoatrophy can be reduced by regular rotation of injection sites but once developed, practical benefits may be obtained by insulin injection into the edge of the area, co-administration of dexamethasone with insulin, or changing the mode of insulin delivery. Lipohypertrophy is the most common cutaneous complication of insulin therapy. Newer insulins have also reduced its prevalence considerably, although its adverse effect on diabetic control is similar to lipoatrophy through impaired absorption of insulin into the systemic circulation. Experience with liposuction at these sites is limited, although good cosmetic results have been achieved. Local allergic reactions to insulin are usually erythema, pruritus, and induration. These allergic reactions are usually short-lived, and resolve spontaneously within a few weeks. Useful adjuncts to managing allergic reactions include addition of dexamethasone to the insulin injection, desensitization to insulin, or a change in delivery system utilizing insulin pump therapy or potentially inhaled insulins when these become available. The use of insulin pump therapy in managing cutaneous complications of insulin therapy is increasing, but this method itself carries risks of abscess formation and scarring. Fortunately, with improved education of patients these are relatively uncommon. Although many of the cutaneous manifestations are decreasing with the use of newer insulins, they may still influence glycemic control and increase the risk of hypoglycemia as well as have a cosmetic impact on a patient. The introduction of novel therapies and newer delivery systems is likely to reduce the cutaneous problems associated with long-term insulin use.
 ...
PMID:Skin-related complications of insulin therapy: epidemiology and emerging management strategies. 1450 28

Management of diabetes mellitus can be responsible for cutaneous adverse events. For example, lipoatrophy or lipohypertrophy can develop at the site of insulin injections. Lipohypertrophy remains a frequent complication of insulin therapy irrespective of the insulin source and mode of administration. Lipoatrophy at insulin injection sites is considered to be an immune complex-mediated inflammatory lesion; however, it has become a rare event since the advent of human insulin. Nowadays, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using a portable pump and/or injections of insulin analogs with an altered amino acid sequence compared with native insulin may cause lipodystrophy in diabetic patients. Some case reports describe the recovery of lipoatrophy following the use of CSII and/or short-acting insulin analogs. Conversely, exceptional cases of lipoatrophy have occurred in patients receiving lispro insulin analog via CSII. Lipodystrophy reactions remain a potential problem when managing diabetic patients with new insulin therapy technologies.
 ...
PMID:Lipodystrophy reactions to insulin: effects of continuous insulin infusion and new insulin analogs. 1729 3

Lipohypertrophy has been a recognized complication of insulin therapy for many years, yet research shows that its prevalence in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes remains high. The problem for the patient is that the injection of insulin into a site of lipohypertrophy, although painless, may lead to erratic absorption of the insulin, with the potential for poor glycaemic control and unpredictable hypoglycaemia. Despite the important implications of this for diabetes control in insulin-injecting patients, there is a dearth of information and completed research into the condition. This article raises awareness of lipohypertrophy by reviewing the available literature on the prevention, identification and management of the condition from a nursing perspective. Recommendations for medical and nursing practice in diabetes care to improve prevention and management of lipohypertrophy are made.
 ...
PMID:The management of lipohypertrophy in diabetes care. 1755 41

From February 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, 13,289 insulin-injecting patients from 423 centers in 42 countries participated in one of the largest surveys ever performed in diabetes. The first results of this survey are published elsewhere in this issue. Herein we report that the most common complication of injecting insulin is lipohypertrophy (LH), which was self-reported by 29.0% of patients and found by physical examination in 30.8% by health care professionals (HCPs). Patients with LH consumed a mean of 10.1 IU more insulin daily than patients without LH. Glycated hemoglobin levels averaged 0.55% higher in patients with vs without LH. Lipohypertrophy was associated with higher rates of unexplained hypoglycemia and glycemic variability as well as more frequent diabetic ketoacidosis, incorrect rotation of injection sites, use of smaller injection zones, longer duration of insulin use, and reuse of pen needles (each P<.05). Routine inspection of injection sites by the HCP was associated with lower glycated hemoglobin levels, less LH, and more correct injection site rotation. Patients were also more likely to rotate correctly if they received injection instructions from their HCP in the past 6 months. Fewer than 40% of patients claimed to have gotten such instructions in the past 6 months, and 10% said that they have never received training on how to inject correctly despite injecting for a mean of nearly 9 years. Use of these data should stimulate renewed commitment to optimizing insulin injection practices.
...
PMID:Worldwide Injection Technique Questionnaire Study: Injecting Complications and the Role of the Professional. 2759 82

Type I diabetes patients depend on insulin injections. Proper injection technique is essential for good glycaemic control. Incorrect technique can also lead to local injection site adverse effects, commonest being lipohypertrophy. Hypoglycaemia, by far the most dreaded adverse effect of insulin, receives utmost focus in management of patients on insulin. Lipohypertrophy, on the other hand, is a relatively neglected adverse effect. It is necessary for health care providers to realize that it can also have serious clinical implications. We present a case of persistent unexplained hyperglycaemia in a Type I Diabetes Mellitus (TIDM) patient with severe injection site lipohypertropy. After switching to normal unused sites, her blood sugar levels improved, along with reduction in insulin requirement. The case highlights the importance of continuous patient education and alert monitoring by health care providers.
 ...
PMID:Unexplained Persistent Hyperglycaemia in a Type I Diabetes Patient - Is Injection Site Lipohypertrophy the Cause? 2779 Apr 96