UMLS:C0011849 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0011849 (diabetes)
277,896 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Whereas the impact of early (first 6 postoperative weeks) acute cellular rejection on patient survival among liver transplant recipients as a whole has been reported to be favorable, we hypothesized treatment for acute cellular rejection may have differing impacts on patient and graft survival in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected and HCV-negative transplant recipients. We studied the impact of immunosuppression and rejection on patient and graft survival among the 166 HCV-infected and 602 HCV-negative transplant recipients enrolled onto the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database. All data were collected prospectively. The association of early acute cellular rejection with mortality was determined using a Cox proportional hazards model with a time-dependent covariate. Median follow-up was 5.0 years for HCV-infected and 5.2 years for HCV-negative transplant recipients. HCV-infected transplant recipients experienced similar frequencies of acute cellular and steroid-resistant rejection as patients undergoing liver transplantation for most other indications. The mortality risk was significantly increased (relative risk = 2.4; P =.03) for HCV-infected transplant recipients who developed early acute cellular rejection compared with HCV-negative transplant recipients. None of the HCV-infected transplant recipients developed allograft failure secondary to chronic rejection. The choice of calcineurin inhibitor did not affect posttransplantation outcomes. Early acute cellular rejection occurs at similar frequencies in HCV-infected and HCV-negative transplant recipients. Although an episode of early acute cellular rejection is associated with a lower cumulative mortality among HCV-negative transplant recipients, the opposite is true for HCV-infected transplant recipients, who experience an increased risk for mortality after an episode of early acute cellular rejection. The adverse impact of early acute cellular rejection on patient survival should be considered in developing primary immunosuppression and acute cellular rejection treatment protocols for HCV-infected transplant recipients.
...
PMID:Impact of immunosuppression and acute rejection on recurrence of hepatitis C: results of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database. 1043 Oct 24

Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of death in transplant recipients. This is due, in part, to the vulnerability of these patients to a complicated set of conditions including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and post-transplant hyperlipidaemia (PTHL). PTHL is characterised by persistent elevations in total serum cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels. The causes of PTHL are complex and not fully understood, however several classes of immunosuppressants including the corticosteroids, rapamycins and calcineurin inhibitors, appear to play a role. PTHL has been observed in most studies in which patients received calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens, and has been observed with both tacrolimus and cyclosporin. Comparing these calcineurin inhibitors with regard to the relative incidence or severity of PTHL occurring during treatment is difficult because of the use of higher doses of corticosteroids in cyclosporin-based regimens, as compared with tacrolimus-based regimens. However, current expert opinion suggests that the discrepancies in the relative incidence and severity of PTHL are largely accounted for by this difference in corticosteroid dose. At this point in time, evidence for potential differences is scant and inconclusive. Further study is needed, not only to investigate differences in lipid profile, but also of the relative effects of these immunosuppressants on long term graft function as well as on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. PTHL can be successfully managed with a combination of dietary management, reduction and, if appropriate, withdrawal of corticosteroids, and the administration of lipid-lowering drugs. With this combination of therapeutic options, the threats to long term health posed by PTHL may be effectively addressed.
...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors and post-transplant hyperlipidaemias. 1167 3

Recent success using a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen has renewed enthusiasm for the use of islet transplantation to treat diabetes. Toxicities associated with the continued use of a calcineurin inhibitor may limit the wide-spread application of this therapy. Biological agents that block key T-cell costimulatory signals, in particular the CD28 pathway, have demonstrated extraordinary promise in animal models. LEA29Y (BMS-224818), a mutant CTLA4-Ig molecule with increased binding activity, was evaluated for its potential to replace tacrolimus and protect allogeneic islets in a preclinical primate model. Animals received either the base immunosuppression regimen (rapamycin and anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody [mAb]) or the base immunosuppression and LEA29Y. Animals receiving the LEA29Y/rapamycin/anti-IL-2R regimen (n = 5) had significantly prolonged islet allograft survival (204, 190, 216, 56, and >220 days). In contrast, those animals receiving the base regimen alone (n = 2) quickly rejected the transplanted islets at 1 week (both at 7 days). The LEA29Y-based regimen prevented the priming of anti-donor T- and B-cell responses, as detected by interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot and allo-antibody production, respectively. The results of this study suggest that LEA29Y is a potent immunosuppressant that can effectively prevent rejection in a steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol and produce marked prolongation of islet allograft survival in a preclinical model.
Diabetes 2002 Feb
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitor-free CD28 blockade-based protocol protects allogeneic islets in nonhuman primates. 1181 31

Immunosuppressant nephrotoxicity is among the major contributors to chronic renal allograft failure, which is the primary cause of graft loss. Because of a lack of alternatives to the inherently nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors for maintenance immunosuppression, long-term survival rates for renal allografts have not increased in proportion to the rise in short-term graft survival. Clinical studies have shown that mammalian target of rapamycin-based immunosuppression in combination with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine is safe and efficacious. These data suggest that a target of rapamycin antagonist (sirolimus/everolimus) should be used initially in combination with calcineurin antagonists in order to prevent early acute rejection. After 3-6 months, a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen can then be individually tailored to each patient on the basis of their clinical and histological status. Those patients at high immunological risk should remain on full-dose triple therapy. All other patients should receive either a calcineurin inhibitor or corticosteroid-sparing regimen, with a maintenance dose of a target of rapamycin inhibitor. This regimen should result in less immunosuppressant nephrotoxicity and a reduction in the serious side effects of steroids, such as diabetes and osteoporosis. Whether the proposed individually designed immunosuppressive regimen, based on protocol biopsies and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, will result in prolonged graft and patient survival remains to be determined.
...
PMID:The future role of target of rapamycin inhibitors in renal transplantation. 1185 56

Cyclosporin A (CsA) is now routinely used for transplantation of all solid organs, bone marrow transplantation, and for an increasing number of immunological diseases. However, treatment with CsA is an important iatrogenic cause of post-transplant hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, which may contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity in transplant recipients. Recently, the calcineurin inhibitor CsA has been employed in vivo and in vitro to examine the role of calcineurin in the signal transduction leading to cardiac hypertrophy. A cell culture study demonstrated the inhibitory effect of CsA on cytokine production by cardiac myxoma cells, the most common primary tumor of the heart. This review discusses recent data on the cardiovascular effects of CsA.
...
PMID:Cardiovascular effects of an immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A. 1259 Aug 68

Recently, new calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus (FK-506) and microemulsion cyclosporin, have been approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients and short-term outcomes have been accumulating. In the majority of patients, these calcineurin inhibitors have been used in combination with new immunosuppressive drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus. Under these circumstances, a comparison of cyclosporin and tacrolimus provides the answer to a very important controversial issue. Which drug should we choose in individual patients? In an attempt to answer this question, this review compared the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporin in modern immunosuppressive regimens, which have already been published in well designed clinical studies, and discusses how immunosuppression should be individualised in renal transplant patients.Overall, short-term patient and graft survival with cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus is almost identical. The incidence of acute rejection is generally lower in tacrolimus/azathioprine- than in cyclosporin/azathioprine-treated patients. However, in conjunction with MMF, the difference in the incidence of acute rejection between tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients became smaller. Adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes (gum hypertrophy, hirsutism) seem to be less frequent in tacrolimus-treated than in cyclosporin-treated patients. Recent randomised studies showed that the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was almost identical between low-dose tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients. According to the data discussed in this review, the recommendation on the choice of calcineurin inhibitors at this moment is that either cyclosporin or tacrolimus can be used safely and effectively for patients without any risk factors. However, at our centre, we prefer tacrolimus to cyclosporin in patients with a high risk for rejection, such as those with ABO-incompatibility, delayed graft function, sensitisation, and African American race and some other risk factors, such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Moreover, tacrolimus may be preferable to cyclosporin for women because of hirsutism and for children because of the steroid-sparing effect. We consider that cyclosporin should be chosen when patients experience tacrolimus-related adverse events, such as severe chest pain, tremor, gastrointestinal symptoms and encephalopathy. In conclusion, well tolerated and effective immunosuppression is feasible with both cyclosporin and tacrolimus. In the current immunosuppressive regimens, a calcineurin inhibitor, either tacrolimus or cyclosporin, is the essential basic standard immunosuppressant. Clinicians need to decide the best means of optimising therapy for individual patients, based on various risk factors, such as risk of rejection, i.e. sensitisation, delayed graft function and ABO-incompatibility, and some adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes.
...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: what is the best option? 1288 61

The anti-interleukin-2 receptor (anti-IL-2R) antibody therapy is an exciting approach to the prevention of acute rejection after renal allograft transplantation whereby immunosuppression is exerted by a selective and competitive inhibition of IL-2-induced T cell proliferation, a critical pathway of allorecognition. The anti-IL-2R antibodies specifically block the alpha-subunit of the IL-2R on activated T cells, and prevent T cell proliferation and activation of the effector arms of the immune system. The anti-IL-2R antibodies are used as induction therapy, immediately after renal transplantation, for prevention of acute cellular rejection in children and adults. During acute rejection, the IL-2Ralpha chain is no longer expressed on T cells; thus, the antibodies cannot be used to treat an existing acute rejection. Two anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibodies are currently in clinical use: daclizumab and basiliximab. In placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials in adults, daclizumab and basiliximab in combination with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression, significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection and corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection without increasing the risk of infectious or malignant complications, and neither antibody was associated with the cytokine-release syndrome. Children who receive calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression, as well as children who receive augmented immunosuppression to treat acute rejection, are at increased risk of growth impairment, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, diabetes mellitus, and cosmetic changes. In older children, the cosmetic adverse effects frequently reduce compliance with the treatment, and subsequently increase the risk of allograft loss. Being effective and well tolerated in children, the anti-IL-2R antibodies reduce the need for calcineurin inhibitors while maintaining the overall efficacy of the regimen; thus, the anti-IL-2R antibodies increase the safety margin (less toxicity, fewer adverse effects) of the baseline immunosuppression. Secondly, the anti-IL-2R antibodies decrease the need for corticosteroids and muromonab CD3 (OKT3) in children as a result of decreased incidence of acute rejection. The recommended pediatric dose of daclizumab is 1 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days for five doses, with the first dose administered within 24 hours pre-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains daclizumab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (5-10 microg/mL) in children for at least 12 weeks.The recommended pediatric dose of basiliximab for recipients <35 kg is 10 mg, and 20 mg for recipients > or =35 kg, intravenously on days 0 and 4 post-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains basiliximab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (>0.2 microg/mL) in children for at least 3 weeks.
...
PMID:Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies for the prevention of rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients: current status. 1451 Jun 27

Cardiovascular disease post-transplant, particularly ischemic heart disease, is a significant problem for all transplant recipients. The major risk factors-smoking, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension-are often more prevalent in heart transplant populations than in the general population. One of the main risk factors influencing graft loss and patient survival is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Because CAV affects between 30% and 60% of cardiac transplant recipients within 5 years of surgery, prevention is a key focus for cardiac transplant teams today. CAV is caused by both immunologic mechanisms (e.g., acute rejection and anti-HLA antibodies) and non-immunologic mechanisms relating to the transplant itself or the recipient (e.g., donor age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and pre-existing diabetes) or to the side effects often associated with immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors or corticosteroids (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, nephrotoxicity and new-onset diabetes after transplantation). The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, effectively prevent acute rejection, but do not prevent the development of CAV. CAV prevention will require a combined approach of new adjunct immunosuppressant agents (e.g., the proliferation signal inhibitors) and reduction in cardiovascular risk. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes are also associated with the immunosuppression required to prevent organ rejection. Some studies have shown that hypertension is present more frequently in cyclosporine-treated patients than in tacrolimus-treated patients and that tacrolimus may be associated with a more favorable lipid profile. On the other hand, tacrolimus may be more diabetogenic than cyclosporine with current data suggesting a trend but no statistically significant supporting evidence. New-onset diabetes after transplantation is at times difficult to manage and may be an important determinant along with hypertension and hyperlipidemia of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease. The choice of calcineurin inhibitor for an immunosuppressive regimen in heart transplantation should consider the associated relative cardiovascular risks.
...
PMID:Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: risk factors and management. 1509 4

The use of immunosuppression regimens containing a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), an adjunct immunosuppressant (e.g., azathioprine, everolimus or mycophenolate mofetil) and corticosteroids has effectively reduced the risk of early graft loss due to acute rejection in heart transplant recipients. At present, late graft loss due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major challenge for transplant teams. CAV is characterized by intimal hyperplasia as a result of endothelial cell injury. Factors relating to the transplant procedure itself (e.g., ischemic time and reperfusion injury), cardiovascular risks (e.g., donor age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pre-existing diabetes and new-onset diabetes after transplantation), immunologic risks (e.g., acute rejection episodes, anti-HLA antibodies) and the side effects of immunosuppression with CNIs or corticosteroids (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, nephrotoxicity) have all been implicated in the development of CAV. The 2 main approaches to the prevention of CAV are modification of underlying risk factors (e.g., treatment with anti-hypertensive agents and lipid-lowering drugs, and optimizing the immunosuppressive regimen) and improvement in immunosuppression. CNIs remain the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens in heart transplantation, but new parameters for monitoring CNI exposure and new immunosuppressive regimens hold the promise of reduced overall CNI exposure with consequent reductions in vascular toxicity and improved clinical outcomes. Traditionally, trough levels of cyclosporine (C(0)) have been used to monitor exposure to cyclosporine and to assess the need for dose adjustment. However, optimal cyclosporine exposure can now be achieved through monitoring of cyclosporine levels 2 hours after dosing (C(2) monitoring). Furthermore, in a pivotal trial in heart transplantation, the new proliferation signal inhibitor, everolimus, plus full-dose cyclosporine and corticosteroids, has been shown to have improved impact on prevention of biopsy-proven acute rejection (and other efficacy end-points) and longer term on the prevention of CAV. In addition, there is evidence from studies in renal transplant recipients that everolimus plus reduced exposure cyclosporine is effective and well tolerated-with the regimen having a reduced potential for CNI-related nephrotoxicity and for other CNI-related cardiovascular side effects.
...
PMID:Optimizing the immunosuppressive regimen in heart transplantation. 1509 7

New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation is characterized by decreased insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance secondary to the effects of immunosuppression. Although impaired beta cell function appears to be the primary mechanism of calcineurin inhibitor-induced new-onset diabetes, impaired peripheral glucose utilization also appears to contribute to insulin resistance and abnormal glucose metabolism. Because transplant recipients who develop new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation are at increased risk for infections, cardiovascular disease, and poor patient and graft survival, all patients should undergo careful assessment of risk for diabetes prior to transplantation and regular screening for the development of hyperglycemia thereafter. For patients in high-risk groups, including certain ethnic backgrounds, older adults, and the very young, and patients with hepatitis C, consideration should be given to initiating immunosuppressive therapy with agents that are less diabetogenic. Recent guidelines include more stringent criteria for diagnosis and stress the importance of strict glycemic control. Diet, exercise, and weight management are core components of treatment with addition of oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin as needed to achieve control. Concomitant measures include aggressive control of lipids and blood pressure to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. New-onset diabetes after transplantation is a serious issue affecting patient and graft outcomes and warrants the attention of all health care professionals involved in assessing and managing the transplant recipient.
...
PMID:New-onset diabetes mellitus in transplant patients: pathogenesis, complications, and management. 1516 75

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>