Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0011570 (
depression
)
172,036
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
It has been postulated that inhalation anaesthetics may interfere with calcium movement across cell membranes. We have evaluated the interaction between diltiazem and the inhalation anaesthetics halothane and isoflurane on sinus automaticity in the isolated right atrium (SAIRA). Isoflurane significantly reduced atrial rate at all concentrations tested. However, halothane produced only a small but significant decrease at the higher concentrations used (1-2 v/v%).
Diltiazem
modified the maximal negative chronotropic response to inhalation anaesthetics. Maximum
depression
of SAIRA was significantly greater in the presence of two different doses of diltiazem compared with exposure to halothane and isoflurane alone. These results suggest that inhalation anaesthetics may block the influx of extracellular calcium through voltage-dependent calcium channels inhibited by diltiazem.
...
PMID:Interactions between diltiazem and inhalation anaesthetics in the isolated heart. 280 89
The effects of orally administered diltiazem combined with maximally tolerated doses of beta-blockers and nitrates were assessed in 12 patients, who during stress testing exhibited persistent effort angina and continued objective evidence for inducible myocardial ischemia. Patients performed multistage semisupine exercise on a bicycle ergometer during equilibrium-gated radionuclide angiography after consecutive 2 week treatment periods of placebo or diltiazem 90 mg qid (mean dose 340 mg/day) combined with maximally tolerated propranolol (mean dose 178 mg/day) and isosorbide dinitrate (mean dose 137 mg/day). All medications (including diltiazem or placebo) were administered four times daily for the duration of the study.
Diltiazem
or placebo was administered according to a double-blind design, with randomized cross-over at the end of each 2 week treatment period. The average number of angina attacks decreased during the double-blind cross-over phase of the trial (7 +/- 7 episodes/week at baseline vs 4 +/- 3 on placebo vs 2 +/- 2 on diltiazem; p = .08). Angina pectoris was abolished during peak exercise in eight of 12 patients on diltiazem (p less than .05 vs placebo).
Diltiazem
increased total exercise duration from 276 +/- 92 to 310 +/- 78 sec (p less than .005 vs baseline).
Diltiazem
likewise increased the time to onset of angina from 231 +/- 84 sec at baseline to 305 +/- 77 sec (p less than .005), as well as the time to the onset of 1 mm ischemic ST segment
depression
(p = .01).
Diltiazem
decreased heart rate at rest, during submaximal workload, and at peak exercise (p less than .05), and decreased systolic blood pressure at peak exercise only (p less than .05). A significant decline in rate-pressure product at submaximal and peak exercise was noted (p less than .05). At any given workload there was significantly less ST segment
depression
during submaximal (p = .05) and peak exercise (p less than .025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Beneficial effects of high-dose diltiazem in patients with persistent effort angina on beta-blockers and nitrates: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. 285 31
To determine if a sustained-release form of the calcium entry blocker diltiazem would be a satisfactory substitute for the combination of beta-adrenergic blocking agent and thiazide diuretic in the treatment of systemic hypertension and angina pectoris, 38 patients were studied in a 4-center trial. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the supine position, immediately after and 5 minutes after standing. Modified Bruce protocol treadmill tests were performed to determine the time to onset of 1 mm ST-segment
depression
, time to onset of chest pain and time to termination of exercise.
Diltiazem
monotherapy resulted in equivalent blood pressure control in 28 of 38 patients (74%). In the remaining patients, blood pressure control was achieved with resumption of the diuretic. Blood pressure with beta blocker plus diuretic compared with diltiazem were, in the supine position 137 +/- 22/82 +/- 7 (+/- 1 standard deviation) versus 139 +/- 22/82 +/- 8 mm Hg, immediately after standing 131 +/- 20/84 +/- 9 versus 133 +/- 21/82 +/- 10 mm Hg and after standing for 5 minutes 134 +/- 19/85 +/- 8 versus 137 +/- 18/85 +/- 9 mm Hg (difference not significant for each). The heart rate with diltiazem was higher supine (67 +/- 11 versus 60 +/- 11 beats/min), standing (73 +/- 13 versus 64 +/- 14 beats/min) and 5 minutes after standing (73 +/- 14 versus 63 +/- 14 beats/min, p less than 0.01 for each).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem as replacement therapy for beta blockers and diuretics for stable angina pectoris and coexisting essential hypertension: a multicenter trial. 289 Dec 91
The safety and efficiency of the administration of diltiazem was evaluated in 10 patients with class II-III chronic stable angina. All the patients had ischemic heart disease documented by coronary angiography and/or an abnormal exercise test. A dose related improvement in both frequency of angina and exercise capacity were obtained by diltiazem administered in increased doses using a single blind protocol. The weekly frequency of angina was reduced from 7.5 +/- 9.8 with placebo to 3.8 +/- 5.5, 1.1 +/- (p less than 0.05) and 0.7 +/- 0.9 (p less than 0.01) with doses of 120, 240 and 360 mg/day respectively. The exercise duration on treadmill was significantly increased from 8.5 +/- 3.6 to 10.6 +/- 3.7 min (p less than 0.05) with the 360 mg/day dose. The mean exercise time required to develop 1 mm ST
depression
was 6.1 +/- 3 min on placebo and was significantly delayed to 9.0 +/- 3.8 min (p less than 0.05) with the 240 mg/day dose and to 10.7 +/- 4.0 min with 360 mg (p less than 0.01). In a double blind randomized crossover phase, the time to the onset of ischemia during exercise was increased from 8.5 +/- 3.8 min with placebo to 11.05 +/- 2.8 min with 360 mg/day of diltiazem (p less than 0.01).
Diltiazem
in doses ranging from 120 to 360 mg/day is an effective antianginal agent with no significant adverse effects.
...
PMID:[Diltiazem in chronic stable angina]. 294 27
The comparative effects of prolonged chronic therapy with diltiazem, nicardipine, tiapamil and verapamil on exercise tolerance, ST-segment changes and heart rate were examined in 63 patients with established chronic stable angina pectoris. Multistage computer-assisted symptom-limited treadmill exercise tests were performed after 2 weeks of placebo ("baseline") and then after 4 months of open-label chronic drug therapy.
Diltiazem
improved the exercise duration by 95% (p less than 0.001), nicardipine by 45% (p less than 0.001), tiapamil by 69% and verapamil by 79% (p less than 0.001). Maximal ST-segment
depression
was not altered by any of the drugs, but time to the development of 1 mm ST-segment
depression
was significantly improved in all cases.
Diltiazem
and verapamil reduced the heart rate at rest significantly by 6 and 8 beats/minute, respectively, whereas nicardipine increased it by 10 beats/minute (p less than 0.02), and tiapamil did not produce any significant change. Maximal heart rate at the peak of exercise was increased by 14% with nicardipine (p less than 0.001) and 6% with verapamil (p less than 0.05), whereas diltiazem and tiapamil did not produce any appreciable effect. The rate-pressure product at the peak of exercise remained unaltered with diltiazem, tiapamil and verapamil, but with nicardipine it increased significantly to 222 +/- 10 units from a baseline of 175 +/- 6 units with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Comparative effects of prolonged therapy with four calcium ion antagonists (diltiazem, nicardipine, tiapamil and verapamil) in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. 315 12
The efficacy and safety of oral nifedipine and diltiazem were compared in 20 patients with stable angina pectoris with use of a placebo run-in, randomized, double-blind titration to maximal effect crossover protocol. The effects of treatment withdrawal were also analyzed. All patients received placebo for 2 weeks and were then randomly assigned to receive either diltiazem or nifedipine. A 2 week drug titration phase in which patients received either diltiazem (180 to 360 mg/day) or nifedipine (30 to 120 mg/day) in three divided doses was followed by a 1 week maintenance phase. Patients then received placebo for 1 to 2 weeks, followed by crossover to the other treatment regimen and a second placebo washout period of 1 week. Patients (n = 13) who remained symptomatic on both diltiazem and nifedipine during the monotherapy periods entered a 3 week combination treatment phase, followed by a final 1 week placebo washout period. Frequency of angina, nitroglycerin consumption, exercise tolerance (Naughton protocol), and frequency of daily episodes of ST segment deviations on the electrocardiogram (1 mm of ST segment
depression
persisting for at least 1 min with and without chest pain) on an ambulatory electrocardiographic monitor were assessed during the baseline placebo, active monotherapy, placebo withdrawal, and combination treatment phases. Plasma drug levels were also measured. Compared with initial placebo values, the frequency of angina and the amount of nitroglycerin treatment were reduced by both diltiazem (p less than .001) and nifedipine (p less than .02).
Diltiazem
was more effective than nifedipine in reducing angina (p less than .02). Exercise duration increased with both drugs (p less than .0001).
Diltiazem
was significantly better than nifedipine in reducing the episodes of ST segment
depression
on the ambulatory monitor (p less than .01).
Diltiazem
reduced the resting heart rate (p less than .01); both drugs reduced the resting blood pressure and rate-pressure product. Overall, combination therapy was more effective in patients who did not maximally respond to diltiazem or nifedipine alone with respect to anginal and exercise variables and in reducing blood pressure at rest and during exercise. Plasma drug levels could not predict an individual patient's treatment response.
Diltiazem
may increase nifedipine drug levels when the drugs are combined. Fewer side effects were observed with diltiazem than nifedipine; the most side effects were seen with combination treatment. There were no apparent withdrawal effects observed with either treatment regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Diltiazem, nifedipine, and their combination in patients with stable angina pectoris: effects on angina, exercise tolerance, and the ambulatory electrocardiographic ST segment. 328 Jan 58
The safety and efficacy of a sustained-release preparation of diltiazem (diltiazem-SR), with dose levels of 240 and 360 mg/day, were assessed in 18 patients with stable angina of effort. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover protocol was used.
Diltiazem
-SR, when given twice daily, reduced the frequency of weekly anginal attacks from 9.3 +/- 10.4 with placebo to 3.7 +/- 4.7 with 240 mg/day and to 3.1 +/- 4.7 with 360 mg/day (both p less than 0.01 compared with placebo). Treadmill time was increased from 410 +/- 180 seconds during the placebo phase to 519 +/- 177 seconds during the 240-mg/day dose and to 506 +/- 182 seconds during the 360-mg/day dose of diltiazem-SR (both p less than 0.01 compared with placebo). The time to the onset of angina and ischemic ST-segment
depression
were similarly prolonged by both doses of diltiazem-SR. The beneficial effects of diltiazem-SR appeared partly due to a reduction in the heart rate during submaximal exercise.
Diltiazem
-SR is effective and safe for the treatment of angina of effort when given twice daily.
...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem in stable angina pectoris. 351 May 25
We evaluated the protective effect of
Diltiazem
from pacing-induced myocardial ischemia in 9 patients (pts) with coronary heart disease (CAD) and stable effort angina by studying the changes in systemic and coronary hemodynamics during pacing. Hemodynamic parameters were evaluated at baseline and at peak pacing before and after
Diltiazem
, 25 mg i.v.
Diltiazem
prevented angina in 6 of 7 pts who presented angina in the control pacing. This beneficial effect was accompanied at peak pacing rate by a significant fall in ST
depression
, arterial pressure, rate-pressure product and left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure, while no significant changes were observed in LV dp/dt max, coronary blood flow and coronary vascular resistance. Therefore,
Diltiazem
exerts a protective effect from pacing-induced myocardial ischemia in pts with CAD and stable effort angina, without impairing LV function. This beneficial effect is due to a reduction in myocardial metabolic requirements, rather than to an improvement of blood supply to the ischemic myocardium.
...
PMID:[Beneficial effects of diltiazem in exertion stable angina. Evaluation of coronary hemodynamics during cardiac pacing]. 355 41
The antiischaemic properties of intravenous diltiazem in recommended therapeutic doses are disputed. In 17 patients with coronary artery disease the systemic and coronary haemodynamic effects of diltiazem were assessed during a high-dose infusion (0.4 mg kg-1 per 5 min, followed by 0.4 mg kg-1 per 10 min). In addition, its potential antiischaemic properties were investigated during identical pacing stress tests, 30 minutes before (P1) and immediately after diltiazem administration (P2).
Diltiazem
reduced left ventricular systolic pressure from 133 +/- 5 to 116 +/- 5 mmHg (P less than 0.005, means +/- SEM), persisting until after P2. It decreased systemic and coronary resistance by 32% (P less than 0.001) and 29% (P less than 0.005), respectively, with a sustained increase in cardiac output from 5.9 +/- 0.4 to 7.3 +/- 0.6 l min-1 (P less than 0.01), but a brief 20% rise in coronary flow (P less than 0.05), after the bolus infusion only. Heart rate, contractility, left ventricular filling pressure and myocardial O2 consumption remained unchanged. Despite high plasma levels (673 +/- 81 micrograms l-1) diltiazem was well tolerated. During identical maximal pacing rates diltiazem considerably reduced myocardial O2 demand (double product: 16.3 +/- 0.8 (P2) vs 21.1 +/- 1.1 (P1), P less than 0.005), due to an 18% decrease in left ventricular systolic pressure, resulting in diminished coronary flow and myocardial O2 consumption during P2 (14% and 15%, respectively, P less than 0.05 vs P1).
Diltiazem
also significantly reduced pacing-induced ischaemia, indicated by normalization of myocardial lactate extraction (1 +/- 8% (P2) vs -41 +/- 12% (P1), P less than 0.05), and left ventricular filling pressure (13 +/- 2 (P2) vs 27 +/- 3 mmHg (P1), P less than 0.01), less ST-segment
depression
(0.12 +/- 0.01 (P2) vs 0.24 +/- 0.02 mV (P1), P less than 0.01) and improved contractility (Vmax 59 +/- 5 (P2) vs 48 +/- 3 s-1 (P1), P less than 0.05). Angina was absent or less in 15 patients during pacing after diltiazem. Thus, diltiazem, in high dosages, induces continuing systemic but short lasting coronary vasodilation, improves pump function without negative chronotropic and inotropic effects and has pronounced antiischaemic properties, predominantly due to diminished myocardial O2 demand.
...
PMID:Acute antiischaemic properties of high dosages of intravenous diltiazem in humans in relation to its coronary and systemic haemodynamic effects. 366 56
Magnesium-diltiazem cardioplegia was evaluated in the intact, perfused rat heart to determine whether the joint administration of these agents would adversely affect myocardial contractile and high-energy phosphate recovery following intermittent, normothermic global ischemic arrest. Sequential metabolic and functional analyses were performed on isolated perfused rat hearts during each phase of the experimental protocol: control (10 min), normoxic cardioplegia (10 min), intermittent global ischemic arrest (two 15-min periods separated by 2 min infusion of the normoxic cardioplegic perfusate), and normoxic postischemic control reperfusion (60 min). Four different cardioplegic solutions were evaluated: 30 mM KCl, 30 mM KCl with 2 mg diltiazem/liter, 20 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM MgCl2 with 2 mg diltiazem/liter. Myocardial phosphatic metabolite levels and intracellular pH were analyzed nondestructively in the intact hearts by phosphorus-31 NMR spectroscopy. Corresponding measurements of peak left intraventricular pressure, rate of peak pressure development (dP/dt), and contraction frequency were performed at the midpoint during each 5-min interval of 31P NMR signal averaging. Magnesium plus diltiazem-treated hearts were distinguished from all other groups by a marked delay in postischemic functional recovery consisting of a prolonged
depression
in contractility (34% of control, P less than 0.01) that persisted throughout the first 50 min of postischemic reperfusion.
Diltiazem
in combination with magnesium cardioplegia was detrimental to postischemic functional recovery, despite a rapid restoration of high-energy phosphate stores. The apparent adverse interactive effects of excess magnesium and diltiazem suggest that elective ischemic arrest with magnesium cardioplegia in combination with diltiazem may be contraindicated clinically. The mechanistic basis and drug specificity of this response require further clarification. The present findings appear to exclude ATP and PCr production, and structural causes as the basis for the observed aberrant functional recovery from global ischemia of magnesium plus diltiazem-arrested hearts.
...
PMID:Sustained postischemic cardiodepression following magnesium-diltiazem cardioplegia. 371 20
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Next >>