Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011570 (depression)
 172,036 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Epidural administration of an opioid analgesic by means of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system was compared with conventional intravenous PCA for pain relief after cesarean delivery. One hundred seventeen healthy women were randomly assigned to receive hydromorphone either intravenously (IV-PCA) or epidurally (EPI-PCA) after cesarean delivery with epidural bupivacaine for operative anesthesia. The hydromorphone requirements were 3.4 and 4.2 times more in the IV-PCA group on the first (P less than 0.01) and second (P less than 0.01) postoperative days, respectively. The mean number (+/- SD) of PCA demands during the first 24 h after the operation was 105 (+/- 88) for the IV-PCA group and 33 (+/- 48) for the EPI-PCA group (P less than 0.01). This difference was also significant 24-48 h after surgery. Although the EPI-PCA group utilized significantly less opioid medication, pain and sedation scores were similar in the two treatment groups; however, a significantly larger percentage of patients in the IV-PCA group (46% vs 22%) stated that they felt drowsy during the first postoperative day. Pruritus was reported more frequently in the EPI-PCA (67%) than in the IV-PCA (33%) group. Nausea was experienced by only 10% of patients in the IV-PCA and 6% in the EPI-PCA group. There was no evidence of postoperative respiratory depression, with minimal oxygen saturation values of 93% (+/- 3%) and 94% (+/- 1%) in the IV-PCA and EPI-PCA groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Epidural patient-controlled analgesia: an alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain relief after cesarean delivery. 137 7

Forty-six patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were given postoperative epidural analgesia for four days with bupivacaine-sufentanil or bupivacaine-morphine. Both groups received a bolus of 8 ml bupivacaine 0.5% followed after 30 minutes by an infusion of 20 ml/h bupivacaine 0.1%. The sufentanil group (group A: 21 patients) received a loading dose of 50 micrograms sufentanil and a continuous infusion of 5 micrograms/h sufentanil. The morphine group (group B: 25 patients) received no loading dose of morphine but only a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/h morphine. Both regimens provided excellent analgesia, but the frequency of respiratory depression was much greater in group A (33% versus 4% in group B). This respiratory depression occurred in the first hours postoperatively, when the patients were still in the post-anesthesia care unit. There was also a high incidence of hypotension after the loading dose of bupivacaine 0.5%. Although we noticed a large incidence of pruritus, no patient needed naloxone reversal. In view of these side effects we recommend a lower loading dose of both bupivacaine and sufentanil.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative analgesia for major abdominal surgery with continuous thoracic epidural infusion of bupivacaine with sufentanil, versus bupivacaine with morphine. A randomized double blind study. 138 19

The efficacy of 0.5kg intrathecal morphine was tested on 10 patients who had hemorrhoidectomy performed at the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan. They were anesthetized with 3 mls of 0.5% intrathecal bupivacine to which 0.5mg of morphine was added. Another 14 patients had intrathecal 3 mls of 0.5% bupivacine with normal saline. Post-operative analgesia was prolonged in the opiate group compared to the saline group up to 8th post-operative hour. Narcotic analgesic requirement was much less in the opiate group. There were no serious complications in either group. In view of the excellent analgesia in the immediate post-operative period and absence of delayed respiratory depression usually associated with higher doses of spinal opiates it is recommended that use of the technique be encouraged in similar surgical patients for pain relief.
 ...
PMID:Assessment of minidose intrathecal morphine for analgesia after hemorroidectomy. 139 Mar 75

The safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia for the long-term control of cancer pain was tested prospectively. Respiratory rates, mental status, and pain relief were recorded at baseline and compared with those during the study period. Patients had a lower analgesic demand (i.e., self-administered less morphine during the nighttime); specifically, dosing declined 48% from the daytime level. Respiratory rates did not change appreciably during the study and no cases of significant respiratory depression were encountered. Patients self-administered sufficient morphine to produce adequate but not complete pain relief in almost all trials. Pain relief was safely achieved by both intravenous and subcutaneous routes of administration in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. Mean 24-h morphine use stayed relatively constant even for patients receiving more than 2 weeks of treatment. In conclusion, patient-controlled analgesia is effective and safe therapy for the long-term control of severe cancer pain.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia for cancer pain: a long-term study of inpatient and outpatient use. 139 84

The analgesic efficacy and safety of a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture was investigated in this prospective, controlled, triple-blinded study of 34 children, aged 1-11 yr and of ASA physical status I-II undergoing urological surgery. After induction of anaesthesia and before surgery, the children were randomly assigned to receive a caudal injection of 1.0 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine 1:400,000 and either fentanyl 1.0 microgram.kg-1 in 1.0 ml of normal saline or 1.0 ml of normal saline. After completion of surgery, patients were assessed in the recovery room for six hours from the time of the caudal injection and for a further 18 hr on the ward. While in the recovery room arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were monitored continuously and recorded hourly together with end-tidal carbon dioxide, pain and sedation scores. Other complications were also recorded. While on the ward, pain and sedation scores, respiratory rate and side effects were recorded every two hours. Postoperative analgesia was provided by intravenous morphine. Analgesic requirements were recorded for the 24-hr study period. Pain and sedation scores did not differ between groups. Respiratory depression or hypoxia did not occur. The incidences of other side effects did not differ. There were no differences in the numbers of patients requiring morphine within eight hours, the time to first morphine administration or the total morphine requirements. We conclude that a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture with epinephrine administered prior to surgery, while safe, offers no advantage over an injection of bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine for paediatric urological surgery.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic efficacy and safety of a caudal bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in children. 139 53

Although epidural opioids frequently are used to provide postoperative analgesia, several articles have suggested that the analgesia after epidural fentanyl is similar to that after an equal dose of fentanyl given intravenously. To address this issue further, 29 postthoracotomy patients were studied in a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing a lumbar epidural fentanyl infusion with an intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia, plasma fentanyl pharmacokinetics, and respiratory effects for 20 h postoperatively. In all patients in both groups, good analgesia was achieved (pain score less than 3, maximum 10) over a similar time course, although the patients receiving epidural infusion required a significantly larger fentanyl infusion dose than did the patients receiving intravenous infusion (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.95 +/- 0.45 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.56 +/- 0.36 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.0002). The time course for the plasma fentanyl concentrations was similar in the two groups, and plasma fentanyl concentrations were not significantly different at any sampling period (T7-T20; group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.8 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.6 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; P = 0.06). Similarly, calculated clearance values for the two groups were not significantly different (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 0.95 +/- 0.26 l.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 0.87 +/- 0.25 l.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.3). Both groups demonstrated a similar degree of mild to moderate respiratory depression postoperatively, which was assessed with continuous respiratory inductance plethysmography and sequential arterial blood gas analysis. Side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were mild and did not differ between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for postthoracotomy pain relief. Analgesic, pharmacokinetic, and respiratory effects. 848 73

Effect of cocaine on morphine-induced analgesia and the accompanying respiratory depression, bradycardia and hypolocomotion/sedation was studied in rats. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects were studied under pentobarbitone-induced anaesthesia. Cocaine enhanced morphine-induced analgesia in the formalin test, hot plate test and heat-induced tail withdrawal test in intact rats. However, in spinal rats a similar combination of cocaine with morphine did not produce increased latencies in the tail withdrawal test. Of the three analgesic tests used, the formalin test was the most sensitive to the enhancement, as well as to the effects of morphine or cocaine alone. Morphine at the dose of 6 mg/kg produced complete analgesia in the formalin test, significant hypolocomotion/sedation, significant bradycardia and significant decrease in the respiratory rate. At an equianalgesic dose (complete analgesia in the formalin test) of morphine (3 mg/kg)-cocaine (5 mg/kg)-combination no significant changes in heart rate, respiratory rate or locomotion(/alertness) were observed. Changes in skin blood flow determined by the laser Doppler flow method were not significant in any of the experimental conditions. The results indicate that cocaine enhances morphine-induced analgesia, mainly due to supraspinal mechanisms. In contrast, the morphine-induced bradypnoea, bradycardia and hypolocomotion/sedation are attenuated by cocaine.
 ...
PMID:Enhancement of morphine-induced analgesia and attenuation of morphine-induced side-effects by cocaine in rats. 143 38

A single dose block randomised double-blind study comparing intramuscular ketorolac, 50 mg of pethidine and 100 mg pethidine was carried out in multiparous women. Pain intensity and sedation effect were recorded at inclusion to the study, half hourly for the first 2 h, then hourly until 6 h after delivery. Maternal and neonatal side effects were noted including the Apgar scores and the baby's requirements for resuscitation. All three treatments are relatively ineffective in relieving labour pain. There was no difference in the analgesic efficacy between the two doses of pethidine but both doses of pethidine were statistically more effective compared with ketorolac. There was no difference in the retrospective assessment of the three groups or when comparison was made with the previous labour. A similar number of patients required further analgesia in each group. In all three groups, no adverse effect occurred in the mother or fetus. Maternal sedation and fetal depression were statistically less in the ketorolac group. Although ketorolac had inferior analgesic effect, its use was not associated with clinically significant sequelae and it showed a superior safety profile compared with either dose of pethidine. The study was not powerful enough to detect a difference between 50 mg and 100 mg of pethidine.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of intramuscular ketorolac and pethidine in labour pain. 145

At the beginning, the way intrathecal morphine was used for postoperative pain relief was quite unfortunate, because the doses derived from experience with morphine-tolerant cancer patients were considerably too high and respiratory depression occurred frequently. Subsequent dose-finding studies showed that the doses of morphine used initially could be reduced by a factor of ten without loss of the analgesic effect and with a marked reduction in side-effects. No respiratory depression has been reported when doses below 0.1 mg morphine are used. METHOD. In this prospective study the effect of 0.06 to 0.08 mg intrathecal morphine, mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anesthesia, was investigated in surgical patients aged 21 to 81 years, ASA grade I or II, scheduled for orthopaedic operations or herniorraphies. Thirty unpremedicated patients were enrolled in the study and were, after informed consent, randomly allocated to a control group without morphine or to a morphine group. The analgesic effect was assessed by the time interval between the administration of the spinal anaesthesia and the first demand for an analgesic medication. The mood state was evaluated with the adjective checklist of Janke and Debus 6 h after the spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the control group half of the patients asked for an analgesic medication within 275 min (median) after the spinal anaesthesia, and all patients within 420 min, whereas in the morphine group half of the patients asked for an analgesic within 1170 min (median). Seven patients had not required an analgesic at the termination of the observation period 20 h after the spinal anaesthesia. The mood status showed no difference between the two groups, in particular, no dizziness or drowsiness after morphine. There was no difference in the incidence of side-effects such as nausea or urinary retention between the two groups. Pruritus was not reported spontaneously but was found upon questioning in five patients. It was in no case disturbing. CONCLUSIONS. Morphine (0.06 to 0.08 mg) mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia provided for an analgesia of more than 20 h duration in half of the patients. This technique is safe, simple, reliable and virtually free of side-effects. No particular supervision due to the administration of intrathecal morphine is necessary in this dose range if systemic opiates are avoided. If the analgesia is unsatisfactory, a non-opioid analgesic is recommended.
 ...
PMID:[Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain]. 146 57

We did a retrospective study on 177 patients after upper and lower abdominal surgery, and compared the efficacy of epidural administration of fentanyl and that of buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief. In fentanyl (F) group, 73 patients received fentanyl 0.1 mg with saline 8 ml epidurally after operation, followed by a constant rate infusion of 0.025 mg.hr-1 for 18-24 hrs. In buprenorphine (B) group, 104 patients, received buprenorphine 0.2 mg with saline 9 ml epidurally. After upper abdominal surgery, 33 patients (76.7%) in F group and 27 patients (52.9%) in B group obtained satisfactory analgesia (P < 0.05). The difference of the degree of analgesia after lower abdominal surgery was not significantly different in both groups. Respiratory depression occurred in 19 patients in B group and 5 patients in F group (P < 0.05). It is concluded that epidural fentanyl delivered by continuous infusion offers a significant advantage compared with epidural buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief following upper abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Analgesic effects of epidurally administered fentanyl for postoperative pain relief--comparison with buprenorphine]. 147 53


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>