Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011570 (depression)
 172,036 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients often are described as "somatizers", who report multiple somatic complaints beyond back pain itself, but the nature and clinical significance of this observation is poorly understood. To clarify the characteristics, correlates and severity of somatization in CLBP, we rigorously assessed somatization symptoms in a sample of patients not selected for psychiatric or pain clinic referral. Male CLBP patients (N = 97), attending a primary care orthopaedic clinic, and matched healthy controls (N = 49), were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule III-A (DIS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and the Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (PAIRS). Although none of the subjects met strict DSM-III criteria for a lifetime diagnosis of Somatization Disorder, 25.8% of CLBP patients reported a lifetime history of 12 or more somatic symptoms, as compared to only 4.1% of controls. In the less symptomatic ranges, patients still generally reported more symptoms than controls, with 51.5% of patients vs. 8.2% of controls reporting 7-11 symptoms, and 22.7% vs. 87.8% of controls reporting 0-6 symptoms (p < .001). Major depression and alcohol dependence were significantly associated with increased severity of somatization (p < .05). Lower mood and increased impairment, but not pain intensity, were related to greater number of somatic complaints. Symptoms of somatization are prevalent, but not universal, in CLBP and the pattern of these symptoms is reminiscent of the "spectrum of severity" reported in other medical populations. Recognizing this spectrum of somatization may lead to better patient-treatment matching and improved clinical outcomes.
 ...
PMID:Somatization symptoms in chronic low back pain patients. 800 98

The results of the dexamethasone test were compared with the depression depth and pain intensity in patients with low back pain caused by degenerative changes and/or disc prolapse. In the light of these studies no correlation was demonstrated between the positive results of the dexamethasone test and depression symptoms and the intensity and duration of pain.
 ...
PMID:[Dexamethasone test in the assessment of depression grade in patients with low back pain]. 804 27

In this study, the psychological functioning of patients with chronic post-traumatic headache (PTH), chronic combination headache and chronic low back pain without headache, whose time of onset was similar, and a matched group of controls was investigated. The Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R), State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y (STAI-Y), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used to assess the degree of psychopathology. A MANOVA test indicated highly significant differences between groups. In general, the pain groups fell along a continuum with PTH subjects demonstrating the highest elevations, back pain subjects demonstrating the next highest elevations, and combination subjects demonstrating fewer elevations. A cluster analysis indicated that findings were best classified into four clusters, but no one pain diagnosis predominated in any cluster. Eighty-nine percent of controls were assigned to clusters 1 or 2, which revealed essentially normal scores on all tests. It is suggested that while chronic pain patients demonstrate more psychopathology than non-pain controls, a variety of coping styles exists within each pain group independent of diagnostic categorization.
 ...
PMID:Psychopathology in individuals with post-traumatic headaches and other pain types. 806 49

This study investigated the factors affecting recovery from low back injury. The study population was designed to be representative of patients presenting with back pain following soft tissue injury. A minimum follow up rate of 90 percent was achieved with a length of elapsed time from the injury of up to five years. Three established methods of assessment of disability and functional capacity (The Oswestry disability scale, The Waddell disability scale and The Waddell physical impairment rating) were compared to each other and a new scale (The Low-Back Outcome Scale) for the measurement of a patient's performance in employment, social activities and activities of daily living. The relationships of these scales to employment, psychological disturbance and other factors were defined. The Outcome Score designed for use in this study provided a comprehensive and discriminating assessment of patient function. Compensation (particularly lump sum claims), psychological disturbance at review, time off work, and age at injury were important factors in recovery; the diagnosis, type and severity of injury, migrant status and neurological deficits were not. Eight psychometric instruments were examined, and the combination of The Zung Depression Scale and The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire was found to be the most accurate in determining the presence of psychological disturbance in patients with low back pain.
 ...
PMID:Recovery from low back pain. 1-5 year follow-up of 287 injury-related cases. 821 39

Cluster analysis of the MMPI has been utilized widely in the chronic low back pain literature to try to identify reliable patient subtypes predictive of treatment outcome. We extended this methodology to patients with heterogeneous chronic medical conditions by replicating prototypic MMPI cluster group profiles and by relating cluster groups to clinical baseline and outcome data. Subjects were two independent samples (n = 254 and n = 263) of chronically ill patients admitted to an inpatient medicine/psychiatry unit. Using a four-cluster solution, similar cluster profile groups were replicated in both samples. Consistent differences emerged between cluster groups on functional impairment, psychiatric diagnoses, depression, and psychosomatic symptoms. Cluster group membership also predicted changes in functional impairment and depression six months after treatment. Results are discussed in terms of similarities between chronic low back pain and chronic illness and tailoring treatment to different patient types.
 ...
PMID:Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) cluster groups among chronically ill patients: relationship to illness adjustment and treatment outcome. 825 51

Individuals with persisting pain often present a constellation of symptoms that includes pain, health-related impairment and dysphoric mood. It is now widely accepted that comprehensive assessment must address each of these dimensions. Despite recognition of the value of multidimensional assessment, no empirical efforts have validated the construct of a multidimensional clinical outcome presentation based on the dimensions of pain, impairment and dysphoric mood. We employed cluster analytic procedures on standard measures of pain, impairment and depression in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients (n = 96) attending a general orthopedic clinic in order to empirically characterize multidimensional clinical outcomes. Results indicated that 3 groups could be identified reliably: (1) 'Chronic Pain Syndrome' (n = 25; high levels of pain, impairment and depression), (2) 'Positive Adaptation to Pain' (n = 24; high levels of pain with low levels of impairment and depression) and (3) 'Good Pain Control' (n = 47; low levels of pain, impairment and depression). The reliability of this cluster solution was supported by several tests of internal consistency. Discriminability of the clusters was examined across both the outcome measures themselves and several additional independent variables. The cluster solution was then cross-validated in an independent sample of pain clinic CLBP patients (n = 180) to test its generalizability. Finally the stability of the cluster dimensions over time was tested by re-assessing 36 CLBP patients 6 months after they initially were characterized into 1 of the 3 outcome groups on the same measures. MANOVA results indicated that the outcome groups were differentiated statistically across assessments. The multiple outcome measures did not change significantly across time, nor did the outcome groups change differentially across time on these measures. We conclude that the outcome dimensions of pain, impairment and depression are relatively stable phenomena that differentially describe CLBP patients.
 ...
PMID:An empirical evaluation of multidimensional clinical outcome in chronic low back pain patients. 827 3

Rheumatic patients very often suffer from chronic pain and impairment and show psychological reactions as a consequence of their physical condition. These reactions may vary from psychophysiological symptoms to anger, anxiety, or depression. We developed a cognitive-behavioral treatment programme in a group setting format with components of relaxation, cognitive restructuring, and the promotion of well-being. Subjects included in the study were given diagnoses of low back pain, tension headache, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Treatment effects in different diagnostic groups were compared to each other, supporting the assumption that pain reduction is greatest in low back pain and least in ankylosing spondylitis. Subjects with inflammatory rheumatic diseases showed some improvement in self-reported physical complaints and in their feelings of well-being.
 ...
PMID:Group treatment for pain and discomfort. 833 93

Previous studies have empirically defined clinical subgroups of chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients, based on differing patterns of pain, disability and emotional distress. Because these identified groups generally are comparable in terms of physical and demographic variables, variation in functional status cannot be adequately explained by medical or social factors. In the present study we evaluated whether other psychosocial factors (stress, coping attempts, and satisfaction with social supports) might differentiate the observed groups. A discriminate function analysis indicated that ratings of life adversity, coping, and social support statistically differentiate clinical groups of CLBP patients. Patients categorized as chronic pain syndrome (i.e., high levels of pain, disability and depression) reported greater life adversity, more reliance on passive/avoidant coping strategies, and less satisfaction with social support networks. Patients categorized as having good pain control (i.e., low levels of pain, disability and depression) reported less life adversity, less reliance on passive/avoidant coping strategies, and more satisfaction with social support networks. Finally, a mixed picture of less life adversity, but more reliance on passive/avoidant coping strategies and more satisfactory social support networks was reported by patients categorized in the positive adaptation to pain group (i.e., high levels of pain, but relatively low levels of disability and depression). These findings suggest that psychosocial factors may be important and complex correlates of multidimensional clinical presentations of CLBP. Psychosocial factors may also offer an avenue for intervention across 3 key dimensions of CLBP.
 ...
PMID:Psychosocial factors discriminate multidimensional clinical groups of chronic low back pain patients. 865 35

Two studies are presented that investigated 'fear of movement/(re)injury' in chronic musculoskeletal pain and its relation to behavioral performance. The 1st study examines the relation among fear of movement/(re)injury (as measured with the Dutch version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-DV)) (Kori et al. 1990), biographical variables (age, pain duration, gender, use of supportive equipment, compensation status), pain-related variables (pain intensity, pain cognitions, pain coping) and affective distress (fear and depression) in a group of 103 chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. In the 2nd study, motoric, psychophysiologic and self-report measures of fear are taken from 33 CLBP patients who are exposed to a single and relatively simple movement. Generally, findings demonstrated that the fear of movement/(re)injury is related to gender and compensation status, and more closely to measures of catastrophizing and depression, but in a much lesser degree to pain coping and pain intensity. Furthermore, subjects who report a high degree of fear of movement/(re)injury show more fear and escape/avoidance when exposed to a simple movement. The discussion focuses on the clinical relevance of the construct of fear of movement/(re)injury and research questions that remain to be answered.
 ...
PMID:Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. 865 37

The variability in estimated rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) in chronic pain samples may be accounted for by sample and methodological differences. Most studies rely on a single measure of depression and lack independent or repeated measures. This study investigated the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in a convenience sample of 18 patients disabled by low back pain (LBP) referred to, evaluated, and treated in a comprehensive pain rehabilitation program specifically designed to restore work readiness and return to work. Subjects had one or more spinal conditions, had work-related back pain for more than 6 months (x = 23.8), were Caucasian, predominantly young (x = 37.5) and male (55%), and were disabled on workers' compensation and approved for rehabilitation. The performance of three diagnostic procedures, the Pain Medicine Evaluation, an independent Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), and Longitudinal Clinical Diagnosis were compared with the "gold standard" of the Final Diagnosis which incorporated information from the other three. Also, the performance of a questionnaire, The Pain & Mood Structural Interview (PMSI), designed to assess the causal relationship of pain and mood and specifically the confounding effects of physical factors, was examined. Thirteen of 18 patients (72%) were diagnosed with MDD at Final Diagnosis. MDD diagnosis was made on 4 of 18 patients (22%) on the initial Pain Medicine Evaluation and on 9 of 18 patients (50%) on the SCID, with only 1 ruled out by the confounding questionnaire, for a SCID current prevalence of 44%. Both the SCID and Pain Medicine Evaluation accurately diagnosed the MDD cases they identified; 9 of 13 MDD cases (69%) were precipitated by a physical factor other than their pain. Three episodes of MDD were ruled out by confounding. These findings are discussed in relation to their implications for assessing pain patients for psychiatric comorbidity.
 ...
PMID:The reliability of depression diagnosis in chronic low back pain. A pilot study. 871


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>