Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011570 (depression)
 172,036 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In 984 patients with generalized anxiety disorder who received buspirone in double-blind studies, the incidence of drowsiness (9 percent) did not differ significantly from that (10 percent) reported in 334 patients who received placebo. A probability value of p less than or equal to 0.10 was the criterion for significance. The incidence of drowsiness in buspirone-treated patients was significantly less than that in each of the groups receiving diazepam (32 percent), clorazepate (26 percent), lorazepam (58 percent), or alprazolam (43 percent). The side effects that did occur significantly more frequently in the buspirone group than in the placebo group were dizziness (9 percent versus 2 percent), headache (7 percent versus 2 percent), nervousness (4 percent versus 1 percent), light-headedness (4 percent versus less than 1 percent), diarrhea (3 percent versus less than 1 percent), paresthesia (2 percent versus less than 1 percent), excitation (2 percent versus less than 1 percent), and sweating/clamminess (1 percent versus 0 percent). The severities of these effects were predominantly rated as only mild or moderate. Fatigue occurred less frequently in buspirone-treated patients than in those receiving any of the benzodiazepines, and weakness occurred more frequently in diazepam-treated patients. Depression occurred less frequently in buspirone-treated patients than in those receiving clorazepate, diazepam, or lorazepam. Impotence occurred only in clorazepate- and lorazepam-treated patients. Decreased libido occurred more frequently in diazepam-treated patients, whereas increased libido was more frequent in clorazepate-treated patients. Nausea was reported more frequently in buspirone-treated patients than in those receiving clorazepate, diazepam, or alprazolam; diarrhea occurred more frequently in the buspirone group than in the diazepam group. The mean daily doses of the various treatments were buspirone, 20 mg; diazepam, 20 mg; clorazepate, 24 mg; lorazepam, 3 mg; and alprazolam, 1.5 mg. In an open-field study in West Germany involving 5,414 patients, gastrointestinal-related complaints were the most frequently reported side effects.
 ...
PMID:Review of the side-effect profile of buspirone. 287 Jun 41

The side-effect profile of labetalol was assessed in 34 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension who had previously experienced side effects during beta-blocker therapy. The most frequently reported beta-blocker side effects were fatigue, impotence, cold extremities, and depression. After discontinuing their previous beta-blocker for 4 weeks, labetalol was titrated (100-400 mg b.i.d.) to achieve blood pressure control. Twenty-seven of 34 patients did not have a recurrence of a beta-blocker related side effect while receiving labetalol. The most common new side effect with labetalol was dizziness (3 patients). As judged by the attending physician and the patient, labetalol was better tolerated than conventional beta-blocker therapy in 30 of 34 patients (88%). Twenty-four of 34 patients (71%) preferred labetalol over previous therapy. Labetalol controlled blood pressure in 30 of 34 patients (88%). At equal antihypertensive doses, some side effects common to beta-blockers are seen less frequently with labetalol.
 ...
PMID:Comparative tolerability of labetalol versus propranolol, atenolol, pindolol, metoprolol, and nadolol. 287 65

A double-blind, multicenter study compared the safety and efficacy of oral betaxolol 10 to 40 mg once daily (n = 68) with propranolol 40 to 160 mg twice daily (n = 73) in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Both agents produced significant (P less than 0.01) and comparable reductions in mean supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures (7/11 mm Hg on betaxolol and 9/10 mm Hg on propranolol). Both betaxolol and propranolol significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced mean supine heart rate by 9 beats per minute. Patients achieved a more significant (P less than 0.01) reduction in blood pressure earlier (weeks 2 and 4 of the titration period) with betaxolol. By the end of treatment there was no significant difference in response between treatment groups. A higher incidence of central nervous system side effects (insomnia, bizarre dreams, depression, hallucinations, dizziness), however, was seen with propranolol than with betaxolol. Overall, the data show that in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, betaxolol 10 to 40 mg administered once daily is as effective as and better tolerated than propranolol 40 to 160 mg administered twice daily.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of betaxolol, a new beta 1-adrenergic antagonist, to propranolol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. 290 Dec 66

Meptazinol is a new opioid-type analgesic with mixed agonist/antagonist properties. It may be given orally, intravenously or intramuscularly. In studies in patients with moderate to severe pain of various aetiologies, usually following surgery or in obstetrics, the characteristics of analgesia with meptazinol were comparable to those seen with equianalgesic doses of pentazocine, pethidine or a combination of dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol. Preoperative use and use as a component of anaesthesia require further investigation before conclusions may be drawn on its effectiveness in these areas. Onset of action, recorded in a few studies, was faster than that with the other analgesics but duration was shorter than that of morphine, buprenorphine and pentazocine. Only a small number of patients with chronic pain have received long term therapy with meptazinol; in such patients there was no need for increased doses as treatment progressed. Respiratory depression has only been observed in patients receiving meptazinol as a premedication or while undergoing anaesthesia. Similarly any haemodynamic changes have been limited to preoperative patients or patients undergoing anaesthesia. Like other agonist/antagonist analgesic drugs, the abuse potential of meptazinol seems relatively low, but only wider clinical use for longer periods can establish this with certainty. The most commonly reported side effects have been gastrointestinal in nature, and although the incidence of central nervous system side effects has been relatively low, drowsiness and dizziness have caused occasional problems. Thus, meptazinol is a relatively potent but safe addition to the analgesics available for treatment of the patient with moderate to severe pain.
 ...
PMID:Meptazinol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. 299 23

Buspirone (Buspar) is a azaspirodecanedione anxiolytic agent. Its mechanism of action is extremely complex, but current investigations indicate that its main neuropharmacologic effects are mediated by the 5-HT1A receptors. Other neuroreceptor systems could be involved, as buspirone displays some affinity for DA2 autoreceptors and 5-HT2 receptors. It has been proposed that inhibition of synthesis and release of serotonin result through the combined interactions of neuroreceptors and secondary messenger systems. This action leads to inhibition of the firing rate of 5-HT-containing neurons in the dorsal raphe. From this novel profile, that differs from that of the benzodiazepines, buspirone lacks anticonvulsant and muscle-relaxant properties, and causes only minimal sedation. The drug is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with a mean bioavailability of 3.9%. After a single oral dose, the mean elimination half-life is 2.1 hours. Buspirone is mainly bound to albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. It is metabolized to an active metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl) piperazine (1-PP). The mean elimination half-life of 1-PP is 6.1 hours. Buspirone is indicated in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders. Its efficacy is comparable to the benzodiazepines. Its use in depression and panic disorders requires further investigation. When combined with alcohol or given alone, psychomotor impairment was not detected. Abuse, dependence, and withdrawal symptoms have not been reported. The frequency of adverse effects is low, and the most common effects are headaches, dizziness, nervousness, and lightheadness. Buspirone should be added to drug formularies and could represent a significant addition in psychopharmacology.
 ...
PMID:Buspirone: an update on a unique anxiolytic agent. 304 84

In order to evaluate the relationships between endogenous opioid activity and premenstrual complaints, we subjected three groups of patients in the mid (days 8-12 prior to menses) and late (days 1-5 prior to menses) luteal phases of the cycle to a naloxone test and some of the patients to a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) test. The premenstrual syndrome (PMS) group was composed of nine patients complaining of dizziness, irritability and depression close to menses for at least three years. The menstrually related migraine (MM) group was composed of 15 patients complaining of premenstrually related migraine. The common migraine (CM) group was made up of 16 women suffering from common migraine for years whose attacks occurred independently of menstrual cycle events. A group of seven fertile women served as controls. Every two days the patients filled out the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire for evaluation of their complaints. After the evaluation of spontaneous LH pulsatility for one hour, 4 mg of naloxone was injected as a bolus, and samples were collected every 15 minutes for 2 hours. Both estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) were measured in basal samples from each naloxone test. LH responsiveness to LHRH was similar in the mid and late luteal phases and did not change between groups. In the mid luteal phase the LH response to naloxone in PMS and MM patients was similar to that in normal subjects, while CM patients had impaired LH secretion. In the premenstrual phase only the controls maintained an LH responsiveness similar to that observed in the mid luteal phase, while both PMS and MM lost the naloxone-induced LH release.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Transient failure of central opioid tonus and premenstrual symptoms. 305 71

Fluoxetine and trazodone were compared in a double-blind, randomized, parallel, 6-week trial in 43 outpatients with major depression after a 1-week single-blind placebo period. Thirty-five patients completed at least 3 weeks of active medication, while 25 patients completed all 6 weeks. Response rates, whether defined by end-of-treatment Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score less than 10 or by a 50% reduction in HAM-D scores, were equivalent for the two medications. For fluoxetine, HAM-D scores were significantly lower at Weeks 1 and 2 compared with those of trazodone. Trazodone improved sleep significantly more than fluoxetine. Fluoxetine was associated more frequently with weight loss (p = .002) and less frequently with dizziness (p = .04) than trazodone.
 ...
PMID:Fluoxetine versus trazodone in the treatment of outpatients with major depression. 305 68

A double-blind crossover trial comparing diltiazem (360 mg/day) and nifedipine (120 mg/day) for treatment of stable angina was conducted in 21 of 27 patients with proven coronary artery disease who completed the trial. All patients started with a 2 week placebo period followed by a random assignment to either drug treatment for 3 weeks and subsequent crossover to the other treatment. The two drug treatment periods were separated by a 1 week placebo washout phase and the study was completed with a 1 week placebo phase. There were no significant differences between patients' responses to diltiazem and nifedipine in relation to time to onset of angina, ST depression responses to exercise, heart rate or systolic or diastolic blood pressure. A total of 37 adverse effects were reported with nifedipine compared with 9 with diltiazem in the 22 patients in whom drug safety was analyzed. Additionally, two patients treated with nifedipine were withdrawn from study participation before crossover. There was a significant (p less than 0.05) difference with respect to incidence of edema (7 of 22 patients taking nifedipine, 1 of 22 taking diltiazem) and dizziness (7 of 22 patients taking nifedipine, 0 of 22 taking diltiazem). The most frequent adverse effect reported with diltiazem was rash (3 of 22 patients). Severe adverse effects were reported in four patients: in one with diltiazem (rash) and in three with nifedipine (palpitation in two and headache in one). A reduction in prescribed dosage was required in 37% of nifedipine-treated compared with 6% of diltiazem-treated patients. Efficacy measures were significantly improved above placebo levels by both diltiazem and nifedipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blind comparison of diltiazem and nifedipine in stable angina. 305 36

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Minulet, a new low-dose combination oral contraceptive (OC) containing 75 mcg of gestodene and 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol, a multicenter trial involving 239 women was conducted in Switzerland. Of the 239 subjects, 187 (78%) were monitored for 6 cycles of OC use and 24 (10%) were followed for 3 cycles, yielding a total of 1265 cycles for observation. No pregnancy occurred during the study period, despite the fact that 1 or more pills had been forgotten in 17.1% of cases. Cycle length and the intensity and duration of bleeding were favorably affected by Minulet use, especially in women with a prior history of prolonged, heavy bleeding. Spotting occurred in 8.2% of subjects by cycle 3, but this rate was reduced to 5.9% by cycle 6. Breakthrough bleeding alone occurred in 2.1% of the cycles. The amenorrhea rate was 1.6% after cycle 6. There were no serious side effects, and symptoms such as headache, depression, breast tenderness, acne, nervousness, and dizziness were actually reduced as a result of OC use. Most notable was the decrease in dysmenorrhea, from 40% before beginning OC use to 13% after 3 months and 8% after 6 months. No significant effects on systolic or diastolic blood pressure were recorded among study participants, nor were there significant weight changes. Of the 17 women who terminated the trial due to side effects, metrorrhagia accounted for 17% of the terminations, depression for 14%, nausea for 14%, and headache for 13%. The findings of this trial, in terms of reliability, cycle control, and tolerability, suggest that Minulet has considerable potential as a new contraceptive choice.
 ...
PMID:Clinical experience in Switzerland with the new monophasic oral contraceptive Minulet (75 mcg gestodene, 30 mcg ethinyl oestradiol). 307 5

Twenty-one smokers underwent 24-h abstinence from cigarettes. Both prior to, and after, the abstinence period cardiovascular and subjective effects of smoking a cigarette were measured. Withdrawal symptoms found during abstinence were: irritability, depression, hunger, difficulty concentrating, restlessness and urges to smoke. In addition, the subjects reported feeling physically less well. Withdrawal discomfort was positively correlated with the strength of the subjective effects (e.g. dizziness, nausea) of smoking the post-abstinence cigarette after taking account of estimated nicotine boost from that cigarette. A similar, though only marginally significant association was found between withdrawal severity and heart rate boost from the post-abstinence cigarette. Our results suggest that the severity of withdrawal may be related to loss of acute tolerance to nicotine. It is not clear whether this is due to more rapid nicotine clearance, constitutional differences in sensitivity to nicotine in the absence of acute tolerance, or other factors. There was no evidence to support the view that higher chronic tolerance to nicotine's heart-rate effects was associated with more severe withdrawal. If anything, the reverse appeared to be the case.
 ...
PMID:Loss of acute nicotine tolerance and severity of cigarette withdrawal. 313 4


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>