Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011570 (depression)
 172,036 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The most frequently used postoperative analgesia techniques are intramuscular injection (IM) and patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Recently, the use of epidural catheter injection (EPI) has been done with success. This study was done to prospectively compare these three techniques for postoperative analgesia after extensive operations upon the colon and rectum. Patients were randomized to one of three analgesia groups--IM, intramuscular morphine sulfate; PCA, patient controlled morphine sulfate, and EPI, epidural morphine sulfate. Data collected included age, time to first bowel movement, amount of narcotic, number achieving 75 per cent of preoperative forced vital capacity, postoperative pruritus, headache, nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, atelectasis or pneumonitis. A visual analog pain scale was used to evaluate postoperative pain severity (0, no; 1, partial; 2, marked, and 3, total relief). Sixty-eight patients were eligible for study (IM, 19; PCA, 22; EPI, 23, and excluded, four). The EPI group required significantly less daily narcotic compared with either the IM or PCA groups (17.0 +/- 6.12 milligrams; 67.8 +/- 26.8 milligrams; 40.5 +/- 20.6 milligrams, respectively, less than 0.05 ANOVA) and total narcotic (81.3 +/- 31.3 milligrams; 355.4 +/- 147.7 milligrams; 215.3 +/- 105.4 milligrams, respectively, p less than 0.05 ANOVA). EPI achieves excellent pain control in more patients with a significantly lower dose of narcotics and significantly fewer pulmonary complications. Therefore, epidural analgesia is the optimal method of postoperative analgesia after extensive abdominal operations.
 ...
PMID:Epidural analgesia. 173 72

This retrospective study explores a number of variables encountered with the use of either epidural or non-epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Postoperative mobility, amount of narcotic used, incidence of blood transfusion, length of stay, and presence of urinary retention, pruritus, nausea and vomiting, or respiratory depression were compared in a group of 101 consecutive patients scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty. Fifty-two patients received epidural anesthesia and analgesia; the remaining 49 received non-epidural anesthesia, followed by standard IM/IV postoperative analgesia. Epidural patients required significantly less narcotic than the non-epidural group. There were significantly fewer blood transfusions in the epidural group; however, epidural patients had significantly increased incidence of urinary retention and pruritus. The use of epidural anesthesia and analgesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty patients has definite merit, but is most safely administered in a monitored, skilled nursing unit.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of epidural and non-epidural anesthesia and analgesia in total hip or knee arthroplasty patients. 173 19

The anatomy and physiology of the epidural space and the mechanism of action, sites of action, and pharmacokinetics of analgesics administered by continuous epidural infusion are reviewed, and the efficacy, adverse effects, and postoperative indications for use of analgesics administered by this route are discussed. Narcotics selectively block pain conduction by occupying specific opiate receptors in the spinal cord. Local anesthetics provide analgesia by axonal membrane blockade; they also can produce nonselective sympathetic and somatic (sensory and motor) blockade in addition to analgesia. A narcotic-local anesthetic mixture should provide an additive analgesic effect, without an increase in the incidence of adverse effects. Comparative efficacy studies have shown that continuous epidural infusions of narcotics, local anesthetics, and narcotic-local anesthetic combinations, when used appropriately, may produce better analgesia than conventional bolus methods of pain relief. Continuous epidural infusions also offer a safety advantage over intermittent epidural injections because peak and trough levels of the analgesic agent are avoided. Adverse effects of epidurally administered narcotics include respiratory depression, pruritus, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, and sedation. Adverse effects of epidurally administered local anesthetics include urinary retention, hypotension, numbness, motor weakness, tachyphylaxis, and, rarely, systemic toxicity. The cost of epidurally administered drugs is substantially higher than that for i.m. or i.v. narcotic analgesia, but this cost may be offset by other benefits such as a shorter hospital stay. Current studies suggest superior analgesia for the majority of surgical procedures with continuous epidural analgesia infusions compared with more traditional methods of providing analgesia.
 ...
PMID:Management of postoperative pain by continuous epidural infusion of analgesics. 174 61

The process of nociception, the anatomy of the epidural space, and the placement of the epidural catheter are reviewed, and the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, analgesic efficacy, and potential adverse effects of epidurally administered narcotics and local anesthetics are discussed, as well as patient monitoring standards and solution preparation guidelines for these agents. The epidural space is located between the dura mater (the outer-most membrane surrounding the spinal cord) and the vertebral canal. The site of catheter placement is determined by the dermatomes corresponding to the site of desired analgesia. The primary factors that differentiate epidural narcotics are related to their pharmacokinetic profiles. Morphine, which is hydrophilic, has a slower onset of action and a longer duration of analgesia than lipophilic compounds such as fentanyl; morphine also results in less segmentalization (the degree to which analgesia is limited to discrete dermatomal segments corresponding to the level of the epidural narcotic injection) than is seen with lipophilic compounds. Studies have shown that epidural narcotics provide superior pain relief compared with systemic narcotics. Common adverse effects associated with therapeutic doses of intraspinal narcotics include itching, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, and sedation; respiratory depression is uncommon after epidural administration of narcotics. The most bothersome adverse effect encountered with analgesic doses of local anesthetics is paresthesia. Solutions for epidural administration must be sterile and preservative free. Epidural administration of narcotics and local anesthetics seems to provide better pain relief than conventional methods but may be associated with more bothersome adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Epidural analgesia. 174 84

Forty-three patients with disseminated refractory malignancies each received an individually specified combination of either Adriamycin (n = 24) or mitomycin-C (n = 19) conjugated to a cocktail of murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Cancers were typed with both immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry using a panel of antibodies. Cocktails of up to six antibodies were selected based on total binding of greater than 80% of the malignant cells in the biopsy specimen. These mAb cocktails were then drug conjugated, safety tested, and administered intravenously. The Adriamycin immunoconjugates were well tolerated in 22/24 patients, with 17/24 having significant side effects. Fever, chills, pruritus, and skin rash were by far the most common transitory reactions. All were well controlled with premedication. A total of up to 1 g Adriamycin and 5 g mAb were administered to each patient. The limiting factor appeared to be a variable dissociation of active Adriamycin from the antibody that unpredictably caused hemopoietic depression. Similar findings were noted among 19 patients treated with mitomycin-C conjugates. Thrombocytopenia at a 60-mg dose of mitomycin-C in this schedule was dose limiting. Serological evidence suggested that the development of an immunoglobulin M antibody specific against the mouse mAb had the specificity and sensitivity to predict clinical reactions. These antibodies were quantitatively less in mitomycin-C-treated patients. Selected patients were retreated. One patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia was treated on three occasions with regression of peripheral lymph nodes. Two patients with breast carcinoma had definite improvement in ulcerating skin lesions, and two patients with tongue carcinoma had shrinkage of their lesions. No responses were seen with mitomycin-C conjugates but binding was noted to tumors. Drug-induced colitis was seen at higher doses with some binding of these conjugates to normal colon epithelium. This study demonstrated the feasibility of preparing individually specified drug immunoconjugate cocktails for patients with refractory malignancies. Cocktail formulation and antibody delivery to the tumor in vivo was accomplished. There was limited antigenic drift among various biopsies within the same patient over time. The major technical hurdle continues to be the selection of effective drug conjugation methods to optimally bind drugs to mAbs for targeted cancer therapy.
 ...
PMID:Custom-tailored drug immunoconjugates in cancer therapy. 176 66

Postoperative analgesia provided by epidurally administered sufentanil and/or morphine was evaluated in 45 patients recovering from major gynecologic surgery. At the first complaint of pain in the Postanesthesia Care Unit, patients received a single epidural bolus of 30 micrograms sufentanil (group A), 5 mg morphine (group B), or 30 micrograms sufentanil plus 3 mg morphine (group C) in a randomized blinded fashion. Analgesic efficacy was assessed throughout the 24-h study period with 10-cm visual analog scales. The need for additional postoperative analgesia (patient-controlled analgesia, 1 mg of morphine every 6 min as necessary) and the incidence of adverse effects were also assessed. Patients receiving sufentanil (groups A and C) had significantly faster onset of analgesia than did patients given morphine alone (group B, P less than 0.05). Group B subjects experienced the longest duration of analgesia (B vs A and C, P less than 0.05) and required significantly less patient-controlled analgesia (morphine) than patients in group A (P less than 0.05). No patient developed clinically significant respiratory depression or excessive sedation, and there were no intergroup differences in incidence of pruritus or nausea (P value not significant). The data indicate that a mixture of sufentanil and morphine provides either a more rapid onset of epidural analgesia or reduced patient-controlled analgesia narcotic requirement than respective doses of each agent administered alone.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of epidurally administered sufentanil, morphine, and sufentanil-morphine combination for postoperative analgesia. 182 73

A retrospective analysis of 133 patients who received continuous epidural fentanyl for postoperative analgesia is presented. Using a concentration of 5 micrograms/mL of fentanyl, patients received continuous epidural infusions for 24 to 72 hours postoperatively. The average rate of infusion was 60 micrograms/h. A total of 59.3% of the patients received no additional narcotics; 26.3% required supplemental narcotics during the first 24 hours only. Three percent had the infusion discontinued because it provided poor pain control. Side effects were less than, or comparable to, those of epidural morphine. Respiratory depression, defined as a respiratory rate of less than 8, or apnea did not occur. Urinary retention occurred in one patient. Pruritus occurred in 4% (6 patients). Nausea occurred in 25.5%, a rate comparable to that which occurred with epidural morphine. No side effects occurred in 70.6% of the patients reviewed. These data show that epidural fentanyl provides good to excellent pain relief with minimal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative analgesia with epidural fentanyl. 183 46

To determine the lowest effective dose of epidural sufentanil given for analgesia, 41 patients undergoing elective abdominal gynecologic surgery during continuous epidural anesthesia (lidocaine 2%) were randomly assigned to one of four postoperative treatment groups. Patients received an epidural bolus of either 25 (group A), 40 (group B), 55 (group C), or 70 micrograms (group D) sufentanil in 10 mL of saline. They were evaluated for the next 8 h using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Except for two individuals in group A, all patients achieved a visual analogue scale score of 1 cm or less during the study interval. The onset of analgesia was most rapid in the two higher dose groups (A vs C and D; P less than 0.05). Pairwise comparison between groups showed a significant difference in the time needed to achieve maximum pain relief between the lowest and highest treatment groups (A vs D; P less than 0.05). Duration of analgesia was also significantly longer in groups C and D than in group A (208.0 +/- 21.1 and 224.0 +/- 14.7 vs 140.0 +/- 10.7 min; P less than 0.05). There were no differences among groups with regard to mean respiratory rate, level of sedation, 24-h narcotic requirements, or incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus (P = NS). A single patient in group D suffered profound respiratory depression within seconds of administration. We conclude that, in patients recovering from lower abdominal surgery, a single 40-55-micrograms epidural bolus of sufentanil provides 3-3.5 h of effective analgesia, and that larger doses are not warranted.
 ...
PMID:Epidural sufentanil for postoperative analgesia: dose-response in patients recovering from major gynecologic surgery. 183 24

In an effort to determine the incidence of respiratory depression and other side effects of subarachnoid morphine, we conducted the following prospective study in a large number (856) of young female patients undergoing cesarean delivery in one hospital. During the period from July 1987 to January 1989, patients receiving subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 0.2 mg preservative-free morphine were included. They were continuously monitored for 24 hours using a pulse oximeter. For 24 hours, the vital signs, including respiratory rate every hour, and the side effects, including pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, were recorded. The need for analgesia and the total dose of opioids during the first 24 hours were documented. Our results showed that respiratory depression (SaO2 less than or equal to 85% and/or respiratory rate ten breaths per minute or less) occurred in eight patients, all of whom were markedly obese. Fifty-eight percent of the patients did not require analgesics for 24 hours. In those requiring an added opioid, the dose was (9.1 +/- 0.5 mg morphine, mean +/- SEM). Eighty-five percent of the patients were satisfied with the postoperative analgesia. Six percent were dissatisfied due to the side effects, i.e., pruritus, nausea and/or vomiting. Nine percent were dissatisfied with the pulse oximeter because it caused false alarms and limited their mobility.
 ...
PMID:The addition of 0.2 mg subarachnoid morphine to hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean delivery: a prospective study of 856 cases. 188 70

The use of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia outside of intensive care units remains controversial. In this report our anesthesiology-based acute pain service documents experience with 1,106 consecutive postoperative patients treated with epidural morphine on regular surgical wards. This experience involved 4,343 total patient days of care and 11,089 individual epidural morphine injections. On a 0-10 verbal analog scale, patient-reported median pain scores at rest and with coughing or ambulation were 1 (inter-quartile range 3) and 4 (interquartile range 4), respectively. The incidence of side effects requiring medication were as follows: pruritus 24%, nausea 29%, and respiratory depression 0.2%. There were no deaths, neurologic injuries, or infections associated with the technique. Migration of epidural catheters into the subarachnoid space and into epidural veins each occurred twice. Overall, 1,051 of the 1,106 patients (95%) experienced none of the following problems: catheter obstruction, premature dislodgement, painful injections, catheter migration, infection, or respiratory depression. We conclude that postoperative pain can be safely and effectively treated with epidural morphine on surgical wards.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative epidural morphine is safe on surgical wards. 172 29


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>