Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011570 (depression)
 172,036 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In this investigation, the antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine and imipramine was compared in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study lasting 4 weeks; 338 depressed patients were recruited at five North American centres. For the efficacy analyses an intent-to-treat sample was defined. The global efficacy of the two drugs was assessed by the Hamilton Depression scale (HAM-D) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores. Antidepressant activity was also assessed using the percentage of responders on the CGI "improvement" scale. In addition the time of onset of antidepressant effect was evaluated by weekly analysis of individual HAM-D items. The intent-to-treat sample was stratified retrospectively according to the severity of the depression (mild, moderate or severe). Regarding global efficacy, compared with placebo, only fluvoxamine significantly improved the HAM-D total scores at Week 4 (p < 0.05). There was a suggestion from individual HAM-D item scores (depressed mood, suicide, psychic anxiety) that fluvoxamine had an earlier effect than imipramine. Overall, compared with placebo, more HAM-D items were improved by fluvoxamine than imipramine. Fluvoxamine but not imipramine was significantly superior to placebo in severely depressed patients as shown by improvements in the HAM-D score (p < 0.01) and the CGI "improvement" score (p < 0.05). Side effect profiles for the active agents were typical for their pharmacological category:imipramine was associated with anticholinergic effects, particularly dry mouth, and fluvoxamine was associated with nausea and vomiting.
 ...
PMID:Antidepressant efficacy in relation to item analysis and severity of depression: a placebo-controlled trial of fluvoxamine versus imipramine. 762 21

A meta-analysis of six randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of the new antidepressant nefazodone in relieving symptoms of anxiety and agitation associated with major depression. Nefazodone blocks serotonin2 (5-HT2) receptors and selectively inhibits serotonin (5-HT) reuptake. This pharmacologic profile may confer clinical benefits that differ from those of other antidepressants, such as tricyclics (TCAs) and serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The data base included 817 patients with major depression and baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) scores > or = 18; 345 received placebo, 288 imipramine, and 184 nefazodone. Both nefazodone and imipramine exhibited antidepressant efficacy compared with that of placebo, irrespective of baseline anxiety levels. Statistically significant improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), HAM-D anxiety factor, HAM-D psychic anxiety item, and HAM-D agitation item scores was observed with both active treatments. Nefazodone-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement in somatic anxiety (HAM-D item 11) ratings than placebo-treated patients from Week 4 through end of treatment (p < or = .01), while imipramine-treated patients did not differ from placebo patients on this item. Nefazodone-treated patients improved more rapidly (as early as Week 1) than imipramine- and placebo-treated patients on agitation (HAM-D item 9) (p < or = .01). Nefazodone was found to have an excellent safety profile and was well tolerated, with 5% of nefazodone patients prematurely discontinuing treatment for adverse experiences compared with 17% for imipramine and 5% for placebo treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Response of anxiety and agitation symptoms during nefazodone treatment of major depression. 764 72

Prolactin and cortisol responses to dl-fenfluramine challenge were examined in 11 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in 11 healthy controls who were age and gender matched. After obtaining two baseline samples, each subject was given 60 mg of dl-fenfluramine orally and further blood samples were drawn hourly during the following five hours in order to measure prolactin and cortisol levels. There was no difference in either baseline or fenfluramine-induced hormonal responses between patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and controls. There was also no correlation between depression scores on HAM-D and hormonal responses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. The findings of this study do not support a role for 5-HT in chronic fatigue syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Neuroendocrine assessment of serotonin (5-HT) function in chronic fatigue syndrome. 870 60

In a 6-week double-blind study, 220 patients with major depression (mostly outpatients) were randomly assigned to receive a fixed dose of brofaromine 150 mg daily (n = 111) or placebo (n = 109) after a 1-week single-blind placebo washout. Except for the HAM-D sleep items, brofaromine was superior to placebo on measures of depression as determined by the four methods of assessing drug efficacy: (1) psychiatric symptom rating (HAM-D 17-item less the three sleep items); (2) self-rating scale (Beck Depression Inventory); (3) Clinical Global Assessment of Efficacy; and (4) drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy. Most commonly reported adverse events with brofaromine were: headache, nausea, dizziness and sleep disturbance. Brofaromine was found to be an effective antidepressant, superior to placebo with a good tolerability profile.
 ...
PMID:A Canadian multicentre placebo-controlled study of a fixed dose of brofaromine, a reversible selective MAO-A inhibitor, in the treatment of major depression. 782 62

The relationship between depression and comorbid personality disorders is still poorly understood. The aims of this study were to examine differences in depression severity between depressed outpatients with and without comorbid personality disorders, to determine the effect of a fixed dose of fluoxetine on personality disorders, and to assess the predictive value of personality disorder diagnoses at baseline with regard to response to fluoxetine. Eighty-three outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) were assessed with a self-rating scale, the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised (PDQ-R), before and after 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day. The presence of a cluster B diagnosis before treatment predicted positive outcome as measured by the change in score on the modified 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17*). Following treatment, we found significant reductions in the frequency of most individual personality disorder diagnoses and total PDQ-R score. While patients no longer meeting criteria for cluster B personality disorders after treatment had similar reductions in depressive symptoms compared to those maintaining the diagnoses, subjects no longer meeting criteria for cluster A and cluster C diagnoses after treatment exhibited significantly greater decreases in depression severity than those who maintained the diagnoses. Overall, these results suggest that fluoxetine may be beneficial in the treatment of certain personality disorder traits in patients with MDD.
 ...
PMID:Personality disorder comorbidity with major depression and response to fluoxetine treatment. 784 59

We report on the results of a study comparing mianserin with amitriptyline and placebo, in outpatients with major depression (DSM-III 296.2 or 296.3). One hundred and forty-nine patients were randomized to mianserin (n = 50), amitriptyline (n = 50) or placebo (n = 49). Medication was taken in a nightly (qhs) dose. During Week 1, the maximum dose was 60 mg mianserin, 120 mg amitriptyline or two placebo capsules. Beginning at Day 7 (through Day 42) maximum dosages were 150 mg mianserin, 300 mg amitriptyline or five placebo capsules. At multiple weeks and endpoint, statistically significant reductions in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) 17- and 21-item scores were recorded for both active drugs compared with placebo. Positive results with the HAM-D were corroborated by other measures of efficacy. There were no statistically significant differences between mianserin and amitriptyline in terms of efficacy; however, the results do suggest a more rapid therapeutic response for mianserin compared with amitriptyline, in terms of percentage of patients showing > or = 50% improvement at Weeks 2 (30% vs 23%) and 4 (61% vs 44%). The most common adverse experiences were somnolence (amitriptyline and mianserin 60%, placebo 31%) and dry mouth (amitriptyline 76%, mianserin 30% and placebo 20%). Our results indicate that mianserin is clearly superior to placebo, compares favorably with amitriptyline, and is a safe, well-tolerated, effective medication in the treatment of depressed outpatients.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing mianserin and amitriptyline in moderately depressed outpatients. 786 49

Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) medications are among the most widely used pharmacologic treatments for depression. However, a substantial number of patients fail to respond to these agents. Few standardized trials of pharmacologic treatments for TCA nonresponders are available. Bupropion has an apparently different mechanism of action than TCAs and represents a possible treatment for the TCA nonresponder. Based on positive results from pilot studies, a standardized study evaluating bupropion in TCA nonresponders was conducted. Forty-one depressed outpatients who had failed to respond to adequate documented TCA treatment, defined by specific criteria of dosage, duration, and plasma concentrations, entered a 1-week single-blind placebo phase, followed by an open 8-week bupropion treatment phase utilizing doses of up to the maximum daily dose of 450 mg. Response was measured by change on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) Scales, and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Bupropion treatment resulted in an improvement in depression on all outcome measures. Forty-nine percent were considered "responders," in that they achieved > or = 50% improvement on the 28-item HAM-D. Fifty-four percent were classified as responders based on a CGI-I rating of much or very much improved. Statistically significant improvement in depressive symptoms, measured by mean scores for the HAM-D, CGI-S, and HAM-A, was achieved at the end of the study (as compared to baseline). Twelve patients (32%) had a HAM-D score of < or = 10 at termination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Bupropion in tricyclic antidepressant nonresponders with unipolar major depressive disorder. 788 95

A common presentation for major depression includes psychomotor agitation. However, this subtype has been the infrequent subject of controlled investigation during depression trials. Yet, the subcategorization of agitated depression has historically been associated with the belief that older, sedating compounds have a superior risk:benefit profile. In the 8-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel trial, 124 subjects with Research Diagnostic Criteria-compatible agitated depression were randomized to either imipramine (IMI) or fluoxetine (FLU). Both compounds proved to be similarly effective as measured by change in HAM-D17, HAM-D17 response, and HAM-D17 remission rates. Similar comparability was seen in secondary measures of agitation, anxiety, suicidality, and global impressions. However, of note, a statistically significant difference in early discontinuations because of intolerable adverse events emerged. Whereas 43.5% of IMI subjects discontinued early, only 9.7% of FLU subjects (p < 0.001) did. Significantly more central nervous system events characterized the IMI than the FLU subgroup (IMI, 24.2%, vs. FLU, 6.5%; p = 0.006). In conclusion, among subjects with major depression, subtype agitated, the risk:benefit profile favored FLU over IMI. This was driven by the superior tolerance of FLU. No evidence emerged in support of the clinical hypothesis that a "sedating" agent is the treatment of choice for this group. The results are important when striving to maximize compliance with pharmacotherapy in order to minimize recidivism and associated psychological and economic morbidity.
 ...
PMID:Is baseline agitation a relative contraindication for a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor: a comparative trial of fluoxetine versus imipramine. 788 18

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the novel antidepressant venlafaxine for the management of treatment-resistant unipolar depression. We gave unblinded venlafaxine to 84 consecutive outpatients and inpatients who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depression and who had failed to respond to at least three adequate trials of antidepressants from at least two different antidepressant classes or electroconvulsive therapy, plus at least one attempt at augmentation. Patients were evaluated after a drug free period at baseline and regular intervals with the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale Improvement item (CGI). Full response for each scale was defined as follows: HAM-D-21 score of 8 or lower, a MADRS score of 12 or lower, and CGI score of 1; partial responses was defined as a 50% decrease in the HAM-D and MADRS, with final scores greater than 8 and 12, respectively, and for the CGI, a score equal to 2. About a third of patients were considered to be either full or partial responders (32.9% by HAM-D-21, 30.0% by MADRS, and 40% by CGI) after 12 weeks of venlafaxine treatment. To date, about 46% of responders have sustained their response for at least 3 months after the acute response. Venlafaxine is effective for a significant, but small, minority of patients with rigorously defined triple-resistant depression; the improvement was maintained for about half of the responders for the first 3 months of maintenance therapy.
 ...
PMID:Venlafaxine for treatment-resistant unipolar depression. 788 23

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ipsapirone (an azapirone anxiolytic) at daily dose levels of 10.0 to 30.0 mg with a daily dose of 2.0 to 6.0 mg of lorazepam (a benzodiazepine) or placebo when given to outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) of moderate or greater severity. A total of 317 outpatients with a primary diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-III criteria (at least 1 month's duration) were randomized. Study entry criteria at the time of screening and at baseline included a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) score of 18 or more, a Covi Anxiety Scale score of 8 or more, and a Raskin Depression Scale score of 7 or less. The study design consisted of a 1-week, single-blind placebo evaluation, a 4-week, double-blind acute treatment period, and a 4-week extension period, followed by a 2-week, single-blind placebo withdrawal period. Efficacy was measured by changes in the HAM-A and Clinical Global Impression Scale and by evaluations of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Zung-Anxiety Self-Rating scale. The Raskin and Covi scales were performed at screening and baseline only. Withdrawal reactions were assessed during the withdrawal period by the Physician Withdrawal Checklist and by a patient self-rating checklist. Two-hundred sixty-three patients were valid for the analysis of efficacy in the ipsapirone (N = 87), lorazepam (N = 89), and placebo (N = 87) groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ipsapirone versus lorazepam in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a prospective multicenter trial. 790 97


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>