Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011570 (depression)
172,036 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Partial sleep deprivation (PSD), keeping a subject awake from 2 AM to 9 PM produces an acute mood improvement in 60% of patients with major depression. We sought to characterize the timing, subcomponent mood, and motor activity changes of this response. Thirty-seven subjects with major depression were rated with the 6-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-6) at 1 PM and completed the Profile of Mood States (POMS) every 2 hr on the day before and day of PSD. Locomotor activity was monitored continuously during the trial with an automated device. Bipolar I patients responded more frequently than other groups. Positive mood responders had greater improvement than nonresponders in POMS subscales of depression, tension, confusion, and anger. The mood improvement increased steadily during the day, peaked in late afternoon, and declined thereafter. Responders showed significantly higher levels of locomotor activity on the baseline pre-PSD day than did nonresponders. All subjects increased motor activity following sleep deprivation, however.
...
PMID:Effects of partial sleep deprivation on the diurnal variation of mood and motor activity in major depression. 175 24

In an Italian multicenter study, 296 patients (115 males, 181 females) affected with major depression diagnosed according to the criteria of the DSM III-R, were treated for 8 weeks with 20 mg/die fluoxetine (Fluoxeren-Menarini s.r.l.). At the end of the therapy the mean scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale had improved considerably, going down from 27.42 to 10.05. 69.6% of the patients had improved by at least in the 50% in the HAM-D scores (responders). At the CGI the overall improvement was evaluated with a mean score of 2.05 (marked improvement), while the patients assessed themselves at the end of treatment as being from "improved" to "greatly improved". No significant differences in efficacy were found to depend on age, type of depression or response to previous treatment, though younger patients (18-40 years), and those with single or recurring episodes, with atypical depression and good response to other antidepressants, showed a more marked improvement. The tolerability of the drug was found to be good. The laboratory tests, ECG and body weight stayed within normal limits.
...
PMID:[Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of fluoxetine in major depression, Multicenter clinical study]. 187 Apr 18

Recent reports supporting the use of lithium carbonate as an adjunct to tricyclic antidepressants for the treatment of refractory depression have not utilized standardized tricyclic antidepressant therapy, nor have they addressed the efficacy of lithium augmentation in a geriatric population. A 3-week open trial was added to the medication regimen of 15 elderly depressed inpatients who had already failed 4 weeks of therapeutic levels of nortriptyline. Treatment response was determined by the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Two of 15 partial responders before lithium augmentation became complete responders. Of the remaining 13 "nonresponders" before lithium augmentation, one had a complete response, 7 had a partial response and 5 remained nonresponders. Although there was a mean HAM-D change of 8.3 points after lithium augmentation (24.7 +/- 5.9 to 16.4 +/- 6.8, p less than .001), when considering the previously reported similar efficiency of extended nonaugmented nortriptyline, these data do not strongly support lithium augmentation in elderly subjects who fail to respond after 4 weeks of nortriptyline. Further study is needed to determine what role, if any, lithium augmentation should play in the treatment of geriatric depression.
...
PMID:Adjunctive lithium carbonate in nortriptyline-resistant elderly depressed patients. 191 24

Sixty-five inpatients of a psychosomatic hospital in the Federal Republic of Germany with the diagnosis of anxiety neurosis (n = 31) or neurotic depression (n = 34) as defined by the International Classification of Disease (ICD-9), were randomized to a 4-week course of ipsapirone at 7.5 mg t.i.d. or placebo in a prospective, double-blind clinical trial to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy. This article reports the efficacy results for those patients with the diagnosis of neurotic depression. The primary efficacy variable for patients with neurotic depression was the change from baseline in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at 4 weeks of treatment. Considering all of the randomized patients with neurotic depression (n = 34, the intent-to-treat population), the mean change from baseline in the HAM-D at Week 4 (observed cases) was -13.13 +/- 6.06 (n = 16) for the ipsapirone group, and -3.19 +/- 5.99 (n = 16) for the placebo group (p less than .001). A parallel analysis of the change from baseline in the Core Depression score of the HAM-D (defined as the sum of items 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8) also showed a significant treatment difference (p less than .01). Results were similar for the intent-to-treat population, last observation carried forward. Safety and tolerability were evaluated for all study patients independent of diagnosis. Treatment-emergent events (n = 65) were reported by 76 percent of patients treated with ipsapirone (n = 33) and by 38 percent of patients treated with placebo (n = 32).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Ipsapirone: evidence for efficacy in depression. 197 72

Although light therapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD), little research has been done to determine which light wavelengths affect treatment outcome. In this triple crossover study the authors compared 1 week of light therapy in which bright (2500 lux), full-spectrum fluorescent light, with and without blockade of the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum, was used with a dim (500 lux) light control in 11 SAD patients. The dim light condition had no significant antidepressant effects as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and an atypical depressive symptom (ATYP) score. The UV-light condition significantly reduced HAM-D, BDI, and ATYP scores, whereas the UV-blocked condition significantly reduced only the ATYP score. These results suggest that the UV-spectrum in light therapy may have a differential effect on typical and atypical symptoms in SAD.
...
PMID:Ultraviolet versus non-ultraviolet light therapy for seasonal affective disorder. 203 28

The effects of high-dose fluoxetine (median 80 mg/day), standard-dose imipramine (median 200 mg/day), and placebo were studied in 706 outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for major depressive disorder. Baseline psychomotor activity of each patient was prospectively categorized as agitated, retarded, or neither. Rates of occurrence of total and significant (leading to discontinuation) activating adverse events (insomnia, agitation, anxiety, nervousness) and sedating events (somnolence, asthenia) were compared between treatments on an overall basis and within categories of baseline psychomotor activity. Additionally, these rates were compared across baseline psychomotor activity for each treatment. Efficacy was evaluated on an overall basis and with respect to baseline psychomotor activity. There was more total activation with fluoxetine than placebo (p = 0.008), but total activation with fluoxetine (28%) showed only a trend (p = 0.092) for being greater than with imipramine (21%). Discontinuations for activation with fluoxetine (5%) did not differ from imipramine (5%). Sedation and discontinuations for sedation with both fluoxetine and imipramine significantly exceeded placebo. The only drug-drug difference in discontinuations was for sedation where imipramine (11%) exceeded fluoxetine (5%; p = 0.008). Only for the occurrence of sedation with imipramine (47% among patients retarded at baseline) was there a significant association with baseline psychomotor activity (p = 0.021). Both fluoxetine and imipramine were superior to placebo and equal in efficacy in decreasing total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the sleep disturbance HAM-D factor, and the anxiety/somatization HAM-D factor scores. These improvements were independent of baseline psychomotor activity.
...
PMID:High-dose fluoxetine: efficacy and activating-sedating effects in agitated and retarded depression. 162 94

The azapirone class of anxiolytic drugs is being evaluated for clinical use in the treatment of depression. Buspirone, a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) partial agonist active at the 5-HT1A receptor subtype, was evaluated in the treatment of depression in a series of five placebo-controlled, parallel group studies involving 382 patients with DSM-III major depression and significant associated anxiety symptoms (both Hamilton depression [HAM-D] and Hamilton anxiety [HAM-A] scales greater than or equal to 18). Buspirone therapy was initiated at 15 mg/day with individual dose titration to a maximum of 90 mg/day and resulted in marked improvement in both depressive and anxiety symptoms. Analyses of the composite data base from the five studies show significant (p less than 0.05) improvement in mean HAM-D, HAM-A, and Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale ratings for buspirone-treated compared with placebo-treated patients. Of particular interest was significant improvement in cardinal depression symptoms, e.g., depressed mood, guilt, work and interest, anergia, and diurnal variation of mood. Subset analyses revealed that patients with melancholic-type major depression and patients with more severe symptoms (judged by higher initial HAM-D or HAM-A total scores) responded better to buspirone than did patients who were less ill. The buspirone dose most frequently associated with clinically significant improvement was 40 mg/day. Gepirone, an analogue of buspirone with highly selective binding affinity for the 5-HT1A receptor subtype, also shows promise of antidepressant efficacy in preliminary controlled clinical trials. These data suggest that azapirones, which as partial agonists modulate 5-HT1A receptor function, have clinically important antidepressant properties.
...
PMID:Clinical effects of the 5-HT1A partial agonists in depression: a composite analysis of buspirone in the treatment of depression. 219 3

Two hundred thirty patients with generalized anxiety and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) scores greater than or equal to 18 were subdivided at random, according to a double-blind design, into one group treated with 5-10 mg of oral buspirone t.i.d. or one group treated with 10-20 mg of oral oxazepam t.i.d. for 6 weeks. No anxiolytic treatment was allowed 3 months prior to trial entry. Analysis of demographic variables revealed no significant imbalance between the two treatment groups. Twenty patients were excluded from efficacy analysis because of treatment withdrawal before the first efficacy evaluation on Day 7. Another 4 patients were excluded because they were taking concomitant psychotropic medication. The remaining 206 patients displayed a decrease in HAM-A scores (mean +/- SD) from 23.9 +/- 4.1 to 10.6 +/- 7.7 in the buspirone group and from 23.9 +/- 4.2 to 11.5 +/- 8.0 in the oxazepam group. The two treatment groups were also found to be virtually identical in an "intent to treat" analysis of all 230 patients as well as in other ratings (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Raskin Depression Scale, Covi Anxiety Scale, Physicians Questionnaire, global ratings, and Hopkins Symptom Checklist [HSCL]-56). However, oxazepam was never superior to buspirone in any of the efficacy analyses. Of the 230 patients, 127 spontaneously reported adverse events, including drowsiness, dizziness, headache, nausea, and nervousness. Adverse events were relatively similar in the two groups. In conclusion, buspirone and oxazepam appear to be equally effective in the treatment of generalized anxiety encountered by general practitioners. This outcome, in addition to a previously documented absence of any dependency liability, makes buspirone a clinically important anxiolytic drug.
...
PMID:A double-blind, controlled trial in primary care patients with generalized anxiety: a comparison between buspirone and oxazepam. 221 67

One hundred forty outpatients with major depression were admitted to an 8-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of buspirone. Entry criteria included a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (25-item [HAM-D]) score of greater than or equal to 18 and a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), score of greater than or equal to 18. A flexible dose schedule ranging from 5-90 mg/day was employed. The mean dose of buspirone was 41-54 mg/day from Week 2 to the end of the study. Sixty-four percent of buspirone patients and 50% of placebo patients were melancholic; 64% of buspirone patients and 74% of placebo patients discontinued treatment before the end of the study. Extender data analysis showed that buspirone patients had significant (p less than .05) HAM-D score reductions compared with the placebo group at Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 6. The HAM-D retardation factor trended toward significance over placebo at Weeks 3, 4, and 6. HAM-D change scores for the subgroup of melancholic patients taking buspirone were significantly (p less than .02) better than those of the placebo-treated melancholic subjects at Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 6. Most other efficacy parameters also favored the buspirone-treated group over the placebo-treated group. The most common adverse experiences for the buspirone group were CNS effects (74% in the buspirone group vs. 21% in the placebo group) and gastrointestinal effects (55% in the buspirone group vs. 37% in the placebo group). Side effects consisted of dizziness, light-headedness, nausea, and headache. No serious or unexpected adverse effects occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Buspirone in the management of major depression: a placebo-controlled comparison. 221 70

One hundred fifty-five outpatients suffering from major depression with significant anxiety entered a double-blind study comparing 8 weeks of treatment with buspirone or placebo. Twenty-nine percent of buspirone and 40 percent of placebo patients discontinued treatment before 8 weeks. Major efficacy measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score, the HAM-D retardation and anxiety factors, the HAM-D Rickels and Bech core depression clusters, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL). Results were consistent across all outcome measures, including the two core depression clusters, with treatment response to buspirone significantly better than to placebo at treatment endpoint. Seventy percent of buspirone and 35 percent of placebo patients (p less than .01) were rated moderately or markedly improved after 8 weeks of therapy. Buspirone was found to be safe and well-tolerated by patients with major depression and concomitant anxiety at doses of up to 90 mg/day.
...
PMID:Buspirone in depressed outpatients: a controlled study. 223 52


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>