Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011168 (dysphagia)
 15,644 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The primary treatment goals in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease are relief of symptoms, prevention of symptom relapse, healing of erosive esophagitis, and prevention of complications of esophagitis. In patients with reflux esophagitis, treatment is directed at acid suppression through the use of lifestyle modifications (e.g., elevating the head of the bed, modifying the size and composition of meals) and pharmacologic agents (a histamine H2-receptor antagonist [H2RA] taken on demand or a proton pump inhibitor IPPI] taken 30 to 60 minutes before the first meal of the day). The preferred empiric approach is step-up therapy (treat initially with an H2RA for eight weeks; if symptoms do not improve, change to a PPI) or step-down therapy (treat initially with a PPI; then titrate to the lowest effective medication type and dosage). In patients with erosive esophagitis identified on endoscopy, a PPI is the initial treatment of choice. Diagnostic testing should be reserved for patients who exhibit warning signs (i.e., weight loss, dysphagia, gastrointestinal bleeding) and patients who are at risk for complications of esophagitis (i.e., esophageal stricture formation, Barrett's esophagus, adenocarcinoma). Antireflux surgery, including open and laparoscopic versions of Nissen fundoplication, is an alternative treatment in patients who have chronic reflux with recalcitrant symptoms. Newer endoscopic modalities, including the Stretta and endocinch procedures, are less invasive and have fewer complications than antireflux surgery, but response rates are lower.
 ...
PMID:Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. 1456 83

The indication for antireflux surgery despite consequent PPI medication includes: persisting disease with non-acid associated symptoms, such as volume reflux, recurrent hoarseness bronchiopulmonal reflux symptoms, in compliance with PPI, recurrent or persisting esophagitis. Our standard procedure is the short full Nissen wrap. Only in a 70% esophageal pump disturbance we actually apply a partial Toupet wrap. In 412 operations (Nissen 82%, Toupet 18%) during one year we observed 1.9% persisting postoperative dysphagia, 5% reflux relapses and 2% gas bloat syndrome of which 1 patient (0.2%) was re-operated. Significant differences between both procedures regarding the rate of function and complication have not been seen. Quality of life nearly came up to that of non-operated healthy patients and was much better than before surgery. The high acceptance of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in a highly selected collective caused a revival of antireflux surgery by minimal invasive methods.
 ...
PMID:[Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery]. 1468 59

The Stretta procedure is safe and effective for the treatment of GERD. There are well-documented clinical trial data supporting its use, including a randomized sham-controlled study, single- and multi-center prospective trials, and community practice reports. The complication rate is within the acceptable range for therapeutic endoscopic procedures and less than the published complication rate for laparoscopic fundoplication. The durability of effect also is established beyond 2 years in several studies. Stretta should be added to the GERD management algorithm specifically for patients considering an antireflux surgical procedure but who are not accepting of the risks of surgery and anesthesia. These patients typically present with incomplete GERD control, despite optimal antisecretory drug therapy, or intolerance to medical therapy. Stretta should be considered only for patients who fit the anatomic inclusion criteria, whereas antireflux surgery should be reserved for those who do not. The decision to undergo antireflux surgery or Stretta must be based on the relative risks and benefits of each procedure. Although antireflux surgery provides better control of esophageal acid exposure than Stretta, the outcomes for GERD symptoms, quality of life, and reduction in PPI use are comparable. Stretta has a low risk of acute adverse events, has no reported cases of long-term dysphagia, and obviates general anesthesia and hospitalization, whereas antireflux surgery has a reported adverse event rate of approximately 2%, a considerable incidence of dysphagia, and requires general anesthesia and 1 to 2 days in the hospital. Another advantage of the Stretta procedure is that antireflux surgery still can be performed in the case of failures. In conclusion, the Stretta procedure offers a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative to antireflux surgery for those patients who have GERD who are controlled unsatisfactorily on antisecretory medications, who are considering surgery, and who meet the anatomic criteria that make the procedure technically feasible and safe.
 ...
PMID:Endoscopic antireflux therapy: the Stretta procedure. 1610 30

Scientific evidence based on controlled clinical research confirm substantial benefits resulting from the eradication of H. pylori infection in such pathologies of the alimentary tract as: gastric peptic and duodenal ulcer (active or confirmed in the future and ulcer disease complications), MALT (Mucosa Associated Limphoid Tissue) lymphoma, atrophic gastritis, past stomach resection, gastric cancer in the family. The above group of indications is strongly recommended for eradicative treatment. During the last several years there have been many guidelines made by international and national specialist groups. "Test and treat" strategy of undiagnosed dyspepsia treatment is based on possibility to carry out non-invasive tests confirming H. pylori infection. First symptoms of dyspepsia in people over 45 years of age constitute recommendation for endoscopy, as well as symptoms assumed to be "alarming" (loss of weight, anaemia, bloody vomiting, tarry stool, dysphagia) regardless of patient age. An individual approach to eradication is proposed in gastroesophageal reflux disease, and use of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. Antibacterial activity towards H. pylori is shown by many antibiotics (amoxicillin, macrolides, tetracyclines) and some other chemotherapeutic agents (nitroimidazoles) and bismuth. PPIs are recommended, because through increase of pH in stomach they create conditions to act for antibiotics. During the stage of first line triple therapy, it is advised to apply PPI and two antibacterial medicines at the same time (PPI + amoxicillin+metronidazole or clarithromycin). Such therapeutic action ensures achievement of eradication of H. pylori infection in 80-90% of cases. In case of lack of treatment efficiency in the first-line therapy, 7-14 day treatment may be repeated using triple therapies (PPI + 2 antibiotics) substituting the antibiotic with the metronidazole or tetracycline, or quadruple therapies (PPI + bismuth citrate + 2 antibiotics). Side effects during eradicative treatments occur quite rarely (from 15 to 30%).
 ...
PMID:Guidelines in the medical treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. 1703 12

Intraluminal impedance monitoring is a new technique that can be used to detect the flow of liquids and gas through hollow viscera. In combination with manometry, it is used for esophageal function testing and while manometry provides information on contractile activity, impedance provides information on esophageal bolus transit. This is especially useful in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. However, impedance monitoring appears to be less suitable for the evaluation of patients with achalasia. When used in combination with esophageal pH monitoring, impedance monitoring makes gastroesophageal reflux monitoring more complete because it allows recognition of both acidic and weakly acidic reflux episodes. The results of several studies suggest that impedance-pH monitoring is useful in the evaluation of patients with PPI-resistant typical reflux symptoms, chronic unexplained cough, excessive belching, and rumination.
 ...
PMID:Technology review: Esophageal impedance monitoring. 1710 Sep 61

Dysphagia can be caused by a number of disorders such as benign or malignant obstruction of the esophagus, inflammatory alterations of the mucosa or primary esophageal motility disorders. Endoscopic evaluation is recommended for all patients to exclude malignancy and to establish or confirm a diagnosis. This article provides an overview of the most frequent inflammatory and functional esophageal disorders causing dysphagia. Clinical findings, diagnostic procedures and therapeutic management of primary esophageal motility disorders such as achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm as well as of GERD and eosinophilic esophagitis are discussed. The diagnosis of achalasia is made by barium swallow with fluoroscopy and by manometry. Therapeutic options for achalasia are pneumatic dilatation of the esophagogastric junction, laparoscopic cardiomyotomy combined with fundoplication and botulinum toxin injection of the lower esophageal sphincter Diffuse esophageal spasm is manometrically characterized by normal peristalsis intermittently interrupted by simultaneous contractions. Potential medical therapies are PPIs for underlying GERD, smooth-muscle relaxants and antidepressant medications. GERD is a multifaceted disease caused by abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus leading to chronic symptoms or mucosal damage. Therapy includes lifestyle modifications, acid suppressive medications mainly by PPI and laparoscopic fundoplication in selected patients. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus diagnosed histologically. The main symptom of eosinophilic esophagitis is dysphagia for solid food with imminent risk of food impaction. Systemic or topical corticosteroids are the therapy of choice.
 ...
PMID:[Esophageal dysphagia]. 1766 9

Dyspepsia is common in the community, and the condition represents a considerable burden to the health service. Individuals over the age of 50 to 55 years consulting with new-onset dyspepsia and those with alarming features, such as dysphagia and weight loss, require urgent endoscopy to exclude gastro-esophageal malignancy. For younger individuals without alarm features prompt endoscopy and "test and scope" are not cost-effective initial management strategies. "Test and treat" or empirical acid suppression therapy should be preferred, depending on patient and physician choice, as well as local prevalence of Helicobacter pylori. If empirical acid suppression therapy is favored, a recent primary care-based trial from the Netherlands suggests the choice of initial acid suppressant (antacid or proton pump inhibitor [PPI]) has little effect on the likelihood of remaining symptomatic, and that stepping-up from antacid to PPI is more cost-effective than stepping-down from PPI, when current prices of branded drugs were considered.
 ...
PMID:Should we step-up or step-down in the treatment of new-onset dyspepsia in primary care? 1969 21

After the omeprazole patent expired in 2002, numerous generic products were introduced on the market. In a relatively short time many patients received substituted treatment. Clinicians noted a substantial number of patients with more reflux symptoms. We describe a male surgeon of 61 and a woman of 59 both with the red flag symptom of dysphagia after generic substitution. The first patient received a generic substitute of omeprazole, the second a therapeutic substitute of pantoprozole, i.e. omeprazole. The literature suggests three possibilities to explain the inadequacy of the substitution: (a) biphasic metabolism where the raised pH in the stomach may prematurely inactivate the PPI, with an unpredictable effect, (b) differences in acid-resistant coating of the generic products, and (c) influence of multiple dosing of PPIs after several days' use. We conclude that all three factors may contribute to a difference in absorption and therefore clinical effectiveness.
 ...
PMID:[Why some proton pump inhibitors are more equal than others]. 1978 39

NICE recommends immediate referral for patients with dyspepsia and significant acute GI bleeding and urgent specialist referral for investigation if any of the following alarm symptoms are present: progressive difficulty swallowing; chronic GI bleeding; unintentional weight loss; persistent vomiting; abdominal mass; iron deficiency anaemia; suspicious findings on barium meal. Patients aged > 55 with unexplained and persistent dyspepsia, despite H. pylori testing and acid suppression therapy, should also be considered for endoscopy, as should those with previous gastric ulcer or surgery, continuing need for NSAIDs or raised risk of gastric cancer. Patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia should be managed by empirical treatment with a PPI or testing for and treating H. pylori if present. Testing by urea breath test, stool antigen test, or locally validated lab-based serology is suggested. H. pylori eradication is usually given as triple therapy, for seven days, involving a PPI, clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole. It is important to take a thorough history and to enquire about any medication the patient is taking. Drugs that are common culprits for dyspepsia include: NSAIDs; calcium antagonists; bisphosphonates; steroids; theophyllines; nitrates. NSAIDs can also cause GI bleeding. Absence of dyspepsia in patients taking NSAIDs does not indicate a reduced risk of bleeding. Peptic ulcers fall into three categories: H. pylori associated ulcers; drug-induced ulcers (particularly NSAIDs); and ulcers in H. pylori-negative patients not taking causative medication. H. pylori is associated with both gastric and duodenal ulcer disease but it is in the duodenum where the closest relationship exists. In any 6-12 month period, 20-40% of healthy people, more commonly men, will experience symptoms of heartburn. Oesophageal reflux can progress to more serious disease such as erosive oesophagitis, stricture or Barrett's oesophagus.
 ...
PMID:Managing dyspepsia in primary care. 1993 59

Herpes simplex infection is characterized by acute or subacute infection, often followed by a chronic carrier state. Consecutive recurrences may flare up if immunocompromise occurs. Herpes simplex associated esophagitis or duodenal ulcer have been reported in immunocompromised patients due to neoplasm, HIV/AIDS or therapeutically induced immune deficiency. Here we report the case of an HSV-DNA seronegative patient who developed grade III dysphagia 13 days after allogeneic liver transplantation. Endoscopy revealed an esophageal-gastric ulcer, and biopsy histopathology showed a distinct fibroplastic and capillary ulcer pattern highly suspicious for viral infection. Immunohistochemistry staining revealed a distinct nuclear positive anti-HSV reaction. Antiviral therapy with acyclovir and high-dose PPI led to a complete revision of clinical symptoms within 48 h. Repeat control endoscopy after 7 days showed complete healing of the former ulcer site at the gastroesophageal junction. Although the incidence of post-transplantation Herpes simplex induced gastroesophageal disease is low, the viral HSV ulcer may be included into a differential diagnosis if dysphagia occurs after transplantation even if HSV-DNA PCR is negative.
 ...
PMID:Seronegative Herpes simplex Associated Esophagogastric Ulcer after Liver Transplantation. 2149 Aug 47


1 2 Next >>