Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011168 (dysphagia)
15,644 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Esophageal carcinoma usually is diagnosed at an advanced, incurable stage. In patients with good operative risk, surgery is still considered the ideal treatment. Patients with coexisting major medical conditions in whom resective surgery is precluded may benefit from several therapeutic options, including photodynamic therapy (PDT) with porfimer sodium (Photofrin; manufactured by Lederle Parenterals, Carolina, Puerto Rico, under license from Quadra Logic Technologies, Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), dilation, thermal destruction, Nd:YAG laser ablation, injection therapy, and placement of prosthetic tubes. Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium is thought to have a direct toxic effect on malignant cells via the production of singlet oxygen, which damages the microvasculature of the tumor and renders it ischemic. The 630 nm wavelength used for clinical PDT exhibits the greatest relative degree of light penetration into tissue, with corresponding activation of retained photosensitizer. The efficacy of PDT with porfimer sodium is closely related to stage of disease. It should be emphasized that PDT has been shown to be potentially curative in patients with early, noninvasive tumors of both squamous and glandular (adenocarcinoma) histologies. Eighty-three patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated using PDT. At presentation, 60% of patients had recurrence following previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients with less advanced disease had a better response to PDT with regard to relief of dysphagia and prolongation of survival. Photodynamic therapy was found to be more useful than Nd:YAG laser therapy for high, upper third lesions, especially circumferential ones. For tumors larger than 8 cm, PDT was twice as effective as Nd:YAG laser therapy in establishing prolonged lumen patency, especially for adenocarcinomas. Photodynamic therapy appears to have the added advantages of fewer treatments and less pain. The role of PDT in gastrointestinal malignancies continues to evolve.
...
PMID:Photodynamic therapy and cancer of the esophagus. 799 3

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for palliating obstructing esophageal cancer. This report reviews our initial experience using PDT to treat malignant dysphagia. Patients with inoperable, obstructing esophageal cancer were considered for PDT. Photofrin was injected 48 hours before endoscopic laser activation. Dysphagia score was assessed. Thirty patients underwent 53 PDT courses. Improvement in dysphagia occurred in 83%. Mean dysphagia score decreased from 2.8 to 1.8 (p < 0.05). Complications included esophageal stricture (9.4%), candida esophagitis (5.7%), symptomatic pleural effusion (5.7%), contained esophageal perforation (1.9%), aspiration pneumonia (1.9%), and sunburn (13.2%). Seventeen patients (57%) required more than one PDT treatment, and in 10 an expandable metal stent was used as an adjunct. The 30-day mortality rate was 7%. PDT is effective in palliating patients with malignant dysphagia. The ideal patient for PDT has an obstructing, primarily endoluminal esophageal tumor with minimal extrinsic compression.
...
PMID:Photodynamic therapy for treatment of malignant dysphagia. 1080 93

The aim of this paper is to present the updated experience of the Yorkshire Laser Centre in PDT for esophageal cancer and to identify its role in specific subsets of patients. Also, in the light of this experience, to compare and contrast the results of PDT with appropriate subsets of patients treated in my esophageal surgery practice. 102 consecutive patients; 84 with advanced (Group A) and 18 with early (Group E) stage esophageal cancer undergoing endoscopic PDT were entered into a prospective study. Every patient had standard work up including clinical staging. PDT protocol was intravenous administration of Photofrin 2mg/kg body weight followed 24-72 hours later by endoscopic illumination using 630 nm laser light. Assessment of results was made on the basis of mortality, morbidity, patient satisfaction to treatment, symptom relief and survival. For comparison of PDT role with non PDT treated patients, reference is made to 3 previous publications comprising over 1100 patients [Moghissi, K., Br. J. Surg. 79, 935-937 (1992) (ref. 1); Sawant, D., Moghissi, K. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 8, 113-117 (1994) (ref. 2); Sharpe, D. A. C., Moghissi, K. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 10, 359-364 (1996) (ref. 3)]. There was no mortality associated with PDT. All patients expressed satisfaction to treatment. Post PDT complications consisted of photosensitivity skin reaction (sunburn) in 5 patients (5%) and esophageal stricture in 8 (8%) patients. Group A: There was significant symptom and dysphagia grade improvement. Mean survival was 9.5 months. Group E: There were no significant symptoms pre or post PDT and mean survival was 60.5 months. Comparison of PDT results in Group A with results of other palliative treatment methods, indicates that palliation can be achieved in all intraluminal cancer using PDT which is at least as good as other treatments. There is, in addition, advantage over other methods in patients with cervical esophageal cancer and in cases with re-growth of tumor obstructing previously placed stents. In early cases PDT appears capable of replicating surgical results in selected cases. PDT is an effective and safe treatment method in esophageal cancer. In advance disease it improves swallowing. In early stage disease it offers long survival and the prospect of cure in some patients. At present the role of PDT in early stage cancer should be limited to patients who are unsuitable for surgical resection. Therefore, PDT should be considered as a valid oncological option to be applied in selected cases.
...
PMID:Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in esophageal cancer: a surgical view of its indications based on 14 years experience. 1289 14

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a form of photochemotherapy requiring the simultaneous presence of a photosensitiser, activating light of the proper wavelength and molecular oxygen in order to produce a localised therapeutic effect thought to be due to high-energy singlet oxygen generation. Neither drug nor light alone are effective as therapeutic agents and thus PDT treatment methods should be looked upon as true, necessary, drug and device combinations ('systems'). Selectivity of treatment is imparted by a combination of factors, including accumulation of photosensitiser by the target lesion and targeted application of activating light. The most common systemic side effect of systemically administered photosensitisers is cutaneous photosensitivity of varying periods of time. Local toxicities depend on the area of treatment. Sources of light which have been used in PDT include lasers, arc lamps, light-emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps. PDT has been used for a wide variety of clinical applications. In 1995, the first PDT system, using porfimer sodium (Photofrin, Axcan Pharma, Inc.), lasers and fibre optic light delivery methods, developed by QuadraLogic Technologies, was approved in the US for endoscopic palliation of malignant dysphagia caused by oesophageal cancer. A topical PDT system, aminolevulinic acid HCL (Levulan Kerastick) and the large-area BLU-U PDT Illuminator, was developed by DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the treatment of actinic keratoses of the face and scalp and approved in the US in 2000. Topical PDT has applicability to a wide variety of skin cancers and precancerous conditions. In 2001, Novartis launched the systemically administered verteporfin (Visudyne) laser-based PDT system in the US as the first pharmacologic treatment for age-related macular degeneration. Development programmes are continuing to investigate PDT for the potential treatment of a variety of diseases, yielding therapeutic results with minimal toxicity.
...
PMID:Photodynamic therapy systems and applications. 1598 54

A case of adenocarcinoma in the pharyngo oesophageal junction extending to the upper cervical oesophagus is described. In this case the neo-plastic changes had occurred from columnar epithelium of gastric and intestinal type: Barrett's oesophagus. The Barrett's mucosa involved the whole length of the oesophagus. Because of the general condition of the patient and advanced stage of the tumour surgical treatment was considered inappropriate. Endoscopic Photofrin Photodynamic Therapy was used with good palliation of dysphagia. The patient survived for 9 months, dying form carcinomatosis and oesophago-airway fistula. As far as can be documented only one such case has been previously reported in the literature.
...
PMID:Adeno-carcinoma of the pharyngo-oesophageal junction and cervical oesophagus in a patient with an oesophagus lined entirely by columnar epithelium report of a case treated by photodynamic therapy (PDT). 1935 59

Endoscopic photodynamic therapy (PDT) is undertaken only when tumour is visible endoscopically with malignancy biopsy confirmed. Patients will be either Group A: inoperable cases with locally advanced cancer when the aim is palliation of dysphagia, or Group E: patients with early stage I-II disease who are unsuitable for surgery or decline operation, when the intent is curative. Following assessment for suitability for PDT and counselling, Photofrin 2mg/(kgbw) is administered 24-72h before endoscopic illumination using a Diode 630nm laser. Illumination may be either interstitial or intraluminal at a dose of 100-200J/cm.
...
PMID:Endoscopic photodynamic therapy (PDT) for oesophageal cancer. 2504 97