Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0011168 (dysphagia)
 15,644 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although Nissen fundoplication controls gastroesophageal reflux disease effectively, it is associated with an incidence of side effects. For this reason we have investigated the use of a laparoscopic 180-degree anterior fundoplication as a technique that has the potential to control reflux, but with less associated postoperative dysphagia and fewer gas-related side effects. Good short-term (6-month) outcomes have been previously reported within the content of a randomized trial. This report details the technique we used and describes the outcome of this procedure with longer follow-up in a much larger group of patients. The outcome for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who underwent a laparoscopic anterior 180-hemifundoplication was determined. Clinical follow-up was carried out prospectively by an independent scientist who applied a standardized questionnaire yearly following surgery. This questionnaire evaluated symptoms of reflux, postoperative problems including dysphagia, gas bloat, ability to belch, and overall satisfaction with clinical outcome. From July 1995 to May 1999, a total ofc107 patients underwent a laparoscopic anterior hemifundoplication. Four patients underwent further surgery for recurrent heartburn, and persistent troublesome dysphagia occurred in one. At 1 year 89% of patients remained free of reflux symptoms, and at 3 years 84% remained symptom free. Of those with symptoms of reflux, approximately half of them had only mild symptoms. The overall incidence and severity of dysphagia for liquids and solids was not altered by partial fundoplication. Epigastric bloating that could not be relieved by belching was uncommon, and only 11% of the patients at 1 year and 10% at 3 years following surgery were unable to belch normally. Overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery remained high at 3 years' follow-up. Laparoscopic anterior partial fundoplication is an effective operation for gastroesophageal reflux, with a low incidence of side effects and a good overall outcome.
 ...
PMID:Outcome of laparoscopic anterior 180-degree partial fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. 1198 90

Self-expanding metal esophageal stents (SMES) are highly effective in relieving dysphagia in patients with esophageal carcinoma. As the incidence of cancer at the lower esophagus/cardia continues to increase, SMES also are being deployed across the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). However, use of SMES in this location makes the stomach and the esophagus, in effect, a common cavity, which predisposes patients to gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and aspiration. Reflux may result from an increase in intra-abdominal pressure or it may occur passively when the patient is recumbent. Acid-suppression medications do not protect against regurgitation and aspiration. We developed a modified antireflux SMES and evaluated its efficacy in vitro, in dogs, and in 11 patients with distal esophageal/GEJ carcinoma. The modification involved extending the polyurethane coating of the stent to 8 cm below the lower edge. In dogs, significantly more reflux episodes occurred with the regular stent (mean, 197 episodes) than with the modified stent (mean, 16 episodes; P = 0.03). In patients who received the modified stent, dysphagia scores were significantly reduced (mean baseline score, 3.4; mean end point score, 1.1; P <0.001). The modified stent prevented GER while allowing belching and vomiting.
 ...
PMID:Antireflux stents in tumors of the cardia. 1174 49

Gastroesophageal reflux disease has become a serious problem not only for general practitioners but for other specialists as well. It is caused by the fact that its clinical picture and symptomatology are very rich. Beside characteristic symptoms such as: heartburn, eructation, gastric contents reflux, epigastric burning or dysphagia, there may appear extroesophageal symptoms (frequently as single or leading ones). It is generally though that the above symptoms result from the direct effect of gastric contents on throat and larynx and/or through vagus nerve. Direct effect of hydrochloric acid and other gastric juice components on larynx may be the cause of subglottic laryngostenosis, neoplastic transformation and development of squamous cell carcinoma. This, it may be concluded that gastroesophageal reflux disease should be in the sphere of interest of laryngologists as well as gastroenterologists. Cooperation of these specialists is particularly useful as it quickens the choice of proper diagnostic procedure and an introduction of an appropriate therapeutic treatment.
 ...
PMID:[Laryngeal mask of gastroesophageal reflux disease]. 1176 26

The cricopharyngeus (CP) is a striated muscle sphincter situated at the pharyngoesophageal junction. The upper esophageal sphincter is comprised of the striated CP muscle and nonmuscular components at the level of the cricoid cartilage. This review describes the basic anatomy and physiology of the CP muscle, its central and peripheral relationship, methods of investigating it, and electrophysiological properties related to deglutition. The main function of the CP muscle is to control flow between the pharynx and esophagus. The CP sphincter muscle is tonically contracted at rest and relaxes during swallowing, belching, and vomiting. Electromyography (EMG) of the CP sphincter muscle has been undertaken frequently in a variety of subhuman species with the aim of understanding deglutition, whereas it has seldom been reported in healthy human subjects and patients. Increased knowledge of the physiology and anatomy of the human CP sphincter muscle is not only important scientifically but is necessary for advancing the diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia, for which neurological causes are responsible in 80% of cases.
 ...
PMID:Electromyography of human cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper esophageal sphincter. 1245 98

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y (RY) gastric bypass is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. However, little information is available regarding the gastrointestinal symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic RY gastric bypass for morbid obesity. The purpose of this study is to identify changes occurring in gastrointestinal symptoms after laparoscopic RY gastric bypass. A previously validated, 19-point gastrointestinal symptom questionnaire was administered prospectively to each patient seen for surgical consultation to treat morbid obesity. Patients rated the degree to which each symptom affected their lives on a 0 to 100 mm Liekert scale with 0 indicating absence of a symptom, 33 indicating the symptom was present occasionally, 67 indicating the symptom occurred frequently, and 100 indicating the symptom was continuous. The same survey was readministered 6 months postoperatively. The mean of each symptom (preoperative vs. postoperative value) was compared using Student's t test with significance at P<0.05. Forty-three preoperative patients (age 37.3+/-8.6 years; body mass index 47.8+/-4.9) and thirty-five, 6 months' postoperative patients (81% follow-up; body mass index 31.6+/-5.3) completed the questionnaire. The result for each symptom is expressed as mean+/-standard deviation of preoperative vs. postoperative scores. Significantly different symptoms include the following: abdominal pain 23.3+/-26.4 vs. 8.6+/-13.5, P=0.003; heartburn 34.0+/-26.6 vs. 8.0+/-14.0, P=0.0001; acid regurgitation 28.1+/-24.0 vs. 10.7+/-21.0, P=0.001; gnawing in epigastrium 19.3+/-22.7 vs. 7.5+/-16.0, P=0.01; abdominal distention 38.2+/-31.5 vs. 11.1+/-19.2, P=0.0001; eructation 27.7+/-24.4 vs. 15.5+/-16.9, P=0.01; increased flatus 40.2+/-25.7 vs. 25.2+/-25.3, P=0.005; decreased stools 5.4+/-16.8 vs. 17.4+/-20.0, P=0.0005; increased stools 23.9+/-26.7 vs. 6.5+/-11.7, P=0.0005; loose stools 29.7+/-26.5 vs. 17.5+/-20.0, P=0.03; urgent defecation 34.3+/-26.5 vs. 14.3+/-19.3, P=0.0009; difficulty falling asleep 44.1+/-38.4 vs. 27.5+/-32.9, P=0.05; insomnia 42.4+/-36.2 vs. 21.6+/-30.5, P=0.008; and rested on awakening 65.1+/-33.8 vs. 30.5+/-28.8, P=0.0001. Symptoms that did not significantly change included the following: nausea/vomiting 17.2+/-22.7 vs. 22.1+/-19.9, P=0.33; borborygmus 28.8+/-25.2 vs. 26.8+/-29.7, P=0.75; hard stools 10.3+/-22.9 vs. 7.1+/-18.6, P=0.56; incomplete evacuation of stool 17.2+/-22.8 vs. 13.4+/-21.7, P=0.45; and dysphagia 10.9+/-15.6 vs. 17.7+/-28.4, P=0.18. Laparoscopic RY gastric bypass significantly improves many gastrointestinal symptoms experienced by morbidly obese patients without adversely affecting any of the measured parameters. This information is useful in preoperative counseling to assure patients of overall symptomatic improvement after this operation in addition to significant weight loss and improvement of comorbid conditions.
 ...
PMID:Gastrointestinal symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 1312 51

Hydrogen peroxide is an oxidising agent that is used in a number of household products, including general-purpose disinfectants, chlorine-free bleaches, fabric stain removers, contact lens disinfectants and hair dyes, and it is a component of some tooth whitening products. In industry, the principal use of hydrogen peroxide is as a bleaching agent in the manufacture of paper and pulp. Hydrogen peroxide has been employed medicinally for wound irrigation and for the sterilisation of ophthalmic and endoscopic instruments. Hydrogen peroxide causes toxicity via three main mechanisms: corrosive damage, oxygen gas formation and lipid peroxidation. Concentrated hydrogen peroxide is caustic and exposure may result in local tissue damage. Ingestion of concentrated (>35%) hydrogen peroxide can also result in the generation of substantial volumes of oxygen. Where the amount of oxygen evolved exceeds its maximum solubility in blood, venous or arterial gas embolism may occur. The mechanism of CNS damage is thought to be arterial gas embolisation with subsequent brain infarction. Rapid generation of oxygen in closed body cavities can also cause mechanical distension and there is potential for the rupture of the hollow viscus secondary to oxygen liberation. In addition, intravascular foaming following absorption can seriously impede right ventricular output and produce complete loss of cardiac output. Hydrogen peroxide can also exert a direct cytotoxic effect via lipid peroxidation. Ingestion of hydrogen peroxide may cause irritation of the gastrointestinal tract with nausea, vomiting, haematemesis and foaming at the mouth; the foam may obstruct the respiratory tract or result in pulmonary aspiration. Painful gastric distension and belching may be caused by the liberation of large volumes of oxygen in the stomach. Blistering of the mucosae and oropharyngeal burns are common following ingestion of concentrated solutions, and laryngospasm and haemorrhagic gastritis have been reported. Sinus tachycardia, lethargy, confusion, coma, convulsions, stridor, sub-epiglottic narrowing, apnoea, cyanosis and cardiorespiratory arrest may ensue within minutes of ingestion. Oxygen gas embolism may produce multiple cerebral infarctions. Although most inhalational exposures cause little more than coughing and transient dyspnoea, inhalation of highly concentrated solutions of hydrogen peroxide can cause severe irritation and inflammation of mucous membranes, with coughing and dyspnoea. Shock, coma and convulsions may ensue and pulmonary oedema may occur up to 24-72 hours post exposure. Severe toxicity has resulted from the use of hydrogen peroxide solutions to irrigate wounds within closed body cavities or under pressure as oxygen gas embolism has resulted. Inflammation, blistering and severe skin damage may follow dermal contact. Ocular exposure to 3% solutions may cause immediate stinging, irritation, lacrimation and blurred vision, but severe injury is unlikely. Exposure to more concentrated hydrogen peroxide solutions (>10%) may result in ulceration or perforation of the cornea. Gut decontamination is not indicated following ingestion, due to the rapid decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by catalase to oxygen and water. If gastric distension is painful, a gastric tube should be passed to release gas. Early aggressive airway management is critical in patients who have ingested concentrated hydrogen peroxide, as respiratory failure and arrest appear to be the proximate cause of death. Endoscopy should be considered if there is persistent vomiting, haematemesis, significant oral burns, severe abdominal pain, dysphagia or stridor. Corticosteroids in high dosage have been recommended if laryngeal and pulmonary oedema supervene, but their value is unproven. Endotracheal intubation, or rarely, tracheostomy may be required for life-threatening laryngeal oedema. Contaminated skin should be washed with copious amounts of water. Skin lesions should be treated as thermal burns; surgery may be required for deep burns. In the case of eye exposure, the affected eye(s) shod eye(s) should be irrigated immediately and thoroughly with water or 0.9% saline for at least 10-15 minutes. Instillation of a local anaesthetic may reduce discomfort and assist more thorough decontamination.
 ...
PMID:Hydrogen peroxide poisoning. 1529 93

The lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) is a specialized segment of the circular muscle layer of the distal oesophagus, accounting for approximately 90% of the basal pressure at the oesophago-gastric junction. Together with the crural diaphragm, it functions as an antireflux barrier protecting the oesophagus from the caustic gastric content. During swallowing or belching, the LOS muscle must relax briefly in order to allow passage of food or intragastric air. These swallow-induced and prolonged transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) respectively result from activation of the inhibitory motor innervation of the sphincter. Both in man and animals, the main neurotransmitter released by the inhibitory neurones is nitric oxide. The two typical examples of dysfunction of the LOS are achalasia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Achalasia is characterized by reduction or even absence of the inhibitory innervation to the LOS, leading to impaired LOS relaxation with dysphagia and stasis of food in the oesophagus. On the contrary, GORD results from failure of the antireflux barrier, with increased exposure of the oesophagus to gastric acid. This leads to symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation, and in more severe cases to oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and even carcinoma. To date, TLOSRs are recognized as the main underlying mechanism, and may represent an important target for treatment. More insight in the pathogenesis of both diseases will undoubtedly lead to new treatments in the near future.
 ...
PMID:The lower oesophageal sphincter. 1583 51

Two gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom questionnaires were developed and tested prospectively in a pilot study conducted in infants (1 through 11 months) and young children (1 through 4 years) with and without a clinical diagnosis of GERD. A pediatric gastroenterologist made the clinical diagnosis of GERD. Parents or guardians at 4 study sites completed the questionnaires, providing information on the frequency and severity of symptoms appropriate to the 2 age cohorts. In infants, symptoms assessed were back arching, choking or gagging, hiccups, irritability, refusal to feed and vomiting or regurgitation. In young children, symptoms assessed were abdominal pain, burping or belching, choking when eating, difficulty swallowing, refusal to eat and vomiting or regurgitation. Respondents were asked to describe additional symptoms. Symptom frequency was the number of occurrences of each symptom in the 7 days before completion of the questionnaire. Symptom severity was rated from 1 (not at all severe) to 7 (most severe). An individual symptom score was calculated as the product of symptom frequency and severity scores. The composite symptom score was the sum of the individual symptom scores. The mean composite symptom and individual symptom scores were higher in infants (P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively) and young children (P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively) with GERD than controls. Vomiting/regurgitation was particularly prevalent in infants with GERD (90%). Both groups with GERD were more likely to experience greater severity of symptoms. We found the GERD Symptom Questionnaire useful in distinguishing infants and young children with symptomatic GERD from healthy children.
 ...
PMID:Age-specific questionnaires distinguish GERD symptom frequency and severity in infants and young children: development and initial validation. 1605 96

An age-appropriate questionnaire (GASP-Q) was used to assess the frequency and severity of the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms: abdominal/belly pain, chest pain/heartburn, pain after eating, nausea, burping/belching, vomiting/regurgitation, choking when eating, and difficulty swallowing, in adolescents age 12 to 16 years. The primary objective was to compare the mean composite symptom score (CSS) at week 8 with baseline after treatment with 20 or 40 mg of pantoprazole. Statistically significant (p < 0.001) improvement in CSS occurred in both groups. Safety was comparable between the 2 groups. Pantoprazole was safe, well tolerated, and effective in reducing symptoms of GERD in adolescents.
 ...
PMID:Multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing 20 and 40 mg of pantoprazole for symptom relief in adolescents (12 to 16 years of age) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). 1696 60

Intraluminal impedance monitoring is a new technique that can be used to detect the flow of liquids and gas through hollow viscera. In combination with manometry, it is used for esophageal function testing and while manometry provides information on contractile activity, impedance provides information on esophageal bolus transit. This is especially useful in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. However, impedance monitoring appears to be less suitable for the evaluation of patients with achalasia. When used in combination with esophageal pH monitoring, impedance monitoring makes gastroesophageal reflux monitoring more complete because it allows recognition of both acidic and weakly acidic reflux episodes. The results of several studies suggest that impedance-pH monitoring is useful in the evaluation of patients with PPI-resistant typical reflux symptoms, chronic unexplained cough, excessive belching, and rumination.
 ...
PMID:Technology review: Esophageal impedance monitoring. 1710 Sep 61


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >>