Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
 23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists inhibit the renin-angiotensin system more completely than ACE inhibitors, and do not increase bradykinin levels as ACE inhibitors do. ACE inhibitors have been proven to increase survival and improve quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). At the 48-week follow-up of the Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) Study, the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (at a dosage of 50 mg/day) was found to be superior to captopril 50 mg 3 times daily in terms of its effects on total mortality, total mortality and/or hospitalisation for CHF, and hospitalisation for any reason. Hospitalisation for CHF was the same for both drugs. Adverse effects occurred in 12 and 21% of those receiving losartan and captopril, respectively. Cough, rash, angioedema or taste disturbances/reduced appetite prompted the cessation of drug treatment in 0 and 7% of those receiving losartan and captopril, respectively. Until additional data are available, this author recommends that elderly patients with CHF and an abnormal or normal left ventricular ejection fraction, and who are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors, should receive losartan 50 mg/day.
 ...
PMID:The ELITE Study. What are its implications for the drug treatment of heart failure? Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study. 963 91

Most antihypertensives have advantages and disadvantages. The ideal antihypertensive drug should be effective in lowering blood pressure, well tolerated, safe in the long term, and easy to use. Ideally, it should be relatively inexpensive. Most importantly it should reduce the risk of the adverse effects of high blood pressure, such as myocardial infarction, sudden death, stroke, heart failure, renal damage, and retinal changes. Most antihypertensive drugs effectively reduce blood pressure, are available as once daily preparations, and are safe long-term. Unfortunately, most antihypertensive drugs cause adverse effects in some patients and for few drugs is there good evidence that they protect the heart, the brain, the kidney, and the eye? Reducing the effects of Angiotensin II (using an ACE inhibitor) has been shown to reduce the incidence of coronary events, sudden death, heart failure, renal damage, and fundal changes. AT1 blocking drugs offer the same pharmacological advantages but also very good tolerability, in particular no cough. Therefore, they have the potential to meet all the criteria for an ideal antihypertensive drug.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic advantages of AT1 blockers in hypertension. 983 62

Angiotensin (Ang) II antagonists provide specific and selective blockade of Ang II at the AT1 receptor, regardless of the enzymatic pathway of production. Valsartan has an affinity for the AT1 receptor 30,000 times that of the AT2 receptor. Valsartan is not a prodrug and undergoes little metabolism. It has a half-life of approximately 9 h, but duration of antihypertensive action at the usual dose of 80 or 160 mg daily is 24 h. The trough to peak ratio is 0.66. Valsartan has antihypertensive efficacy at least equivalent to that of established antihypertensive drugs and has additive effects in combination. The efficacy of valsartan appears to be independent of age, sex, and race. Valsartan is effective in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency and is associated with maintenance of renal function. It is well tolerated, with a side-effect profile indistinguishable from that of placebo, and does not cause cough. Ang II antagonists are a promising class of cardiovascular drugs with considerable potential in clinical practice.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II antagonism in clinical practice: experience with valsartan. 1002 51

One possible intervention to interrupt the deleterious effects of the renin-angiotensin system is suppression of angiotensin II (Ang II) formation by inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). However, ACE inhibition incompletely suppresses Ang II formation and also leads to accumulation of bradykinin. Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors are believed to promote the known deleterious effects of Ang II. Therefore, AT1 receptor antagonists have been recently introduced into therapy for hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there are significant differences between the effects of AT1 receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors including the unopposed stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptors by AT1 receptor antagonists, the discussion of whether ACE inhibitors, AT1 receptor antagonists or the combination of both are superior in the pharmacotherapy of CHF is still largely theoretical. Accordingly, AT1 receptor antagonists are still investigational. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remain first line therapy in patients with CHF due to systolic dysfunction. However, in patients not able to tolerate ACE inhibitor induced side effects, in particular cough, AT1 receptor antagonism is a good alternative. In clinical practice, emphasis should be placed on increasing the utilization of ACE inhibitors, as more than 50% of patients with CHF do not receive ACE inhibitors. In addition, the majority of those on ACE inhibitors receive doses lower than the dosage used in the large clinical trials. Although not yet completely proved, it is likely that high doses of ACE inhibition are superior to low doses with respect to prognosis and symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Recent insight into therapy of congestive heart failure: focus on ACE inhibition and angiotensin-II antagonism. 1019 12

Pulmonary endothelium takes part in the metabolization of some products such as prostaglandins, norepinefrine, serotonin, bradikinin and angiotensin I. Angiotensin I is the substrate for Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE). It is known that greatest production site of ACE is the pulmonary endothelium. A lot of studies have been done for determining the levels of ACE in various lung diseases. It has been observed that serum ACE activity is increased in granulomatous diseases such as sarcoidosis and berylliosis. In patients with bronchial carcinoma, serum ACE activity is found to be decreased. There are some papers about the significant changes in serum ACE activities in asthmatic patients. We determined the activity of ACE and total IgE levels at the serum of 40 asthmatic patients and 20 healthy subjects. Among 40 patients 20 of them were mild asthmatic and they developed symptoms only during the attacks. The remainder 20 patients were chronic asthmatics and all the time they had the symptoms of dyspnea, wheezing and coughing. Serum ACE activity was found 25.5 +/- 11.77 U in the control group, 22.8 +/- 8.04 U in mild asthmatic group and 16.6 +/- 6.13 U in chronic asthmatic group. When compared with control group serum ACE levels found to be significantly decreased in chronic asthmatic group. Also a weak but significant correlation was found between serum total IgE levels and ACE activity in the chronic asthmatic group. These findings suggest that there is a relation between ACE and Total IgE production.
 ...
PMID:The relationship between serum ACE activity and total IgE levels in patients with bronchial asthma. 1038 31

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIA) are both pharmacological groups that inhibit the actions of angiotensin II. ACEI prevent the formation of angiotensin II from angiotensin I, whereas A II A inhibit the final crucial step of angiotensin II binding with the AT1 receptor site. A similar antihypertensive efficacy has been described for both groups but A II A drugs have a better safety profile above all due to the absence of dry cough. Despite the fact that evidence with ACEI is more conclusive, A II A seems to achieve the same protective effects on the target organ damage in hypertensive patients. At present, ACEI are the drugs of choice in the treatment of patients with cardiac dysfunction and failure. The information of ongoing trials with A II A will be of great value in deciding the optimal treatment for hypertensive patients with different cardiovascular diseases.
 ...
PMID:[Do angiotensin II receptor antagonists substitute angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of high blood pressure?]. 1070 16

Angiotensin II (AT-II)-receptor antagonists are reviewed. Research focused on blocking the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) led to the discovery of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which are effective in the treatment of hypertension but are associated with a high frequency of cough and other adverse effects. AT-II-receptor antagonists were developed as agents that would more completely block the RAS and thus decrease the adverse effects seen with ACE inhibitors. AT-II-receptor antagonists include losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, candesartan, eprosartan, telmisartan, and tasosartan. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that AT-II-receptor antagonists are as effective as calcium-channel blockers, beta-blockers, and ACE inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension and induce fewer adverse effects. The adverse effects of AT-II-receptor antagonists--dizziness, headache, upper-respiratory-tract infection, cough, and gastrointestinal disturbances--occur at about the same rate as with placebo. [corrected]. All available AT-II-receptor antagonists seem to be equally effective in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and they are comparable in cost. Currently, AT-II-receptor antagonists are used either as monotherapy in patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Angiotensin II-receptor antagonists are well tolerated and are as effective as ACE inhibitors in decreasing blood pressure.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II-receptor antagonists: an overview. 1090 66

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in regulating blood pressure, and maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance. Angiotensin II is the principal mediator of the RAS and has been implicated in the development of hypertension as well as other forms of cardiovascular and renal disease. Angiotensin II-receptor antagonists are a new class of drugs that inhibit the RAS by selectively blocking the AT(1) receptor. These compounds therefore provide more specific and thorough blockade of the RAS by inhibiting the deleterious actions of angiotensin II at the receptor level, irrespective of how this peptide is formed. The increased specificity of action of angiotensin II-receptor antagonists may also circumvent unwanted side-effects normally associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (eg, cough and angioedema) as these agents do not interfere with the metabolism of other peptides (eg, bradykinin, substance P, etc.). There is still some concern with angiotensin II-receptor antagonists and the long-term effects of hyper-stimulation of the unopposed AT(2) receptor that is caused by elevated levels of angiotensin II. However, it appears that stimulation of the AT(2) receptor may actually contribute to the beneficial effects of angiotensin II-receptor antagonists by counteracting the effects mediated by the AT(1) receptor. Angiotensin II-receptor antagonists display great therapeutic promise in the field of cardiovascular medicine and are currently being exploited as new antihypertensive agents. These drugs have demonstrated safety, efficacy, and tolerability; however, morbidity and mortality data are still lacking. Nonetheless, it is likely that angiotensin II-receptor antagonists will become part of the medical arsenal against cardiovascular and renal disease, thus consideration should be given to their future use as first-line antihypertensive agents.
 ...
PMID:Spectrum of use for the angiotensin-receptor blocking drugs. 1098 Oct 96

Suppression of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is an established method for controlling blood pressure and reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. In addition to reducing blood pressure, suppression of the RAS is able to protect against the target-organ damage that results from hypertension. Unfortunately, despite the use of ACE inhibitors and agents from the other classes of conventional antihypertensives, effective control of blood pressure remains poor. A major contribution to this failure to control blood pressure appears to be lack of compliance with the prescribed medication, arising from the presence of unacceptable side effects. Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers, such as candesartan, are the latest class of antihypertensive agent to be developed. They target the AT1-receptor - the final common pathway for all the known negative cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II - and provide pronounced antihypertensive efficacy without the side effects of cough and angioneurotic oedema that are associated with the use of ACE inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:The renin-angiotensin system and cardiovascular disease. 1105 28

Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers, such as candesartan, are attractive alternatives to ACE inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are able to suppress the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), their mechanism of action may limit their clinical utility in the treatment of hypertension. For example, they act as competitive inhibitors of ACE. This means that their effects can be overcome by high levels of angiotensin I, which occur after ACE inhibition due to removal of the negative feedback effect of angiotensin II on renal renin release. ACE inhibitors are also unable to block the production of angiotensin II by non-ACE-mediated pathways. Furthermore, ACE is not a specific enzyme. Its inhibition therefore has effects on other substances, such as bradykinin, leading to the class-specific side effects associated with ACE inhibitors. Candesartan, on the other hand, binds insurmountably to the AT1-receptor, thereby providing more complete blockade of the negative cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II than is possible with ACE inhibitors. The specificity of AT1-receptor blockade also ensures that efficacy is achieved without inducing the side effect of cough that results from the non-specific consequences of ACE inhibition. Preclinical and early clinical studies demonstrate that AT1-receptor blockers produce at least the same degree of target-organ protection as has been demonstrated for ACE inhibitors. Additional benefits of AT1-receptor blockers may arise from the fact that, unlike ACE inhibitors, they do not prevent the activity of angiotensin II on AT2-receptors in the heart, which is thought to reduce cardiac remodelling. From a mechanistic perspective, therefore, AT1-receptor blockers appear to have advantages over ACE inhibitors, in terms of a more complete blockade of angiotensin II effects, while also avoiding the specific side effects associated with ACE inhibition.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade: a novel therapeutic concept. 1105 29


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>