Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
 23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

1. We have assessed the effect of a specific histamine H1-receptor antagonist, terfenadine, in the treatment of atopic asthmatics during the grass pollen season. 2. Eighteen mild, grass pollen sensitive asthmatics (10F, 8M, mean +/- s.e. mean age 34.7 +/- 5.6 years), all of whom were controlled on inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists alone, took part in a 9 week, double-blind, crossover study using terfenadine 180 mg three times daily and placebo. Throughout the study patients recorded peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) twice daily, symptoms of cough, wheeze, breathlessness and chest tightness (scored 0-3), and their use of bronchodilators. Methacholine inhalation challenge tests were performed each week. Data were analysed by a method suitable for a two group, two period crossover trial with baseline measurements. 3. Terfenadine significantly reduced symptoms of cough by 76.9% (P less than 0.05) and wheeze by 46.9% (P less than 0.02). Symptoms of breathlessness and chest tightness were reduced by 16.8 and 30.3% respectively but these were not statistically significant. Morning and evening PEFR rose by 5.5 (P less than 0.001) and 6.2% (P less than 0.003) respectively on treatment with terfenadine and bronchodilator use fell by 40.3%. A progressive increase in methacholine sensitivity was seen in both treatment groups throughout the study but did not reach statistical significance. 4. We conclude that treatment with terfenadine during the grass pollen season in sensitive asthmatics reduced their symptoms and bronchodilator requirements and produced a modest improvement in their lung function without affecting the development of increased methacholine sensitivity that occurred during the grass pollen season.
 ...
PMID:Terfenadine, a potent histamine H1-receptor antagonist in the treatment of grass pollen sensitive asthma. 197 43

Because the older antihistamines possessed relatively weak antihistaminic action, as well as sedative and anticholinergic effects, they could not be administered in doses high enough to confer relief to atopic patients with asthma. In contrast, the newer nonsedating, more potent H1-receptor antagonists appear to achieve effective histamine blockade in patients with asthma. Terfenadine and astemizole inhibit bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled allergens by 50% in the early asthmatic reaction. High-potency antihistamines also significantly reduce cough and wheeze as compared with placebo in grass pollen-sensitive asthma patients. Significant reductions in symptom severity and bronchodilator use were found with terfenadine, 120 mg twice daily, although these improvements may be confined to younger patients. Some of the newer antihistamines have demonstrated interesting effects on the late-phase allergic response. Azelastine partially inhibits bronchoconstriction in the allergen-induced late reaction of atopic persons with asthma, possibly by suppressing the release of additional inflammatory mediators. In the skin, cetirizine has been found to reduce eosinophil and neutrophil late-phase infiltration and prostaglandin D2 release. These interesting properties now warrant further investigation in clinical studies.
 ...
PMID:Antihistamines in the treatment of clinical asthma. 197 84

A double-blind study was carried out in 65 patients with seasonal rhinitis to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of terfenadine and dexchlorpheniramine. Patients were allocated at random to receive treatment for 1 week with either 60 mg terfenadine twice daily or 2 mg dexchlorpheniramine maleate 3-times daily. Before and after treatment, patients underwent RAST and skin prick tests for reactivity to pollen and those who were positive also had rhinomanometric measurements made of nasal resistance. Diary cards were used by patients to record the severity of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, watery, irritated and red eyes, itching of the nose, throat and eyes, and cough. Details were also kept of the frequency and severity of any side-effects. Pollen counts were taken daily during the treatment period. The results showed that both terfenadine and dexchlorpheniramine produced good or excellent relief of the main symptoms in 78% and 73% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the pollen count and reduced symptom severity. Both drugs produced a reduction in total nasal resistance but this was not significantly different from initial values, neither was there a significant difference between treatment. Terfenadine was well tolerated and side-effects incidence was significantly lower (p less than 0.01) than in patients treated with dexchlorpheniramine, particularly so with reference to drowsiness.
 ...
PMID:Antihistaminic treatment of allergic rhinitis: a double-blind study with terfenadine versus dexchlorpheniramine. 288 17

The role of histamine in the pathogenesis of infectious rhinitis is unclear, as is the efficacy of antihistaminic drugs in the treatment of the common cold. This study evaluated the short-term efficacy of oral terfenadine (Seldane) in the treatment of the common cold. Over a 5-week period, the authors recruited 250 adults who had developed cold symptoms within 6 to 48 hours prior to enrollment. Volunteers had a primary complaint of runny or stuffy nose; at least one other respiratory symptom; no fever or exudative pharyngitis; and no history of atopy, sinusitis, or use of cold preparations within 1 week of enrollment. Out of the eligible subjects, 126 were randomly assigned terfenadine (60 mg), and 124 received placebo. Volunteers self-administered either terfenadine or placebo twice a day on Days 1, 2 and 3, and a final dose on the morning of Day 4. They also recorded the severity of their clinical symptoms (runny nose, sniffles, sneezing, postnasal drip, cough and sore throat) on symptom cards. Both groups reported similar severity scores throughout the treatment period. Average symptom burdens declined at almost identical rates for both groups. Terfenadine was well tolerated and had a low incidence of side effects. According to subject evaluation, terfenadine was no more effective than placebo. The mean +/- SD score of global efficacy was 2.2 +/- 1.1 in the terfenadine group and 2.1 +/- 1.3 in the placebo group (P = NS). Slightly fewer terfenadine recipients (41%) than placebo recipients (48%) said they would use the study medication again for treating cold symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Ineffectiveness of oral terfenadine in natural colds: evidence against histamine as a mediator of common cold symptoms. 289 9