Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
 23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine administered via the endotracheal tube in suppressing cough reflex during anesthetic recovery in children. Fifty ASA class I-II children, aged from 1-5 years old undergoing elective abdominal or urogenital surgery were randomly assigned into two groups. 2% lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg (1ml = 20mg) was administered in group B while normal saline (N/S) 0.1 ml/kg was used in group A (control group). Either one of the agents was instilled into the endotracheal tube right before the end of operation. Airway responses and other associated phenomena were recorded during the recovery period. Recovery condition was categorized into a two-grade categories, namely "good", and "poor" to denote the quality of recovery. Recovery conditions differ significantly between the control group and the experimental group. In group A, 3 patients were classified as the "good" grade but 22 patients were categorized in the "poor" grade. Group B (lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg) has a much better recovery condition than the control group, there were 19 in the "good" grade and only 6 in the "poor" grade. The experimental group treated with 2% lidocaine presented a significantly better recovery than the control group. This effective suppression of the cough reflex might be due to the local anesthetic effect exerted by lidocaine. For the sake of safety all patients were closely followed up at the post anesthesia room until the return of consciousness and laryngeal reflexes. In conclusion, we found that 2% lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg given intratracheally via the endotracheal tube could attenuate cough response during recovery in pediatric anesthesia.
 ...
PMID:Endotracheal lidocaine instillation in pediatric anesthesia. 134 38

Lung function and clinical evidence of muscle weakness were assessed in 12 ASA I patients who received vecuronium 0.01 mg kg-1 pretreatment as a part of their anaesthetic management, before and 3 min after pretreatment. Most patients demonstrated ptosis and diplopia, while five of the 12 were unable to raise the head for > 4 s and had difficulty in swallowing. Significant reductions occurred in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and maximum mid-expiratory flow rate. Among static lung volumes, functional residual capacity and expiratory reserve volume decreased significantly. However, these changes were not serious enough to cause clinically significant impairment of coughing or a decrease in oxygen saturation in any patient.
 ...
PMID:Lung function after vecuronium pretreatment in young, healthy patients. 135

We studied recovery in 25 adult patients, ASA I, undergoing elective orthopaedic procedures after anaesthesia with 0.65 MAC desflurane (n = 16) or isoflurane (n = 9) with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Early emergence from anaesthesia was assessed in the operating room by measuring time to spontaneous movement, cough, response to painful pinch, tracheal extubation, opening of the eyes and stating correct age, name and body parts. The return of cognitive functions in the late recovery phase was assessed in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) by post-anaesthesia recovery scores (PARS), the Trieger dot test (TDT), and the digit substitution test (DST). In the early recovery phase, time to tracheal extubation, opening eyes, telling correct name, age and body parts occurred significantly faster in the desflurane group than in the isoflurane group (P < 0.05). The mean "triple orientation" time (to name, age, body parts) was 10.9 (SEM 0.9) min for desflurane, compared with 18.6 (2.5) min for isoflurane (P < 0.01). In the late recovery phase, desflurane patients had significantly greater PARS, more correct responses to the DST and fewer error responses to the TDT. Recovery times were not increased by increased duration of desflurane anaesthesia. The desflurane patients showed no delirium, minimal sedation and less shivering during the entire postoperative course. We conclude that desflurane anaesthesia was superior to isoflurane anaesthesia, not only in emergence, but also in the recovery of cognitive functions.
 ...
PMID:Recovery of cognitive functions after anaesthesia with desflurane or isoflurane and nitrous oxide. 138 42

To achieve tracheal anesthesia during intubation, an endotracheal tube was purposely designed. The tube had multiple laser-induced perforations in its lower portion produced that allowed administration of the local anesthetic in a pulverized form. We evaluated the efficacy of lidocaine 2% in preventing cough during recovery from general anesthesia. The goal of this study was to perform a topical anesthesia of the hypopharynx, larynx, and trachea. This attenuates the laryngeal reflex occurring during anesthesia recovery and therefore, prevents from potential complications. Sixteen patients ASA I-II underwent surgery with general anesthesia. They were prospectively studied following a randomized double blind protocol. The control group received saline infusion (n = 6) whereas the experimental group (n = 10) was treated with lidocaine. At the end of the anesthesia period, the presence of cough was treated with the test solution. In 90% of cases treated with lidocaine, cough disappeared in about 30 seconds and patients tolerated the endotracheal tube until extubation was performed. All patients who received saline solution presented cough until extubation.
 ...
PMID:[Efficacy of topical administration of lidocaine through a Malinckrodt Hi-Lo Jet tube in lessening cough during recovery from general anesthesia]. 141 Jul 55

Thirty patients, scheduled for short urological surgical procedures and ranked ASA 1 or 2, were randomly assigned to two homogenous groups. In group P, they were given a 2 mg.kg-1 bolus of propofol and 10 micrograms.kg-1 of alfentanil, followed by a continuous infusion of propofol (5 mg.kg-1.h-1) and 5 micrograms.kg-1 doses of alfentanil. In group E, they were given a 0.3 mg.kg-1 bolus of etomidate, followed by an infusion (1.5 mg.kg-1.h-1). The doses of alfentanil were the same as in group P. Further doses of either propofol (0.5 mg.kg-1) or etomidate (0.2 mg.kg-1) were used should anaesthesia prove not to be deep enough. The patients were not intubated, and breathed spontaneously. Surgery lasted a mean of 18.3 +/- 11.8 min (group P) and 18.8 +/- 9.4 min (group E). The following parameters were studied: the amount of each agent required for maintenance of anaesthesia, the duration of apnoea at induction, the quality of anaesthesia and of muscle relaxation, adverse effects (coughing, trismus, restlessness, nausea, vomiting), the time required for recovery, and its quality. In group P, there was a 27% decrease in arterial pressure, without any tachycardia or hypoxia, together with a quick recovery of excellent quality. On the other hand, in group E, there was little or no haemodynamic alteration, but there often was a trismus at induction. Hypoxia also occurred during induction with etomidate, being severe enough in one case to require tracheal intubation and artificial ventilation. The reasons for this hypoxia seemed to be the apnoea and the trismus, which tends to hinder assisted ventilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Propofol versus etomidate in short-time urologic surgery]. 144 8

Sixteen children, aged 2 to 5 years and ranked ASA 1, were included in this study assessing gastro-oesophageal reflux occurring under halothane anaesthesia, before and during, caudal anaesthesia. They were scheduled for surgery below the umbilicus lasting 1 to 5 h. After premedication with oral hydroxyzine (2 mg.kg-1) and intravenous atropine (10 micrograms.kg-1), induction was carried out with 3% halothane. A gastro-oesophageal pH probe was inserted via the nose after calibration at 37 degrees C. A neutral pH for the oesophageal electrode and an acid pH for the gastric one demonstrated the correct position of the probe. The pH was then registered every 4 s. The probe was left in situ until the patient left the recovery room. The caudal anaesthesia catheter was then inserted with the patient lying on his left side. Caudal anaesthesia was began with 2.5 mg.kg-1 of plain bupivacaine and 5 mg.kg-1 of plain lidocaine. When the patient was lying supine again, narcosis was maintained with 0.5% halothane and 50% nitrous oxide. A dose of 1.5 mg.kg-1 of bupivacaine was injected every 30 to 45 min. None of the children displayed any respiratory signs (coughing, dyspnoea, bronchospasm, cyanosis) during the combined anaesthetic. Two episodes of asymptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux were revealed by this method, one lasting 7 minutes and occurring during insertion of the caudal catheter, and the other, lasting 4 minutes, during recovery. There were no pulmonary sequels. There was excellent respiratory and haemodynamic stability throughout. The two episodes seemed to have been triggered off by rapid displacement of the patient and too deep an anaesthetic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Gastroesophageal reflux with combined caudal and halothane anesthesia in children]. 144 13

A randomized, double-blind study was carried out on 193 ASA I-II surgical patients to assess the effect of aerosolized lidocaine on sore throat, hoarseness and cough in connection with tracheal intubation. The study group received aerosolized lidocaine 100 mg 2 min before tracheal intubation, using a spray. The control group received no spray. The patients underwent a standardized general anaesthesia. The patients were interviewed when leaving the recovery room and the next day in the ward. Specific questions were asked regarding sore throat, cough and hoarseness. There were no significant differences between the two groups, which suggests that topical anaesthesia of the mucosa of the upper airway is ineffective as a means of ameliorating airway complaints in connection with tracheal intubation.
 ...
PMID:Prophylactic laryngo-tracheal aerosolized lidocaine against postoperative sore throat. 151 31

This study was designed to determine the relative speeds of induction and complication rates using either halothane or isoflurane for rapid inhalational induction of anaesthesia. Forty ASA physical status 1 and 2, unpremedicated patients presenting for day-care dental surgery received a rapid inhalational induction (RII) with either halothane 3.5% or isoflurane 5% in humidified oxygen. The carrier gas was humidified in order to limit airway irritation caused by the pungency of the volatile agents. Isoflurane produced a faster induction than halothane-121(50) (SD) sec vs 176(36) sec (P less than 0.01). Complication rates during induction (coughing, secretions, excessive movement and abandoned inductions) were similar for the two groups. The majority of patients in both the isoflurane group (17/20) and the halothane group (14/20) found the technique of RII to be acceptable. The incidences of headache, nausea and vomiting were low and not significantly different for the two groups. Isoflurane 5% in humidified oxygen is as acceptable for RII as halothane 3.5% and has a similar complication rate. Isoflurane may be used for RII in cases where it is deemed necessary to avoid halothane, or when a more rapid inhalational induction is required than is possible with halothane. The technique of RII with either agent in unpremedicated patients is well suited to day-care anesthesia.
 ...
PMID:Rapid inhalational induction of anaesthesia with isoflurane or halothane in humidified oxygen. 155 Nov 55

This study examined the relationship among pseudo-steady-state (constant) serum thiopental concentrations, clinical anesthetic depth as assessed by several perioperative stimuli, and the electroencephalogram (EEG). Twenty-six ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients participated in the study. Two constant serum thiopental concentrations were maintained in each patient using a computer-controlled infusion pump. The first randomly assigned target serum concentration of 10-30 micrograms/ml was maintained for 5 min to allow serum:brain equilibration. Then the following stimuli were applied at 1-min intervals: verbal command, tetanic nerve stimulation, trapezius muscle squeeze, and laryngoscopy. A second, higher, randomly assigned target serum concentration of 40-90 micrograms/ml was then achieved and maintained by the computer-controlled infusion pump. The previously described stimuli were reapplied, after which laryngoscopy and intubation was performed. A positive response was recorded if purposeful extremity movement or coughing was observed. Using the quantal movement or cough response and the measured constant serum thiopental concentration, the probability of no movement to each stimulus was characterized using logistic regression. The serum thiopental concentrations that produced a 50% probability of no movement response for the clinical stimuli were as follows: 15.6 micrograms/ml for verbal command, 30.3 micrograms/ml for tetanic nerve stimulation, 39.8 micrograms/ml for trapezius muscle squeeze, 50.7 micrograms/ml for laryngoscopy, and 78.8 micrograms/ml for laryngoscopy followed by intubation. The EEG was analyzed using aperiodic waveform analysis to derive the number of waves per second. A biphasic relationship between constant serum thiopental concentration and the EEG number of waves per second was observed. Loss of responsiveness to verbal stimulation occurred when the EEG was activated at 15-18 waves/s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Thiopental pharmacodynamics. II. Quantitation of clinical and electroencephalographic depth of anesthesia. 164 41

In the present study a comparison has been made between intubating condition obtainable after anesthesia induction with Thiopental or Propofol, using Vecuronium Bromide to achieve muscle relaxation. Data were collected about hemodynamic parameters, vocal cords position, coughing or bucking, and involuntary movements. Three-hundred patients, males and females, ASA classes I and II, not premedicated, were included in the study; they all had to undergo surgery requiring tracheal intubation. The patients were divided in six different groups, and in each of them intubation was performed at different times from injection of inducing agents (2-2, 30-3-4-5-6 minutes). Overall results show a lack of satisfying intubating conditions on the extreme of selected times (2 and 5-6 minutes), with no significant difference between Thiopental and Propofol, except for a minimal unlike behaviour in hemodynamics. Therefore, on the basis of our data, as far as intubating conditions are considered, we can conclude that there is no reason to prefer one of the two inducing agents.
 ...
PMID:Intubating conditions with propofol under muscle relaxation with vecuronium bromide. A time-related comparison with thiopental. 168 99


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>