Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
 23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The renin-angiotensin system plays a central role in the regulation of blood pressure through its primary effector hormone angiotensin II. Studies conducted nearly 30 years ago with peptidic angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) suggested that disruption of the renin-angiotensin system offered considerable promise for the treatment of hypertension as well as heart failure. This promise was initially realized with the advent of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and more recently with nonpeptidic ARB that selectively antagonize the AT1-angiotensin receptor subtype. The potent and long-acting agent candesartan cilexetil illustrates how these new ARB fulfill the promises suggested by the early studies. Candesartan cilexetil provides a clinically relevant, dose-dependent reduction in diastolic and systolic blood pressure at doses of 4 to 16 mg once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Recent studies suggest that further blood pressure lowering is obtained with a 32-mg once daily dose. In comparative clinical trials, 8 mg of candesartan cilexetil and 10 to 20 mg of enalapril provided comparable antihypertensive effects. The safety and tolerability profile of candesartan cilexetil is comparable to placebo. Notably, this agent does not produce the dry, nonproductive cough that often limits use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, nor does it cause side effects that limit other antihypertensive drug classes. On the basis of the results of initial clinical studies, ARB also possess cardioprotective and renoprotective properties that promise to expand the role that these new agents will play in treating cardiovascular disorders.
 ...
PMID:Update on the clinical pharmacology of candesartan cilexetil. 1067 85

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIA) are both pharmacological groups that inhibit the actions of angiotensin II. ACEI prevent the formation of angiotensin II from angiotensin I, whereas A II A inhibit the final crucial step of angiotensin II binding with the AT1 receptor site. A similar antihypertensive efficacy has been described for both groups but A II A drugs have a better safety profile above all due to the absence of dry cough. Despite the fact that evidence with ACEI is more conclusive, A II A seems to achieve the same protective effects on the target organ damage in hypertensive patients. At present, ACEI are the drugs of choice in the treatment of patients with cardiac dysfunction and failure. The information of ongoing trials with A II A will be of great value in deciding the optimal treatment for hypertensive patients with different cardiovascular diseases.
 ...
PMID:[Do angiotensin II receptor antagonists substitute angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of high blood pressure?]. 1070 16

The treatment of congestive heart failure focuses on three steps: 1. Elimination of the precipitating cause or mechanism, and/or treatment of the underlying disease respectively. 2. Treatment of the failing heart syndrome itself. We shall concern ourselves with pharmacotherapy, omitting technical and surgical aspects. 3. Prophylactic treatment of complications, such as thromboembolism and arrhythmias. Drugs for the treatment of heart failure can be classified as follows: 1. Diuretics 2. Vasodilators 3. Neurohumoral Inhibitors 4. Inotropic drugs. Diuretics improve symptoms and exercise capacity and probably survival. They are the drug of first choice in acute and chronic heart failure. Potassium supplementation is necessary. Renal function needs to be monitored. The aldosterone antagonist spironolactone has probably important effects upon the myocardium. It retards fibrous tissue development and improves prognosis. Vasodilators unload the heart and improve contractile geometry and hemodynamics, thereby lessening symptoms. Prognosis, however, is not affected. They are indispensable in acute heart failure. In longterm treatment only the combination of nitrates with hydralazin has been shown to be effective. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors combine vasodilation with neurohumoral inhibition. They are most effective in improving symptoms, exercise capacity and surviving chronic heart failure. If side effects (cough, allergy) prevent their use, then angiotensin II receptor antagonists can be used with equal benefit. However, both groups of drugs impair renal function and cannot be given in advanced renal failure or renal artery stenosis. Beta-receptor antagonists, previously considered contraindicated in heart failure are today amongst the most important drugs in heart failure. They improve survival and retard the need for cardiac transplantation in advanced failure. Their use, however, is rather difficult requiring extremely slow dose titration beginning with very low doses. Inotropic drugs are today mainly used in acute failure and cardiogenic shock. In longterm treatment only the digitalisglycosides have been shown to be effective in improving symptoms, exercise capacity and the general clinical course. Often antiarrhythmic treatment is necessary. Here amiodarone is the drug of choice today if beta blockers do not suffice. Prophylactic anticoagulation is indicated in all cases NYHA III and IV, with large hearts already in II. Future developments may include new inotropes, the ANP-system, and cytokines, as well as gene therapy for correction of myocardial phenotype change.
 ...
PMID:[Therapy for heart failure]. 1085 91

(1) Valsartan is a antihypertensive drug belonging to the family of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. (2) At a dose of 40 mg/day its antihypertensive effect is inconsistent. (3) At 80 mg/day its effect on blood pressure, its adverse effects and its contraindications (mainly pregnancy and renal artery stenosis) are similar to those of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, except that coughing is rarer with valsartan than with ACE inhibitors. (4) Valsartan has no demonstrated advantage over losartan, another angiotensin II antagonist. (5) Valsartan has not been shown to prevent the complications of arterial hypertension, and its use is therefore less well validated than that of diuretics and betablockers.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan: new preparation. Just a second-line antihypertensive drug. 1091 19

Eprosartan is a potent and selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist. Results of large (n > 100) randomised double-blind studies in patients with mild, moderate or severe hypertension demonstrated that the antihypertensive efficacy of eprosartan (usually 400 to 800 mg/day as a single daily dose or in 2 divided doses) is significantly greater than that of placebo and at least as good as that of enalapril. In placebo-controlled trials, eprosartan achieved mean reductions from baseline in trough sitting systolic blood pressure of 6.3 to 15 mm Hg and in diastolic blood pressure of 4.1 to 9.7 mm Hg. Response rates associated with once daily administration of eprosartan 400 to 800 mg were approximately double those with placebo. Overall, eprosartan was well tolerated with a similar tolerability profile to that of placebo. In comparative trials, in which the incidence of persistent dry cough was evaluated as the primary end-point, enalapril was several-fold more likely to induce this adverse event than eprosartan (the difference being statistically significant regardless of study population and definition of cough). In conclusion, the angiotensin II receptor antagonist eprosartan is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent that is administered once or twice daily without regard to meals. Eprosartan has a low potential for serious adverse events, and the drug has not been associated with clinically significant drug interactions. Unlike ACE inhibitors such as enalapril, eprosartan does not have a high propensity to cause persistent nonproductive cough. Thus, eprosartan represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. 1092 34

Two independent pharmacologic methods of specifically interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have been brought to the marketplace: angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). These agents have the potential not only to be very widely used for a broad variety of clinical indications but also to compete against each other as treatments for hypertension, heart failure, renal impairment, and other conditions. Many short-term comparative studies of these two classes of drugs have now been completed. Most have focused on surrogate endpoints, such as blood pressure, renal function, or cough. These studies have generally concluded that ARBs are better tolerated but that the two drug classes otherwise have similar efficacy. The largest clinical trial comparing ARBs and ACE inhibitors thus far completed, Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE 2), failed to confirm the results of a smaller study; it did not demonstrate a significant improvement in outcomes (death or hospitalization for heart failure) with an ARB used alone, despite better tolerability. Many longer-term outcome studies with survival endpoints are under way, but most will compare the combination against an ACE inhibitor alone. These studies will define the optimal use of these agents in medicine for decades to come.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic trials comparing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. 1098 Nov 76

Arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for microangiopathic diabetic complications and associated with an increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. An intensified antihypertensive treatment reduces microangiopathic complications and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Even in normotensive type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, the treatment with ACE inhibitors may prevent the later development of diabetic nephropathy. Treatment with ACE inhibitors increases the concentrations of bradykinin, which is responsible for the side effects such as cough and urticaria in some patients. On the other hand, bradykinin may have beneficial intrarenal effects decreasing the intraglomerular pressure. The novel angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonists do not influence the bradykinin concentrations and seem to be tolerated by patients suffering from chronic cough with ACE inhibitor therapy. It is still unclear whether the different intrarenal effects are of clinical relevance in the long-term treatment of diabetic patients. In studies with diabetic animals the nephroprotective effects of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists are comparable. It was shown that glucose and lipid metabolism is not influenced by treatment with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists. Further compared to Felodipine the reduction of urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) was more pronounced by Losartane in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Short-term studies directly comparing the renal effects of ACE inhibitors with AT II type 1 receptor antagonists revealed similar reduction of blood pressure and albumin excretion rate in patients with diabetic nephropathy, so a combination of both substances might be useful. Data from ongoing long-term trials are still missing. Further, it is unknown whether different phenotypes of the ACE gene (DD, II polymorphism) require different therapeutic options. In conclusion, treatment with angiotensin II receptor antagonists is well-tolerated and has no adverse effects on metabolic control in diabetic patients. The beneficial effect on microangiopathic complications however has to be proven in randomized long-term studies in direct comparison with ACE inhibitors, which were clearly shown to delay the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:[Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antagonists and diabetes mellitus]. 1145 Jan 65

Diabetic nephropathy has become the leading cause of terminal renal failure in all Western nations due to a steady increase of patients with the renal complication of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. A number of modifiable risk factors have been identified that predispose to and/or accelerate renal disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Among these, the level of blood pressure, even in the range of normotension according to World Health Organization or Joint National Committee definition, is closely related to the rate of progression of diabetic nephropathy. This has been documented in patients with incipient (microalbuminuric) and in patients with manifest (proteinuric) diabetic renal disease. Consequently, the treatment of even normotensive diabetics has been recommended once microalbuminuria is present, and blood pressure values in the low normal range should be aimed for. The selection of antihypertensive agents is also important, however, since a 'renoprotective effect' has been documented for drugs that interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Recently, a new class of drugs that selectively inhibits this system by specifically targeting the angiotensin II receptor has been developed. These angiotensin II subtype 1-receptor antagonists are efficacious antihypertensive agents with a side-effect profile similar to placebo. Evidence for a renoprotective effect in patients with diabetic nephropathy from a large controlled clinical trial is still awaited, but data generated in animal experiments and in smaller clinical trials are encouraging. Currently, these drugs are a valuable substitute for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in patients who experience side effects such as intractable cough.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II subtype 1-receptor antagonists in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. 1145 Dec 16

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system has proved an important principle in the pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular diseases. There is now overwhelming documentation on the beneficial effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) on mortality and morbidity in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Such documentation is still lacking for the angiotensin II receptor antagonists which, in 1999, sold for 77% of the amount spent on ACE inhibitors in Denmark. This review assesses the therapeutic effects of angiotensin II antagonists compared with the ACE inhibitors in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. From 21 comparative studies with a duration of up to one year, it can be concluded that the lowering of the blood pressure with the two classes is similar. Both showed relatively few side effects, the only difference being a higher incidence of cough after ACE inhibitors. Until larger comparative long-term studies on mortality and morbidity have been conducted, angiotensin II antagonists should only be used in hypertensive patients experiencing unacceptable side effects with ACE inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:[Angiotensin II antagonists versus ACE inhibitors in the treatment of raised blood pressure]. 1179 33

Imidapril hydrochloride (imidapril) is a long-acting, non-sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which has been used clinically in the treatment of hypertension, chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and diabetic nephropathy. It has the unique advantage over other ACE inhibitors in causing a lower incidence of dry cough. After oral administration, imidapril is rapidly converted in the liver to its active metabolite imidaprilat. The plasma levels of imidaprilat gradually increase in proportion to the dose, and decline slowly. The time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) is 2.0 h for imidapril and 9.3 h for imidaprilat. The elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of imidapril and imidaprilat is 1.7 and 14.8 h, respectively. Imidapril and its metabolites are excreted chiefly in the urine. As an ACE inhibitor, imidaprilat is as potent as enalaprilat, an active metabolite of enalapril, and about twice as potent as captopril. In patients with hypertension, blood pressure was still decreased at 24 h after imidapril administration. The antihypertensive effect of imidapril was dose-dependent. The maximal reduction of blood pressure and plasma ACE was achieved with imidapril, 10 mg once daily, and the additional effect was not prominent with higher doses. When administered to patients with AMI, imidapril improved left ventricular ejection fraction and reduced plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. In patients with mild-to-moderate CHF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-III], imidapril increased exercise time and physical working capacity and decreased plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and BNP levels in a dose-related manner. In patients with diabetic nephropathy, imidapril decreased urinary albumin excretion. Interestingly, imidapril improved asymptomatic dysphagia in patients with a history of stroke. In the same patients it increased serum substance P levels, while the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan was ineffective. These studies indicate that imidapril is a versatile ACE inhibitor. In addition to its effectiveness in the treatment of hypertension, CHF, and AMI, imidapril has beneficial effects in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy and asymptomatic dysphagia. Good tissue penetration and inhibition of tissue ACE by imidapril contributes to its effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular complications of hypertension. The major advantages of imidapril are its activity in the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases and lower incidence of cough compared with some of the older ACE inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Protection of the cardiovascular system by imidapril, a versatile angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. 1217 88


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>