Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
 23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

One hundred and thirty five non-smoking hypertensive patients with ACE inhibitor cough confirmed by lisinopril rechallenge and placebo dechallenge were recruited into a double-blind random parallel-group comparison of losartan 50 mg, lisinopril 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg each given once daily for a maximum of 8 weeks. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of cough with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan, the ACE inhibitor lisinopril and the hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with previous ACE inhibitor cough. Cough detected by self-administered questionnaire was the primary end-point, and cough frequency by visual analogue scale a secondary end-point. The incidence of cough with losartan (29%) was lower than that for lisinopril (72%, P < 0.01) and similar to that for hydrochlorothiazide (34%). Cough frequency by visual analogue scale was lower for losartan than lisinopril (P < 0.01) and similar to that for hydrochlorothiazide. The specific selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan is significantly less likely than lisinopril to cause cough in patients who previously have had ACE inhibitor cough. ACE inhibitor cough is likely to be related to non-specific kininase II inhibition.
 ...
PMID:ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonists and cough. The Losartan Cough Study Group. 858 82

The past few decades have seen a remarkable development in the field of pharmacological therapy, one of the most notable examples being the treatment of arterial hypertension. Some of the early anti-hypertensive agents were relatively crude by today's standards, but gradually efficacy, tolerability, or both, of blood pressure-lowering (BP) drugs have been improved. It is presently possible to choose from a number of effective and well-tolerated compounds for the treatment of hypertension. The latest additions to the anti-hypertensive armamentarium are the angiotensin II receptor antagonists, the most advanced of these being losartan. It is perhaps most relevant to compare losartan to the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, another class of anti-hypertensive agents which acts mainly by interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Studies have shown that losartan lowers BP at least as effectively as ACE inhibitors. However, the side-effect profile of losartan is more favourable. In particular cough, a relatively common side-effect of ACE inhibitors, has been shown to be significantly less common during losartan treatment. This is probably because losartan does not interfere with bradykinin metabolism, unlike the ACE inhibitors. Regarding the reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a powerful risk indicator for cardiovascular disease, we have shown that losartan is more effective in this regard than treatment with the beta-blocker atenolol. It appears, based on these and other findings, that interference with the RAAS is particularly useful in causing reversal of the cardiovascular hypertrophic changes. The prognostic implications remain to be demonstrated, but it would be logical to expect a benefit from this effect. It was recently shown that polymorphism of the ACE gene is associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease even in the absence of conventional risk factors. If these findings are confirmed the interest in interfering with the RAAS as a therapeutic modality in hypertension would obviously be strengthened. It is not easy to predict the future role of any new therapeutic modality. The positive relation between efficacy and tolerability of losartan, as well as the fact that several observations suggest that interference with the RAAS could be favourable from a prognostic point of view, suggest that losartan may come to play an important role in the future treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:The future role of losartan. 858 83

Losartan is an orally active angiotensin II antangonist that selectively blocks effects mediated by the stimulation of the AT1 subtype of the angiotensin II receptor. This agent, at doses of 50-150mg/day, is as effective at lowering blood pressure as chronic angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Losartan is generally well tolerated and has an incidence of adverse effects very similar, in double-blind controlled trials, to that of placebo. It does not cause coughing, the most common side-effect of the ACE inhibitors, most probably because angiotensin II antagonism has no impact on ACE, an enzyme known to process bradykinin and other cough-inducing peptides. Losartan is a promising antihypertensive agent with the potential to become a first-line option for the treatment of patients with high blood pressure.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II antagonists: a new class of antihypertensive agent. 879 3

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists represent a new class of drugs that provide a site-specific blockade of the effects of angiotensin II. Losartan potassium, the first compound of this drug class, has recently become available in the United States. The clinical experience with angiotensin II receptor antagonists has demonstrated that these drugs are safe and efficacious for the treatment of hypertension and, possibly, congestive heart failure. Unlike with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, the incidence of cough observed with angiotensin receptor antagonists is similar to that with placebo. Although several angiotensin receptors have been characterized, the effects of losartan and other angiotensin receptor antagonists under development are selective for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists do not inhibit bradykinin metabolism or enhance prostaglandin synthesis. The antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin receptor antagonists has been documented to be similar to that of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. If the findings of clinical studies corroborate the initial reports on efficacy and safety, it seems likely that the angiotensin receptor antagonists will be added to the list of drugs that have been deemed suitable for first-line therapy in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor inhibition. A new therapeutic principle. 882 49

Despite the availability of safe and efficacious antihypertensive agents, hypertension continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Losartan, the first of a new class of agents, the angiotensin II receptor antagonists, can be administered as monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension or to complement existing therapy. The angiotensin II receptor antagonists block the effects of angiotensin II through preferential binding to angiotensin II receptor subtype AT1 on the cell membrane. Compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, they may provide more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system and be associated with a lower frequency of cough as a side effect.
 ...
PMID:A new class of antihypertensive therapy: angiotensin II receptor antagonists. 888 79

This study compared the incidence of cough with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril and the diuretic metolazone with angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan in elderly hypertensive patients with previous histories of ACE inhibitor-induced cough. A randomized, double-blind, stratified, parallel-group comparison of lisinopril at 10 mg, losartan at 50 mg, and metolazone at 1 mg, each given once daily for a maximum of 10 weeks, was performed in four hypertension clinics in four centers in two countries. Cough was detected by a questionnaire (the primary end point) given to elderly patients with hypertension, and the cough frequency was quantified by a visual analog scale (a secondary end point). A total of 84 elderly patients with hypertension, all who were nonsmokers with ACe inhibitor-induced cough and were confirmed by lisinopril rechallenge then placebo dechallenge, were randomized to the three treatment groups. The incidence of cough with losartan (18%) was significantly lower than with lisinopril (97%) and similar to that for metolazone (21%). Cough frequency evaluated by the visual analog scale was significantly lower for losartan than for lisinopril and similar to that for metolazone. The specific, selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan is associated with a decrease in the incidence of cough in patients with previous ACE inhibitor-induced cough.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of losartan, lisinopril, and metolazone in elderly hypertensive patients with previous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough. 908 28

ACE inhibitors have been shown to be effective in reducing the morbidity and mortality of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, but their application to clinical practice in this situation is still limited. In part, the failure to prescribe an ACE inhibitor to a patient with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is due to perceptions regarding their side effects, such as cough and renal dysfunction. Relatively few patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and a serum creatinine > or = 2 mg/dl receive an ACE inhibitor in clinical practice. In this situation one should consider an agent such as fosinopril, which is metabolized by the liver as well as secreted by the kidney. In patients with moderate renal dysfunction, fosinopril has been well tolerated without an increase in serum creatinine. In patients who develop cough due to an ACE inhibitor, consideration should be given to an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agent, such as losartan. The relative safety and efficacy of an ACE inhibitor compared with an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agent is being explored in a prospective randomized trial (Evaluation of Losartan In The Elderly [ELITE]), as well as the safety and pharmacological effectiveness of adding an angiotensin II receptor antagonist to an ACE inhibitor (Randomized Angiotensin receptor antagonists-ACE-inhibitor Study [RAAS]). There may also be a role for the combination of an aldosterone receptor antagonists and an ACE inhibitor in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Once an ACE inhibitor is administered to a patient with left ventricular systolic dysfunction it should be continued indefinitely. ACE inhibitors may be of value not only in preventing the progression of heart failure but also in reversing endothelial dysfunction and preventing the development of atherosclerosis and its consequences, such as myocardial infarction.
 ...
PMID:ACE inhibitors in heart failure: prospects and limitations. 921 Oct 22

Candesartan is a highly potent, long-acting and selective angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker. It is administered orally as the inactive prodrug candesartan cilexetil which is rapidly and completely converted to candesartan during gastrointestinal absorption. In vitro studies have shown that candesartan acts as an insurmountable angiotensin II receptor antagonist, binding tightly to and dissociating slowly from the AT1 receptor. The above characteristics are thought to contribute to the marked and long-lasting antihypertensive effects of candesartan cilexetil in several animal models of hypertension. These included rodent models of renal hypertension in which candesartan cilexetil also demonstrated efficacy equivalent to or greater than enalapril. In other animal models, candesartan cilexetil reduced the incidence of stroke, renal dysfunction and renal disease while reducing cardiac and vascular hypertrophy. Furthermore, candesartan cilexetil conferred some protection against cerebral and renal damage at a dose that had no blood pressure-lowering effect. In toxicity and general pharmacology studies, candesartan cilexetil was shown to possess a 'clean' profile with a large safety margin. Also it did not potentiate chemical- or autocoid-induced cough or anaphylactoid reactions.
 ...
PMID:Candesartan cilexetil: a review of its preclinical pharmacology. 933 Sep 99

In this double-blind, randomized study, an antihypertensive regimen based on irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 40/30 mm Hg at week 12 in patients with severe hypertension; this reduction was at least equivalent to that of a regimen using enalapril up to 40 mg. The irbesartan-based regimen had a better tolerability profile with fewer adverse events (55% vs 64%) and significantly less cough (2.5% vs 13.1%, p = 0.007).
 ...
PMID:Effects and tolerability of irbesartan versus enalapril in patients with severe hypertension. Irbesartan Multicenter Investigators. 941 50

Eprosartan is a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist which has a high affinity for the AT1 receptor subtype. When administered at dosages of 400 to 800 mg/day (once or twice daily) for 13 weeks to patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, eprosartan significantly reduced blood pressure compared with placebo. Eprosartan was at least as effective as enalapril 10 to 40 mg/day in a dose-titration study in patients with severe hypertension. Eprosartan is generally well tolerated; clinical trials have shown the drug to have a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo. As with other angiotensin II receptor antagonists, it does not cause cough. Eprosartan is not metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system and therefore has a low potential for drug interactions.
 ...
PMID:Eprosartan. 958 67


1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>