Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A number of new classes of antihypertensive drugs have become available in the recent years which appear to hold therapeutic potential for better management of hypertension. Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, does not produce cough which is classically seen with ACE inhibitors. Fenoldopam, a dopamine D1-receptor agonist, has a rapid and short duration of action and is ideally suited by intravenous infusion for quick control of BP in hypertensive emergencies. Kentaserin, a serotonin (5-HT2A) receptor antagonist, has a long duration of action and can be given once daily. It has the added benefit of having antiplatelet effect. Monatepil, a dual alpha-receptor and calcium channel blocker, has potent antihypertensive effect, lowers serum cholesterol and also has antiatherosclerotic effect. Dual ACE and endopeptidase inhibitor, such as alatriopril, has a "broad spectrum" antihypertensive effect and may be effective in majority of hypertensive patients. Many other classes of antihypertensive drugs are still in the investigative stage, and their therapeutic potentials and safety need to be ascertained in long-term controlled clinical trials.
...
PMID:New classes of antihypertensive drugs: therapeutic potentials. 1005 49

Losartan is the first orally active angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonist for a new class of cardiovascular therapeutic agent. Losartan is converted to an active metabolite (E3174) after oral administration in humans and rats. Both losartan and E3174 contribute to the net angiotensin II receptor blockade and produce anti-hypertensive effect. Losartan not only blocks the vasoconstrictive effect of angiotensin II but also inhibits its mitogenic effect; thus losartan is expected to protect against end-organ-damage-related hypertension and chronic heart failure. Unlike angiotensin-coverting-enzyme inhibitor, losartan does not elicit adverse effects of cough and angioneurotic edema by its blockade of angiotensin II receptor. It is also expected to reduce proteinuria in nephropathy. In addition to its blockade of angiotensin II receptor, losartan blocks thromboxane A2 receptor and facilitates excretion of uric acid, although therapeutic importance of these effects are under investigation. In summary, losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist is a new class of antihypertensive agent and its therapeutic potentials are not merely reduction of blood pressure but total protection from end-organ damage resulting from activation of both the systemic and local renin-angiotensin system.
...
PMID:[Pharmacological characteristics and clinical application of losartan, an orally active AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist]. 1052 59

The efficacy and tolerability of losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg and enalapril 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg were compared in a double-blind, randomized trial in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled and experiencing side effects on prior therapy. Patients with moderate or severe hypertension, currently treated with at least two single-agent drugs (excluding angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) above 90 mm Hg, and at least one undesirable drug-related symptom were randomized to once-daily treatment with one of the combinations for 12 weeks. Losartan/HCTZ lowered sitting DBP from the prior therapy baseline by 13.7 mm Hg and sitting systolic blood pressure 19.3 mm Hg; similar reductions occurred with enalapril/HCTZ. Trough sitting DBP was reduced to normal levels (< 90 mm Hg) in 63% of patients switched to the losartan combination and in 58% of those treated with the enalapril combination. Each combination was associated with improved tolerability compared with prior therapy, although fewer patients reported each of 24 undesirable symptoms after 12 weeks of losartan/HCTZ. The improvement from prior therapy in the occurrence of cough was significantly greater with losartan/HCTZ (P = .005). Enalapril/HCTZ, but not losartan/HCTZ, increased serum uric acid levels at week 12. In conclusion, the combination of losartan 100 mg/HCTZ 25 mg offers a beneficial therapeutic option for patients with a history of moderate to severe hypertension whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled or who exhibit side effects while on two or more single-agent antihypertensive drugs. In this population, the switch from prior antihypertensive therapies to once daily losartan 100 mg/HCTZ 25 mg improves blood pressure control and reduces side effects.
...
PMID:Increased efficacy and tolerability with losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and therapy-related symptoms receiving two monotherapies. 1091 94

Two independent pharmacologic methods of specifically interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have been brought to the marketplace: angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). These agents have the potential not only to be very widely used for a broad variety of clinical indications but also to compete against each other as treatments for hypertension, heart failure, renal impairment, and other conditions. Many short-term comparative studies of these two classes of drugs have now been completed. Most have focused on surrogate endpoints, such as blood pressure, renal function, or cough. These studies have generally concluded that ARBs are better tolerated but that the two drug classes otherwise have similar efficacy. The largest clinical trial comparing ARBs and ACE inhibitors thus far completed, Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE 2), failed to confirm the results of a smaller study; it did not demonstrate a significant improvement in outcomes (death or hospitalization for heart failure) with an ARB used alone, despite better tolerability. Many longer-term outcome studies with survival endpoints are under way, but most will compare the combination against an ACE inhibitor alone. These studies will define the optimal use of these agents in medicine for decades to come.
...
PMID:Therapeutic trials comparing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. 1098 Nov 76

The management of diabetic hypertension requires meticulous selection of agents in the antihypertension armamentorium. There may be several associated factors to be considered while treating a hypertensive diabetic. These include hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure to name a few. Losartan is the first of a new class of agents in the list of antihypertensive drugs. By its selective angiotension II receptor (subtype AT1) blocking action it is postulated to bring about a more complete inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. Thus, it might produce all the benefits of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy with the freedom from cough so commonly seen with the use of ACE inhibitors. This review attempts to analyze the possible benefits of losartan therapy in diabetes.
...
PMID:Role of losartan therapy in the management of diabetic hypertension. 1127 47

Improvements in the death rate from coronary heart disease and in the control of hypertension have leveled off in recent years, reversing a trend toward steady improvement that began in 1972. Of the roughly 20% of Americans who suffer from hypertension, only 29% achieve adequate control (<140/90 mm Hg) with treatment and nearly half receive no treatment at all. Poor adherence to therapy doubtless plays a key role in this failure. As a major cause of poor adherence, tolerability becomes an extremely important element in any discussion of effective antihypertensive treatment. Despite their efficacy in treating hypertension, diuretics, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers have all been associated with numerous side effects, including increased serum lipid levels, insulin resistance, and edema. With the introduction of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, patients were able to achieve blood pressure goals with fewer side effects. These agents, however, cause an irritating cough in up to 19% of patients. A newer class of drugs, the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), have similar effects to the ACE inhibitors, but their highly selective nature produces even fewer side effects. Eprosartan is a structurally unique ARB. Like the other ARB, this promising new agent has a side effect profile similar to placebo, and its response rate rivals or exceeds that of enalapril. Although it remains to be seen whether the ARB can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease, preliminary data from the Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) trial appear to be promising.
...
PMID:Issues in hypertension: drug tolerability and special populations. 1145 11

The rising incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) has signalled a need to increase awareness, treatment and control of hypertension. There continues to be a need for effective antihypertensive medications since hypertension is a major precursor to various forms of cardiovascular disease. The renin-angiotensin (AT) aldosterone system (RAAS) is a key component to the development of hypertension and can be one target of drug therapy. Angotensin II (ATII) receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent class of agents available to treat hypertension, which work by by inhibiting ATII at the receptor level. Currently, national consensus guidelines recommend that ARBs should be reserved for hypertensive patients who cannot tolerate angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEIs). ARBs, however, are moving to the forefront of therapy with a promising role in the area of renoprotection and CHF. Recent trials such as the The Renoprotective Effect of the Angiotensin-Receptor Antagonist Irbesartan in Patients with Nephropathy Due to Type 2 Diabetes Trial (IDNT), the Effect of Irbesartan on the Development of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (IRMA2), and The Effects of Losartan on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy (RENAAL) study have demonstrated the renoprotective effects of ARBs in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) adds to the growing body of evidence that ARBs may improve morbidity and mortality in CHF patients. As a class, ARBs are well tolerated and have a lower incidence of cough and angioedema compared to ACEIs. This article reviews the differences among the ARBs, existing efficacy data in hypertension, and explores the role of ARBs in CHF and renal disease.
...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of hypertension. 1182 17

Angiotensin II receptor blockers represent a class of effective and well tolerated orally active antihypertensive drugs. Activation of AT(1) receptors leads to vasoconstriction, stimulation of the release of catecholamines and antidiuretic hormone and promote growth of vascular and cardiac muscle. AT(1) receptor blockers antagonise all those effects. Losartan was the first drug of this class marketed, shortly followed by valsartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, candesartan, eprosartan and others on current investigation. All these drugs have the common properties of blockading the AT(1) receptor thereby relaxing vascular smooth muscle, increase salt excretion, decrease cellular hypertrophy and induce antihypertensive effect without modifying heart rate or cardiac output. Most of the AT(1) receptor blockers in use controlled blood pressure during the 24 h with a once-daily dose, without evidence of producing tolerance to the antihypertensive effect and being with low incidence of side effects even at long term use. Monotherapy in mild-to-moderate hypertension controls blood pressure in 40 to 50% of these patients; when a low dose of thiazide diuretic is added, 60-70% of patients are controlled. The efficacy is similar to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, diuretics, calcium antagonists and beta-blocking agents. AT(1) receptor blockers are specially indicated in patients with hypertension who are being treated with ACE inhibitors and developed side effects such as, cough or angioedema. The final position in the antihypertensive therapy in this special population and other clinical situations, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, diabetes mellitus and renal disease, has to be determined in large prospective clinical trials, some of which are now being conducted and seem promising.
...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor antagonists role in arterial hypertension. 1198 4

Angiotensin II plays a central role in the pathogenesis and progression of proteinuric nephropathies and related cardiovascular complications. Losartan is a selective non-peptide angiotensin Type 1-receptor blocker (ARB) with unique uricosuric effect, not shared by other ARBs. Losartan has demonstrated renoprotective effects in animals and humans with diabetic and non-diabetic renal diseases similar to those of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with a lower incidence of dry cough and angioneurotic oedema. A reduced incidence of cerebrovascular events and diabetes has been reported in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy on losartan therapy compared with patients treated with atenolol. Whether ARBs have superior cardioprotective effects, compared with other blood pressure medications, is still unknown. Combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and ARB therapy improves renal outcomes in non-diabetic nephropathies more than single drug renin-angiotensin system inhibition. Whether this also applies to diabetic nephropathy and related cardiovascular outcomes is still unknown.
...
PMID:Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and cardio-renal protection: focus on losartan and angiotensin receptor blockade. 1614 12

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have been emerging as drugs to treat atherosclerosis. The effectiveness of the ARB losartan at reducing atherosclerosis was compared with that of ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients. A total of 50 patients with hypertension were divided into 3 groups: a control group receiving neither an ARB nor an ACE inhibitor (n = 14), a losartan group (n = 22) receiving 50 mg/day of losartan, and an ACE inhibitor group (n = 14) receiving either 5 mg/day of enalapril or 5 mg/day of imidapril. Atherosclerosis was evaluated based on the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery measured by B-mode ultrasound at baseline and after approximately 12 months of treatment. After the treatment, IMT significantly decreased with losartan (from 0.87 +/- 0.14 to 0.79 +/- 0.16 mm, P < 0.05) and with ACE inhibitor (from 0.81 +/- 0.14 to 0.74 +/- 0.11 mm, P < 0.05). The reduction was comparable between the two groups, -0.078 +/- 0.136 with losartan and -0.073 +/- 0.109 mm with ACE inhibitor, and the rate of the reduction was similar between the two drugs; -0.098 +/- 0.142 mm/year with losartan and (-0.076 +/- 0.118 mm/year) with ACE inhibitor. On the contrary, IMT did not change in the control group (from 0.90 +/- 0.20 to 0.95 +/- 0.26 mm) during the treatment period. Concomitant medication and coronary risk factors such as hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking did not differ significantly among the groups. The antiatherosclerotic effect of losartan on the carotid artery was comparable to that of ACE-inhibitors, and less adverse effects, such as coughing that occurs with ACE inhibitors, were observed. Losartan appears to be a better alternative to ACE inhibitors for treating atherosclerosis in Japanese hypertensive patients.
...
PMID:A one-year study of the antiatherosclerotic effect of the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan in hypertensive patients. A comparison with angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors. 1836 68


<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>