Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
 23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Valsartan competitively and selectively inhibits the actions of angiotensin II at the AT1 receptor subtype which is responsible for most of the known effects of angiotensin II. In clinical trials in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension valsartan was as effective as losartan, lisinopril, enalapril, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. Addition of the latter reduced blood pressure in patients who did not respond sufficiently to valsartan monotherapy. Preliminary data also suggest valsartan may be effective in patients with severe essential hypertension. The drug was as effective as lisinopril as treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension in patients with renal insufficiency and did not worsen renal function. Headache, dizziness and fatigue were the most common adverse events in placebo-controlled studies; the incidence of these adverse events was not significantly different between placebo and valsartan recipients. Compared with ACE inhibitors, valsartan was associated with a significantly lower incidence of dry cough. Thus, valsartan is an effective treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension and may be particularly useful in patients who experience persistent cough during ACE inhibitor therapy.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension. 925 84

A total of 501 elderly patients with essential hypertension were randomized to receive valsartan or lisinopril in this one year multi-center, double-blind, parallel group trial. Patients received valsartan 40 mg (n = 334) or lisinopril 2.5 mg (n = 167) daily for 2 weeks with subsequent titration (alone or in combination with hydroclorothiazide), depending on response to treatment. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients with a response, defined as sitting diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or drop of > or = 10 mmHg from baseline. A high percentage of patients responded to treatment in both valsartan and lisinopril groups: 80% for both groups at 12 weeks and 81% and 87%, respectively, at 52 weeks with no statistically significant difference between treatments (12 weeks, p = 0.925; 52 weeks, p = 0.148). More patients on lisinopril experienced drug-related cough (7.5% on valsartan, 17.4% on lisinopril). In 5.4% of lisinopril treated patients, cough led to discontinuation of therapy compared to 0.6% on valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg daily provides comparable short and long-term antihypertensive efficacy to lisinopril in elderly patients with a lower incidence of drug-related cough.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan: long-term efficacy and tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension. 938 75

Angiotensin (Ang) II antagonists provide specific and selective blockade of Ang II at the AT1 receptor, regardless of the enzymatic pathway of production. Valsartan has an affinity for the AT1 receptor 30,000 times that of the AT2 receptor. Valsartan is not a prodrug and undergoes little metabolism. It has a half-life of approximately 9 h, but duration of antihypertensive action at the usual dose of 80 or 160 mg daily is 24 h. The trough to peak ratio is 0.66. Valsartan has antihypertensive efficacy at least equivalent to that of established antihypertensive drugs and has additive effects in combination. The efficacy of valsartan appears to be independent of age, sex, and race. Valsartan is effective in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency and is associated with maintenance of renal function. It is well tolerated, with a side-effect profile indistinguishable from that of placebo, and does not cause cough. Ang II antagonists are a promising class of cardiovascular drugs with considerable potential in clinical practice.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II antagonism in clinical practice: experience with valsartan. 1002 51

OBJECTIVE: To compare the blood pressure reduction induced by valsartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, with that induced by enalapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in essential hypertension. METHODS: In total 189 adult outpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension participated in this double-blind study. Patients were allocated randomly in equal numbers to be administered 80 mg valsartan or 20 mg enalapril daily for 12 weeks. Patients whose blood pressure had not been controlled adequately despite 8 weeks of monotherapy were administered additional therapy with 12.5 mg hydroclorothiazide (HCTZ) daily thereafter. Patients were assessed aftger 4, 8 and 12 weeks of therapy. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) after 8 weeks of therapy. Other variables analyzed included the change in sitting systolic blood pressure and percentage responses after 8 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Valsartan and enalapril were both effective at lowering the blood pressure. Similar falls were induced in the two groups with a similar time course of blood pressure reduction. The mean decreases in SDBP after 8 weeks of therapy were 13.2 mmHg for valsartan and 12.0 mmHg for enalapril. There was no significant difference between the treatments [P = 0.475, 95% confidence interval of the estimated difference (SBP after therapy - SDBP before therapy) -3.5 to 1.6 mmHg]. After 8 weeks of therapy 60.6% had responded to valsartan and 52.6% to enalapril (P = 0.267). Both treatments were tolerated well. Three patients administered enalapril and one patient administered valsartan discontinued their treatment because it made them cough. CONCLUSION: The data show that 80 mg valsartan is as effective as 20 mg enalapril in the treatment of moderate hypertension and that it is tolerated well.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist; blood pressure reduction in essential hypertension compared with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril. 1023 13

Valsartan is a specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist with high selectivity for the AT(1) receptor subtype. After oral administration of single or repeated once-daily doses, valsartan 40-80 mg inhibits the pressor response to angiotensin II for 24 hours. In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, efficacy of valsartan appears to be independent of age, sex, and race, and is at least equivalent to that of calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, or thiazide diuretics. Response rate to valsartan 160 mg o.d. is significantly greater than after receiving losartan 100 mg o.d. Valsartan has additive effects with other antihypertensive drugs and combination therapy is effective in severe hypertension and in hypertension with renal insufficiency, where renal function is well maintained. Valsartan has good tolerability with a side-effect profile indistinguishable from placebo and superior to that of comparable drugs. Valsartan does not cause cough or adverse metabolic effects; first dose hypotension and rebound hypertension on abrupt withdrawal have not been encountered. Valsartan has clear clinical advantage in the management of hypertension. Its impact on prognosis in patients with a high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is under evaluation.
 ...
PMID:Clinical advantage of valsartan. 1044 90

Adult Indonesian outpatients were randomised to receive either valsartan 80 mg once daily or captopril 25 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. The main criterion for tolerability was the incidence of adverse events. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) from baseline to endpoint. No valsartan patients experienced dry cough, which was reported by 22 captopril patients (21.6%). Both drugs reduced mean SDBP and SSBP, with a trend in favour of valsartan. The percentage of valsartan patients whose BP normalised was higher than in captopril patients at week 4 (37% and 22%) and week 8 (45% and 34%), the difference being statistically significant at week 4 (p < 0.05). Valsartan 80 mg once daily is as effective as captopril 25 mg twice daily in reducing blood pressure in Indonesian patients, and has a better tolerability profile in respect of dry cough.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of valsartan and captopril in patients with essential hypertension in Indonesia. 1056 70

Valsartan (Diovan) is an antihypertensive drug belonging to the family of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. At a dose of 40 mg/d, its antihypertensive effect is inconsistent. At 80 mg/d its effect on blood pressure, its adverse effects, and its contraindications (mainly pregnancy and renal artery stenosis) are similar to those of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, except that coughing is rarer with valsartan than with ACE inhibitors. Valsartan has no demonstrated advantage over losartan, another angiotensin II antagonist. Valsartan has not been shown to prevent complications of arterial hypertension, and its use is, therefore, less well validated than that of diuretics and beta-blockers.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan. Just a second-line antihypertensive drug. 1058 70

The study compared valsartan 80 mg or 160 mg o.d. with captopril 25 mg t.i.d. or placebo on plasma lipids in normotensive and treated hypertensive patients with type II diabetes and microalbuminuria. One hundred and twenty-two adult outpatients were randomised to receive either valsartan 80 mg or 160 mg, captopril 25 mg or placebo for 360 days. Changes from baseline to endpoint in plasma lipid parameters were measured. The primary criterion for tolerability was the incidence of adverse events. All treatment groups showed minor changes in lipid parameters. Triglyceride increased by 2.7% (valsartan 160 mg) to 9.1% (placebo). Total cholesterol decreased under valsartan 80 mg, while other groups showed increases of up to 0.031 mmol/l. Decreases in total cholesterol (p = 0.018), apolipoprotein B (p = 0.042) and apolipoprotein A1 (p = 0.025), were significant for the comparison of 80 mg valsartan and captopril. Valsartan 80 mg or 160 mg o.d. does not cause deleterious changes in the diabetic lipid profile and, unlike captopril, is not associated with dry cough.
 ...
PMID:The effect of valsartan and captopril on lipid parameters in patients with type II diabetes mellitus and nephropathy. 1069 51

(1) Valsartan is a antihypertensive drug belonging to the family of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. (2) At a dose of 40 mg/day its antihypertensive effect is inconsistent. (3) At 80 mg/day its effect on blood pressure, its adverse effects and its contraindications (mainly pregnancy and renal artery stenosis) are similar to those of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, except that coughing is rarer with valsartan than with ACE inhibitors. (4) Valsartan has no demonstrated advantage over losartan, another angiotensin II antagonist. (5) Valsartan has not been shown to prevent the complications of arterial hypertension, and its use is therefore less well validated than that of diuretics and betablockers.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan: new preparation. Just a second-line antihypertensive drug. 1091 19

The rising incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) has signalled a need to increase awareness, treatment and control of hypertension. There continues to be a need for effective antihypertensive medications since hypertension is a major precursor to various forms of cardiovascular disease. The renin-angiotensin (AT) aldosterone system (RAAS) is a key component to the development of hypertension and can be one target of drug therapy. Angotensin II (ATII) receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent class of agents available to treat hypertension, which work by by inhibiting ATII at the receptor level. Currently, national consensus guidelines recommend that ARBs should be reserved for hypertensive patients who cannot tolerate angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEIs). ARBs, however, are moving to the forefront of therapy with a promising role in the area of renoprotection and CHF. Recent trials such as the The Renoprotective Effect of the Angiotensin-Receptor Antagonist Irbesartan in Patients with Nephropathy Due to Type 2 Diabetes Trial (IDNT), the Effect of Irbesartan on the Development of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (IRMA2), and The Effects of Losartan on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy (RENAAL) study have demonstrated the renoprotective effects of ARBs in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) adds to the growing body of evidence that ARBs may improve morbidity and mortality in CHF patients. As a class, ARBs are well tolerated and have a lower incidence of cough and angioedema compared to ACEIs. This article reviews the differences among the ARBs, existing efficacy data in hypertension, and explores the role of ARBs in CHF and renal disease.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of hypertension. 1182 17


1 2 Next >>