Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
 23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The clinical efficacy and tolerability of losartan were studied in clinical trials in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. In a short-term trial, losartan (25 to 100 mg once daily) provided good control of blood pressure for 24 h without affecting the patient's own diurnal blood pressure profile. In a double-blind study, the efficacy and tolerability of losartan (25 to 50 mg once daily) were compared to enalapril (5 to 10 mg) in Japanese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Losartan, 25 to 50 mg given once daily, produced an antihypertensive effect comparable to enalapril, 5 to 10 mg, in these patients. The incidence of adverse reactions in the losartan group was 9.0% (13/144), which was lower than that observed in the enalapril group, 20.3% (29/143). The incidence of cough in the losartan group (0.7%) was lower than that of the enalapril group (13.3%). No discontinuation due to cough was observed in the losartan group: however, seven patients were discontinued from the enalapril group. Losartan exhibited antihypertensive efficacy comparable to enalapril and a tolerability profile superior to enalapril in this study. The efficacy and tolerability of losartan were also investigated in 29 hypertensive patients with renal impairment. When losartan (25 to 100 mg) once daily was used, blood pressure was controlled in 62.1% (18/29) of patients. The rate of cases assessed as "useful" was 58.3% when the pretreatment serum creatinine level was less than 3.0 mg/dL. No cases, however, were assessed as "useful" in patients in which the level was 3.0 mg/dL or higher. In a trial with hypertensive diabetic patients, losartan did not adversely affect glucose tolerance and lipid metabolism. Losartan was associated with a decreased total cholesterol (p < 0.01) and LDL cholesterol (p < 0.01) without significantly changing HDL cholesterol in patients with total serum cholesterol of > 220 mg/dL. In summary, losartan, the first angiotensin II antagonist, is an effective antihypertensive agent with an excellent tolerability profile.
 ...
PMID:The clinical efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin II-receptor antagonist losartan in Japanese patients with hypertension. 891 45

Methotrexate (MTX) has become one of the most widely prescribed second-line agents world-wide for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Studies have established efficacy in populations which have failed other second-line agents. Although MTX must be considered as a potential hepatotoxin, studies have shown that liver histologic changes can be predicted by monitoring of serum albumin and AST at four to eight week intervals. MTX pulmonary toxicity appears to be more common than liver disease. It most often presents with a subacute course with dry cough and dyspnea with or without fever. Clinicians must be aware of this presentation and withhold the drug when these symptoms appear. MTX may also cause mild renal impairment when used with NSAIDs. This effect has been observed with higher mean weekly doses in the 15 to 20 mg range, but not with a starting dose of 7.5 mg. Although MTX may exhibit a variety of effects in in vitro systems its mechanism of action in patients with RA has not yet been determined.
 ...
PMID:Methotrexate update. 899 67

Losartan potassium is the first of a new class of orally active antihypertensive drugs which antagonise the action of angiotensin (AT) II at the AT1 receptor subtype. Losartan potassium is converted by the liver to the active metabolite E-3174, which is a more potent antagonist at the AT1 receptor. E-3174 is responsible for most of the pharmacological effects of losartan potassium, and its long half-life contributes to the extended duration of action of the drug. Losartan potassium is effective as a once-daily antihypertensive agent. In mild to moderate hypertension, losartan potassium has similar efficacy to enalapril, atenolol and felodipine extended release. When losartan potassium is combined with hydrochlorothiazide there is a further reduction in blood pressure. Losartan potassium is well tolerated in mild, moderate and severe essential hypertension, with dizziness being reported as the only drug-related adverse effect. The overall rate of patient withdrawal from therapy due to adverse experiences with losartan potassium is lower (2.3%) than that of placebo (3.7%). First-dose hypotension is uncommon, perhaps due to the slower onset of action of the drug, and cough does not appear to be a significant problem. A number of areas concerning the safety and efficacy of losartan potassium remain to be clarified. In particular, long term tolerability studies are needed; cough only became apparent as an adverse effect of ACE inhibitors after 3 to 4 years of use. Postmarketing surveillance has shown that angioedema, a rare but life-threatening adverse effect of ACE inhibitors, also occurs with losartan potassium. Further data are needed on the use of losartan potassium in patients with renal impairment before accepting the recommendation that dosage adjustment is not necessary. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan potassium in patients with hepatic disease also require further investigation. Losartan potassium increases uric acid secretion and lowers plasma uric acid levels, which may be of benefit when losartan potassium is combined with a thiazide diuretic, but which may otherwise lead to uric acid stone formation and possibly to nephropathy. Simple control of blood pressure is no longer an adequate goal in the management of hypertension. Any new antihypertensive agent should also reduce cardiovascular events, prevent or cause regression of end-organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy, atherosclerosis and renal failure, and should not impair quality of life. Such data on losartan potassium are not currently available. Losartan potassium is likely to be used in patients who are intolerant of ACE inhibitors, but its future in the management of hypertension will depend on long term tolerability studies and data on its effects beyond simple blood pressure control.
 ...
PMID:A risk-benefit assessment of losartan potassium in the treatment of hypertension. 901 Jun 43

There has been some concern raised regarding the safe use of ACE-inhibitors in patients with severe renal insufficiency, including the development of hyperkalaemia in these patients. Therefore, the objective of the current analysis was to evaluate the long-term safety of enalapril in patients with severe renal sufficiency and hypertension. Three protocols with similar randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled designs were selected for analysis. A total of 153 patients, enrolled at six sites, were treated for up to 3 years with enalapril; 164 patients served as controls. One protocol used a fixed dose (5 mg/day) of enalapril, while the other two protocols allowed open titration up to 40 mg/day. The primary comparison was between the enalapril and control populations. For the analysis, patients, by treatment, were grouped according to the degree of renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > or < 3 mg/dl) at baseline. The incidence of the most common, as well as important, clinical and laboratory adverse events for this patient population were summarized. In addition, trends in important laboratory adverse events and the incidence of first-dose events, cough and angioedema were evaluated. The incidence of clinical adverse events was similar for both treatment groups, regardless of the severity of renal insufficiency. Seven patients died, four in the control group and three in the enalapril treatment group; none was considered related to treatment. Enalapril appeared to be well-tolerated in this group of patients with severe renal impairment.
 ...
PMID:The long-term tolerability of enalapril in hypertensive patients with renal impairment. 926 6

Losartan is a novel orally active nonpeptidal antihypertensive agent that specifically blocks the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. This paper compares the short- and long-term safety and tolerability of losartan with those of placebo. Approximately 3800 patients with mild-to-severe essential hypertension were enrolled in 16 double-masked and 4 open clinical trials worldwide. Of these, approximately 2900 were treated with losartan either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. These trials included patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 133). An additional 5 trials enrolled hypertensive patients with compromised renal function (n = 115) or heart failure (n = 220). Losartan dosages primarily ranged from 10 to 150 mg once daily, with most patients receiving 50 to 100 mg per day. Hypertension trials generally lasted 12 weeks. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, dizziness, and asthenia/fatigue, but only dizziness occurred more frequently (> or = 1%) in the losartan-treated groups. Cough occurred in 3.1% of patients treated with losartan and 2.6% of patients treated with placebo. The overall incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events in the losartan- and placebo-treated groups was similar among patients with hypertension and either diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, or heart failure. The data suggest that losartan can be safely administered in hypertensive patients with concomitant illnesses. It can be considered for first-line therapy and is suitable as an alternative therapy in patients already experiencing side effects with other agents.
 ...
PMID:Clinical safety and tolerability of losartan. 937 6

Understanding the mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic properties of vasodilatory drugs facilitates optimal use in clinical practice. It should be kept in mind that a drug belongs to a class but is a distinct entity, sometimes derived from a prototype to achieve a specific effect. The most common pharmacokinetic drug improvement is the development of a drug with a half-life sufficiently long to allow an adequate once-daily dosage. Developing a controlled release preparation can increase the apparent half-life of a drug. Altering the molecular structure may also increase the half-life of a prototype drug. Another desirable improvement is increasing the specificity of a drug, which may result in fewer adverse effects, or more efficacy at the target site. This is especially important for vasodilatory drugs which may be administered over decades for the treatment of hypertension, which usually does not interfere with subjective well-being. Compliance is greatly increased with once-daily dosing. Vasodilatory agents cause relaxation by either a decrease in cytoplasmic calcium, an increase in nitric oxide (NO) or by inhibiting myosin light chain kinase. They are divided into 9 classes: calcium antagonists, potassium channel openers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor antagonists, alpha-adrenergic and imidazole receptor antagonists, beta 1-adrenergic agonist, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, eicosanoids and NO donors. Despite chemical differences, the pharmacokinetic properties of calcium antagonists are similar. Absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is high, with all substances undergoing considerable first-pass metabolism by the liver, resulting in low bioavailability and pronounced individual variation in pharmacokinetics. Renal impairment has little effect on pharmacokinetics since renal elimination of these agents is minimal. Except for the newer drugs of the dihydropyridine type, amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nilvadipine, nisoldipine and nitrendipine, the half-life of calcium antagonists is short. Maintaining an effective drug concentration for the remainder of these agents requires multiple daily dosing, in some cases even with controlled release formulations. However, a coat-core preparation of nifedipine has been developed to allow once-daily administration. Adverse effects are directly correlated to the potency of the individual calcium antagonists. Treatment with the potassium channel opener minoxidil is reserved for patients with moderately severe to severe hypertension which is refractory to other treatment. Diazoxide and hydralazine are chiefly used to treat severe hypertensive emergencies, primary pulmonary and malignant hypertension and in severe preeclampsia. ACE inhibitors prevent conversion of angiotensin-I to angiotensin-II and are most effective when renin production is increased. Since ACE is identical to kininase-II, which inactivates the potent endogenous vasodilator bradykinin, ACE inhibition causes a reduction in bradykinin degradation. ACE inhibitors exert cardioprotective and cardioreparative effects by preventing and reversing cardiac fibrosis and ventricular hypertrophy in animal models. The predominant elimination pathway of most ACE inhibitors is via renal excretion. Therefore, renal impairment is associated with reduced elimination and a dosage reduction of 25 to 50% is recommended in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. Separating angiotensin-II inhibition from bradykinin potentiation has been the goal in developing angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. The incidence of adverse effects of such an agent, losartan, is comparable to that encountered with placebo treatment, and the troublesome cough associated with ACE inhibitors is absent.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part I. 964 8

A 49 year-old man was admitted for edema and renal impairment due to SLE. Since he did not improve with predonisolone and methylprednisolone pulse therapy, cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (300 mg div.) was administered. The patient subsequently developed a fever, dyspnea and cough, and interstitial regions of the lungs exhibited shadows on X-ray and CT. The patient also suffered hypoxemia and poor lung function. Since several culture tests and viral antibody tests were negative for infection, antibiotics were not effective, and TBLB indicated interstitial pneumonia, which we speculated was induced by cyclophosphamide. However, this was such a severe case of interstitial pneumonia that it could not be cured merely by discontinuing the cyclophosphamide, but it did improve immediately after starting methylprednisolone pulse therapy. The incidence of cyclophosphamide-induced interstitial pneumonia is very low, but the mortality rate is high. Since cyclophosphamide pulse therapy is often used to treat SLE, attention should be focused on the incidence of interstitial pneumonia.
 ...
PMID:[SLE with interstitial pneumonia during cyclophosphamide pulse therapy]. 980 18

Two independent pharmacologic methods of specifically interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have been brought to the marketplace: angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). These agents have the potential not only to be very widely used for a broad variety of clinical indications but also to compete against each other as treatments for hypertension, heart failure, renal impairment, and other conditions. Many short-term comparative studies of these two classes of drugs have now been completed. Most have focused on surrogate endpoints, such as blood pressure, renal function, or cough. These studies have generally concluded that ARBs are better tolerated but that the two drug classes otherwise have similar efficacy. The largest clinical trial comparing ARBs and ACE inhibitors thus far completed, Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE 2), failed to confirm the results of a smaller study; it did not demonstrate a significant improvement in outcomes (death or hospitalization for heart failure) with an ARB used alone, despite better tolerability. Many longer-term outcome studies with survival endpoints are under way, but most will compare the combination against an ACE inhibitor alone. These studies will define the optimal use of these agents in medicine for decades to come.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic trials comparing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. 1098 Nov 76

The fixed low-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor perindopril and the non-thiazide diuretic indapamide has been evaluated in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Combination therapy aims to improve overall therapeutic efficacy while minimising adverse effects. In well-designed multicentre clinical trials, perindopril/indapamide at doses ranging from 2/0.625 to 8/2.5 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control. A similar reduction in supine BP was observed when combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was compared with losartan 50 mg/day or atenolol 50 mg/day. Similar reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP were also seen with perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day and irbesartan 150 mg/day. However, response and normalisation rates were significantly higher with combination therapy than with losartan or irbesartan monotherapy. Combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy effectively reduced BP in elderly patients aged 65 to 85 years to a significantly greater extent than either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Supine BP was also normalised in approximately two-thirds of patients in a small noncomparative trial in patients with hypertension and renal impairment. Low-dose perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was well tolerated in clinical trials; the most common adverse events were headache and cough. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of diuretics, occurred with a higher incidence with combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy than with either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day has shown efficacy in well designed comparative trials with atenolol, losartan and irbesartan including elderly patients and patients with renal impairment. Studies comparing this dosage of perindopril/ indapamide with other combination therapies would be beneficial in allowing the place of perindopril/indapamide to be more accurately determined. The fixed-low dose combination of perindopril/indapamide provides a promising and well tolerated treatment option in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day: a review of its place in the management of hypertension. 1146 78

Heart failure is a common and often debilitating condition, but one for which there exists a variety of effective pharmacological therapies. The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors represent one of the mainstays of the treatment of heart failure. In spite of a wealth of evidence regarding the efficacy of these agents in improving mortality and morbidity in heart failure, they are often under-utilised. Failure to prescribe or to prematurely withdraw ACE inhibitor therapy often stems from physicians perceptions regarding the likelihood of unwanted effects, in particular hypotension, renal impairment and cough. The evidence from clinical trials is that these unwanted effects are relatively uncommon. In routine clinical practice the rate of prescription of ACE inhibitor therapy is related to the expertise and motivation of the physician. There is a need for education of all health care professionals involved in the care of patients with heart failure with regard to the maximisation of ACE inhibitor therapy in heart failure.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in heart failure: clinical trials and clinical practice. 1208 81


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>