Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (
cough
)
23,843
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) have been proven to be effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure or post-myocardial infarction left ventricular dysfunction. Despite evidence from several large-scale randomized trials, the use of
ACE
-I in patients with heart failure remains relatively low. In part, the failure to achieve more widespread use of
ACE
-I in patients with heart failure may be due to physician's perceptions of the side effects associated with
ACE
-I, such as angioedema, renal dysfunction,
cough
, and hypotension. Many of these side effects are thought to be due to
ACE
-I-induced bradykinin accumulation. It is possible to inhibit the effect of angiotensin II without increasing bradykinin levels using an angiotensin II type I blocking agent such as losartan. How effective losartan is compared with an
ACE
-I is uncertain, however. Some of the beneficial effects of
ACE
-I have been attributed to bradykinin accumulation, and therefore
ACE
-I might have an advantage compared with an angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist such as losartan. On the other hand, angiotensin II may be produced by non-
ACE
-I-dependent mechanisms, which would suggest that an angiotensin II type I receptor blocking agent would be advantageous. To determine the relative safety and efficacy of an
ACE
-I, which results in bradykinin accumulation and inhibitors of angiotensin II, versus an angiotensin II type I receptor blocking agent, which does not result in bradykinin accumulation, we have begun the Evaluation of Losartan In The Elderly (ELITE) trial, which will compare the safety and efficacy of captopril and losartan in elderly patients with heart failure.
...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor antagonists in heart failure: rationale and design of the evaluation of losartan in the elderly (ELITE) trial. 857 52
One hundred and thirty five non-smoking hypertensive patients with
ACE
inhibitor
cough
confirmed by lisinopril rechallenge and placebo dechallenge were recruited into a double-blind random parallel-group comparison of losartan 50 mg, lisinopril 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg each given once daily for a maximum of 8 weeks. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of
cough
with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan, the
ACE
inhibitor lisinopril and the hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with previous
ACE
inhibitor
cough
.
Cough
detected by self-administered questionnaire was the primary end-point, and
cough
frequency by visual analogue scale a secondary end-point. The incidence of
cough
with losartan (29%) was lower than that for lisinopril (72%, P < 0.01) and similar to that for hydrochlorothiazide (34%).
Cough
frequency by visual analogue scale was lower for losartan than lisinopril (P < 0.01) and similar to that for hydrochlorothiazide. The specific selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan is significantly less likely than lisinopril to cause
cough
in patients who previously have had
ACE
inhibitor
cough
.
ACE
inhibitor
cough
is likely to be related to non-specific kininase II inhibition.
...
PMID:ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonists and cough. The Losartan Cough Study Group. 858 82
C-fibres probably represent the common final pathway in both
ACE
inhibitors and neoplastic
cough
. A recent report demonstrated that inhaled sodium cromoglycate is an effective treatment for
ACE
inhibitors'
cough
; this effect might be due to the suppression of afferent unmyelinated C-fibres. We tested the hypothesis that inhaled sodium cromoglycate might also be effective in lung cancer patients who presented with irritative neoplastic
cough
. Twenty non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients complaining of
cough
resistant to conventional treatment were randomised to receive, in a double-blind trial, either inhaled sodium cromoglycate or placebo. Patients recorded
cough
severity daily, before and during treatment, on a 0 to 4 scale. The efficacy of treatment was tested with the Mann-Whitney U-test for non-parametric measures, comparing the intergroup differences in the measures of summary of symptom scores calculated in each patient before and after treatment. We report that inhaled sodium cromoglycate can reduce
cough
, also in NSCLC patients and that such reduction, observed in all patients treated, is statistically significant (P < 0.001). Inhaled sodium cromoglycate appears to be a cost-effective and safe treatment for lung cancer-related
cough
.
...
PMID:Inhaled sodium cromoglycate to treat cough in advanced lung cancer patients. 868 42
1. In eight hypertensive patients with
ACE
inhibitor-induced
cough
the resolution of the
cough
was examined in a prospective observational study over 4 weeks duration. Resolution of
cough
was measured by visual analogue scales and questionnaire at baseline and days 3, 7, 14 and 28. In addition changes in
cough
sensitivity to inhaled capsaicin, and skin responses to bradykinin and substance-P were measured at the same time points. 2. All patients recorded significant subjective improvement in
cough
questionnaire scores for severity and night time waking, and by visual analogue scales for severity and frequency of
cough
(all P < 0.0005 for trend from day 0-28). Significant changes in subjective measures were recorded by 3 to 7 days for most measures, but further reductions were observed up to day 28 (all P < 0.01 day 28 vs day 0). 3. The sensitivity to inhaled capsaicin fell over the 28 days of study after stopping enalapril. The potency of capsaicin relative to day 0 was reduced to 0.25 (95% CI 0.07-0.87) by day 14, and to 0.20 (95% CI 0.06-0.67) by 28 days. 4. After stopping enalapril there was a highly significant reduction in wheal area produced by intradermal bradykinin, with the majority of the effect seen by day 3 (P < 0.0005). The wheal area to intradermal substance-P also declined with time after stopping enalapril, but significant changes were not observed until 14 days (P < 0.01). 5. Multiple regression analysis of the rates of decline for the subjective and objective measures of
cough
showed significant associations between the response to inhaled capsaicin and the VAS scores for severity of
cough
(P = 0.005) and frequency of
cough
(P = 0.011). Capsaicin response was not related significantly to the severity of
cough
measured by self-administered questionnaire. 6. There was a significant association between bradykinin response and VAS scores for frequency of
cough
(P < 0.04) and severity of
cough
(P < 0.05), but not with
cough
by questionnaire or the capsaicin response. The response to substance-P did not relate significantly to any of the measures of
cough
. 7.
Cough
caused by enalapril improved markedly by 14 days but took up to 28 days to resolve. It was associated with increased sensitivity to inhaled capsaicin which decreased over 28 days, and which paralleled changes in subjective
cough
scores.
...
PMID:Resolution of ACE inhibitor cough: changes in subjective cough and responses to inhaled capsaicin, intradermal bradykinin and substance-P. 870 45
OBJECTIVE. This study examines
cough
recorded in Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) of four
ACE
-inhibitors. Particular attention was paid to the study of enalapril because the drug was monitored before the causal relationship between
cough
and
ACE
-inhibitors had been widely accepted. RESULTS. Several factors which had obscured the causal relationship in the individual cases were found to be also an obstacle in PEM. For example,
cough
was a common and non-serious event and was under-reported in the PEM study of enalapril and the rate was not strikingly different from that recorded for other drugs.
Cough
induced by
ACE
-inhibitors has several characteristics which reduce the chance of a recognisable "signal'. The original questionnaires returned from doctors in the PEM study of enalapril have been reexamined. The observation that the rate of
cough
diminished after enalapril had been stopped rather than increased after starting, provided the best evidence of causality, because this was not affected by many biases such as the publicity that had occurred prior to doctors participating in PEM completed later reports.
...
PMID:ACE-inhibitor-induced cough, an adverse drug reaction unrecognised for several years: studies in prescription-event monitoring. 870 66
We describe a rare case of
ACE
inhibitor-induced angioedema during long-term therapy in a 51-year-old male patient with essential hypertension; and this is the third case reported of this adverse reaction in Japan. The patient received enalapril for 66 months, and complained of a dry
cough
which was mild and tolerable. Recently, he noted tenderness of his mouth, face, swelling of lips and tongue for 3 to 4 h after taking his morning dose of enalapril. These symptoms abated spontaneously, so he continued taking the drugs. He again noted similar episodes of angioedema 29 days after the first experience. He had no further episodes of angioedema or dry
cough
after cessation of enalapril. This case of angioedema developed during long-term therapy with enalapril administered as 19,930 mg of enalapril maleate. We emphasize that angioedema may occur at any time during the use of enalapril.
...
PMID:A case report of angioedema during long-term (66 months) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition therapy with enalapril. 874 Dec 42
The use of
ACE
inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) has been the subject of several studies conducted during recent years. These studies have demonstrated the capacity of these agents to improve both survival and morbidity of patients with MI. However, the use of
ACE
inhibitors in patients with MI has been shown to reduce blood pressure (BP) and so could jeopardise the ischaemic myocardium. A significant reduction in systemic BP has been demonstrated by all the studies of
ACE
inhibitors in patients with MI, but no relationship has been found between the occurrence of hypotension and a worse clinical outcome. An increased risk of death has been observed exclusively in association with severe and sudden hypotension, the occurrence of which can be largely prevented by the administration of the
ACE
inhibitor according to an increasing dose-titration scheme. Conversely, a certain degree of long term BP reduction could result in some beneficial effect in patients with MI and contribute to the lower incidence of re-infarction observed in patients with acute MI undergoing long term treatment with captopril. Since the renin-angiotensin system is strictly related to kidney function, its blockade by an
ACE
inhibitor could result in some degree of renal dysfunction, particularly in patients with MI and impaired ventricular function. The available results from large-scale studies suggest that abnormalities in kidney function (namely an increase in serum creatinine) are observed in 0.9 to 2.4% of patients with MI who, nevertheless, experience some benefit from treatment with
ACE
inhibitors. Interestingly, the administration of
ACE
inhibitors does not seem to further compromise severely impaired renal function, and may also represent a useful tool for the treatment of patients with renal dysfunction associated with MI. The use of
ACE
inhibitors in patients with MI is associated with a satisfactory clinical and laboratory safety profile. The occurrence of significant adverse effects seems to be very low and mainly attributable to a rather modest prevalence of
cough
(2.4 to 6.8%). Discontinuation of treatment because of biochemical and haematological abnormalities has been observed in less than 1% of treated patients. Thus, the beneficial effects of
ACE
inhibitor treatment seem to outweigh safety concerns, thereby reinforcing the role of
ACE
inhibition as a suitable therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients with MI.
...
PMID:A risk-benefit assessment of ACE inhibitor therapy post-myocardial infarction. 880 Jun 25
Refractory
cough
in a patient with a normal chest X-ray usually falls into one of five categories: drug-induced (especially by
ACE
inhibitors), secondary to postnasal discharge, gastroesophageal reflux, or hyperactive airway disease, and idiopathic but responsive to nebulized lidocaine. The history may point to the most likely cause, and empiric therapy may confirm the diagnosis.
...
PMID:Persistent cough: causes and cures. 907 71
Fosinopril is a phosphinic acid derivative which undergoes rapid hydrolysis after oral administration to the active diacid
ACE
inhibitor fosinoprilat. Cardiotropic effects have been associated with the drug, and the compensatory dual elimination route of fosinopril via renal and hepatic systems offers an opportunity for
ACE
inhibitor treatment of hypertension in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Comparative trials of monotherapy with fosinopril 10 to 40 mg/day have demonstrated antihypertensive efficacy equivalent to that of sustained release nifedipine 40 mg/day, hydrochlorothiazide 25 to 50 mg/day, enalapril 5 to 10 mg/day amlodipine 5 to 10 mg/day and sustained release verapamil 240 to 480 mg/day, and superior to that of isradipine 5 mg/day. The efficacy of combination therapy with fosinopril 10 to 20 mg/day and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day was significantly superior to that of hydrochlorothiazide alone, tended to be superior to that of fosinopril 20 mg/day alone and was similar to that of sustained release nifedipine 40 mg/day alone. The combination of fosinopril/chlorthalidone 20 to 40/25 mg/day was as effective as propranolol/chlorthalidone 80 to 160/25 mg/day. The incidence of adverse effects associated with fosinopril is low, and
cough
may possibly occur less often with this drug than with other
ACE
inhibitors. Fosinopril thus offers an effective and well tolerated option for the treatment of hypertension in adult and elderly patients, including those with renal or hepatic impairment.
...
PMID:Fosinopril: a reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in essential hypertension. 886 47
Losartan potassium is an orally active, nonpeptide angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist. It is the first of a new class of drugs to be introduced for clinical use in hypertension. This novel agent binds competitively and selectively to the AII subtype 1 (AT(1)) receptor, thereby blocking AII-induced physiological effects. An active metabolite, E3174, contributes substantially to its antihypertensive effect, which persists throughout 24 hours after once-daily administration. In patients with mild to moderate hypertension, losartan potassium 50 to 100mg once daily as monotherapy lowers blood pressure to a similar degree to enalapril, atenolol and felodipine extended release (ER). Losartan potassium combined with hydrochlorothiazide reduces blood pressure further than either drug given separately. About one-third of patients with severe hypertension have responded to the combination product. Losartan potassium appears to be effective in elderly patients. Losartan potassium is very well tolerated. In clinical trials, dizziness was the only drug-related event reported more frequently with losartan potassium monotherapy than with placebo. First-dose hypotension is uncommon. An aspect of the drug's tolerability profile which may prove to be particularly advantageous is that it is associated with a similar incidence of
cough
to placebo in patients with a history of
ACE
inhibitor-related
cough
. Additionally, clinically relevant adverse metabolic effects or laboratory abnormalities have not been documented during losartan potassium therapy and renal function is preserved in patients with or without renal insufficiency. The adverse effect profile of the losartan potassium-hydrochlorothiazide combination resembles those for losartan potassium monotherapy and placebo. Long term tolerability data are limited (<2 years) but support the very good tolerability profile in shorter studies. Elements of the drug's profile yet to be assessed or reported fully in the literature include long term efficacy; potential to favourably influence cardiovascular and renovascular systems (and ultimately mortality) in patients with hypertension and, lastly, cost effectiveness and influence on quality of life. In summary, losartan potassium is the first AT(1)+ receptor antagonist to become available for the management of hypertension and, as such, it is an important new antihypertensive agent. Pending long term data as outlined above, it is likely to find initial use in patients with mild to severe hypertension who are unresponsive to, or intolerant of their current therapy. However, with its novel mechanism of action, good efficacy and favourable tolerability profile, losartan potassium is well placed to claim a prominent position in the management of patients with essential hypertension in the future.
...
PMID:Losartan potassium: a review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of hypertension. 886 49
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>