Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0010200 (cough)
23,843 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses, adverse effects, drug interactions, dosage, cost, and therapeutic interchange of oral angiotension-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are reviewed. ACE inhibitors attenuate the formation of angiotension II and may lead to the accumulation of kinins. Although the hypotensive effects of many ACE inhibitors may persist for 24 hours, some patients require more than one dose per day to achieve adequate control. These agents accumulate in patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction, but it is unclear whether dosage adjustments are necessary. ACE inhibitors are effective against mild to moderate hypertension; for severe hypertension, additional anti-hypertensive agents may be necessary. Other conditions in which ACE inhibitors have shown efficacy include congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic renal insufficiency, insulin sensitivity, and coronary artery disease. The most common adverse effect is a persistent nonproductive cough. Angioedema, fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, acute renal failure, and hyperkalemia may also occur. ACE inhibitors may interact with diuretics, lithium, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral hypoglycemic agents, and some other drugs. ACE inhibitor therapy should be initiated with low doses that may then be slowly adjusted upward. Many of the agents have similar costs for lower and higher dosages. The only significant differences among the ACE inhibitors are the time of onset of hypotensive effects, time to peak effect, and duration of effect. Each formulary should include, at least, captopril and one intermediate-acting and one long-acting ACE inhibitor.
...
PMID:Oral angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. 940 13

A descriptive retrospective study conducted in 62 villages in Western Niger in July-August 1994, examined the prevalence of postpartum cardiac failure (PCF). This condition, the most frequent clinical form of heart failure in hospitalized women in Sudanese-Sahelian Africa, has not previously been investigated in a field study. Meetings with village leaders were used to identify women who had just given birth and those who were ill. Through this method, 60 ill women who had given birth in the preceding 9 months were identified. PCF was diagnosed in 28 of these women from 27 villages on the basis of predefined symptoms (dyspnea and cough) and physical signs (edema of the legs) of congestive heart failure during the 6 months after delivery. The prevalence of PCF was 1.40/1000 women of childbearing age; likely an underestimate since the field identification criteria did not take into account women who had already died. The mean age of identified patients was 28 years, with a mean parity of 4. Low socioeconomic status, postpartum ablutions with hot water, and a high sodium intake were common in these women. A comparison of 17 clinical and epidemiological factors in this series with those of 66 patients who previously had PCF confirmed at Niamey National Hospital did not reveal any significant differences in the incidence of symptoms between the 2 groups, although functional discomfort was more severe in the hospital study. Untreated cardiac failure is usually a fatal disease. Timely identification of PCF is hindered, however, by well-tolerated symptoms.
...
PMID:Postpartum cardiac failure in Sudanese-Sahelian Africa: clinical prevalence in western Niger. 954 11

Legionellosis is an important cause of severe pneumonia in the community. Inadequate therapy will lead to respiratory distress syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and finally fatal multiple organ failure. We encountered a rare case in which early manifestation included septic shock and DIC complicated by acute myocardial infarction (AMI) suspected to be derived from Legionnaires' disease. A 54-year-old healthy female complained of lumbago, high fever and dry cough 10 days after visiting a hot spring spa. She was emmergently admitted due to shock. Physical examination demonstrated hypotension, high fever, course creakle in the right lower lung. Hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy and eruption were not found. WBC count was 34600/microliters with nuclear shift. CRP elevated. FDP, D dimer and TAT also elevated CPK elevated with dominance of the MB isozyme. Chest roentogenography revealed congestive heart failure, pleural effusion and obscure pneumonic shadow and EKG showed ST segment elevation in leads I, II, III, aVF, V4, V5, and V6. The patient was diagnosed as having septic shock, DIC and AMI. She was treated with gabexate mesilate, high dose methyl prednisolone and dopamine hydrochloride as well as piperacillin, meropenem, isepamycin and fluconzaole. Despite intensive care, the blood pressure fell again and pneumonia had progressed on the 8th hospital day. These antibiotics appeared to be ineffective. Erythromycin was then administered and a dramatic effect. was obtained as the patient recovered. Serum titer of Legionella pneumophila (serogroup 1) rose to 128-fold 2 weeks after the onset. Other serum titers such as Chlamydia psittaci, Rickettsia, Mycoplasma were all negative. Cultures obtained from the sputum, throat swab, urine and blood did not yield any microorganisms. Although the diagnosis could not be confirmed because the titer did not elevate over 256-fold of 4-fold within 2 weeks after the onset, Legionella infection was highly suspected from the clinical features. This is a rare case in which septic shock and DIC with AMI preceded pulmonary symptoms in a non-immunocompromised patient.
...
PMID:[Early manifestation of septic shock and disseminated intravascular coagulation complicated by acute myocardial infarction in a patient suspected of having Legionnaires' disease]. 958 3

Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists inhibit the renin-angiotensin system more completely than ACE inhibitors, and do not increase bradykinin levels as ACE inhibitors do. ACE inhibitors have been proven to increase survival and improve quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). At the 48-week follow-up of the Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) Study, the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (at a dosage of 50 mg/day) was found to be superior to captopril 50 mg 3 times daily in terms of its effects on total mortality, total mortality and/or hospitalisation for CHF, and hospitalisation for any reason. Hospitalisation for CHF was the same for both drugs. Adverse effects occurred in 12 and 21% of those receiving losartan and captopril, respectively. Cough, rash, angioedema or taste disturbances/reduced appetite prompted the cessation of drug treatment in 0 and 7% of those receiving losartan and captopril, respectively. Until additional data are available, this author recommends that elderly patients with CHF and an abnormal or normal left ventricular ejection fraction, and who are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors, should receive losartan 50 mg/day.
...
PMID:The ELITE Study. What are its implications for the drug treatment of heart failure? Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study. 963 91

Whatever facts we gather and no matter how many we have, you and I must eventually put the journal down and pick up our stethoscope, pen, and prescription pad and go to work. Hopefully we can do better than, "Therapy is not uniform and specific antibiotic regimens are usually selected based on local tribal custom." We can discard an old paradigm, "The absence of data bears no relation to the strength of opinion." Personally, I have used these new scientific data before I reached my conclusion. I have developed 10 points to structure my new approach. I invite you to compare my conclusions to yours. 1. In acute bronchitis, in otherwise healthy adults, my preference is to not prescribe an antibiotic. If I do, it is not over the phone. You should want to see and examine the patient. If there are no helpful hints to etiology, I choose a newer macrolide for those under age 50 and use a short course, five-seven days. For patients over age 50, especially if they are "healthy smokers," consider a short course of cefuroxime. (You can see, even in these acute bronchitis patients, you want an antibiotic effective against today's pathogens.) 2. In all chronic bronchitis patients, prevention of further damage to the airways should be attempted by instituting a program of smoking cessation and appropriate immunizations against influenza and pneumococcus. 3. Treatment outcomes will also improve if we recognize that in some patients the progressing SOB, cough, and increasing sputum production are due to congestive heart failure and not due to infection. I try to think about congestive heart failure in all of my patients, but especially in those with known heart disease and cardiomegaly on their chest x-ray. 4. Routine pulmonary function testing is important in smoking patients. Physicians underestimate the degree of obstruction present when they rely on physical exam alone. Hopefully long before the patient's acute illness you have established whether or not obstruction is present. This information helps identify the high risk patient for not only recurrent bouts of infection but also those at increased risk for lung cancer. 5. We will have more success in treating AECB when we elect to use an antibiotic only for patients with at least two of the following three cardinal symptoms: increased dyspnea, increased sputum production, and increased purulent sputum. COPD patients have many days when they feel more SOB. To use this or any one sign as the sole indication for starting an antibiotic has been proven not to make a statistically significant difference in outcome in most patients. Also, the value of prophylactic antibiotic therapy has not been established. 6. When airflow obstruction is moderately severe or more pronounced, AECB should usually be treated with oral steroids. Other measures such as chronic bronchodilator therapy, supplemental and home oxygen use, and pulmonary rehabilitation have been extensively reviewed elsewhere.
...
PMID:Challenging questions in treating bronchitis. 979 74

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an important role in both the short-term and long-term regulation of arterial blood pressure, and fluid and electrolyte balance. The RAAS is a dual hormone system, serving as both a circulating and a local tissue hormone system (i.e., local mediator) as well as neurotransmitter or neuromediator functions in CNS. Control of blood pressure by the RAAS is exerted through multiple actions of angiotensin II, a small peptide which is a potent vasoconstrictor hormone implicated in the genesis and maintenance of hypertension. Hypertension is a primary risk factor associated with cardiovascular, cerebral and renal vascular disease. One of the approaches to the treatment of hypertension, which may be considered as a major scientific advancement, involves the use of drugs affecting the RAAS. Pharmacological interruption of the RAAS was initially employed in the late 1970s with the advent of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril. ACE inhibitors have since gained widespread use in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and diabetic nephropathy. As the roles of the RAAS in the pathophysiology of several diseases was explored, so did the realization of the importance of inhibiting the actions of angiotensin II. Although ACE inhibitors are well tolerated, they are also involved in the activation of bradykinin, enkephalins, and other biologically active peptides. These actions result in adverse effects such as cough, increased bronchial reactivity, and angioedema. Thus, the goal of achieving a more specific blockade of the effects of angiotensin II than is possible with ACE inhibition. The introduction of the nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan in 1995 marked the achievement of this objective and has opened new vistas in understanding and controlling the additional biological effects of angiotensin II. Complementary investigations into the cloning and sequencing of angiotensin II receptors have demonstrated the existence of a family of angiotensin II receptor subtypes. Two major types of angiotensin II receptors have been identified in humans. The type 1 receptor (AT1) mediates most known effects of angiotensin II. The type 2 receptor (AT2), for which no precise function was known in the past, has gained importance recently and new mechanisms of intracellular signalling have been proposed. This review presents recent advances in angiotensin II receptor pharmacology, molecular biology, and signal transduction, with particular reference to the AT1 receptor. Excellent reviews have appeared recently on this subject.
...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptors-antagonists, molecular biology, and signal transduction. 1009 99

One possible intervention to interrupt the deleterious effects of the renin-angiotensin system is suppression of angiotensin II (Ang II) formation by inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). However, ACE inhibition incompletely suppresses Ang II formation and also leads to accumulation of bradykinin. Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors are believed to promote the known deleterious effects of Ang II. Therefore, AT1 receptor antagonists have been recently introduced into therapy for hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there are significant differences between the effects of AT1 receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors including the unopposed stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptors by AT1 receptor antagonists, the discussion of whether ACE inhibitors, AT1 receptor antagonists or the combination of both are superior in the pharmacotherapy of CHF is still largely theoretical. Accordingly, AT1 receptor antagonists are still investigational. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remain first line therapy in patients with CHF due to systolic dysfunction. However, in patients not able to tolerate ACE inhibitor induced side effects, in particular cough, AT1 receptor antagonism is a good alternative. In clinical practice, emphasis should be placed on increasing the utilization of ACE inhibitors, as more than 50% of patients with CHF do not receive ACE inhibitors. In addition, the majority of those on ACE inhibitors receive doses lower than the dosage used in the large clinical trials. Although not yet completely proved, it is likely that high doses of ACE inhibition are superior to low doses with respect to prognosis and symptoms.
...
PMID:Recent insight into therapy of congestive heart failure: focus on ACE inhibition and angiotensin-II antagonism. 1019 12

Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists (or blockers) are a newer class of antihypertensive agents. These drugs are selective for angiotensin II (type 1 receptor); unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, they do not inhibit bradykinin metabolism or enhance prostaglandin synthesis. Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists are well tolerated. Cough occurs much less often with these agents than with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and they do not adversely affect lipid profiles or cause rebound hypertension after discontinuation. Clinical trials indicate that angiotensin-II receptor antagonists are effective and safe in the treatment of hypertension. Their use in congestive heart failure and renal disease is under investigation.
...
PMID:Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists: their place in therapy. 1039 95

After two weeks of a wash-out run-in period with placebo, 131 patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II to III) and left ventricular ejection fraction </=40% were randomly assigned to a treatment period of 4 weeks with 10 mg quinapril once daily or 12.5 mg captopril twice daily. At the end of this period, doses were titrated to 20 mg quinapril once daily or 25 mg captopril twice daily on the basis of physician judgment if there were no major adverse reactions and if blood pressure was not below 110/70 mm Hg. Clinical symptoms of heart failure were significantly relieved by both drugs at the end of a 12-week treatment period. At the beginning of the study, 23 (35%) of the 65 patients taking quinapril and 27 (41%) of the 66 patients taking captopril were in NYHA functional class III, whereas, at the end of the trial, only 4 (6%) of the patients in the quinapril group and 14 (22%; p < 0.05 versus quinapril) patients in the captopril group were classified as NYHA class III. Both drugs had a positive effect on echocardiographic parameters. There was a statistically significant increase in exercise duration in both treatment groups (quinapril, 6.2 +/- 1.8 versus 7.8 +/- 1.9 minutes, p < 0.001; captopril, 5.9 +/- 1.9 versus 7.1 +/- 2.3 minutes, p < 0.001). One patient in the quinapril group died suddenly during the study and two patients in the captopril group dropped out of the study due to persistent dry cough. No patient in the quinapril group reported side effects. Three patients in the captopril group suffered from moderate dry cough, one from taste-blindness, and another from unstable angina. The safety of the tested drugs was confirmed by laboratory tests. Quinapril was as effective as captopril in reducing signs and symptoms of heart failure and in improving the left ventricular function and the exercise capacity with few side effects.
...
PMID:Quinapril in patients with congestive heart failure: controlled trial versus captopril. 1042 9

The history of antiarrhythmic therapy reveals these agents to be associated with a high incidence of toxicity. Although several agents have ocular effects, amiodarone is the most widely recognized for producing adverse effects in the eyes. Corneal microdeposits are almost ubiquitous in patients being treated with amiodarone. However, they are, for the most part, benign and produce no changes in visual acuity. Lack of microdeposits should prompt the physician to investigate whether there is a problem with drug absorption or adherence to therapy. Other effects on the eye have been reported including optic neuropathy, but no causal link has been proved with amiodarone. The population of patients treated with amiodarone often have ischemic disease and/or diabetes, which affect retinal and optic nerve health. Many antiarrhythmic agents also affect lung function. The frequent association of procainamide with a lupus-like syndrome, where half the cases develop pleural-pericardial involvement, may require discontinuation of that drug. Although beta blockers and to a lesser degree, calcium antagonists, may cause bronchospasm in some patients, this is not usually a major clinical problem. Again, it is amiodarone that has the most widespread reputation for causing pulmonary toxicity. Although infrequent (< 1% incidence), it generates the most fear as it is sometimes fatal. Because of the lack of a diagnostic "gold standard," it is often overdiagnosed, placing patients at risk from overlooked congestive heart failure and infections and from recurrent arrhythmias after drug withdrawal. Patients with pre-existing pulmonary disease appear to be more at risk. Common features include indolent onset of cough, malaise and fever associated with patchy peripheral infiltrates, and severely decreased diffusion capacity. Several cases of pulmonary toxicity have had inordinately high serum desethylamiodarone to amiodarone ratios. Most cases recover with cessation of amiodarone therapy. Steroids are commonly used, but are of unproved efficacy. In terms of its toxicity, amiodarone remains the most feared of the antiarrhythmic agents. In the future, a better understanding of its pharmacokinetics, mechanisms of toxicity, and optimal dosing regimens should provide a possibility of better strategies for avoidance, early diagnosis, and more directed therapy of toxicities associated with amiodarone.
...
PMID:Clinical organ toxicity of antiarrhythmic compounds: ocular and pulmonary manifestations. 1056 58


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>