Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0009319 (colitis)
 19,384 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In rodents colitis can be induced by adding 2% (w/v) carrageenan (CARR) for 4 weeks or 10% (w/v) dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) for 7 days to their drinking water. These models are suitable to test anti-inflammatory drugs used in inflammatory bowel disease in man. Mice were treated with olsalazine (400 mg/kg body wt) starting 7 days before the DSS or CARR administration. Colonic tissues were incubated with [1-14C]-arachidonic acid and stimulated with A23187 and, thereafter, the pattern of eicosanoids was determined by separation on HPLC. DSS and CARR produced a marked diffuse inflammatory response in the colon and a subsequent 5-fold increase of all eicosanoids after DSS, whereas after CARR only a 2-fold increase of PGs was observed. Olsalazine treatment decreased all cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase products to baseline levels.
 ...
PMID:Experimental colitis in mice: effects of olsalazine on eicosanoid production in colonic tissue. 144 39

Olsalazine (sodium azodisalicylate; azodisal sodium) is an anti-inflammatory agent designed to deliver its active moiety, mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid; mesalamine), to the colon while avoiding the adverse effects associated with the use of a sulfapyridine carrier. As a prodrug, olsalazine is an effective oral treatment for both active ulcerative colitis and for maintenance of disease remission and may possibly be of benefit in patients with Crohn's colitis. Findings from both short and long term noncomparative and comparative studies demonstrate that olsalazine 1 to 3g daily in divided doses improves clinical signs and symptoms of colitis in approximately 60 to 80% of patients with acute ulcerative colitis of mild to moderate severity. This improvement rate was similar to that obtained with sulfasalazine. Lower doses of olsalazine, usually 1g daily in divided doses, also maintained remission in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. While olsalazine effectively delivers mesalazine to the colon, the prodrug itself increases net luminal water secretion and accelerates gastrointestinal transit of a meal. The resulting diarrhoea (occurring in approximately 17% of patients and resulting in withdrawal from therapy in 6% of patients) is distinguishable from that associated with inflammatory bowel disease by the high water content and the absence of blood. Olsalazine-induced diarrhoea usually occurred soon after initiation of olsalazine therapy or dosage increase, was more frequent with higher doses and was usually transient. Dosage reduction, increases in frequency of dosing and concomitant administration with food reduced the severity in many patients with persistent olsalazine-induced diarrhoea. With the exception of diarrhoea, olsalazine was generally well tolerated. Fewer than 14% of patients allergic to or intolerant of sulfasalazine had similar reactions to olsalazine. Olsalazine appears to be a suitable therapy for the treatment of first attacks as well as acute exacerbation of mild to moderate acute ulcerative colitis, and for the maintenance of remission in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.
 ...
PMID:Olsalazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in inflammatory bowel disease. 171 64

Olsalazine is a compound consisting of two 5-amino salicylate (5-ASA) molecules linked by an azo bond, which, administered orally, is split by colonic bacteria to liberate 5-ASA. It lacks the sulfapyridine moiety found in sulfasalazine. Using a specific protocol, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of olsalazine in patients with symptomatic ulcerative colitis. Inclusion criteria included mild to moderate disease with involvement of more than 15 cm of colon, visible blood in stools, and the discontinuation of all other medications prior to and during the study. Patients were given oral olsalazine 3.0 g/day or placebo for 4 wk. Patients were evaluated clinically, by laboratory analysis and by colonoscopic evaluation, at entry and at 4 wk. Additional clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed at 2 wk. Fifteen patients entered the study. Of the seven patients randomized to olsalazine, four (57%) improved clinically and by colonoscopic scoring, one showed no improvement in either, and two (29%) withdrew after developing severe watery diarrhea. Of the eight patients treated with placebo, two (25%) improved clinically but were without colonscopic improvement and six (75%) worsened, of whom four withdrew early because of worsening symptoms of colitis. Seven of eight placebo patients were then treated with olsalazine on an open basis. Of these seven, five (71%) improved clinically and colonoscopically and two (29%) withdrew because of severe watery diarrhea. Overall, of 14 patients treated with Olsalazine, nine (64%) improved, one showed no improvement, and four (29%) discontinued because of persistent watery diarrhea. No other serious side effects were noted. Minor side effects included transient diarrhea, flares of acne, and anxiety attacks which resolved despite continuation of the drug.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind placebo-controlled study of olsalazine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. 233 59

Olsalazine (2 g/day) and sulphasalazine (3 g/day) were compared in a double blind three centre trial in 37 patients presenting with first attack of distal colitis. Sigmoidoscopic appearances, rectal biopsies, and symptom and stool diary records were used to assess benefit and adverse effects. Both groups showed a similar decrease in stool frequency (p less than 0.001). The proportion of unformed stools was also decreased, but to a lesser extent (p less than 0.05) in those taking olsalazine (78% v 55%; p less than 0.001) compared with those taking sulphasalazine (72% v 28%; p less than 0.001). There was a diminution in the proportion of stools containing blood in both groups (olsalazine: 61% v 22%; p less than 0.001/sulphasalazine: 67% v 37%; p less than 0.001). Sigmoidoscopic and histological appearances and clinical activity improved significantly and to a similar extent in both groups. Intolerance was encountered in two patients on olsalazine and four on sulphasalazine; intolerance to sulphasalazine being even higher (five of seven patients) in a preliminary study using a dose of sulphasalazine releasing the same amount of 5-aminosalicylic acid as 2 g olsalazine. Olsalazine was at least as effective as sulphasalazine in the treatment of new patients with distal colitis, and in a dose releasing an equivalent amount of 5-aminosalicylic acid was better tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Olsalazine or sulphasalazine in first attacks of ulcerative colitis? A double blind study. 256 66

The effects of olsalazine were studied mainly in patients with ulcerative colitis who were intolerant to sulphasalazine, and for relapse prevention. A crossover design with sulphasalazine, 3 g/day, and olsalazine, 1.5 g/day, was applied to compare the side-effects of each drug and to evaluate their therapeutic efficacy. A total of 41 patients with mild or moderately severe left-sided colitis or proctitis were assigned to a randomized treatment schedule. Olsalazine and sulphasalazine were similar in their therapeutic efficacy. Twelve patients complained of adverse effects while on sulphasalazine and 4 patients during olsalazine treatment (p less than 0.05). It is concluded that olsalazine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of mild or moderately severe ulcerative colitis, and is comparable to sulphasalazine, though with reduced side-effects.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of ulcerative colitis with olsalazine and sulphasalazine: efficacy and side-effects. 290 79

Olsalazine (OLZ), a relatively new form of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), is being used for the treatment of colitis. A major side effect of olsalazine is diarrhea, reported in 12-25% of patients. One suggested mechanism for this side effect is enhanced ileal water and electrolyte secretion. We propose that OLZ may also inhibit ileal bile acid (BA) transport, resulting in choleretic diarrhea. This would result in excess BAs reaching the colon, with consequent BA-induced secretory diarrhea. Therefore, we studied the effect of OLZ on rat ileal absorption of taurocholate. BA uptake was determined in rat ileal segments, everted sacs, brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV), and Xenopus laevis oocytes. Segments and everted sacs were treated with 5 mM OLZ for 30 min prior to and throughout 10-min taurocholate (Tc) uptake. Terminal ileal BBMV were used to study the effect of OLZ on sodium-dependent bile acid uptake independent of cellular metabolism. Direct effects on the bile acid carrier were examined using Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing the cloned apical rat ileal BA transporter. In ileal segments 5 mM OLZ inhibited 10-min Tc uptake by 69.4 +/- 8.8% (P < 0.01) (N = 10 animals). Increasing concentrations of OLZ resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of Tc uptake. Ten-minute Tc uptake with 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 5 mM OLZ was inhibited by 13.5, 39.6, 49.7, and 70.5%, respectively. In BBMV, OLZ inhibited 45-sec Tc uptake in a dose-dependent manner but did not effect Na-dependent L-alanine uptake.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Effect of olsalazine on sodium-dependent bile acid transport in rat ileum. 772 83

Despite limited understanding of therapeutic aetiopathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, there is a strong evidence base for the efficacy of pharmacological and biological therapies. It is equally important to recognise toxicity of the medical armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Sulfasalazine consists of sulfapyridine linked to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) via an azo bond. Common adverse effects related to sulfapyridine 'intolerance' include headache, nausea, anorexia, and malaise. Other allergic or toxic adverse effects include fever, rash, haemolytic anaemia, hepatitis, pancreatitis, paradoxical worsening of colitis, and reversible sperm abnormalities. The newer 5-ASA agents were developed to deliver the active ingredient of sulfasalazine while minimising adverse effects. Adverse effects are infrequent but may include nausea, dyspepsia and headache. Olsalazine may cause a secretory diarrhoea. Uncommon hypersensitivity reactions, including worsening of colitis, pancreatitis, pericarditis and nephritis, have also been reported. Corticosteroids are commonly prescribed for treatment of moderate to severe IBD. Despite short term efficacy, corticosteroids have numerous adverse effects that preclude their long term use. Adverse effects include acne, fluid retention, fat redistribution, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, psycho-neurological disturbances, cataracts, adrenal suppression, growth failure in children, and osteonecrosis. Newer corticosteroid preparations offer potential for targeted therapy and less corticosteroid-related adverse effects. Azathioprine and mercaptopurine are associated with pancreatitis in 3 to 15% of patients that resolves upon drug cessation. Bone marrow suppression is dose related and may be delayed. The adverse effects of methotrexate include nausea, leucopenia and, rarely, hypersensitivity pneumonia or hepatic fibrosis. Common adverse effects of cyclosporin include nephrotoxicity, hypertension, headache, gingival hyperplasia, hyperkalaemia, paresthesias, and tremors. These adverse effects usually abate with dose reduction or cessation of therapy. Seizures and opportunistic infections have also been reported. Antibacterials are commonly employed as primary therapy for Crohn's disease. Common adverse effects of metronidazole include nausea and a metallic taste. Peripheral neuropathy can occur with prolonged administration. Ciprofloxacin and other antibacterials may be beneficial in those intolerant to metronidazole. Newer immunosuppressive agents previously reserved for transplant recipients are under investigation for IBD. Tacrolimus has an adverse effect profile similar to cyclosporin, and may cause renal insufficiency. Mycophenolate mofetil, a purine synthesis inhibitor, has primarily gastrointestinal adverse effects. Biological agents targeting specific sites in the immunoinflammatory cascade are now available to treat IBD. Infliximab, a chimeric antibody targeting tumour necrosis factor-or has been well tolerated in clinical trials and early postmarketing experience. Additional trials are needed to assess long term adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Comparative tolerability of treatments for inflammatory bowel disease. 1108 48